Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Daughter fails math test, so dad thrown in jail
WorldNutDaily ^ | 11 May 2008 | Staff Writer

Posted on 05/12/2008 12:49:06 PM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

A northern Kentucky man is in jail today – serving a 180-day sentence – because his 18-year-old daughter failed a math test and didn't get her General Equivalency Diploma, or GED, as a previous court order required.

Brittany Gegner, the daughter, says if anyone should be jailed, it should be her.

[snip]

Butler County Juvenile Court Judge David Niehaus ordered Gegner to jail for contributing to the delinquency of a minor by not following a court order which required Gegner to be sure his daughter got her GED.

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Kentucky; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: judicialtyrants; stupidjudges
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-63 next last
I think I know of a judge what needs a good tail whippin'.

Just sayin'.

1 posted on 05/12/2008 12:49:10 PM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

This is from the state that is rushing out to vote for Hillary in the primary?


2 posted on 05/12/2008 12:53:00 PM PDT by LottieDah (Democrats and liberals never fail to disappoint.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

What about jailing the father of the baby?


3 posted on 05/12/2008 12:54:11 PM PDT by spanalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

Roger that.


4 posted on 05/12/2008 12:54:30 PM PDT by ComputerGuy (Delphi for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
his 18-year-old daughter failed a math test

Judge David Niehaus ordered Gegner to jail for contributing to the delinquency of a minor

Not the brightest star in the sky, eh?

5 posted on 05/12/2008 12:54:51 PM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

Note to self. Stay away from Kentucky.


6 posted on 05/12/2008 12:55:23 PM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

Rocket Surgeon is scrawled all over this chick's face.

7 posted on 05/12/2008 12:56:12 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Secondhand Aztlan Smoke causes drug addiction obesity in global warming cancer immigrant terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

Something doesn’t add up here


8 posted on 05/12/2008 12:56:42 PM PDT by clamper1797 (It would be insane to vote for Hussein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797

We gotta stop these people from multiplying — or it will divide America. Subtract out this Rediculus sentence, and there still is enough calculus to show the geometry of a country gone wrong.


9 posted on 05/12/2008 1:00:18 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Secondhand Aztlan Smoke causes drug addiction obesity in global warming cancer immigrant terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TLI

18 and still considered a minor...??...i thought at 18 you reached the age of majority and was considered an adult...if so the father is doing time for the daughter not following a court order....America is lost folks....


10 posted on 05/12/2008 1:00:18 PM PDT by tatsinfla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LottieDah
This is from the state that is rushing out to vote for Hillary in the primary?

It takes a village...

11 posted on 05/12/2008 1:01:05 PM PDT by CDFingers (EALM: Ethnic Americans Living in Massachusetts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

I don’t think so...they shoulda jailed the kid, too. We’ve allowed the pendulum to swing too far off center with the treatment of juveniles. Perhaps if we started holding parents responsible for their kids REPEATED actions the snotty attitudes of both proud parent and recalcitrant kid might decrease.

I can assure you, if I would have known I would be held responsible if my kid failed a court ordered assignment, as this dad did, you can bet your last dollar I would have made sure my kid had all the tools necessary to ace the exam even if I had to take a leave of absence from work.

This maybe, by the degree of protestation by the teen, been the hook it took to get her attention.


12 posted on 05/12/2008 1:02:42 PM PDT by bigfootbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tatsinfla

The progressive infantilization of citizens was accelerated by raising the drinking age to 21. When people accept that it’s OK for the state to treat adults like children, this sort of thing is bound to happen.


13 posted on 05/12/2008 1:02:50 PM PDT by Squawk 8888 (TSA and DHS are jobs programs for people who are not smart enough to flip burgers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
There is a certain logic to this. I remember a scene from a Japanese TV drama called Hotelier. A spoiled rich brat tried to run away from home. Rich daddy had a female body guard stay at the house specifically to prevent said female brat from leaving the house. She got out of the house anyway, but not very far. Daddy brings brat home and as the bodyguard is rushing out the door to apologize to her boss, he slaps her across the face right in front of the daughter.

The daughter asked the dad why he slapped the bodyguard and not her. He said, “It will hurt you more to slap her.”

Maybe this is a wakeup call to this spoiled girl that her laziness and stupidity do have consequences for other people and to wake her out of her selfishness.

14 posted on 05/12/2008 1:03:49 PM PDT by Tamar1973 (Catch the Korean Wave, one Bae Yong Joon film at a time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spanalot

Bring back the shotgun marriage.

Young men would be a lot more careful where they rubbed their jubblies if this was a possible consequence.

On the other hand, the father/mother obviously let their daughter go unchaperoned at least once. So they, too, share in the blame.


15 posted on 05/12/2008 1:06:13 PM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
Brittany told WCPO-TV in Cincinnati. "I would way rather me go to jail than my dad." Even Brian Gegner's ex-wife agrees the judge's decision is absurd. "They probably should have punished me if they were going to punish anybody," said Brittany's mother Shana Roach. "Because she did live with me at the time, but because he had the custody, that's why he's being punished.

Not too often you find an entire family that wants to and deserves to serve time together. This judge missed a perfect opportunity.

16 posted on 05/12/2008 1:06:20 PM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
It's an interesting case.

One fascinating detail is that Miss Gegner's parents are divorced and that her soon-to-be-incarcerated father had custody.

That's fairly rare.

More interestingly, even though he had custody - a situation many divorced fathers can only pray for - she was living with her mom and a truant from school while he supposedly was in charge of her upbringing.

To be honest, I don't have a whole lot of sympathy for any parent who stands for his child cutting school.

My parents made my education and that of my siblings their first priority.

This guy is both a poster-child for (due to the harshness of his punishment) and an embarrassment to (due to his failure to even bother maintaining custody) the fathers' rights movement.

17 posted on 05/12/2008 1:07:25 PM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888

it just amazes me that she is considered a minor....when at 18 you can join the military...vote etc...even alot of 16 yr olds are tried as adults now .....just seems we call it whatever fits the needs of the justice system anymore....


18 posted on 05/12/2008 1:08:35 PM PDT by tatsinfla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tatsinfla
18 and still considered a minor...??...i thought at 18 you reached the age of majority and was considered an adult...if so the father is doing time for the daughter not following a court order....America is lost folks....

As you know, there's a lot of gray area between 18 and 21.

Try buying alcohol at the age of 18.

19 posted on 05/12/2008 1:09:04 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TLI
It is possible that he contributed to her delinquency before she turned 18 and is being sanctioned for it now.

Not every offense is litigated the same day it is charged.

20 posted on 05/12/2008 1:11:19 PM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
"Rocket Surgeon"??
21 posted on 05/12/2008 1:11:37 PM PDT by Constitutionalist Conservative (Global Warming Heretic -- http://agw-heretic.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TLI
From the article:

Court administrators say that even though Brittany is an adult now, the case remains active in their court because she was a juvenile when the problems started.

22 posted on 05/12/2008 1:12:36 PM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

the only reason that area between 18 and 21 is grey is because the judicial system makes it up as it goes along...you can fight for your country at 18 without a parents consent....minor girls can get abortions without a parents consent or knowledge...but don’t follow a court order at 18 and the parent goes to jail....i’m not buying it....


23 posted on 05/12/2008 1:13:18 PM PDT by tatsinfla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I really like the angle you put on this whole thing. It made it very plane to understand. I was not sure about the others going round and round in circles over the finer points. You have intersected the discourse with rays of light.


24 posted on 05/12/2008 1:13:35 PM PDT by RachelFaith (Doing NOTHING... about the illegals already here IS Amnesty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

...and you’ve only summed up a fraction of the problem!


25 posted on 05/12/2008 1:13:52 PM PDT by woollyone (entropy extirpates evolution and conservation confirms the Creator blessed forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative

Glad you caught that. T’was intentional. ;^)


26 posted on 05/12/2008 1:14:16 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Secondhand Aztlan Smoke causes drug addiction obesity in global warming cancer immigrant terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Rocket surgeon. Good 'un.
27 posted on 05/12/2008 1:15:43 PM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
There's a lot of missing information — but, from what is written in the article; the sentence seems ludicrous.

What powers did the father actually have over the girl — especially when she was living with her mother? Suppose he tried to use corporal punishment to enforce curfews and study time — what charges would he then be facing? Suppose he tried to prevent the girl from visiting her mother — would the courts have tolerated that? Suppose he tried to “lay down the law” with the mother, regarding the girl's behaviour — would the courts have tolerated that?

Why is is assumed that everyone can pass the GED? If just anyone can get a GED — simply because they're told they have to — what does that say about the actual value of the GED? The GED is used as an entrance requirement for a lot of advanced training programs — what good is it, if it doesn't filter out people who can't learn these skills?

28 posted on 05/12/2008 1:21:53 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Yes ... but you have make sure that you square it with everyone ...


29 posted on 05/12/2008 1:22:28 PM PDT by clamper1797 (It would be insane to vote for Hussein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797

Once I saw a local guy pull his 5 kids outta public school, try homeschooling. After 5-6 years, kids couldn’t pass benchmarks, so state threatened to prosecute parents over all the money, computers, services, supplies they had given them for homeschooling. Father sent them back to public school; everything was dropped. Kids were in high school, didn’t know times tables or basic math; and no social skills. I know vast majority homeschoolers do a great job, but the state legally does goes after the few who don’t. Must be more to this case too.


30 posted on 05/12/2008 1:25:16 PM PDT by Eska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tatsinfla
the only reason that area between 18 and 21 is grey is because the judicial system makes it up as it goes along...you can fight for your country at 18 without a parents consent....minor girls can get abortions without a parents consent or knowledge...but don’t follow a court order at 18 and the parent goes to jail....i’m not buying it....

Yeah, something about that doesn't fit the associative, distributive, and commutative properties of math. ;-)

-PJ

31 posted on 05/12/2008 1:27:51 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (Repeal the 17th amendment -- it's the "Fairness Doctrine" for Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
Around 70% of all high school students in DC and Baltimore are dropouts. Let's just incarcerate all the parents. That will solve the problem./s
32 posted on 05/12/2008 1:31:57 PM PDT by khnyny (Hillary is the national equivalent of Tracy Flick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CDFingers

Village of idiots... why hasn’t the local country-folk there in Kentucky taken this judge out and hanged him yet????


33 posted on 05/12/2008 1:32:54 PM PDT by Rick.Donaldson (http://www.transasianaxis.com - Please visit for latest on DPRK/Russia/China/et al.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
As long as he's caucasian, no problem. if he's non-caucasion then this is clearly another blatant episode of genocide committed by the lily-white racist oppressors.
34 posted on 05/12/2008 1:34:57 PM PDT by MrBambaLaMamba (Hussein Obama for Caliph 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tatsinfla

I’m sure whatever infraction caused the court to order the Father to make sure she got her GED happened when she was a juvenile.. since he failed in that order, he goes to jail.

I’m sure the order to get her her GED or go to Jail were the terms of the original sentence.


35 posted on 05/12/2008 1:36:08 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I saw her interview on Fox and she was actually quite articulate, admitting she was quite immature and now trying to improve her life.


36 posted on 05/12/2008 1:38:16 PM PDT by Rennes Templar ( Never underestimate the difficulty of changing false beliefs by facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

WorldNutDaily? Is that typo or you really mean WND.Com articles are nutty?


37 posted on 05/12/2008 1:38:19 PM PDT by hamboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tamar1973

She knew what the court order decreed yet she still didn’t do what was necessary so I’d say your theory is incorrect. She doesn’t give a rat’s ass about anyone but herself.


38 posted on 05/12/2008 1:38:44 PM PDT by visualops (artlife.us . nature photography desktop wallpapers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

Any lawyers out there? How does this pass Due Process muster? He is being put in jail for someone else’s actions over which he had/has no control. That CAN’T be legal, can it?


39 posted on 05/12/2008 1:44:57 PM PDT by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
The original news story is here:

http://www.wcpo.com/news/local/story.aspx?content_id=28d2acca-9947-44cc-8831-9859f1f6137e

40 posted on 05/12/2008 1:46:14 PM PDT by Abby4116
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888

“Progressive infantilization of citizens” is right. So what if these kids want to drop out? It’s called freedom. With freeedom come consequences, which are on them. I don’t believe that the state or parents can or should make these kids do anything.


41 posted on 05/12/2008 1:46:58 PM PDT by khnyny (Hillary is the national equivalent of Tracy Flick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tamar1973

Hmm, interesting point...


42 posted on 05/12/2008 1:48:03 PM PDT by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: All
I said this on another thread with this same article and I will say it here. If anyone thinks the state actually has a constitutional right(not a "legal" right but a constitutional right)to tell you, or your kids, that they have to be in school, let alone actually force then to get a diploma or pass the GED, then you are not conservatives. The states started these school laws with the intention(always "good" intentions and unintended consequences)of allowing(not forcing)kids who wanted to go to school instead of bringing in the crops in the fall, to attend school even against their parents wishes. Lots of farmers, and to be honest others also, wouldn't let their kids go to school in the fall and spring.

Like all misguided but well intended laws that interfere with our freedoms these laws escalated out of control. We don't need the state to make it unlawful to attend school, we don't need the state to jail parents because their kids don't go to school.

What we need is for the state to stay the hell out of our lives, all parts of it, except for the bare minimum which I won't go into here, and let us, as parents, take care of our kids as we see fit.

Some of you will twist my words thinking that I mean we should be able to abuse our children(which I don't believe at all), mainly because you are not real conservatives and will use any argument to justify the fact you let the state control you and your children.

Get the government out of our lives, just as many children would graduate as do now, maybe more. They had high graduation rates in the past without all these crappy laws(and kids were better educated) and they would now if these laws were dropped.

43 posted on 05/12/2008 1:53:42 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus; All

I think there is more to this story than what is being said imho..


44 posted on 05/12/2008 1:57:46 PM PDT by KevinDavis (John McCain "08")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Aside from the issue of the reputation of a cluster of lawyer-party sensitive New Age guys (SNAGs: false rivals of the man-haters), it's not legally feasible to try to force a 16-18-year-old woman to stay with a particular parent of the two. Young people of that age can go to either parent as they wish in at least some states. And the mother might have had some extensive time ordered by the court, for all that we know (little). The father might have only been the primary custodian. The press will often say that such a parent simply had "custody."

We need to shut down feminism/romanticism (along with no-fault divorce) and schools administered and funded by the Government. And abolish the doctrine of parens patriae (which allows governments to usurp the rights of parents).

[Disclaimer: I'm not an attorney. If you need legal advice, contact a licensed attorney. This is a discussion of public policy.]

[Caution: divorce lawyers have their spines removed in law schools.]


45 posted on 05/12/2008 1:59:47 PM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Rick.Donaldson
Village of idiots... why hasn’t the local country-folk there in Kentucky taken this judge out and hanged him yet????

VERY simple explanation...are ya ready? Because the judge is in Butler County OHIO. The dad lives in Northern Kentucky.

46 posted on 05/12/2008 2:01:31 PM PDT by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: microgood; Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
The father lives in Kentucky. The daughter lives with her mother in Ohio goes to school there. It is Ohio that has put the man in jail.

Strange story.

47 posted on 05/12/2008 2:17:15 PM PDT by Between the Lines (I am very cognizant of my fallibility, sinfulness, and other limitations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

Yet another judge who should be removed from the bench.


48 posted on 05/12/2008 2:18:30 PM PDT by Continental Soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hamboy
WorldNutDaily? Is that typo or you really mean WND.Com articles are nutty?

It means that (in general) I think WND articles are nutty.

49 posted on 05/12/2008 2:29:29 PM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Here they come boys! As thick as grass, and as black as thunder!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: visualops

She didn’t believe the court would really follow through because I have a feeling her parents never followed through on much of anything raising her. She got a heck of a surprise.


50 posted on 05/12/2008 2:48:01 PM PDT by Tamar1973 (Catch the Korean Wave, one Bae Yong Joon film at a time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson