Posted on 05/15/2008 5:40:36 AM PDT by jaydubya2
Trumpeting the major endorsement from John Edwards for Barack Obama, the day after Obama was trounced by 40 points in West Virginia all three broadcast network evening newscasts led Wednesday night with the dramatic announcement of the political prize that gives Obama a major boost. Katie Couric returned at the end of the 6:30 PM EST CBS Evening News feed to reiterate our top story tonight as she effused over live video of Edwards speaking at the rally: John Edwards endorses Barack Obama, saying he's one man who knows in his heart that it's time to create one America, not two.
ABC was so excited that its 6:30 PM feed of World News went live at about 6:40 PM to Grand Rapids, Michigan for 90 seconds of Obama introducing Edwards, compete with a Bruce Spingsteen song as Edwards bounded on stage. Gibson then acknowledged:
Timed for maximum exposure, timed to coincide with the evening newscasts, timed to give Barack Obama a needed boost after his bad defeat yesterday in West Virginia. George Stephanopoulos, this is the kind of publicity that you can't buy.
Indeed, no need to pay for it when ABC News is eager to give it to you for free.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
Well, sure. The entire Obama Bubble is a media synthesis. There is really nothing there at all, otherwise.
They could have picked someone at random from the phone book and done the same thing.
Consider some of the absurd, preposterous candidates that have appeared the last few election cycles.
Io, Saturnalia!
How the hell is that minor?
Mr 400 dollar haircut ambulance chaser can start building “one America” by voluntarily giving away all his wealth until he lives at the median income level. THEN we’ll listen to him about doing the same...
Last night on O’Reilly, Dennis Miller described Edwards as a vehicle for a haircut to get around on.
I think this blog post is petty. Hillary had beaten humiliatingly Obama 2:1 in a semi-battleground state and was trying to resuscitate her campaign that was on life support via the media, and Obama was able to counter with a roundhouse kick to her head via the media with the Edwards endorsement (something that Hillary really wanted— and it actually seemed in public appearances that Elizabeth Edwards, his wife, strongly preferred Hillary over Obama).
Edwards was the last man standing before the field finally narrowed to two people and both candidates spent a lot of effort behind the scenes to get his endorsement, so he’s a significant endorsement for Obama.
Law Suit endorses Empty Suit.
The Nets are the committed propaganda organ of the marxist DNC. They will actively and openly suppress any and all information that might harm their ballerina darling Obeyme. Even Pravda wasn’t this conspicuous. Our Republic is facing utter distruction.
I was joking. Of course it’s minor, very minor. Sometimes sarcastic humor doesn’t translate to written word very well. LOL
“...to create one America”
Ein Volk
Ein Reich
Ein Fuhrer
I appreciate the clarification.
John Edwards endorsing Obama is like a housefly recommending a pile of dog crap.
Headline: Ninety-two percent of blacks vote for Obama
"I have overcome America's divisiveness. We are one." Obama.
If he were any lighter, he'd need weights to keep from floating away. He'd be listed above helium on the table of elements.
BTW, even Brit Hume was saying "honorable John Edwards"!
How do Obama/Edwards create “one America” when half of us oppose socialism?
BUMP!
Barack Obama... now endorsed by John Edwards in Michigan, Hamas in Gaza, and the Ferengi across the universe...
Create One America? What? After 40 years of multiculturalism and diversity they’re telling us we need to become One America? The dream of creating a Socialist America never dies, does it?
Diversity and multiculturalism are nothing but a ruse. An attempt to teach Americans to be ashamed of their heritage. And now I have to add the obligatory note, sure we’ve made mistakes in the past but the U.S. is the greatest country in the history of the world - very few close seconds actually.
Multiculturalists encourage moral relativism.
Diversity mongers encourage dissent among the Citizenry.
And now, today, we done ain’t goin’ to join no One America under the likes of Obama or the snivelling Edwards... Who besides that dullard Katie Couric even believes than nonsense?
I think multiple states secceeding from the Union is more likely. Give California back to Mexico. Let Texas become the pround independent Republic is once was. South Carolinians are already daydreaming about seccession because of the widespread teaching of homosexuality and pro-abortion propaganda. The New England states could from one small socialist state - it’s in their heart of heart anyway.
Bigger isn’t better. Normally, bigger means your diluting your stills. Imagine a small winery with 60-100 year old vines producing 200 cases of fine wine every year. Now think of a wine factory producing 25,000 cases of cheap wine every year. If they joined as one, the fine wine would be so diluted with the cheap one it would be unrecognizable. Well. the states are the same way.
So, let’s forego this immature collectivistic one America nonsense and become 30 different independent Republics with NO FEDERAL GOVERNMENT control as originally intended and if the founding fathers didn’t intend it’s because they thought we’d always be freedom minded people. This doesn’t apply to the socialist state of New England (formerly Mass, Maine, Vermont and Connecticeut - I left our New Hampshire because the spark of liberty still burns there.)
Yours truly,
The Woim
well executed!
Obama has some superb PR people. They have been the secret to his campaign.
“Obama has some superb PR people. They have been the secret to his campaign”
So true. They keep outflanking Hillary while keeping McCain at bay
We have one America, just not theirs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.