Skip to comments.Did the California Supreme Court make the correct decision on Homosexual Marriage?
Posted on 05/18/2008 2:03:06 PM PDT by TheEaglehasLanded
The poll is in the middle of the left hand column in the story that it was a tough decision for Ron George.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
It never was their “decision” to make - it belongs to the voters.
Do you people remember when Rose Bird and 2 or 3 other CA. supreme court judges were recalled some 30 years ago? I would suggest we do the same with the current SC members that voted to allow gay marriage.
And, the voters said no!
I guess, they didn't like the outcome. Thus, the legislating from the bench.
Looks like my opinion is about as valid as the opinion of the majority of CA voters.
Did the California Supreme Court make the correct decision?
35288 total responses
Good Idea, maybe recalling Gov Arrrrnoolld would be another good move. He is trying to rebrand the party into the Austrian Socialist party and MCLAME is going to be there to eat it up.
Maybe a FREEPER protest of their meeting is in order.
GOOD BYE AMERICA.......WE HARDLY KNEW YE!
75.7 percent said yes. That state is hopeless.
He thus equated homo marriage with the rest of our God given rights.
Never again pal. Adios.
Liberals justify every decision by saying it was either ‘difficult’ or ‘complex’.
Regardless of how one feels about homosexual “marriage” this was legislating from the bench, in direct violation of the will of the people of California. Typical of liberals when they don’t get their way.
This poll needs FReeping.
Would a (FReep this poll) tag in the headline be appropriate?
The poll was in the LA Times. I’m surprised it wasn’t 100% (even more surprised that there was 35K votes).
And .. it’s exactly why the Clintons PACKED THE COURTS for the 8 years they were in office.
And .. it’s exactly why the DEMOCRATS have refused to even vote on Bush’s nominee’s.
I don’t remember how many openings there are - but a sizeable amount of judgeships remain open because the DEMOCRATS will not allow Bush to fill them.
The DEMOCRATS KNOW their ideas cannot pass the voters - so they make phoney cases and bring them to their DEMOCRAT JUDGES - and they get what they want while poking the voters in the eye.
If people don’t believe that .. they should read Mark Levin’s book, “Men in Black” .. it will make you furious.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.
Romans 1:25-27 tells us that same-sex sexual relationships are a consequence of idolatry. In other words, such relationships are a consequence of disobeying the 1ST COMMANDMENT, a major aspect of the GREATEST COMMANDMENT, to love the jealous God with all your being.
Homosexuals need to keep in mind, however, that the good news of the gospel is not about how God despises same-sex sexual relationships. In fact, 1 Corinthians 6:9-11 indicates that certain members of that church had been slaves to such relationships but had been cleansed in Jesus' name. So these former homosexuals had evidently repented and accepted God's grace to straighten their lives out.
Yep. I remember.
Correction: Not that “Byrd” but former Judge Rose Bird.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.