Skip to comments.Arguments that Prove that Climate Change is driven by Solar Activity and not by CO2 Emission
Posted on 05/26/2008 4:09:08 PM PDT by Delacon
Conveyor of a super-Einsteinian theory of gravitation that explains, among many other post-Einstein-effects, the Sun-Earth-Connection and the true cause of the global climate changes.
As the glaciological and tree ring evidence shows, climate change is a natural phenomenon that has occurred many times in the past, both with the magnitude as well as with the time rate of temperature change that have occurred in the recent decades. The following facts prove that the recent global warming is not man-made but is a natural phenomenon.
1. In the temperature trace of the past 10 000 years based on glaciological evidence, the recent decades have not displayed any anomalous behaviour. In two-thirds of these 10 000 years, the mean temperature was even higher than today. Shortly before the last ice age the temperature in Greenland even increased by 15 degrees C in only 20 years. All of this without any man-made CO2 emission!
2. There is no direct connection between CO2 emission and climate warming. This is shown by the fact that these two physical quantities have displayed an entirely different temporal behaviour in the past 150 years. Whereas the mean global temperature varied in a quasi-periodic manner, with a mean period of 70 years, the CO2 concentration has been increasing exponentially since the 1950s. The sea level has been rising and the glaciers have been shortening practically linearly from 1850 onwards. Neither time trace showed any reaction to the sudden increase of hydrocarbon burning from the 1950s onwards.
3. The hypothesis that the global warming of the past decades is man-made is based on the results of calculations with climate models in which the main influence on climate is not included. The most important climate driver (besides solar luminosity)...
Note from Mod: The source has pulled the article from their web site. Could be a hoax
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
New!!: Dr. John Ray's
Ping me if you find one I've missed.
Might be a problem with this.
Anyone contributing anything on “a super-Einsteinian theory of gravitation” must speak to me as if to a small child whose mother drank and smoked during pregnancy.
Human activity not only doesn’t significantly effect climate change, human activity CAN’T effect climate change.
This is what frightens the left most. They don’t believe in God so they have no faith in His mercy. This means that if humans can’t effect the climate then it is completely out of control and bounded by nothing. Therefore they experience much greater anxiety than normal people do about the subject.
Environmentalism isn’t a science, it has no respect for the scientific method and views science as just another political implement to be used to generate propaganda. I don’t think it’s a religion either. It’s more of a petty superstition - maybe the wood sprites will stop global warming if we just stop cutting down trees.
Sorry, I hadn't read the whole article when I posted #9. "Dr. Gerhard Löbert" is obviously a nutter, ranting against Jewish Physics.
FYI-—I am a AGW skeptic to the core. I believe most of the recent warming is due to the Sun and not human produced CO2. But I think this article has been debunked elsewhere on the WEB . Please don;t let AGW propaganda and misinforamation fool you by trying to get you to go crazy over jibberish.
WTF does gravity have to do with (solar) global warming?
But look at all the great things you can say from this article, such as ‘vacuum density waves’ or ‘VLBI baseline lengths’. No math required.
First I’ve heard of it as well, but the way it is described makes perfect sense to me. WAY more sense that we humans are changing our climate, esentially, overnight.
According to this article, it’s sunspots (or lack thereof) that is the culprit.
There’s a “Little Ice Age” coming very soon.
“FYI-I am a AGW skeptic to the core. I believe most of the recent warming is due to the Sun and not human produced CO2. But I think this article has been debunked elsewhere on the WEB . Please don;t let AGW propaganda and misinforamation fool you by trying to get you to go crazy over jibberish.”
I leaped before I looked. I’ve now looked. Its actually hard to find any debunking of Herr Loebert but thats because he has only been posting for about the last 3 months. He is all over the climate change blogs posting the same stuff that is listed in the article I posted. He is a busy bee and I am now pretty certain a loon. My apologies to everyone. My only excuse its that I fell for the fact that his “findings” have been sited on several well known blogs and that I’ve am a bit loggy from the holiday weekend.
Ya think? : ) I particularly liked this quote:
"Despite its great successes, the gravitational theory of the great physicist Albert Einstein, General Relativity, (which is of a purely geometric nature and is totally incompatible with the highly successful quantum theory) must be discarded because this theory is completely irreconcilable with the extremely large energy density of the vacuum that has been accurately measured in the Casimir experiment."
It isn't good to be associated with nutcases.