Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Demron lightweight, lead-free radiation-proof suit
na ^ | 5/8/08 | na

Posted on 05/08/2008 8:50:56 PM PDT by Flavius

2008 Radiation Shield Technologies has been granted a new patent for Demron, the protective garment that shields users from alpha and beta radiation, gamma rays, x-rays, and other nuclear emissions. The flexible, cool, and lightweight suit provides all the protection of a lead apron with a new level of comfort, and without any dermal or inhalation risks. ..

(Excerpt) Read more at nuovoportale.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: radiation
Welcome. Radiation Shield Technologies is pleased to offer the finest products available for radiation protection. All our products make use of our patented Demron™ material. Our new expanded product line offers items for a variety of uses and industries.

First Responder First ResponderFirst Responder

Demron™ radiation shielding garments will allow emergency responders to respond to incidents such as transportation accidents involving radioactive materials, terrorist incidents involving radioactive dispersal devices (RDD), or nuclear weapons. Additional benefits provided by Demron™ garments are psychological fear remediation, as well as providing a cooler core environment (suit) for the wearer.

JSLIST protective clothing currently worn by our men and women in uniform offers no protection from penetrating ionizing radiation. Demron™ radiation shielding garments can be worn alone, or in conjunction with JSLIST protective clothing to provide our soldiers with the protection they need in specific radiological combat environments.

Medical MedicalMedical

Demron™ fabric offers a lead free and toxic free alternative to traditional lead aprons. The Demron™ aprons and vests are lightweight, comfortable, washable, and have no disposal restrictions. Unlike traditional medical aprons, the Demron™ fabric does not crack when bent or folded. This advantage allows for unique designs.

http://www.radshield.com/store.cfm

1 posted on 05/08/2008 8:50:57 PM PDT by Flavius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Flavius

If it’s light weight, it offers minimal protection from gamma rays.


2 posted on 05/08/2008 8:52:49 PM PDT by coloradan (The US is becoming a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

“ummm, does it come in something besides BLACK?”

I was thinking of a nice teal.


3 posted on 05/08/2008 8:54:54 PM PDT by Wiseghy ("You want to break this army? Then break your word to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
Interesting stuff. Does this mean I'm less likely to get crushed into the chair the next time my dentist wants x-rays? < /rant=on > I mean, they put this twenty-pound apron on me to protect my scrawny chest and then they shoot the stuff at my head?!? < /rant >

;-)

4 posted on 05/08/2008 8:57:25 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Perfect anti-Zot suit


5 posted on 05/08/2008 8:57:28 PM PDT by JRios1968 ("If you go over a cliff with all flags flying, you are still going over a cliff"--Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coloradan

I’ll stick with lead.


6 posted on 05/08/2008 8:58:56 PM PDT by Westlander (Unleash the Neutron Bomb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wiseghy

Ah, a Sharks fan...


7 posted on 05/08/2008 9:01:31 PM PDT by null and void (My brain is a sieve, and Aratosthenes is nowhere to be found. ~ Stolen from Darksheare...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Westlander
Lead's dead, baby, lead's dead.


8 posted on 05/08/2008 9:04:14 PM PDT by TheWasteLand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
the protective garment that shields users from alpha and beta radiation, gamma rays, x-rays, and other nuclear emissions.

What portion of radiation is stopped? Paper will stop alpha radiation, so I expect essentially 100% blockage of it. Now, how much beta or gamma radiation will it block?

9 posted on 05/08/2008 9:05:59 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Pray for Rattendaemmerung: the final mutually destructive battle between Obama and Hillary in Denver)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
Interesting stuff. Does this mean I'm less likely to get crushed into the chair the next time my dentist wants x-rays? < /rant=on > I mean, they put this twenty-pound apron on me to protect my scrawny chest and then they shoot the stuff at my head?!? < /rant >

Dental X-ray strangeness: My hygenist tells me to shut my eyes during the x-ray. She's shooting radiation through my teeth and my eyelids are supposed to protect my eyes? Maybe she just doesn't want the radiation coming in the back of my eyes to get out.

10 posted on 05/08/2008 9:08:50 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Pray for Rattendaemmerung: the final mutually destructive battle between Obama and Hillary in Denver)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
Maybe not. Hydrogenous materials such as water and hydrocarbons such as paraffin make good radiation shielding due to hydrogen's high neutron scattering cross section. These materials are usually soft and malleable at room temperature, and offer good protection despite their lack of seeming solidity. (In the 1950s, several designs for liquid radiation shields were patented!) Hydrogenous materials such as Wardray Premise's Premadex® offer significant neutron shielding properties despite being a waxy, lightweight solid material. Hard EMR (gammas, X-rays) can be attenuated by spun lead acrylic weaves such as Wardray Premise's Premac® product. When combined with additional coatings (e.g. barium sulfate) meaningful shielding factors can be achieved with such materials, mitigating the weight and malleability problems of typical solid lead shielding.

The reason flexible rtadiation shielding is advantageous due to its lack of concentrated bulk, i.e. lead plates, etc. By the use of flexible shielding materials, the shield mass necessary to stop neutrons and ionizing radiation is distributed over a wider area, thus decreasing the weight loading per unit of support surface area.

11 posted on 05/08/2008 9:23:41 PM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

LOL. Sounds like the basis for a good Mythbuster’s episode.


12 posted on 05/08/2008 9:25:23 PM PDT by kenth (Just think, .000001783% of the population is screwing it all up for the rest of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

You might want to add this to the space ping list.

I can see where this material might prove useful in spaceflight. Although stopping heavy cosmic ray particles is still an issue.


13 posted on 05/08/2008 9:25:56 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
I went to their website and found at least one major error on their Radiation FAQs page https://www.radshield.com/faqs_qa.cfm:

Q- What is meant by the term "Half-Life"?

Half-life is a constant; all atoms of the same element have the same half-life just as they have the same "mean" life. The half-life of a nuclide is the time it takes for half of the original number of atoms to decay. This constant rate of decay varies depending upon the particular element involved.

All atoms of the same elements have the same half-life? So all forms of hydrogen have the same half-life? All forms of uranium have the same half-life? Wrong! Wrong! Wrong!

H-1 (normal hydrogen) is stable. Its half-life is infinite. H-3 (tritium) has a half-life of about 12 years. U-235 (enriched uranium) has a half-life of 704 million years, while U-238 (depleted uranium) has a half-life of about 4.5 billion years.

I really hope they had Skippy the Webmaster writing this instead of someone responsible for designing nuclear protection material.

14 posted on 05/08/2008 9:26:48 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Pray for Rattendaemmerung: the final mutually destructive battle between Obama and Hillary in Denver)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
ROTFL! Yeah, and another thing < rant=on > There you are sitting there with the thingy Goldfinger was gonna cut Bond in two with pointed at yer head and she's telling you not to worry while she's ducking behind enough shielding to stop a thermonuclear blast! < /rant >

Oh, sorry. Where were we? It's a mug's game. We gotta be nice. She's gonna put them sharp pointy thingies in our mouth real soon now...

15 posted on 05/08/2008 9:28:18 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

“The molecules in the polymer have been designed so that any radiation will meet a large electron cloud, giving the impression of large atoms, which will deflect or absorb it.”

“Demron is a liquid metal that feels like fabric and is cool to the touch,” said DeMeo, the surgeon who developed Demron. “It’s the world’s only full-body radiation protection fabric that shields against X-ray and low-energy Gamma emissions.”

“Demron is an advanced radiopaque nano-polymeric compound fused between layers of fabric and manufactured into several lightweight, nuclear-blocking garments. Demron is used in full-body nuclear, biological, and nuclear-biological-chemical (NBC) suits, tactical anti-nuclear vests, high-energy nuclear suppression blankets, medical X-ray vests and aprons.”


16 posted on 05/08/2008 9:31:21 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
Ordinary clothing will stop almost all beta radiation.

The key to radiation safety is to keep the source material outside of the body. Unbroken skin is actually a fairly good radiation shield, but if a radiation source (e.g a tiny piece of plutonium, bomb debris, fallout etc.) gets inside the body via ingestion, inhalation, or through a cut or scratch, the result is serious trouble. Even "weak" alpha radiation is pure murder on mucous membranes, organs, and soft tissue; betas, gammas, and neutrons are even worse. Subcritical plutonium is only an alpha emitter, but if ingested, a piece of plutonium the size of a grain of salt will cook a person's insides like a Christmas hen in a matter of days, and there is essentially no medical treatment for such a horrible injury. Pain management and general hospice care are the only options indicated in such cases.

This the value of coveralls. The primary purpose of a "radiation suit" is not to stop radiation from passing through the wearer, but to keep the sources of that radiation outside of the wearer's body. Given external sources and a limited exposure, the body's natural repair mechanisms can usually fix radiation-induced somatic damage.

17 posted on 05/08/2008 9:36:01 PM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

Even if the ‘nauts were protected those cosmic rays could fry computers on the ship.


18 posted on 05/08/2008 9:43:21 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

I suspect that they would tell you that an H-1 atom and an H-3 atom are not the same atoms. I’ll let the sub-atomic philosophers fight over that though....


19 posted on 05/08/2008 9:45:34 PM PDT by Uriah_lost (This space reserved for a decent candidate,,,lemme know when we get one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Cosmic radiation is composed of high-energy electrically charged particles (helium nuclei, protons, etc.) that can be mitigated onboard a spacecraft by the use of shielding, both passive (plastics, water, liquid hydrogen, hydrocarbons, etc.) and active (magnetic fields and plasma sheaths). Of course, some of those cosmic particles come zooming in at such high energies that nothing can stop them. I read about one single cosmic radiation particle impact event that carried with it an impact energy of 50 Joules — the impact of a tennis ball hitting a wall at 94 mph! Now imagine the tennis ball is the size of a subatomic particle, and the “wall” is a cell within your body...


20 posted on 05/08/2008 10:01:50 PM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Could this be adapted to be used in space?

This could be something big.


21 posted on 05/08/2008 11:44:25 PM PDT by wastedyears (The US Military is what goes Bump in the night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

I’d like to rent one of these to use in November. Simply holding one’s nose won’t do the trick.


22 posted on 05/09/2008 12:12:19 AM PDT by Ancesthntr (An ex-citizen of the Frederation trying to stop Monica's Ex-Boyfriend's Wife from becoming President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan

btt


23 posted on 05/09/2008 3:13:42 AM PDT by Robert A. Cook, PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Radiation hardened electronics are already utilized in military satellites that have to survive even a moderate nuclear event. But there are efforts made in civilian spacecraft to minimize their susceptibility to most of the radiation they will see in space. But certainly this new material might give designers new options for protecting sensitive electronics too. But like B-chan noted, the cosmic radiation shielding is a different animal and even with the best shielding, the rare particle strike can fry a circuit and keep on going.


24 posted on 05/09/2008 8:33:32 AM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

I wouldn’t want to be out there with limited spares and repair capability, not to mention limited medical care options.


25 posted on 05/09/2008 10:19:50 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
If it’s light weight, it offers minimal protection from gamma rays.

Yep, Z is key.

26 posted on 05/09/2008 10:25:36 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Play that Funky Music Typical White Boy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan
Subcritical plutonium is only an alpha emitter, but if ingested, a piece of plutonium the size of a grain of salt will cook a person's insides like a Christmas hen in a matter of days...

Not true. The risk would be development of a cancer due to damage to nearby cells. PU will not 'cook' you. If 'ingested', the Pu would most likely be eliminated in a day or so. Particles fine enough to be inhaled could be trapped in the lungs which could cause a cancer after many years of alpha damage to cells.

27 posted on 05/09/2008 10:39:35 AM PDT by Ditto (Global Warming: The 21st Century's Snake Oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Wiseghy

“Additional benefits provided by Demron™ garments are psychological fear remediation, as well as providing a cooler core environment (suit) for the wearer.”

Get one for Al Gore in Polar-bear white.


28 posted on 05/09/2008 11:12:51 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
It's true that, if swallowed, a chunk of Pu would probably pass through you too quickly to do any lasting damage. The U.S. Department of Energy estimates that inhaling 2.5 μg of reactor-grade plutonium will increase one's lifetime risk of developing cancer as a result of the exposure to 3%. 1 [PDF]

Inhaled Pu, however, is extremely dangerous. Keep in mind I'm talking about macro-scale particles here; as you correctly point out, microscopic particles of Pu "merely" pose a higher lifetime cancer risk. "Extremely small particles of plutonium on the order of micrograms can cause lung cancer if inhaled into the lungs. Considerably larger amounts may cause acute radiation poisoning and death if ingested or inhaled" 2.

Thanks for correcting my mistake.

29 posted on 05/09/2008 12:22:47 PM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan
Back during the Manhattan project, they injected Pu directly into the blood streams of 25 men. (That is considered highly unethical now, but in the frenzy of WWII --- well, stuff happened.)

As of 1990 -- 45 years later, all but 7 were still alive, and only one of those 7 had died of cancer -- a rare form of bone cancer which they suspect was the result of prolonged alpha radiation from Pu which took up residence in the bone marrow region. The odds of one of the subjects developing that type of cancer is 1 in a 100, so they can't rule out that it was a natural occurrence.

30 posted on 05/09/2008 1:24:20 PM PDT by Ditto (Global Warming: The 21st Century's Snake Oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

That’s why you are not out there.

A few centuries ago people were afraid of crossing the Atlantic and entering a dangerous new world. We call their descendants Europeans. The future belongs to the bold.


31 posted on 05/10/2008 5:30:20 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

F U.

YOu don’t know me. Don’t ever respond to my posts again.


32 posted on 05/10/2008 6:25:36 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson