Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Appeasing Iran, North Korea?
The Washington Times ^ | 5-9-08 | Ed

Posted on 05/09/2008 12:02:45 PM PDT by JZelle

As President Bush enters his final months in office, there are mounting signs of disarray when it comes to current U.S. policy towards Iran and North Korea. The three remaining plausible candidates to succeed him — Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and John McCain — have yet to explain how thier policies will differ from the current administration. Regarding Iran, for example, senior administration officials are continuously disavowing their own administration's National Intelligence Estimate, produced late last year, which suggested that Iran had halted a critical component of its nuclear weapons program. But the damage to American credibility has already occurred, and the administration appears to have decided that the Iranian nuclear program will be left for its successor to deal with.

It hasn't always been this way. During Mr. Bush's first term, Undersecretary of State for Arms Control John Bolton was particularly energetic about urging Moscow not to supply fuel for Iran's light-water nuclear reactor at Bushehr. The Department of Energy studied how much plutonium could be extracted from the facility and concluded that a middle-range estimate would be enough to build 50 to 60 nuclear weapons. But after Mr. Bush was re-elected, the administration, under intense pressure from Europe, made a regrettable bargain in an effort to bolster its diplomatic case against Iran: accept the premise that Tehran has every right to go forward with purportedly "civilian" nuclear energy programs even if such programs could be diverted to military use. This has led to the absurd situation (spotlighted in hearings held by the House Energy and Commerce Committee earlier this year), in which the White House is supporting an Energy Department budget that includes $4 million for two Russian institutes that are helping Iran complete the Bushehr reactor.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: iran; northkorea; nukes
I thought they said NK was dismantling everything and Iran was "years" away! /INTELLIGENCE
1 posted on 05/09/2008 12:02:46 PM PDT by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JZelle

They figure Star Wars Part Deux is locked in. Major job done.


2 posted on 05/09/2008 12:18:54 PM PDT by Shermy (Nightmares From My Pastor, A Story of Race and Insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

It is quite obvious that either Hussein Obama or McCaniac will not have the gonads to take on tinpot dictators and rouge countries. AQ, Hamas, and Hezbola will have a field day in 2009.


3 posted on 05/09/2008 12:23:59 PM PDT by DownInFlames (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DownInFlames
It is quite obvious that either Hussein Obama or McCaniac will not have the gonads to take on tinpot dictators and rouge countries.

So how will that make things any different?

4 posted on 05/09/2008 3:08:15 PM PDT by itsahoot (Global Government is coming because, I guess we want it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson