Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

KIDDIE-PORN CHIC: BEYONCE'S TINY HO'S
nypost.com ^ | May 14, 2008 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 05/14/2008 10:49:49 AM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

IF you thought the soft-porn image of Disney teen queen Miley Cyrus - wearing nothing but ruby-stained lips and a bedsheet - in Vanity Fair magazine was disturbing, you ain't seen nothing yet.

Pop diva Beyonce Knowles, 27, and her fashion-designer mother have launched a girls' clothing line that makes Miley's bare-backed glam session look like a Shirley Temple photo shoot.

The Knowles' family business, "House of Dereon," recently published ads for its "Dereon Girls Collection" with young models who look no older than my second-grade daughter. They are seductively posed and tarted up, JonBenet Ramsey-style, with lipstick, blush and face powder.

Draped in bling, several girls sport leather jackets and studded accessories.

One child wears sparkly, high heels (more pint-size Pussycat Doll than Dorothy from "The Wizard of Oz") and another slouches, gangsta gal-style, with a neon-pink boa, leopard-skin fedora and stilettos.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: beyonce; clothes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: mysterio
"Michelle needs to learn not to use an apostrophe to pluralize. "

She probably knows better. It might have been a newspaper person's error??

41 posted on 05/14/2008 2:34:58 PM PDT by OldEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic

And the clothes you put your kid in today would offend your grandparents.
Ant the clothes your grandchildren will wear will offend you.

Heck, I’m such a conservative, the clothes I wore in the 70’s offends me.


42 posted on 05/14/2008 2:53:07 PM PDT by Philly Nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Philly Nomad

Well, yeah, I mean c’mon - if 70’s clothing didn’t offend you, I’d say you had a screw loose ;)


43 posted on 05/14/2008 3:19:36 PM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Average White Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Yow! Those sky-high heels can’t be good for young, growing feet!


44 posted on 05/14/2008 7:46:38 PM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

“He looks like a deranged Easter Bunny.”

I needed that laugh this morning.....


45 posted on 05/15/2008 4:57:04 AM PDT by Cathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RepoGirl

There are so many things wrong with these outfits that it is hard to list. I think they are tacky, gaudy, uncomfortable and inapproproiate for toddlers/young girls and yes, make them look like tarts, but not necessarily skimpy. However, put a full body leotard on a woman and although it doesn’t show a lot of skin, it is not appropriate for daywear to the office or a PTA meeting.

Preteens with their butts hanging out of their jeans (thong on display) and flabby bellies are just as bad in my opinion, although their parents are not dressing them, for the most part. My concern is that parents are choosing to dress their very small children as hip-hop-gangster girls with attitude.


46 posted on 05/15/2008 5:05:06 AM PDT by Cathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson