Posted on 05/16/2008 5:45:58 AM PDT by kellynla
Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa hailed the California Supreme Court decision today, saying he would officiate over as many same-sex weddings as possible.
The mayor stood by leaders of the gay and lesbian community today, calling the high-court's decision a victory for California.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
ping
Guess its like being a “Jack” Morman.
(He’s a Catholic?)............not any more........

Read about how a pro-communist, ultra radical "MEChista" named Tony Villar cut his hair, changed his name, put on a tie, and became the mayor of America's second largest city.
He will rot in hell for what he is going to do.
IF he officiates at such a “wedding,” he automatically excommunicates himself.
THAT’s what I meant...........
Excommunicate his butt
“L.A. Mayor Villaraigosa Says He Will Officiate at Same-Sex Weddings (He’s a Catholic?)”
Apparently not...
“he automatically excommunicates himself?”
For those of us who might not know what that means,
could you be so kind as to explain it...in layman’s terms. LOL
Thanks,
Kelly
it was better when there was a secret underground society of these people.
Whether through nature or nurture these people became what they are.
But for the good of society we risk ending up like the decline of the Roman Empire by legitimizing their activity. All things considered, the closet was a good thing.
In the Catholic church, when one violates the primary tenets of the faith, that person is no longer entitled to receive communion, and is essentially shunned unless they repent their sin and receive absolution. Absolution can only be granted by a priest.
I just vomited! :)
but in all fairness to Catholics who maybe confused, may be I missed it?... But in his recent visit, the Pope, although he spoke several times about the abuses of "Pedophiles,"... NOT ONCE uttered the word "homosexuals." And that leads me to all kinds of suspicions. I don't mind telling you that I believe the CC is probably full of homosexual priest already, STILL ACTIVE, and very probable in high ranking positions already. Could the Pope be simply giving the homos the old wink... wink?
You know how the CC screams often enough in favor of the Illegals and how unjust we are in the U.S... But have they EVER shown the same passion against the fags?... Whom by the way, is not that they want "to be left alone" anymore, but that they are ACTIVELY trying their best to indoctrinate and initiate as many kids as they can into a homosexual life... And where is the Catholic Church on these issues? Furthermore, where is the OUTRAGE of Catholics themselves on the position of the CC on this?..... Hmm????????.... The old wink.. wink? I guess..
Sure. As long as he checks the right external boxes and dies with a scapular on, he’s all-good, acc’g to Rome.
“it was better when there was a secret underground society of these people?”
It would be better if these people turned to God, picked up a Bible, read it, prayed and changed their ways.
BS!
If someone dies in a state of mortal sin they go straight to hell, according to the Church. They do not pass go, they do not go to purgatory (I know, you don't believe in it), they burn in hell for all time!
OK Sure...but these practices go back forever and if your going to have it...be quiet about it.
Sorry. ;-) Excommunication is the most serious censure the Catholic Church imposes on her members. It is based on an understanding of the concept of SIN. An excommunicated person is still a member of the Church, but he/she has lost certain key rights attached to Church membership and is cut off from many of the activities and benefits of the Church. For example, an excommunicated person may no longer receive Communion.
“Can. 1314 A penalty is for the most part ferendae sententiae, that is, not binding upon the offender until it has been imposed. It is, however, latae sententiae, so that it is incurred automatically upon the commission of an offence,...”
Hope this helps.
john and ken 640 am
have returned the mayor to his original name:
villar!
yes, mayor villar.
Three things in life are definite.
Death
Taxes
And if there is a Catholic thread posted, you will be there to bash the Catholic Church.
gezzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...get a friggin’ life, will ya. LMAO
No "wink-wink". The Pope is just using the accepted media language for the problem. Believe me, the Church is well aware of the problems of homosexual priests, and has already promulgated and implemented policies in an attempt to keep queers out of the priesthood. Where the Church went wrong is that they got hood-winked into accepting the "queers are just like us" meme that the psychologists are peddling, and, based on that idea, allowed a relaxation of the "no queers" rules--the reasoning being that as long as the priest remains true to his vows of celibacy, there wouldn't be a problem. BUT, the evidence on the ground now proves that there IS a problem, and that queers CANNOT and WILL NOT remain true to their celibacy vows. Hence the return of the more stringent screening for queer candidates for the priesthood.
"You know how the CC screams often enough in favor of the Illegals and how unjust we are in the U.S... But have they EVER shown the same passion against the fags?... Whom by the way, is not that they want "to be left alone" anymore, but that they are ACTIVELY trying their best to indoctrinate and initiate as many kids as they can into a homosexual life... And where is the Catholic Church on these issues? Furthermore, where is the OUTRAGE of Catholics themselves on the position of the CC on this?"
And here speaks your ignorance. The Church has CONSISTENTLY spoken out against the active queer lifestyle, and homosexual activity. On the same note, the Church has always taught that, as long as they do not engage in active homosexuality (i.e. remain celibate), then they can be forgiven and receive the sacraments just like anybody other sinner. And I can absolutely guarantee that we Catholics are just as outraged by the push to legitimize queer-ism as anybody else.
Mayor Villar would be the perfect running mate for Obama OR
McCain.
This is a serious request:
Find a web site
Quote the words of the scapular in full
Then a retraction and apology from you would be appropriate
When a person has committed a grave sin of that nature, technically he has excommunicated himself - that is, he has excluded himself from the communion and also from being able to go to sacramental Communion. He can come back by repenting and going to Confession. While he has technically excommunicated himself, though, much depends on having the priest refuse him Communion, because sinners like this don’t care and will go to Communion anyway. Priests are timid and reluctant to refuse, even assuming they know who the person is and what he has done, particularly if there has been no announcement from a bishop that makes it a public matter.
However, a formal excommunication is one that is announced by a Church official, such as the person’s bishop, subject to provisions of canon law. This is a public matter, and the person is usually subject to some kind of public penalty, such as publicly renouncing his actions, as well as going to Confession. These excommunications can be lifted by a bishop, but there are certain excommunications that can only be removed by Rome.
Bishops who do excommunicate people now don’t seem to do it with the formal anathemas and things that used to surround the procedure, and generally write a letter which is publicly released telling that person to refrain from going to Communion. This was done recently by Archbishop Naumann of Kansas in the case of Governor Kathleen Sibelius, after he had met with the governor and discussed her relentlessly pro-abortion policies with her - and then she went and vetoed an abortion limit approved by the large majority of the state’s legislators. So far as I know, she hasn’t challenged it or tried to go to Communion.
Hope this makes sense!
You’re that down on Rome that anyone who simply accurate states its doctrines is “bashing”?
I don’t think your problem is my problem.
Get used to same sex marriages folks. When the O’man is Prez, this will be the law of the land.
Bearing false witness is a violation of the Eighth Commandment. Shame on you.
See reply 18.
The Pope actually did mention homosexuals, and said (significantly, I thought) that this was a “separate matter” that he would deal with at a different time. This was in an address to the bishops.
The number of genuine child molesters among the clergy was actually not very high, and the greatest percentage of the cases involved men molesting teenage boys and occasionally even harrassing young adult men. Just lumping them under “pedophiles” lets them skate under the radar, and I think the Pope is trying to separate the two issues so he can deal with them appropriately.
I wonder what other subjects they see fit to blithely lie about?
Heck they may be made mandatory.
Ok granted, that I am not as brilliant and educated as some of you are and I have never pretended otherwise - just look at my 'spelling'! :)
You seem to know your stuff, again, did the Pope say anything of substance against the 'queers' IN THIS TRIP?
Because, there is a problem with people such like me who may not get it unless the CC makes their position very clear. There is no question in my mind, this last trip was a very successful PR trip for the CC and the pope. I liked the Pope before he was Pope and still do because he seems like not nonsense type of man, that is probably why I expect so much from him.
I judge by what I hear on the regular news outlets... And I simply don't hear ANYTHING...NOTHING!... on the position of the church on these issues. :)
Case in point: The 'queers' marriages in CA now legal. You would think this was a BIG DEAL for the CC... I WOULD LOVE TO HEAR THE CC Comment on this? :)... Have they? Have they said anything?... Has Rome said anything on it?
You may “think” you are an expert on Catholicism, but it's obvious, you didn't major in English in college now did you.
After you clean up the grammar in your post;
you might try documenting your claims with some references/links, oh “wiser than the rest of us.” LMAO
Well, yes, in the real Catholic world. We’re talking about Mahoneyland here.
Foolish guy.
ya know your “one trick pony” has gotten reeeeeeeeeeeel old after all these years...either back up your claims with some documentation AND links or find some other forum to “break wind.” You can pick up your Anti-Catholic Bigot Badge on your way out!
McGreevy is now an Episcopal seminarian. Imagine that.
I understand. We can only pray for Bishop Mahoney. A great Catholic saint once stated that the floor of hell is paved with the skulls of bishops (I am NOT saying this is the case for Bishop Mahoney as only God can do that). To refocus, keep in mind that Bishop Mahoney has no power over Canon Law: ‘It is, however, latae sententiae, so that it is incurred automatically upon the commission of an offence,...’
Well, I’ll tell myself it was worth a try. Once a year should do it.
But on my longer list of undeniables would be this:
Attempts at rational, fact-based dialogue with kellynla always fail, and are always regretted.
This is terribly sad for our country. I think there’s very little chance to put this genie back in the bottle. It’s just like abortion—here to stay forever now.
The movement within the Church, which takes the form of pressure groups of various names and sizes, attempts to give the impression that it represents all homosexual persons who are Catholics. As a matter of fact, its membership is by and large restricted to those who either ignore the teaching of the Church or seek somehow to undermine it. It brings together under the aegis of Catholicism homosexual persons who have no intention of abandoning their homosexual behaviour. One tactic used is to protest that any and all criticism of or reservations about homosexual people, their activity and lifestyle, are simply diverse forms of unjust discrimination.Click here for the full document.
unbelievable, but the mayor is running for
terminator’s position.
villar flunked the bar exam 4 times.
I’ve long thought of him as a p*ndejo..
Thanks.
Done. Reply 18.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.