Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush in Saudi Arabia for Nuclear Deal
ISRAPUNDIT ^ | May 15/08 | Ted Belman

Posted on 05/16/2008 12:19:06 PM PDT by tedbel

U.S. President George Bush is in Saudi Arabia for talks with King Abdullah marking the 75th anniversary of diplomatic relations between Washington and Riyadh. VOA White House Correspondent Scott Stearns reports, the two leaders are expected to reach agreement on civilian nuclear technology.

They will discuss a deal to help the kingdom develop civilian nuclear power for medical and industrial uses as well as generating electricity. The agreement provides access to safe, reliable fuel sources for nuclear reactors and demonstrates what the Bush Administration calls Saudi leadership as a non-proliferation model for the region.

[I certainly hope McCain disowns this policy. It seems to me that it totally undermines Bush's stand on Iran's nuclear development. Nowhere did Bush demand the Saudi Arabia stop financing the spread of Wahhabism or make peace with Israel.] The agreement expands cooperation to better safeguard the kingdom's vast oil reserves and its pipeline distribution system, as well as borders.

As part of the deal, Saudi Arabia joins a global initiative to combat nuclear terrorism to enhance the protection of nuclear systems and improve its ability to detect and confiscate illegally held nuclear material.

The kingdom also joins an international alliance to combat the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related materials, including delivery systems.

President Bush says he will ask King Abdullah to boost Saudi oil production to drive down record energy prices. A similar request in January was denied as Saudi output has held steady at just over 8.5 million barrels a day.

Relations between Washington and Riyadh are strained by the war in Iraq. Unlike the first Gulf War when Saudi Arabia boosted oil production and helped pay for the liberation of Kuwait, the kingdom opposed America's 2003 invasion to topple Saddam Hussein.

(Excerpt) Read more at israpundit.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; bushvisit; israel; middleeast; nuclear; presidentbush; saudiarabia

1 posted on 05/16/2008 12:19:06 PM PDT by tedbel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tedbel

Nuclear power for increase in oil production at agreed level for next 50yrs. Otherwise, why would we do this?


2 posted on 05/16/2008 12:21:16 PM PDT by sappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tedbel

Yes, let’s give the Wahhabis nuclear technology...good thinking.


3 posted on 05/16/2008 12:21:32 PM PDT by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tedbel

We need to work on our own nuclear technology so we can stop buying oil from the OPEC monopoly. The Saudis just told us to get bent. Why are we aiding them again?


4 posted on 05/16/2008 12:21:43 PM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tedbel

Lucky Israel.


5 posted on 05/16/2008 12:24:17 PM PDT by stuartcr (Election year.....Who we gonna hate, in '08?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tedbel

Why does a country with basically unlimited oil and limited infrastructure and no manufacturing industry to speak of need nuclear power?


6 posted on 05/16/2008 12:25:16 PM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative

Because the Saudi will acquire the technology. Better we work with them.


7 posted on 05/16/2008 12:28:45 PM PDT by stravinskyrules (Why is it that whenever I hear a piece of music I don't like, it's always by Villa-Lobos?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative

Excellent Question!

There’s absolutely no need (as I see it) for the Saudis to need a nuclear reactor. That’s just asking for trouble to give them one.

I’m sure the Israelis are less than impressed to hear this.


8 posted on 05/16/2008 12:30:29 PM PDT by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: stravinskyrules

That has worked so well up until now right. They screw us every chance they get and laugh when our President comes begging.


9 posted on 05/16/2008 12:30:42 PM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tedbel

We’re nuts.


10 posted on 05/16/2008 12:36:45 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
We’re nuts.

No. You've now entered The Twilight Zone.

11 posted on 05/16/2008 12:38:05 PM PDT by E. Cartman (Screw MacCain and the elephant he rode in on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative
To sell more oil, which is how they intend to pay for the GOOD nuke plant that won't produce plutonium. The Saudis can purchase nuclear technology from the russians or chicoms any time they wish. This is actually a very good thing. Oh and BTW even the Saudis will eventually run out of oil.
12 posted on 05/16/2008 12:40:42 PM PDT by Camel Joe (liberal=socialist=royalist/imperialist pawn=enemy of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tedbel
President Bush says he will ask King Abdullah to boost Saudi oil production to drive down record energy prices. A similar request in January was denied as Saudi output has held steady at just over 8.5 million barrels a day.



Saudis see no reason to raise oil production now Yahoo ^ | May 16, 2008 | Jennifer Loven

Posted on Friday, May 16, 2008 11:14:46 AM by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia - Saudi Arabian leaders made clear Friday they see no reason to increase oil production until their customers demand it, apparently rebuffing President Bush amid soaring U.S. gasoline prices.

13 posted on 05/16/2008 12:41:00 PM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tedbel
Heck, if Saudi would increase production of oil by 1 million barrels a day the US shouldn't make them process Uranium, we should give them already preprocessed weapons grade Uranium to act as a counterbalance to Iran.
14 posted on 05/16/2008 12:45:22 PM PDT by tobyhill (The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080516/ap_on_re_mi_ea/bush_mideast


15 posted on 05/16/2008 12:51:15 PM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tedbel

“The agreement provides access to safe, reliable fuel sources for nuclear reactors . . . “
and presumably for the security, e.g. cyclone fencing, etc. to guard them.

Gee, we offer to help build nuclear reactors overseas—for people screwing us everyday—and throw tax dollars at walls and fences for our ally, Iraq, and even neighbors like (oil producer) Mexico, for their border with Guatemala & Belize to fight the Global War on Drugs . . . but nuclear power and walls/fences—other than the ones surrounding the White House and gated communities—just aren’t feasible in this country, the USA, where the atom was first `split’/currently under siege by foreign invaders, or so they say.
I just don’t understand this strategery: It all must be part of the Global War on Terror.
Never mind.


16 posted on 05/16/2008 12:52:20 PM PDT by tumblindice (Go watch The Simpsons. It's a documentary on Fox. Your masters know what's best for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLI
RIYADH, Saudi Arabia - Saudi Arabian leaders made clear Friday they see no reason to increase oil production until their customers demand it, apparently rebuffing President Bush amid soaring U.S. gasoline prices.

Why should they, the Senate just voted to prevent our domestic exploration.
The Saudis have no competition.

In the past, every time we started to up domestic production, the Saudis dropped the price, making domestic exploration unprofitable .
I'll bet if we announced we were going to drill in ANWR and off the Coasts, Saudi would drop the price substantially.
But Congress is too stupid, or worse, to do that.

17 posted on 05/16/2008 1:03:22 PM PDT by Vinnie (You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Jihads You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Camel Joe
To sell more oil, which is how they intend to pay for the GOOD nuke plant that won't produce plutonium. The Saudis can purchase nuclear technology from the russians or chicoms any time they wish. This is actually a very good thing. Oh and BTW even the Saudis will eventually run out of oil.

The Saudis have almost as little fresh water as the have lots of oil. Most of their fresh water comes from desalination plants, which are very energy intensive to run. Nukes would apparently be a cheaper, more efficient way to run desalination plants than oil and natural gas, which they can sell for more than the nuclear power will cost. They can also get electricity from nukes used for desalination.

18 posted on 05/16/2008 1:08:55 PM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson