Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GM says Strikes at its plants, American Axle will cost it $2B pretax in 2Q and curb production
AP ^ | May 23, 2008 | David Runk

Posted on 05/23/2008 2:01:26 PM PDT by Brilliant

General Motors Corp.'s stock dropped almost 5 percent Friday after the company reported that strikes at some of its own plants and parts supplier American Axle will cost the automaker about $2 billion before taxes in the second quarter.

GM also expects to produce 230,000 fewer vehicles during the quarter due to the nearly three-month American Axle strike, which crippled its production of large sport utility vehicles and pickups. The other strikes will cost it 33,000 vehicles.

"We anticipate only a portion of this lost production will be recovered, due to the current economic environment in the United States and to the market shift away from the types of vehicles that were impacted by the action at American Axle," GM said in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

GM's shares fell 83 cents to close at $17.60, after touching $17.38 earlier in the session, their lowest level in nearly 26 years.

GM said the American Axle strike was expected to have the biggest effect by far, costing it $1.8 billion in the second quarter before taxes. GM previously said it lost $800 million in the first quarter and produced 100,000 fewer vehicles in that period because of the American Axle strike.

Detroit-based GM also said in Friday's filing that it put in $215 million to help settle the American Axle strike. GM earlier had said that it had agreed to provide Detroit-based American Axle and Manufacturing Holdings Inc. up to $200 million to help fund buyouts, early retirements and buydowns to help end the strike.

Without the strike at American Axle, GM likely would have had to cut production of SUVs and pickup trucks to keep its supply in line with demand, said Michael Robinet, vice president of global forecast services for CSM Worldwide, an auto industry consulting company based in Northville.

"Nobody wants to take a strike," Robinet said, "but it certainly had a lesser effect than if it had happened a few years ago."

High gas prices and a slow economy have reduced demand for trucks and SUVs.

At GM's plants, strikes over finalizing local UAW agreements were expected to cost the automaker about $200 million before taxes in the second quarter, resulting in the loss of about 33,000 vehicles in the period.

Those facilities include the Fairfax assembly plant in Kansas City, Kan., where GM said production resumed Thursday, and the Delta Township plant near Lansing, Michigan, where production resumed Monday. The Fairfax plant makes the hot-selling Chevrolet Malibu as well as the Saturn Aura. The Delta Township plant makes the Buick Enclave, Saturn Outlook and GMC Acadia, which are popular crossover vehicles.

"We plan to recover the lost production due to the impact of the local strikes over the remainder of this year," GM said in the filing.

American Axle said Friday it expects production to resume next week after United Auto Workers members overwhelmingly approved a new contract that contains steep pay cuts and other concessions. The vote was finalized Thursday.

"This new contract provides AAM and its UAW-represented work force the opportunity to transition through a most difficult period of structural change in the domestic automotive industry," American Axle Chairman and CEO Richard Dauch said in a statement.

American Axle shares fell 81 cents, or 4.2 percent, to $18.44 Friday.

About 3,650 UAW members went on strike Feb. 26 over American Axle's demand for lower wages to match its U.S. competitors. American Axle makes axles, drive shafts and stabilizer bars, mainly for GM's pickups and large SUVs. GM accounts for 80 percent of business at American Axle, which was formed from parts plants sold by GM in 1994.

"Our members have had to make some tough decisions for themselves and their families and have done so with careful deliberation," UAW President Ron Gettelfinger said in a statement.

The strike forced GM to temporarily close or cut production at more than 30 factories. It also caused thousands of layoffs at GM and other auto parts suppliers.

GM spokesman Dan Flores said Friday the automaker has a plan to bring its idled factories back on line, but didn't release details.

"We want to get our operations back to normal as soon as we can," he said.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: autos; generalmotors; manufacturing; uaw; unions
Tell me again about all the wonderful benefits that unionism provides...

It cost GM (alone) $2 billion in one quarter.

1 posted on 05/23/2008 2:01:27 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Another deathblow to the domestic auto industry courtesy of the union mob bosses.


2 posted on 05/23/2008 2:04:51 PM PDT by Neoliberalnot ((Hallmarks of Liberalism: Ingratitude and Envy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
The strike forced GM to temporarily close or cut production at more than 30 factories. It also caused thousands of layoffs at GM and other auto parts suppliers.

Protecting those jobs one closed factory at a time.

3 posted on 05/23/2008 2:06:08 PM PDT by A message
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot
And how much does selling inferior quality products cost them? For years we have bought Honda's and Toyota's because their engines are more refined and the interiors beat the pants off of GM. GM is finally fixing their lackluster interiors to be competitive, but I put most of the blame on the unions. Unfortunately, money that Honda and Toyota spend on their interior parts is spent by GM to pay the unions IMO.

That being said, we are currently in a debate on whether we should buy 2 Honda Accord EX-L’s for our company cars or 2 Pontiac G8 GT’s. They are both priced almost exactly the same and don't have the luxury branding (we deal mostly with truckers and farmers who don't want to see us driving up in a BMW). The Honda has a much better interior-near luxury car level-and we like the looks. The Pontiac has sweet looks, is sportier to drive (which we like), but the interior isn't quite up to the Honda even though it is tons better than past GM models. Still, there are some pretty cheap feeling interior parts whereas the Honda is top notch. We don't like the Camry because the suspension and steering feel too soft, and the Avalon is a little too old for us.

4 posted on 05/23/2008 3:30:03 PM PDT by Skenderbej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Skenderbej
Sorry, should be Hondas and Toyotas, why did I add the apostrophe?
5 posted on 05/23/2008 3:31:32 PM PDT by Skenderbej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Skenderbej

I don’t disagree with you, but if you are dealing with farmers buy American cars. Farmers are fiercely loyal to anything domestic. We neighbor drove a small Pontiac 235,000 miles. What difference does the perceived interior quality make to you, or more importantly, to your clients?


6 posted on 05/24/2008 7:44:45 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot ((Hallmarks of Liberalism: Ingratitude and Envy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot
It is a real difference in interior quality, not a perceived one. It matters to us because we consistently drive 200 miles or more per day, which equals a lot of time in the cockpit. We want cars that are comfortable and make us feel more at home inside for those long days. Plus, the higher the quality of the materials, the longer those materials will look good. The interior doesn't matter to the clients because few ever ride with us. It's really just a matter of personal preference and comfort.

Still, it's a toss up. We are younger, so we like the sportier feeling and looking cars-which the Pontiac is.

7 posted on 05/24/2008 10:19:31 PM PDT by Skenderbej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Skenderbej

Sorry for the lack of proofreading in my last post. Seat comfort is important, but the lap of luxury in the long run is not so important as impressing the client. IMHO, The customer is always first. If farmers are your primary client, go for the Pontiac.


8 posted on 05/25/2008 4:56:17 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot ((Hallmarks of Liberalism: Ingratitude and Envy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson