Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First California gay weddings may be on a Saturday
AP via SFGate ^ | 5/26/8 | LISA LEFF, Associated Press Writer

Posted on 05/26/2008 2:46:07 PM PDT by SmithL

San Francisco, CA (AP) -- Same-sex couples in some counties will be able to marry as soon as Saturday, June 14, the president of the California's county clerks association said Monday.

Stephen Weir, who heads the California Association of Clerks and Election Officials, said he was told by the Office of Vital Records that clerks would be authorized to hand out marriage licenses as soon as that date — exactly 30 days after the California Supreme Court ruled that gay marriage should be legal.

The court's decisions typically take effect after 30 days, barring further legal action.

"They are shooting for the 14th," said Weir, adding that the state planned to give California's 58 counties advice early this week for implementing the historic change so local officials can start planning.

An effort, however, is under way to stay the Supreme Court's decision until voters can decide the issue with an initiative planned for the November ballot. The measure would overrule the justices' decision and amend the state constitution to ban gay marriage.

Justices have until the ruling's effective date to weigh the request, but could give themselves longer to consider it, attorneys have said. Another complicating factor is that the Supreme Court also directed a midlevel appeals court that upheld the state's one man-one woman marriage laws a year ago to issue a new order legalizing same-sex marriage, and it's not clear when the appeals court would comply.

Suanne Buggy, a spokeswoman for the California Department of Public Health, which oversees the vital records office, would not confirm Monday that state officials have settled the matter of when counties can or must start extending marriage licenses to same-sex couples.

"We will be getting guidance out to the counties soon,"

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: activistjudges; homosexualagenda; mentalillness; playinghouse; samesexmarriage; sanfranciscovalues
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-61 next last

1 posted on 05/26/2008 2:46:08 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Prediction — in the next couple of months:

Divorce paper files by first gay couple married legally in California.


2 posted on 05/26/2008 2:48:54 PM PDT by i_dont_chat (The elephant has fallen and it can't get up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

There is an easy answer to the Gay Marriage issue.

Do not ban gay marriage but simply prohibit Divorce for both gay and heterosexual couples.


3 posted on 05/26/2008 2:49:21 PM PDT by trumandogz ("He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and it worries me." Sen Cochran on McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
I wonder why they never refer to them as homosexual weddings.
4 posted on 05/26/2008 2:49:49 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (De-Globalize yourself !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Heh.

Nothing turns off the American public more than sight bytes of same sex couples getting married.

As politically incorrect as it might be, a heterosexual’s natural inclination is to find same sex couplings abhorrent.

The last time San Fran went nuts and Newsom showed bits of all those homosexual couples the Dems like to went nuts.

So this is not a bad thing. Wait until Americans, some 95% heterosexual, get a load of what’s coming down the pike.

Sometimes you gotta hit Joe Six Pick over the head with a sight byte.


5 posted on 05/26/2008 2:51:47 PM PDT by Fishtalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i_dont_chat
I would venture to guess that if you were to tract the first 1000 gay weddings in California as well as a random selection of 1000 heterosexual marriages for five years that at the end of that period they divorce rate of the heterosexual couples would be higher than that of the homosexual couples.
6 posted on 05/26/2008 2:53:25 PM PDT by trumandogz ("He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and it worries me." Sen Cochran on McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
I would venture to guess that if you were to track the first 1000 gay weddings in California as well as a random selection of 1000 heterosexual marriages for five years that at the end of that period the divorce rate of the heterosexual couples would be higher than that of the homosexual couples.
7 posted on 05/26/2008 2:55:14 PM PDT by trumandogz ("He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and it worries me." Sen Cochran on McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Fishtalk

Be sure to point out that this all will start on Flag Day and the day before Father’s Day. Really perk up Joe Six-Pack.


8 posted on 05/26/2008 2:56:34 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs to said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Yeah....they generally don’t have kids.....and they have MORE money.....


9 posted on 05/26/2008 2:57:21 PM PDT by goodnesswins (Liberals learning curves are pretty flat,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

The homosexual community looks at the word “homosexual” as a clinical or scientific term describing sexual behavior. The word “gay” was taken over by the homosexual community because they wanted a term that would not just describe behavior. I’m sure the word “gay” worked for them because “gay” used to mean happy and carefree, which was an image they wanted to convey to the outside world.

Has anyone ever heard the word “gay” used in recent years in any other context besides homosexuality? Remember the words of the Flintstones song, that “we’ll have a gay old time”? If they were making that cartoon today, they would change the lyrics not to use “gay”. Same with “gay apparel” from “Deck The Halls”.


10 posted on 05/26/2008 2:57:57 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

This is revolting. Thanks, I needed a reason to loose my appetite tonight and not eat dinner.


11 posted on 05/26/2008 2:59:05 PM PDT by proudofthesouth (Homosexuality IS a choice! There isn't any biological reason for it. They CHOOSE to be that way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
First California gay weddings may be on a Saturday

Monday may be first day for gays to file for divorce. Gays are not the only ones licking their lips at the prospect of gay marriage, I am sure divorce lawyers are licking their lips as well.

12 posted on 05/26/2008 2:59:05 PM PDT by Biblebelter (If the big blue states got to choose the Republican nominee, I say let them elect him in the fall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fishtalk

Massachusetts has had pervert marriages for some time. I haven’t noticed any such photos at FR. The old media knows how repellent the sight of affection between two men is. I hope I am wrong but doubt we’ll see widespread publication of Bruce kissing Steve at the altar.


13 posted on 05/26/2008 3:00:25 PM PDT by Jacquerie (There is no right to humiliate Old Glory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

The latest trend among the young set is “gay” as lame or dumb, ie, “that’s so gay.” Used in this context it doesn’t refer to sexual preference at all. The evolution of language is a funny thing.


14 posted on 05/26/2008 3:04:06 PM PDT by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Biblebelter

It will not take much for the gays to maintain a divorce rate that is lower than that of straight couples.


15 posted on 05/26/2008 3:04:29 PM PDT by trumandogz ("He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and it worries me." Sen Cochran on McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Bill Gates, my proposal is still open. No prenups.


16 posted on 05/26/2008 3:04:31 PM PDT by BlueStateBlues (Blue State for business, Red State at heart..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Will RHINO, Arnie be there to officiate?


17 posted on 05/26/2008 3:04:39 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

I’m not going to argue about it. Only time will tell. Let’s see how long this particular couple stay married.


18 posted on 05/26/2008 3:05:30 PM PDT by i_dont_chat (The elephant has fallen and it can't get up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Well you could be right. My assertion would require that the media gets down there toot de sweet, take the pics and publish the things.

I remember the brouhaha when a bunch of gays snuck in under that small window before and got married. Of course the fine and personable Rosie O’Donnell helped with the publicity as I recall.

I also recall the Democratic party getting furious and demanded that Newsome shut down the display as it was giving Democrats a bad name.


19 posted on 05/26/2008 3:07:59 PM PDT by Fishtalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: i_dont_chat

Unfortunately, in the United States, marriage once a holy but now decaying institution with men in women jumping into marriage without the understanding of commitment to God and one another.

However, my marriage is still strong despite a high divorce rate and the introduction of gay marriage into the culture.

If one believes that their marriage is weakened due to gay marriage then there must be other issues within that marriage.


20 posted on 05/26/2008 3:20:39 PM PDT by trumandogz ("He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and it worries me." Sen Cochran on McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Can the Earthquake come soon enough out there?

Now taking odds:


21 posted on 05/26/2008 3:21:22 PM PDT by padre35 (Conservative in Exile/ Isaiah 3.3/Cry havoc and let slip the RINOS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: padre35
Can the Earthquake come soon enough out there?

You mean like the tornados that have struck Iowa, Oklahoma, Colorado, Minnesota, Kansas and Indiana over the last couple of weeks?

22 posted on 05/26/2008 3:29:05 PM PDT by trumandogz ("He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and it worries me." Sen Cochran on McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
They may not be legal per the following article:

Whoa! Marriage laws aren't changed – yet
23 posted on 05/26/2008 3:29:35 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fishtalk
Photos of Americans exercising their God given rights acknowledged in our Bill of Rights are not uncommon.

OTH, liberal, judge made "rights" such as the end result of abortion, a mutilated dead baby or Bruthe and Stevie smooching are nonexistent.

If they were actually exercising true rights, photos would not be problematic.

24 posted on 05/26/2008 3:29:40 PM PDT by Jacquerie (There is no right to humiliate Old Glory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

” the divorce rate of the heterosexual couples would be higher than that of the homosexual couples.”

Spoken like someone who hasn’t witnessed the dynamics of gay relationships much. Or perhaps you have?

Speaking from my experience having gay roommates and going out with them, it’s very rare to see one of these couplings last for more than a few months, much less a year. Perhaps in a small town where there are no other options.

In a larger city, infidelity is the rule rather than the exceptional surprise in gay relationships. I’ve seen it over and over again.

Before seeing the gay community in action, I was more modest in my opposition to gay marriage. Seeing that dynamic in action only solidified it.


25 posted on 05/26/2008 3:33:19 PM PDT by CaspersGh0sts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CaspersGh0sts
I have friends, relatives and neighbors that are gay. Some of their relationships last a long time and others a short time, not unlike my friends, relatives and neighbors that are straight.
26 posted on 05/26/2008 3:37:01 PM PDT by trumandogz ("He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and it worries me." Sen Cochran on McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

No, if I had meant that, I would have said that.


27 posted on 05/26/2008 3:39:29 PM PDT by padre35 (Conservative in Exile/ Isaiah 3.3/Cry havoc and let slip the RINOS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: padre35

Or do you mean like hurricanes that strike North Carolina?


28 posted on 05/26/2008 3:42:12 PM PDT by trumandogz ("He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and it worries me." Sen Cochran on McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

We’ll see.


29 posted on 05/26/2008 3:43:01 PM PDT by padre35 (Conservative in Exile/ Isaiah 3.3/Cry havoc and let slip the RINOS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

“As it was in the days of Noah, so shall it be at the coming of the Son of Man.” In Noah’s day men were so wicked that God was sorry that he even made man, and he destroyed all but Noah and his family. May God have mercy on us!


30 posted on 05/26/2008 3:44:57 PM PDT by tessalu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: tessalu

Perhaps my house in New Orleans at two feet above sea level would be impacted my such an event but my house here in the Texas Hill Country should be safe from such flooding.


31 posted on 05/26/2008 3:53:03 PM PDT by trumandogz ("He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and it worries me." Sen Cochran on McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Gay marriage sets a precedent for the acceptance of polygamy, incest, pedophilia, etc.


32 posted on 05/26/2008 3:59:12 PM PDT by Ajnin (Neca Eos Omnes. Deus Suos Agnoset.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

To: Ajnin

The FLDS in Texas have most of those bases covered.


34 posted on 05/26/2008 4:01:04 PM PDT by trumandogz ("He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and it worries me." Sen Cochran on McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

To: SmithL

Oh good, they can have the batchelor’s party on a Friday Night!!!


37 posted on 05/26/2008 4:39:22 PM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

FR and JimRob are based in Cali.


38 posted on 05/26/2008 6:46:30 PM PDT by informavoracious (Freedom Isn't Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Ajnin

You are on the money with that scenario.

Too often I hear “hate the sin, love the sinner.” That’s a cop-out. The only appropriate answers to homosexuality are social opprobrium and censure supported by strong laws.

Sadly, the disease of “progressivism” that has been undermining everything worthwhile in our society for 75+ years has erased from the books the laws that dealt forcefully with homosexuals, i.e., criminalized their behavior. Hence, is it any wonder that we continue to see a downward spiral in morality in every phase of American life?

Homosexuality is an immoral choice. It is a willful affront to the laws of God and man. When we forget this we strengthen our enemies, internal and in foreign lands.


39 posted on 05/26/2008 8:55:00 PM PDT by libsmacker75
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Ajnin

The bible has only negative things to say about homosexuality, incest, and pedophilia, and yet nothing negative to say about polygamy.. let’s not lump that in with the others. you might want to do some homework.


40 posted on 05/26/2008 8:55:18 PM PDT by Awestruck (All the usual suspects)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: informavoracious

As am I and a LOT of the other participants here. Thank you for pointing this out! :)


41 posted on 05/26/2008 8:57:15 PM PDT by libsmacker75
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: CaspersGh0sts

There are many gay couples in our neighborhood. Some are older and have been together for a very long time.


42 posted on 05/26/2008 8:57:26 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Awestruck

Jesus reject multiple marriage:

John 4:17-18

The woman answered and said to him, “I do not have a husband.” Jesus answered her, “You are right in saying, ‘I do not have a husband.’ For you have had five husbands, and the one you have now is not your husband. What you have said is true.”


43 posted on 05/26/2008 9:05:09 PM PDT by Philo-Junius (One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

The great majority of lasting male homosexual couplings simply do not consider fidelity a requirement of the relationship. The great majority of lasting female homosexual couplings evolve into sexless partnerships of old maids.

Neither one emulates the true lasting marriage of opposites.


44 posted on 05/26/2008 9:07:50 PM PDT by Philo-Junius (One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

It was just a couple of weeks ago that I read an article praising gay marriage because both “spouses” tend to be so forgiving of dalliances outside the marriage. That’s not so in normal marriages. So, if a given gay couple should stay married for any length of time, it is almost guaranteed that one or both of them has sexual flings on the side.


45 posted on 05/26/2008 9:51:21 PM PDT by ChocChipCookie (<----- Typical White Person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

There was another article posted just today, I believe, that took a look at the long-term affects of gay marriage in the most liberal parts of Norway, where gay marriages have taken place for 10-15 years. As it turns out, about 70% of children there are now born to illegitimate parents. The author, who is actually gay himself, points out that gay marriage devalues the institution of marriage and becomes more about coupling than about establishing families. As marriage becomes less and less about commitment and establishing families, fewer and fewer men and women marry. They still continue to have children, but those children rarely know the security of a home with one mom and one dad who are committed to each other. It was a fascinating article. If I find the link, I’ll post it.


46 posted on 05/26/2008 9:56:09 PM PDT by ChocChipCookie (<----- Typical White Person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Awestruck

I don’t think I need to do any homework, because I agree with you. It’s a trap I set for those that believe that homosexuality is no different than hetero’y.


47 posted on 05/26/2008 10:29:09 PM PDT by Ajnin (Neca Eos Omnes. Deus Suos Agnoset.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ChocChipCookie

I hate to break it too you but marriage in America is devalued through high divorce rates and reality shows where men and women choose their spouse.


48 posted on 05/26/2008 11:20:34 PM PDT by trumandogz ("He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and it worries me." Sen Cochran on McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Homosexuals want marriage in order to sully the institution, whether consciously or not. There has been research on homo relationships that show that many are effectively “open” relationships and promiscuity outside the confines of the “commitment” are rampant. Not to say that normal heterosexual couples are lily white in this respect, but homosexuals are notoriously fornicators, unashamedly and flippantly.

So the objective is not to bring the institution of marriage to themselves, but to bring a debauched lifestyle to marriage.

49 posted on 05/27/2008 4:33:07 AM PDT by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

and after 11/4 they won’t mean a thing...


50 posted on 05/27/2008 5:21:40 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-61 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson