Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Election 2008: Virginia Presidential Election Virginia: McCain 47% Obama 44%
Rasmussen ^ | May 12, 2008 | Scott Rasmussen

Posted on 05/12/2008 6:59:13 PM PDT by Red Steel

The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey in Virginia finds John McCain leading Barack Obama by just three percentage points, 47% to 44%. That’s a significant improvement for Obama after trailing the presumptive Republican nominee by eleven points a month ago.

The current survey was conducted just two days after Obama’s strong performance in the North Carolina and Indiana Primaries. Following those primaries, Rasmussen Reports stated that the Democratic race is over and that Obama will be the nominee of his Party. Nationally, McCain and Obama are quite competitive in the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll.

In Virginia, McCain leads by fifteen percentage points among men but trails by seven among women. A generation gap is found both nationally and in Virginia. In the state, Obama leads among voters under 40 but trails among their elders. McCain is supported by 81% of Republicans and Obama by 75% of Democrats. McCain has a nineteen point advantage among the state’s unaffiliated voters.

McCain leads by seventeen percentage points among Investors but most non-Investors support Obama. McCain also leads among those who attend Church or other religious services at least a couple of times a month. Obama leads among those who attend less frequently or not at all.

McCain is viewed favorably by 60% of Virginia voters, Obama by 51%.

Individual polls can sometimes overstate volatility in a race, especially when the results carry a four-and-a-half percentage point margin of sampling error. One way of addressing this is to look at a rolling-average of three consecutive polls. Using this approach, Obama leads McCain 49% to 43% in Virginia.

In the unlikely event that Hillary Clinton gets the Democratic nomination, she trails McCain by six in Virginia, 47% to 41%.

Democrats are heavily favored to win the Virginia Senate race.

Virginia has cast its Thirteen Electoral College votes for the Republicans in ten consecutive Presidential Elections dating back to 1968. Rasmussen Markets data currently gives the GOP a 58.0 % chance of continuing that streak. George W. Bush carried the state by eight percentage points in each of the last two elections. At the time this poll was released, Virginia was ranked as “Leans Republican” in the Rasmussen Reports Balance of Power Calculator.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: 2008polls; mccain; obama; va2008

1 posted on 05/12/2008 6:59:13 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

i’m already tired of this election.


2 posted on 05/12/2008 7:10:53 PM PDT by ken21 ( people die + you never hear from them again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

So McCain has about a 10 point lead?


3 posted on 05/12/2008 7:26:44 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
BREAKING NEWS: GOP socialist leads Democrat socialist in polls!
4 posted on 05/12/2008 7:31:10 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC; meandog; onyx; MARTIAL MONK; Kuksool; freespirited; Salvation; furquhart; mossyoaks; ...
The McCain List.

Closer, but look at the favorables. McCain will easily win here.

Virginia
McCain 47%
Obama 44%

McCain is viewed favorably by 60% of Virginia voters, Obama by 51%.

Rasmussen Reports is not polling Hillary Clinton anymore.
5 posted on 05/12/2008 7:32:21 PM PDT by Norman Bates (Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

In the words of Joe Scarborough:

“Always bet on the Seniors”

Those folks show up in ice storms, Mad John Wins VA....


6 posted on 05/12/2008 7:36:19 PM PDT by padre35 (Conservative in Exile/ Isaiah 3.3/Cry havoc and let slip the RINOS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

McCain opposed and voted against the trillion dollar prescription drug plan, federal farm subsidies, federalized insurance, and every pork project under the sun. He also singlehandedly scuttled a multi-billion dollar “defense” contract sham. Is that a socialist’s record these days?


7 posted on 05/12/2008 7:36:21 PM PDT by Norman Bates (Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates
McCain opposed and voted against the trillion dollar prescription drug plan, federal farm subsidies, federalized insurance, and every pork project under the sun. He also singlehandedly scuttled a multi-billion dollar “defense” contract sham. Is that a socialist’s record these days?

1. McCain once sought out the socialist Democrats in 2001 to become a member.

2.McCain voted against the 2001 and 2003 Bush tax cuts.

3.McCain co-sponsored bills to close the gun-show loophole, expand AmeriCorps, and federal airport security. He opposed nearly the entire Republican Party on these issues.

4.McCain co-sponsored, with John Edwards and Ted Kennedy, a patients' bill of rights.

5. McCain joined Chuck Schumer to sponsor one bill allowing the re-importation of prescription drugs and another permitting wider sale of generic alternatives. These measures were strongly contested by the health care industry, Bush and the GOP leadership.

6. McCain sponsored with John Kerry a bill raising automobile fuel-efficiency standards

7. McCain was considered by John Kerry as a potential VP running mate in 2004.

8. McCain has been funded by communist billionaire George Soros.

9. McCain has sponsored a bill(McCain-Kennedy) with a socialist that would have granted amnesty to illegal aliens.

10.McCain sponsored a bill(McCain-Feingold) with a socialist that would have restricted free speech.

11. McCain sponsored a bill(Lieberman-McCain Stewardship Climate Act) with a socialist that is based on the fallacy of human induced global warming.

12. McCain has promised to meet with La Raza during his campaign.

13. McCain admonished his own party and defended Marxist Obama because the North Carolina GOP ran an ad against Obama. 14. McCain has promised not to stop sanctuary cities.

15.McCain has promised never to drill in ANWR.

This is the record of socialist McCain past and present.
8 posted on 05/12/2008 7:53:34 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

McCain’s ACU rating is extremely high...Nitpicking votes does not help our situation....


9 posted on 05/12/2008 8:11:25 PM PDT by TortReformer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

“McCain joined Chuck Schumer to sponsor one bill allowing the re-importation of prescription drugs and another permitting wider sale of generic alternatives. These measures were strongly contested by the health care industry, Bush and the GOP leadership.”

That is not socialism. Scouring the international market for available cheap US drugs is called global free trade. If the US drug companies are dumb enough to sell their products to Canada at cut throat prices, what is wrong with allowing the US consumer to access these products. Funny, if corporate America scours the world for cheap products, raw materials and even labor at the expense of the American workers, it is call capitalism and free markets. If the working man tries to do the same it is call socialism???


10 posted on 05/12/2008 8:13:30 PM PDT by Fee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TortReformer
McCain’s ACU rating is extremely high....

If your going to use the ACU rating for McCain then include all the relevant facts. Per the Conservative website The American Thinker: McCain's ACU Ratings

Senator John McCain's lifetime rating of 82.3% from the American Conservative Union is often cited as proof that he is conservative. Here is a closer look at that 82.3 rating.

First, a rating of 82.3 is not really that high. It puts Senator McCain in 39th place among senators serving in 2006, the latest year for which the ACU has its ratings posted online. For that most recent year in particular, McCain scored only 65, putting him in 47th place for that year. Ben Nelson (D-NE) and Chuck Hagel (R-NE), for example, scored 64 and 75, respectively, in 2006.

Generally, McCain has voted less conservatively in more recent years. His average for 1990-97 was 88, but was only 74 for 1998-2006.


Nitpicking votes does not help our situation

If you consider placating the socialist Democrats toe become one of them, being funded by a communist, being considered as a socialist VP running mate, supporting several bills with socialists that will steal more power and freedom from the people and is anathema to the Constitution, admonishing his own party in defense of a Marxist candidate all as nitpicking then you are at the wrong website. This is a conservative website.
11 posted on 05/12/2008 8:22:00 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

That’s a little too close for comfort.


12 posted on 05/12/2008 8:39:30 PM PDT by popdonnelly (Concerned about the price of arugula)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

I would have though Oprah’s Obama would be brought to victory on the coattails of Mark Warner for the Senate. VA people are moving far to the left, away from the old Jefferson-Madison-Monroe school, when VA was in her heyday.


13 posted on 05/13/2008 5:53:24 AM PDT by Theodore R. ( Cowardice is still forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly

Six weeks ago McCain was beating him by eleven. The trend is not McCain’s friend in VA, a state that should be a Pubbie slam dunk.


14 posted on 05/13/2008 6:03:45 AM PDT by LadyNavyVet ("No more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition ..." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly; Red Steel; LadyNavyVet
That’s a little too close for comfort.

Yes, but you have to understand that on ELECTION DAY in 2004, the "polls" had Kerry wining the state by about 10%. Roughly the margin he lost by. The exit polls were manipulated to favor Kerry.

While Virginia should remain in the GOP column, it is no longer a "slam dunk" state. In influx of liberals is changing the make up of the state. I still think McCain wins Virginia, but not as easily as Republican candidates have in the past.

15 posted on 05/13/2008 6:59:08 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands (What if Tony Almeida is the 12th Cylon?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands
"Yes, but you have to understand that on ELECTION DAY in 2004, the "polls" had Kerry wining the state by about 10%."

Not Rasmussen. His final numbers in Virginia were 50 for Bush, 44 for Kerry. Bush won 52 to 44. Rasmussen is a Republican and uses the best techniques available, which is why I quote him.

There are a lot of agenda polls, including most done by the MSM. But don't delude yourself. McCain is struggling in some places where he shouldn't be. If Obama picks Jim Webb as his running mate, Virginia could be lost. That means McCain will have to pick up those electoral college votes elsewhere.

Those Freepers telling themselves this is going to be a landslide are in for a rude awakening, and I notice that some of them are the same ones strenuously denying, even in the face of good polling data, that the Dems were going to win both houses of Congress in 2006.

16 posted on 05/13/2008 7:39:35 AM PDT by LadyNavyVet ("No more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition ..." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LadyNavyVet
I'm not deluded about anything. This early in the game Rasmussen was also showing it a lot closer for Bush and Kerry in Virginia. And,like I said, it was the exit polls that were manipulated. I was putting out panic fires all day long on FR saying those numbers couldn't be right (they had Kerry winning by about 8%). Actual numbers weren't releasd until well after 8:00 p.m. and it was close to 9:00 before it was called.

As I said this won't be an easy win for McCain. But I think he wins it. And, after two years of Jim Webb in office, I don't think our military votes Webb over McCain.

17 posted on 05/13/2008 8:03:11 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands (What if Tony Almeida is the 12th Cylon?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands

Exit polls in 2004 have nothing to do with actual polls in 2008, and less than nothing to do with who will win in November. They were manipulated, Rasmussen is not. That is why I cited Rasmussen and not manipulated exit polls when making my point.

Perhaps you are not deluded. But many Freeprs are. How many have responded to McCain’s weak polling by saying, “Nobody’s going to vote for a Marxist,” despite the fact that 59 million of them voted for John Kerry in 2004, against an incumbent President in wartime. That would be the John Kerry who has a WORSE lifetime ACU rating than Barack Obama.

Freepers were responding to a Rasmussen Michigan poll yesterday that had McCain up one point over Obama as proof of an impending McCain landslide. This, despite the fact that McCain has lost support over the past month against Obama in Michigan, as in almost all the states Rasmussen has polled, and is trailing him in the head to heads and in favorability ratings. We are at the point in the campaign where people are realizing that Obama will be the nominee, are taking a second look, and are liking what they see. If that trend keeps up McCain is going to have a tough time in November.

I’m trying to get Freepers to stop looking in the mirror when they comtemplate how people will vote and look at the facts. McCain can win, but so can Obama. And either way, so far it’s shaping up to be a squeaker.


18 posted on 05/13/2008 8:41:56 AM PDT by LadyNavyVet ("No more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition ..." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LadyNavyVet
They were manipulated, Rasmussen is not.

Okay fine. I think I said that.

19 posted on 05/13/2008 8:47:22 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands (What if Tony Almeida is the 12th Cylon?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson