Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saudis see no reason to raise oil production now
Yahoo ^ | May 16, 2008 | Jennifer Loven

Posted on 05/16/2008 9:14:46 AM PDT by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia - Saudi Arabian leaders made clear Friday they see no reason to increase oil production until their customers demand it, apparently rebuffing President Bush amid soaring U.S. gasoline prices.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; bushvisit; demobstructionist; energy; middleeast; oil; saudi; saudiarabia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last
It must be humiliating for President Bush, a Texas oil man from an oil family, to have to travel to the middle-east, the world's cradle of hatred, bigotry, sexism, violations of human rights, anti-semitism, homophobia, xenophobia, and almost all other forms of evil and depravity (this side of San Francisco)....to have to go there, hat in hand, leader of the free world, leader of the world's largest economic and military power, and beg for an increase in oil production.

What the hell is wrong is George Bush? While we are at it, what the hell is wrong with Liberals, Environmental Whackos, and frankly much of mainstream America?

We have countless oil reserves off shore from the West Coast, off shore from the Gulf states, in Alaska, and throughout the continential United States. We must look like completely self-destructive, hypocritical, foolish, morons to the rest of the oil producing world.

Our working class, and over-extended middle class, are now fighting $100-$125 gasoline fill-ups. A huge chunk of the money we pay for crude oil, and petroleum products, goes right into the hands of our enemies, and so-called allies (who hate our guts and hope we and Israel die).

We waste billions, and billions, and billions of dollars fighting a war on poverty (that will never be won), a war on (some) drugs (that will never be won), a war of (some) terror (that will never be won so long as morons refuse to seal our borders) - yet we won't spend a penny to help ourselves with the oil crisis?

I grew up in the oil fields. Almost every man in my family worked in the California (and Oklahoma, and Texas) fields at some point. I worked in an oil productio supply warehouse starting at 10 years old. BEfore that, I would ride in the fields with my grandpa and dad as they drilled and produced oil.

This is what needs to be done:

1 - We need to build 3 massive refineries. One in the Gulf, Two on the West Coast. We haven't built a refinery in decades, and the ones we have are above maximum capacity.

2 - We need to lift almost all regulations and taxes on oil exploration, oil drilling, oil pumping, oil shipping, oil refining.

3 - We need to make sure that all of those oil related companies, above a certain $ level, are publicly traded and thus can be invested in by each and every american.

4 - We need to open drilling. Gloves Off. Drill offshore (each of our shores). Drill Alaska. Drill on land. And drill with international partners.

5 - We need to use the massive burst to our economy to partially invest in solar, wind, nuclear, other-atomic, and other forms of cheaper, cleaner, renewable energy, as well as technology to CHEAPLY increase fuel efficiency.

6 - we need to make Iraq pay for its own liberation by taking enough oil from them, or buying at cost, until we have been repaid each and every damn dollar we spent on the war to liberate them. And, we need to take enough more to pay the families of each and every dead soldier one million dollars.

When it has reached the point that we are begging terrorists to please pump more oil, the madness has got to stop.


1 posted on 05/16/2008 9:14:47 AM PDT by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

Awesome post!


2 posted on 05/16/2008 9:18:07 AM PDT by Longtooths
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

yes all you say is true

We also need to also hold back all military and other aid to Saudi Arabia.


3 posted on 05/16/2008 9:18:48 AM PDT by Vaquero (" an armed society is a polite society" Heinlein "MOLON LABE!" Leonidas of Sparta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

Our Nation sure has stooped pretty low hasn’t it? Disgraceful, I say.


4 posted on 05/16/2008 9:19:37 AM PDT by MrLee (Sha'alu Shalom Yerushalyim!! God bless Eretz Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Longtooths

This is all for show. Bush and virtually every POS politician could care less.


5 posted on 05/16/2008 9:19:47 AM PDT by gathersnomoss (General George Patton had it right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh; admin

Why don’t you use the actual title of the article instead of dogging the President.


7 posted on 05/16/2008 9:21:47 AM PDT by aft_lizard (born conservative...I chose to be a republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

Our biggest problem, supply wise, is with Mexico. They nationalized the oil production system and don’t know how to expand or maintain it. They used to be our number 1 (possibly only 2) supplier and now are down to at least number 3 or lower.

Mostly we have refining problems as you mentioned.


8 posted on 05/16/2008 9:21:53 AM PDT by Ingtar (Haley Barbour 2012, Because he has experience in Disaster Recovery. - ejonesie22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Longtooths
Thanks. I have had it. Of all the people in the world who would engage in this kind of humiliating, backwards assed, self-destructive, pandering to terrosists, it makes me sick to the pit of my gut that George Bush won't put his foot down.

Since when did compassionate conservatism come to mean self-destructive spineless energy policies?

We bitch and whine about how the working and lower middle-class are disappearing. Think about this

In 1980-1985, an uneducated, hard-working young man could get a job in the oil fields, making $20.00 per hour or more, working drilling rigs and production. In today's dollars, thats got to be at least $60 per hour. Today, if you can even find an oil field job, you're lucky to find one paying more than $12-$15 an hour to start, and topping out in the $20's.

Who is the jackass that thinks that's good for our country? Our economy? Our family structure?

We give those jobs away, to terrorists, meanwhile we leave the working class to wither and die on the vine.

Then, you take a moron like Obama, who panders to the poor (while making fun of them in his rich gay elitist inner circles in San Francisco) - by empathizing about jobs shipped overseas. His solution? TAX THE COMPANIES. Hey moron, how about this solution - KEEP THE JOBS HERE.
9 posted on 05/16/2008 9:23:18 AM PDT by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

To prevent duplication, please do not alter the title. Thanks.


10 posted on 05/16/2008 9:23:57 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
"Saudi Arabian leaders made clear Friday they see no reason to increase oil production.."

Maybe we should give them a reason. Like getting enough money together to rebuild Mecca.

11 posted on 05/16/2008 9:24:32 AM PDT by Jaxter ("Vivit Post Funera Virtus")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L98Fiero

First, your name calling is completely uncalled for. Second, if you’re gonna talk like a big boy, at least have the decency to support your position. How about you explain yourself? I would be interested to see how you think there’s nothing wrong with begging overseas nations for oil, while our reserves go unused and our economy tanks.


12 posted on 05/16/2008 9:24:45 AM PDT by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

What a load. Want to buy a refinery? 220,000 barrels per day. Good market for jet fuel.


13 posted on 05/16/2008 9:25:45 AM PDT by RightWhale (You are reading this now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

I agree with the aforementioned proposals, but lets go a step further. Based upon any relevant evidence, Saudi Arabia should be added to the list of nations that are considered to aid terrorists and their cause. This would effectively end foreign aid to them and cause them to reevaluate their position.


14 posted on 05/16/2008 9:25:45 AM PDT by Historix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aft_lizard
Because the title I had is better. Frankly, it is humiliating and shameful for Bush to be there in the first place.

Think of this perspective for a minute. The entire Arab world knows that (a) we have massive untapped reserves of our own (b) our economy centers around petroleum products (c) we voluntarily choose not to use our own oil based on the simple reason that a bunch of panty-waist liberals and treehuggers feel bad about oil (d) our economy is tanking (e) our working class high-earning jobs are disappearing and (f) we have to go to terrorists and beg for oil.

We are the laughing stock of the arab world, and its our own fault.
15 posted on 05/16/2008 9:28:03 AM PDT by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gathersnomoss
This is all for show. Bush and virtually every POS politician could care less.

You are correct my friend. Our elected politicians and family, many of whom are stock holders in oil companies, love the big dividend checks, love the increased value of the stock, love the extra tax revenue (no conflict in owning stock in an industry they regulate, nah)....As well, the oil companies are very happy not to drill more, build more refineries...why not, profits keep going up...The Saudis and the rest of the oil producers laugh all the way to the bank as they live the high life....Hey, who cares if the little guy is screwed at the pump...Our elected officials and their families are happy and the oil companies and their stock holders are happy, the Saudis and their friends are happy...whats not to like?

16 posted on 05/16/2008 9:29:23 AM PDT by never4get (We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
"1 - We need to build 3 massive refineries. One in the Gulf, Two on the West Coast. We haven't built a refinery in decades, and the ones we have are above maximum capacity."

IMHO - This will only increase our reliance on oil we do not control. Instead, I would suggest that we need to construct electrical generation plants, coal, hydro, whatever; even nuclear (though they take 10 years to build). And, we "immediately" undertake a national effort of "land a man on the moon" scale or greater, to maximize the use of the electric "plug in" vehicles (pure electric or hybrid) which are very close to being introduced.

Electrical power can come from many different sources (even "green" people can be satisfied), and, since most vehicles would be charged at night, we have adequate infrastructure to begin.

REMEMBER RIYADH!

17 posted on 05/16/2008 9:30:39 AM PDT by LZ_Bayonet (There's Always Something.............And there's always something worse!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
It must be humiliating for President Bush...to have to go there...and beg for an increase in oil production.

I object to the use of the word begging and the lefties would be screaming if he didn't try to do something about gas prices. Jeez.

18 posted on 05/16/2008 9:32:11 AM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

Why should they? It’s in their best interest to make a buck off our stupidity.

They are probably thinking about all the help we did not give them back in the 90s when the price of oil was $14 a barrel. It’s pure business, nothing more. You’ve got to look out for number one. Unfortunately, our politicians have not done that.


19 posted on 05/16/2008 9:32:52 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

“What the hell is wrong is George Bush?”

He’s just responding to political pressure directed upon him by the media. It’s not so much Bush who is the blame for this fiasco as it is the media.

In fact, I would say that the media is pretty much to blame for all of the problems this nation faces.


20 posted on 05/16/2008 9:35:11 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
This situation is shades of Dubya’s father traveling over to the Japanese “hat in hand” at what was to be the end of his presidency also.

We are a nation bent on committing economic suicide and until people wake the hell up and demand we find our own energy any way we can, it will only get worse. We simply must STOP relying on other countries for our energy security. They simply do not and never will give a damn about us. It's time we act in our own interest in this area.

21 posted on 05/16/2008 9:35:25 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (Been here before)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

Well technically I think they have *NO* spare capacity. They’re probably pumping as much as they can, and, as bad as it sounds, it’s easier and better to say ‘we won’t’ as opposed to ‘we can’t’.

That said, I agree with all the points regarding increasing domestic production.


22 posted on 05/16/2008 9:37:23 AM PDT by farlander (Try not to wear milk bone underwear - it's a dog eat dog financial world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LZ_Bayonet
When I talk about building refineries, what I'm saying is that

1) We need more, because we are at maximum, and whever one goes down for mechanical reasons or storms or etc, it causes a huge crisis.
2) We need more to refine the oil we should be pumping from our own reserves.
3) We need to difuse the refineries, as they are targets, and they are huge job sources. Building then, then operating them, will boost our economy.
23 posted on 05/16/2008 9:38:34 AM PDT by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
I don't buy the "George Bush is responding to media pressure" argument.

When it came to the war in Iraq, Bush has the courage and leadership to do what he thought and knew was right. Bravo. And the media, and left wingers, and even middle of the roaders, are all whining about it, but he ignores it all and keeps going.

I don't belive for a minute that a Guy who will start, stay in, and plan for a war, despite crushing popular opnion against it, would turn around and beg for oil from terrorists just because the same people are whining about gas prices.
24 posted on 05/16/2008 9:40:43 AM PDT by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: farlander
Actually, there is literally no capacity left. Refineries on US Soil are at 100% capacity. Due to whining liberals, whining environmentalists, prohibitive regulations and building-enviro restrictions and all the huge business interests making so much money off artifically high prices, we have not built a refinery here in decades.

All the foreign crude gets shipped here in tankers, dumped at the refineries, and they are producing as much as is physically possible.

What we are NOT utilizing is our massive untapped resources of crude oil. The moritorium of all off-shore oil drilling (thank you liberals, treehuggers, and feel-gooders who dont like to see rigs), the refusal to drill in Alaska, the massive prohibiting resrictions, regulations and costs which has led to the near cessation of drilling on-land...we do not HAVE to rely on foreign oil, we choose to do so.
25 posted on 05/16/2008 9:44:24 AM PDT by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
Most of us agree as to our needs. However, no one can offer a methodology for overcoming the impediments to a successful execution of any plan.
26 posted on 05/16/2008 9:46:00 AM PDT by verity ("Lord, what fools these mortals be!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: never4get
Thank you for elaborating with a dead on point. I now work from home when possible, and the cars, yes 3, sit when possible.

Trends that I have noticed. Slower driving, less outdoor lighting being used at night, carpooling is in vogue.

Also, people are ticked off, well at least I am. The middle class has just been lowered a notch or two, thanks to income redistribution.

Socialism will fail in the US, but the experiment must go on for the good of the whole.

27 posted on 05/16/2008 9:52:53 AM PDT by gathersnomoss (General George Patton had it right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
"Saudi officials stuck to their position that they are already meeting demand,"

"Supply & Demand" - Shouldn't this Saudi statement drive oil prices down? I understand the effect a rising Euro has on the price, but from what I've been reading about speculators involvement, this is just a bubble waiting to POP!

Speculators: 1. ROI on oil speculation better than stocks.
2. China and India demand (But there is NO Shortage!)

The White House knew what Saudi Arabia was going to say before he went there. Maybe what Bush is trying to do is make a big media deal out of what the Saudi's have been saying all along, thus lessening speculation and lowering the price.

28 posted on 05/16/2008 9:54:05 AM PDT by LZ_Bayonet (There's Always Something.............And there's always something worse!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Pretty good job of summing things up there Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh,
Good job


29 posted on 05/16/2008 10:00:04 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (An enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

“Saudi Arabian leaders made clear Friday they see no reason to increase oil production until their customers demand it, apparently rebuffing President Bush amid soaring U.S. gasoline prices.”

I thought we ARE a customer and our president asked for it. Should he have demanded it?


30 posted on 05/16/2008 10:15:10 AM PDT by weegee (Vote NO on Marxism in 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gathersnomoss

I gave up on unessential driving (especially at night) because of the highway robbery trend in my community. 4 or 5 police cars will sit and wait in their speedtrap to write waves of tickets every couple of minutes. I guess the extra car is there in case they accidently get someone with outstanding warrants.

A single traffic stop can include numerous offenses (including the speeding ticket at a base rate of 1-5 miles over the limit).

I’d rather not fund more billionaire playgrounds (sport stadiums and coke/X dealing nightclubs).


31 posted on 05/16/2008 10:21:26 AM PDT by weegee (Vote NO on Marxism in 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: LZ_Bayonet
IMHO - This will only increase our reliance on oil we do not control. Instead, I would suggest that we need to construct electrical generation plants, coal, hydro, whatever; even nuclear (though they take 10 years to build). And, we "immediately" undertake a national effort of "land a man on the moon" scale or greater, to maximize the use of the electric "plug in" vehicles (pure electric or hybrid) which are very close to being introduced.

We need to set a national goal of doubling our electric generating capacity, and to have 80% of our electricity be generated by nuclear. We should take a good look at the "pebble bed" reactor, which is a modular design which allows for a 2 to 3 year construction period. Due to modular design, you can add more capacity to an existing reactor site by adding more modules.

And it would have an effect on prices NOW, as the Saudis realize that, once the new reactors come online to power electric cars, they will have a greatly restricted market for their oil

32 posted on 05/16/2008 10:21:54 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." — George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

Nothing short of a National Catastrophe that brings out martial law and some sort of executive order(backed up by armed forces) ala the Chertoff-border fence decision will open these areas up to exploration and drilling. They will not stop, they will not stop.


33 posted on 05/16/2008 10:25:16 AM PDT by steel_resolve (We are living in the post-rational world where being a moron is an asset)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

I am so sick of the excuse makers on FR with the blah blah blah refinery crap.

What does refinery output have to do with the price of crude oil per barrel?


34 posted on 05/16/2008 10:27:14 AM PDT by Southerngl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

I agree ,no oil,no defense.


35 posted on 05/16/2008 10:30:13 AM PDT by linn37 (phlebotomist on duty,its just a little pinch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: weegee

What Saudi Arabia MEANT was, China and India are willing to pay this price and until they aren’t, we will continue to pump what we are pumping and get alllll this money and to hell with you America.


36 posted on 05/16/2008 10:32:27 AM PDT by Southerngl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: LZ_Bayonet

Only one third of our oil is used for transportation...the rest for heating, manufacturing, etc.

We shouldn’t be using oil to generate heat! All those Northeast liberals still burning heating oil should get a clue.


37 posted on 05/16/2008 10:39:59 AM PDT by rightinthemiddle (The Mainstream Media Controls Our Party. Go, RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

Here is my post from a similar thread:

Why should Saudia Arabia increase oil production? We have plenty of our own oil in Alaska, off the east and left coast, and in the Gulf of Mexico, but we lack the vision and leadership to effectively manage and use our own natural resources.

Since the first oil embargo in 1973, and despite the fact that Republicans controlled the White House for 23 years since then, including 12 years when we also controlled both houses of Congress, we still do not have an meaningful, comprehensive energy policy. Every Republican president begining with Mr. Reagan should have been hammering this issue day in and day out. He should have been using the power of the bully pulpit and the veto pen to shame and punish both Republicans and Democrats alike for failing to advance the policy. He should have been using executive orders to advance the policy. He should have been tying Federal revenue sharing, from highway and transportation funds to agricultural subsidies, to a State’s willingness to advance the energy policy. If the losers in France and in the other Euroweenie countries can safely convert 80% or more of their electric grid to nuclear power, than we should have able to do it also.

If you want the price of oil to go down, then show the world that we as a Country are very serious about putting an end to OPEC by doing everything that we can to become energy self-sufficent, including (a) the construction of dozens of nuclear power plants, windmills, and solar panels; (b) the aggressive exploration for oil and natural gas within our own borders and waters; (c) the construction of state of the art oil refineries in all regions of the country; (d) the education of our citizens about the importance of energy conservation; (e) the reallocation of foreign aid from subsidizing the OPEC countries to subsidizing our own domestic energy research, exploration and production; and (f) the prosecution of OPEC interests within the jursidiction of our Federal courts for anti-trust violations.

Saudia Arabia is not to blame - WE ARE!


38 posted on 05/16/2008 10:41:56 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Longtooths; All
We're not learning from our mistakes concerning our dependence on foreign oil.

I'm keeping an eye on developments in biofuel production.

First, the bad news about ethanol. Ethanol fires are evidently harder to control than gasoline fires.

Ethanol fires hard to control 1
Ethanol fires hard to control 2
Hopefully, ways will be developed to make controlling ethanol fires easier.

On the brighter side concerning ethanol, there's now evidence that people might get as much, or more, bang per buck for their gas dollars with gas / ethanol mixtures.

Gas-competitive gas / ethanol mixtures
Also, I was surprised by the introduction of a machine (popularly known as a still) for making home-made ethanol.
EFuel100
In stark contrast to the 1700 gallons of water required to make one gallon of corn-based ethanol as indicated by the OP, the EFuel100 uses only 170 gallons of water to produce 35 gallons of ethanol In other words, the EFuel100 uses less than 1% as much water as corn ethanol, under five gallons, to produce one gallon of ethanol (corrections welcome).

But watch out for fines for violating biofuel regulations.

Fines for violating biofuel regulations
Also, progress is being made in the development of other non-corn ethanol production technologies as well.
Non-corn ethanol
Finally, I've also been hearing good things about biodiesel production but need to find some links.
39 posted on 05/16/2008 10:43:07 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: weegee
"I thought we ARE a customer and our president asked for it. Should he have demanded it?"

They are already meeting demand. The only thing they could do is over-produce and end speculation by using oil tankers as holding tanks. Do the speculators, who are responsible for most of the price increase, really need to see "anchored tankers" to understand that there is no shortage of oil for shipment.

DO YOU REALLY THINK BUSH HAD TO GO TO SAUDI ARABIA TO GET THIS ANSWER FROM SAUDI ARABIA? DO YOU THINK HE WOULD SET HIMSELF UP FOR THIS RESPONSE? IMHO-Bush knew what was going to happen before he left the White House, and the MSM and the Dems are in the process of "misunderestimating" Bush again. The scenario: The speculators finally say, "If there is plenty of supply, why would I want to be the last idiot to buy high, from someone who speculated that demand could not be met? If there is no supply problem, the price could fall at any minute!" We'll see.

40 posted on 05/16/2008 10:43:47 AM PDT by LZ_Bayonet (There's Always Something.............And there's always something worse!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: LZ_Bayonet
And, we "immediately" undertake a national effort of "land a man on the moon" scale or greater, to maximize the use of the electric "plug in" vehicles (pure electric or hybrid) which are very close to being introduced.

Battery technology is the real key. Electric motors are already amazingly efficient and give instant torque. Regenerative breaking recharges the batteries and makes the breaks last incredibly long. Advance materials allow the cars to be lighter without sacrificing safety. Everything about extremely efficient, long-lasting electric cars has already been invented and manufactured, except for batteries that give the cars an acceptable range. I hope that Silicon Nanotube batteries take off. The government could give tax breaks and fast-track regulatory hurdles to get the factories started to building them.

Current Li-ion batteries are 600 joules per gram, while gasoline is 47,000 joules per gram. The new silicon nanowire anodes give this a 10x boost to 6,000 joules per gram, but they feed into different technologies. Internal combustion engines are about 20% efficient, while electric motors are 90% efficient. So battery technology only needs to reach 9,400 joules per gram to get the same overall power density. The new tech brings us only 36% from the capability of gasoline, with far less maintenance and much better flexibility.

41 posted on 05/16/2008 10:52:02 AM PDT by dan1123 (If you want to find a person's true religion, ask them what makes them a "good person".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: gathersnomoss

For years, I marveled that pretty much every light on every floor of my office building stayed on until 11:00 p.m. or midnight, when the security guy usually came around and turned off most of the lights. Most people are gone by 7 or 8 p.m. if not sooner. About two years ago, I noticed that most of the lights started being turned off by the cleaning people between 6 and 7 p.m. I don’t know how much money or energy is actually saved, but it is better than wasting either to fully light empty floors.


42 posted on 05/16/2008 11:26:14 AM PDT by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Southerngl
What does refinery output have to do with the price of crude oil per barrel?

Not much, but then what you pay at the pump has a lot less to do with the price the Saudis receive per barrel either. The speculators on the gasoline and oil markets drive the price even more. There is actually more oil being sold than can be refined, even with China bringing up new refineries at an incredible rate. Short supplies of refined products and the speculators drive much of the price.

43 posted on 05/16/2008 11:32:26 AM PDT by Ingtar (Haley Barbour 2012, Because he has experience in Disaster Recovery. - ejonesie22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos

“What a Great Post” BUMP!


44 posted on 05/16/2008 12:14:35 PM PDT by Pagey (Horrible Hillary Clinton is Bad For America, Bad For Business and Bad For MY Stomach!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Southerngl

Obviously the people of China and India don’t think that prices are too high.


45 posted on 05/16/2008 12:15:42 PM PDT by weegee (Vote NO on Marxism in 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
This has been floating around on the net. Your "investment" in the Saudi oil paid for this diamond studded Mercedes; Image and video hosting by TinyPic At some point we are going to have to tell the EnviroNuts to sit down and STFU. Drill NOW!
46 posted on 05/16/2008 12:18:42 PM PDT by WeldonsRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WeldonsRight

Well, we might start by asking the Congresscritters why they just voted down drilling in ANWR and the coasts off the shores! Call and write the CONGRESS who just dumped the opportunity to drill in the USA AGAIN!!!! Oh, and many Repubs joined them...........


47 posted on 05/16/2008 12:41:37 PM PDT by nuclady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

I would add one thing: When the enviro whackos take things to court, deny their filings/motions/crap based on national security.


48 posted on 05/16/2008 12:55:45 PM PDT by 5Madman2 (There is no such thing as an experienced suicide bomber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

The Saudis don’t need to raise production, we need to freakin’ DRILL IN ANWR and ease the foreign oil addiction.

But of course the Dems won’t let us....


49 posted on 05/16/2008 3:15:56 PM PDT by G8 Diplomat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gathersnomoss
This is all for show. Bush and virtually every POS politician could care less.

LOL! Why should they? We buy their gas. Blackbird.

50 posted on 05/17/2008 7:02:40 AM PDT by BlackbirdSST (No Vote, No money for liberals no matter their stripes!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson