"jane doe"
Posted on 05/10/2008 6:33:31 PM PDT by RDTF
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A Navy admiral engaged in sexual relations in the White House in 1990 with a federal employee whom he falsely told he was a widower, according to a report released Friday by the Defense Department.
In March, when the report was submitted to Pentagon officials, Rear Adm. John Stufflebeem was demoted and fired from his post as director of the Navy staff.
Stufflebeem told investigators he couldn't remember the name of the woman he had an affair with. He also lied when he told investigators he did not engage in sexual relations with the woman, identified as "Jane Doe," the Defense Department's inspector general's report said.
Jane Doe, who was then unmarried and working for a federal agency, told the investigators the allegations were true, the report said. Her supervisor and Stufflebeem's superiors supported her testimony.
Stufflebeem was convicted April 18 of making false official statements to investigators. After the hearing, called an admiral's mast, he requested retirement.
Jane Doe told investigators that she and Stufflebeem began their affair on an overseas trip in 1989, that the married admiral told her he was a widower who was raising his children as a single parent and that they had sexual relations several times, including once in a White House room reserved for "military aides with overnight duties."
-snip-
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
Hey, hey, hey....If the Commander in Chief can do it in the White House...why can’t an admiral?
Maybe it’s the guy who inspired the original whitehouse.com. /sarc
Is this guy related to "Rear Admiral" Bill Clinton?
He's now second-class semen.
Without “Jane Doe’s” mug, we can’t say whether the admiral should walk the plank or not.
Ooooooh. Booooo. HIsssssss.
Whatever works.
Hmmm, where have I heard something like this before?
LOL!
LOL, I missed it the first time!
18 plus years ago who fen cares
It was apparently before Clinton was even elected.
1990???? Boy they are really digging. Why didn’t the guy just say that he cannot recall that far back?
“He also lied when he told investigators he did not engage in sexual relations with the woman, identified as “Jane Doe,” the Defense Department’s inspector general’s report said.”
Whatever happened to the 5th amendment?
I know of a Brigadier General who is up for a big promotion, but the guy is way deep into Internet porn.
I haven’t a clue as to how to turn him in so he doesn't get that promo.
What a great title and name for a fornicator!
Oh, well, it’s nothing that the President wasn’t doing.
"jane doe"
Stufflebeem told investigators he couldn’t remember the name of the woman he had an affair with.
Not that uncommon. Right, guys?
He needs to be fired from the Navy, period. What a POS!
can you do a screen shot of the history on his computer? (cntrl h) Or have the IT department run some “disgnostics” while he’s surfin’ porn?
No. I don’t have access to his computer.
So, where did Rear Adm. John Stufflebeem stuff his beem?
This clown was questioned and dealt under the UCMJ.....under a code of conduct we should all be held to.
Not civil law.
Somewhere near the stern. Hopefully not on the poop deck.
Well, blow me down!
“This clown was questioned and dealt under the UCMJ”
Don’t misconstrue my question regarding the 5th for approval of his behavior.
“.....under a code of conduct we should all be held to.”
Sheer nonsense, you honestly think that martial law is appropriate for the general population?
I didn’t know affairs in the White House could sink any lower.
He was a Line Admiral (I think # 18 in the pecking order)- then reverted to Rear - then assigned some staff job. Talk about throwing a career down the drain for something that happened 18 years ago...
“I haven’t a clue as to how to turn him in so he doesn’t get that promo. “
IG may work, other BG’s that are up for that star are another option. Your Congressmen or someone on the appropriate committee may be a good option too.
Better be right too.
Yeah, the Founders were real big on cracking down on "false official statements to investigators", weren't they?
Seems like our officially elected and appointed thugs have been using the "lying to officials" crap more and more over the last few years - well, unless you happen to be the Democrat president or her husband...
Mulva? Arethra? Kest?
How could you possibly know something like that if no one else does?
Surely you jest.
If you read the article - it sounds like he has already been demoted.
He HAD a 3 star rank - Vice Admiral.
The article, in many places, calls him Rear Admiral. A 1 star admiral is a Rear Admiral, Lower Half (please ...no bad jokes!!), while a 2 star admiral is a Rear Admiral, Upper Half.
Flag rank doesn’t have the same retirement guarantees, and mid-deeds can cause loss of rank. Admiral Kimmel was blamed for the loss of so many ships at Pearl Harbor (7Dec41) and was retired with loss of 1 star.
Mike
“Waaaas that wrong? Because, to be honest, I have to plead ignorance, because you know, with some offices, that's completely acceptable”.
“Your fired”.
"A Midshipman does not lie, cheat, steal, or engage in any activity which would compromise the integrity and security of his or her conscience, the well-being of the unit, or the values of the United States Navy and Marine Corps."
This is NOT "martial law" -- it is simply a CODE OF CONDUCT , I believe we should ALL be held to...
The fact that too many folks find this Code of Conduct "sheer nonsense" goes a long way toward explaining the degradation of modern society...
We've become a thug culture - following the "code" of a lower form of animal than honorable human beings...
See Post 45 ...
And no, I am not jesting.
I don't know, but I have to admit I believe him when he says he can't remember her name. The affair apparently began in '89 overseas and ended in '90. That's pushing 20 yrs. ago. I hope nobody is digging through my previous life to nail me for something I did that long ago because I probably couldn't remember enough from that far back to defend myself.
The weird part of this thing was I recognized his name from someplace, the face looked familiar, and finally at the very end of the article it says where I would have seen him on the tube.
Any boy such as the POS that has to tell lies to women in order to get a roll in the hay, in this day and age, deserves to be shot.
In one Congressional investigation Hillary told the Congressmen, “ I have no independent recollection of that” about 233 times. Worked for her.
How does his interest in porn detract from his fitness to fight and lead troops?
Why is it anyone’s business?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
