Posted on 05/21/2008 8:21:21 AM PDT by SJackson
High volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel, WOT
..................
This nation will remain divided.
There's no way many Americans want to link up with these socialist (communist) America-hating traitors!
Nobama never read shakespeare then. Methinks he protesteth too much.
As Mark Steyn wrote earlier this week....”It says something for Democrat touchiness that the minute a guy makes a generalized observation about folks who appease terrorists and dictators the Dems assume: Hey, theyre talking about me.”
Ladies and gentlemen, the "H-Word" has now entered the areana. It is now open season for any Rupublican with the brass to bring it up.
This raises the question: Is there any way to break out the support that is given to John McCain (as the probable most likely intellectual heir to the George W. Bush doctrine), to Herself, still the Cold and Joyless, and to Barack, the Magic Negro, among first the religious and practicing Jews, and to the rather larger number of ethnic but non-practicing Jews?
This would be telling in two ways, first in the dedication that American Jews have for Israel, and more importantly, whether self-interest is a compelling motivation among various segments of this population.
This by itself would not change the outcome of the looming Presidential race, but it would be a good indicator to watch in future political moves.
Obama whines more than McCain did when McCain was a POW. And Obama is either narcissistic or a solipsist who cannot think that Bush had to be talking about him. After all, Bush’s speech about Israel’s 60th anniversary wasn’t about Israel’s history, or the history of the Jews and the West’s failure in the 20th Century, it was all about Obama.
“Obama Takes It Personally”
If the shoe fits, wear it.
Note that I can think of, in fact I’d be highly skeptical of the results of most polls in that area. Most just don’t get a large enough sample
I was disappointed more of Bush’s speech wasn’t highlighted in the press. I had to seek out an online video to hear more than the single line that seemed to capture all the headlines. Although I cheered when he slapped down the appeasers among us, there was so much more to the speech. As a Christian and supporter of Israel, I was deeply touched. My feelings were bittersweet when Bush said this at the end:
“And you have built a mighty democracy that will endure forever and can always count on the United States of America to be at your side. God bless.”
I hope Israel can continue to count on the U.S. after the next election. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out Obama’s true feelings about Israel.
“Obama takes it personally....”
If this socialist gets elected there’s going to be a hell of a lot more he’s going to get to take personally!
mark
I would be interested to know if the Jewish Press is generally a “mainstream” Jewish publication, or are these writers already right-wing Jews to begin with....
Bush’s speech came after a BHO adviser said ‘Jeruselum must be on the table.’
Obama Advisor: Put Jerusalem on Negotiating Table
In the course of Obama’s winding interview with Jeffrey Goldberg yesterday, there was very little discussion of the substantive issues that impede a comprehensive settlement between the Israelis and Palestinians. Obama briefly touched on Israeli settlements, which “at this juncture are not helpful” he said, but made no mention of the security fence, or right of return, or the final status of Jerusalem. What are his positions on these issues? Another Obama advisor speaks out:
Daniel Kurtzer, former ambassador to Israel and advisor of U.S. presidential hopeful Barack Obama, said Tuesday that Jerusalem must be included in peace talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority.
“It will be impossible to make progress on serious peace talks without putting the future of Jerusalem on the table,” Kurtzer said in a conference organized by the Jewish People Policy Planning Institute (JPPPI).
Kurtzer, who has been appointed Obama’s advisor for the Middle East, said that future governments will have to deal with the issue of Jerusalem, as opposed to the current Israeli administration which is not.
JPPPI head and Winograd war panel member Yechezkel Dror said that Jerusalem must become the cultural center of the Jewish people.
Kurtzer said in response that “before we do that, we must first accept a number of facts and the political reality of Arabs who live in East Jerusalem who do not feel part of the city.”
Jerusalem, by Israeli law, is the undivided capital of Israel, and there’s no reason to believe the next government will be any more willing to deal on this point than the last. The J Street contingent will be thrilled to hear that Obama’s advisors have plans to force that government into making painful concessions regardless, but it’s unclear whether Obama shares these views. Would an Obama administration redraw the map of Jerusalem on its own? What if that was the only way to heal the “constant sore” that “infects all of our foreign policy”?
Posted by Michael Goldfarb on May 13, 2008 12:09 PM | Permalink
I’m surprised that the link between Poland and Jerusalum and Chamberlain and Obama isn’t more clear!
Obama also told David Brooks
There are rarely purely ideological movements out there.
So what really drives these maniacs, Senator Obama?
This guy doesn’t get it!
I’d call it mainstream, but it’s geared toward the right.
Obama is a trained organizer, trained in the Saul Alinsky style. Personalizing an issue is part of the technique.
And which legitimate claims would those be? That we are Christians and Jews therefore we most be killed?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.