Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Main Street, not Wall Street, should fix crumbling U.S. infrastructure (some barfiness present)
Yahoo! News / Christian Science Monitor ^ | May 7, 2008 | Kathleen Sebelius and Andy Stern

Posted on 05/09/2008 9:09:46 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Topeka, Kan. and Washington - At its best, America's infrastructure has powered our economic prosperity, created well-paying jobs, and served the public interest.

Today, however, it has fallen into a dangerous state of disrepair. The Minnesota bridge collapse last summer brought home the urgency of repairing and modernizing our nation's system of highways, bridges, tunnels, power plants, transmission lines, and airports.

But doing so will be prohibitively expensive. Current plans seek to exploit the nation's need for private profit. But there's a better source of capital at hand: public pension funds.

The American Society of Civil Engineers estimates that $1.6 trillion is needed in the next five years alone just to maintain the adequacy of existing infrastructure.

But even if every bridge was repaired, it still would not be enough – trillions more will be required to build the new systems necessary to keep our economy competitive. As anyone who commutes every day knows, we need to reduce congestion on our roads and in the air, speed the transportation of people and goods, increase energy efficiency, and do so in ways that are environmentally sustainable.

The thought of coming up with the money necessary for all this, makes people wince – understandably. This is a time when many states face budget shortfalls and our federal deficit is at an all-time high.

Leaders of both the Republican and Democratic parties know the US cannot raise money from traditional public sources of financing, including municipal bonds, user fees, and taxes.

The financiers on Wall Street already have positioned themselves to take advantage of this national crisis for their own gain. Where most Americans see crumbling bridges and traffic congestion, the money managers see a treasure trove of fees, profits, and more record bonuses for CEOs.

It's why some private equity firms and banks on Wall Street are raising massive funds to buy these assets that have typically been owned and managed by the government.

In recent years, new infrastructure funds have been established in North America with capital commitments of $40 to $45 billion. These private funds have sprouted up like weeds, structured for short-term profits and sky-high fees – usually up to a 2 percent management fee plus up to 20 percent of the profits.

It would be a monumental mistake to turn the future of America's infrastructure over to the same crowd that brought us the subprime crisis, an economy loaded down with debt, and recession.

We should know better by now than to create a scenario where bridges and highways are sliced and diced like subprime loans into financially engineered "collateralized infrastructure obligations."

America needs a large source of stable, long-term capital to build the system of buildings, roads, and power supplies needed to sustain the country. We need a source of capital that values infrastructure because it provides a reasonable rate of return, strengthens the overall economy, and doesn't burden users with excessive fees.

Enter that source of capital:

Public pension funds, which are responsible for the retirement benefits of more than 18 million Americans, have more than $3 trillion in assets, and a long-term investment approach consistent with the stable returns that infrastructure assets generate.

Pension funds could buy and build infrastructure, putting the profits to work for the retirement of workers, not for the benefit of Wall Street CEOs.

This is how it works: Pension funds pool their assets and invest directly in projects to build new roads and bridges in multiple states, bypassing the Wall Street firms that want to siphon off profits. The steadyily increasing streams of revenue that come from tolls and other sources would deliver stable, long-term returns to working Americans, while creating well-paying construction and service jobs connected to each project.

These pooled pension direct investment vehicles would:

• Provide the much needed capital infusion sought by governors and state legislatures to improve their states' infrastructure;

• Ensure that billions of dollars stay in our communities instead of going to big financial firms;

• Create a multiplier effect, generating jobs, economic activity, and new tax revenue for states;

• Achieve strong investment returns and stable long-term cash flows that meet or exceed actuarially required levels; and

• Support "green" infrastructure projects that are environmentally sustainable.

Hurdles remain to pension funds' direct investment in infrastructure. Pension funds with little history of collaboration will have to work together. But one important barrier could be lifted by passing federal legislation that would allow pension funds to access tax-exempt debt to finance infrastructure investments.

This is a solution worth supporting. Public pension funds, governors, state treasurers, comptrollers, and the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), whose members participate in pension funds with more than $1 trillion in assets, have begun preliminary discussions about how to create this type of investment vehicle.

This collaboration offers a promising model for a win-win solution to help address the growing infrastructure problem we face across America.

• Kathleen Sebelius is the Democratic governor of Kansas. Andy Stern is the president of the SEIU and author of "A country that works."

TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: andystern; government; infrastructure; kathleensebelius; pensionfunds; ppp; seiu; wallstreet; workers

1 posted on 05/09/2008 9:09:46 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

There is some wince inducing garbage in this article, but overally I can’t say that it’s a bad idea.
Our infrastructure is falling apart and does need to be updated.

2 posted on 05/09/2008 9:42:20 AM PDT by frankiep (Democrats base their ideology on the premise that you are too stupid to do anything for yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frankiep

overally = overall

3 posted on 05/09/2008 9:43:10 AM PDT by frankiep (Democrats base their ideology on the premise that you are too stupid to do anything for yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; Grampa Dave; Dog Gone; Ernest_at_the_Beach; NormsRevenge; BOBTHENAILER; ...
Better not have 'em invest in this, even though Bob Brinker has long recommended it till just recently!!!
4 posted on 05/09/2008 11:14:30 AM PDT by SierraWasp (Out of the dung of adversity, spring the seeds of opportunity! America will always be exceptional!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

A Democrat governor and a union president salivating over getting their hands on untapped funds. Excuse me if I’m skeptical!

5 posted on 05/09/2008 11:38:48 AM PDT by GodBlessRonaldReagan (Wakka-ding-hoy - battle cry of the Plexus Rangers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp

How about they just cut out all the government programs that they have no business in being in? The price tag for the global warming nonsense currently coming up in the Senate is $2.3 trillion. The estimate for the Amnesty bill was $2.5 trillion. In California, we’re spending billions on climate research institutes, after-school babysitting, embryonic stem-cell research, massive land-grabs to save a frog, etc.... and the government crooks whine that they don’t have enough money to maintain roads (while their cronies line up the equity funds to reap profits of a massive rape of state resources and revenue generating assets.)

Throw the bums out!

6 posted on 05/09/2008 12:47:33 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

When this idea was suggested to Texas Retirement Funds, the head of the Texas Teacher Retirement Fund said that they could make a better return by investing in China’s roads.

7 posted on 05/09/2008 12:52:33 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson