Skip to comments.Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: 'There Is No Liberal Media'(video barf!)
Posted on 05/26/2008 7:56:33 PM PDT by paltz
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. uses odd liberal logic to explain how the media consistently favors conservatives.
Right. And the sun rises in the west and sets in the east...
Sonny, go back to helping your hero, Chavez.
Is this the famous drug user Kennedy?
I am quite certain all the Kennedy’s have malignancies in their brains...
Maybe when you’re that far left, everything else looks right?
What drugs was he on?
This is the one who takes after his great aunt.
Both have neen lobotomized.
Their understanding of ‘liberal’ is different from ours. For them, most if not all MSM are part of big business, which by definition is against working class people.
Never in my life - and I am an old great granny - have I seen such an identifiable divide between the sane and the insane. Liberals minds are hardwired backwards and upside down.
I keep hearing the echo of the Biblical phrase about the time that will come when the wheat is separated from the chaff.
The left is now so steeped in hatred that there is no room for any rational thought to seep through. They are truly a blight on the human stage
Rep. Patrick "Patches" Kennedy, (D), RI, was the most recent one that comes to mind. Tried to run over a Capitol cop, claiming "Ambien made him do it."
Of course, a few months earlier, in RI, he was in a traffic accident, pulling in front of an oncoming vehicle, in his haste to get a prescription refilled.
Yet, the voters keep rewarding such behavior, sending him back to DC.
He needs to back off the crack.
Kennedy = joke
We never thought it was comic.These people are the enemy within and have been for sometime.
The New York Times
THE PUBLIC EDITOR; Is The New York Times a Liberal Newspaper?
By DANIEL OKRENT
Published: July 25, 2004
OF course it is.
The fattest file on my hard drive is jammed with letters from the disappointed, the dismayed and the irate who find in this newspaper a liberal bias that infects not just political coverage but a range of issues from abortion to zoology to the appointment of an admitted Democrat to be its watchdog. (That would be me.) By contrast, readers who attack The Times from the left — and there are plenty — generally confine their complaints to the paper’s coverage of electoral politics and foreign policy.
I’ll get to the politics-and-policy issues this fall (I want to watch the campaign coverage before I conclude anything), but for now my concern is the flammable stuff that ignites the right. These are the social issues: gay rights, gun control, abortion and environmental regulation, among others. And if you think The Times plays it down the middle on any of them, you’ve been reading the paper with your eyes closed.
The public editor serves as the readers’ representative. His opinions and conclusions are his own.
Is it just me or does his voice remind anyone else of fingernails on a chalkboard. I just can’t stand to listen to his whinny voice.
Jeez, not this croaking, stammering, inarticulate trust fund baby again. His entire family has been a stain, beginning with his criminal grandfather.
I've heard this reasoning also, but it is mostly hogwash.
I used to work at a company where vice-presidents and some of the highest paid individuals sound like Karl Marx when talking politics. Some in their spare time even join leftist, if not darn near Communist organizations.
So just because a business or person makes money, it really has no bearing on their political slant.
I am trying to picture Rush replaying this tape on his show and yelling to his staff ever 5 sec “STOP THE TAPE !!”
"Pay no attention to the communists behind the curtain." - Robert F. Kennedy
I’ve never said it as a joke. Liberals are highly neurotic and have to be to hold tightly to positions that can’t stand up to any logical scrutiny.
“Jeez, not this croaking, stammering, inarticulate trust fund baby again. His entire family has been a stain, beginning with his criminal grandfather.”
This stain you refer to....is it the famous brown skidmark on the panties of history ?
I think they're all pretty f-ed up, but this is the one who wasn't satisfied with drinking all day like Uncle Ted and Patches. He needed the hard stuff and a needle to get through his day.
Just another day in camelot huh junkie?
Probably because they don't want him driving under the influence on THEIR streets.
No, it’s not just you. Hannity likes to have him on now and then. I have to turn it off.
Could you be more specific?
Robert Kennedy is a result of Poor and exhausted Gene Pool.
The Kennedy’s are well known for a number of things. Intellect is not on that list. This Kennedy is proof.
He also bitches that Reagan abolished the Fairness Doctrine as a present to the religious right.
I tried using "Editor" as a job description and got the following result:
$936,783 was given by people who identified their occupation as "Editor".
$83,076 from 100 people to Republicans
$853,707 from 1,178 people to Democrats
You’re welcome. I found it when another Freeper posted it a few weeks ago.
Here’s a few more:
$1,484,637 from 1,914 people to Republicans
$4,331,915 from 7,272 people to Democrats
$466,225 from 268 people to Republicans
$901,896 from 736 people to Democrats
$894,281 from 1,007 people to Republicans
$881,646 from 787 people to Democrats
From Police Officers...
$126,717 from 273 people to Republicans
$39,129 from 71 people to Democrats
If you want a good laugh, try “Actor”. North Korea has more diversity.