Skip to comments.
If It’s Reagan Principles You Want, Katherine Jenerette Is Your Gal
SC hotline ^
| 5/26/2008
Posted on 05/27/2008 2:27:47 PM PDT by 2nd amendment mama

We have a three way Republican Primary in South Carolina’s First Congressional District. Henry Brown is an incumbent Congressman running for this fifth term. I really have no feelings toward Brown one way or the other. He isn’t one to show up in the media much. He received a rating of 96 from the American Conservative Union for 2007, not too shabby and he’s been involved in government for about 27 years, starting in the city council, moving up to state office and then Federal.

He has two challengers in the primary. The first, Paul Norris, is the President of Southeast Energy Partners. Naturally, he is big on the coming energy crisis that most Americans have not yet awaken to. I also like how he released his tax returns. He feels that if he is going to be handling others tax money, they have a right to see how he manages his own.
The one candidate that really stands out to me out of the three, however, is Katherine Jenerette. A history professor, mother of four, and a second lieutenant in the army reserves, I think Mrs. Jenerette is the total package that disgruntled conservatives and others disoriented with the Republican Party are looking for. Read and learn:
She said she decided to run for Congress partly out of frustration of how Republicans
squandered their congressional majorities.
“We had the playing field, and we fumbled,” she said. “We spent like drunken sailors. We left the party platform behind.”
Jenerette said she favors a federal hiring freeze and the Fair Tax, a plan to eliminate the income tax by significantly raising the sales tax. She said her service in the U.S. Army Reserve would make her an important voice on national security issues.
As for the Iraq war, she said, “We can sit here and be Monday morning quarterbacks. We’re there because of our national interests. We’re there because of oil. What angers me is how we’ve made it into a political football.” She said she supports U.S. Gen. David Petraeus in Iraq and would pounce on his critics.
Jenerette said education is a big issue with her, and she would push to abolish the federal No Child Left Behind Act. “It’s created a nightmare bureaucracy for our schools.”
Marvelous. She hit the fiscal issues, the education issues, and the military issues right on the button. Additionally, she points out how Congressional Republicans have lost their way and threw a platform for success overboard to satisfy their own greed. Ah, it brings tears to my eyes.
It’s very difficult to take down an incumbent, even more so in a primary, but hope springs eternal. I hope enough Republicans who are looking for a return to the Class of ‘94 ideals are paying attention in this race. They have a candidate.
TOPICS: Announcements; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: 2008; carolina; classylady; congress; desertstorm; freeper; jenerette; kjenerette; paratrooper; reagan; sc2008; scelection; veteran
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-57 next last
Love these lines....
I hope enough Republicans who are looking for a return to the Class of 94 ideals are paying attention in this race. They have a candidate.
To: kjenerette
Hope definitely does spring eternal.
2
posted on
05/27/2008 2:29:31 PM PDT
by
2nd amendment mama
( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
To: 2nd amendment mama
A paratrooper chick, and darn good looking to boot.
3
posted on
05/27/2008 2:30:02 PM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: pissant
And she's a great conservative!
4
posted on
05/27/2008 2:32:41 PM PDT
by
2nd amendment mama
( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
To: 2nd amendment mama

Candidate for Pissant's Conservative Babe of the Week, without a doubt.
5
posted on
05/27/2008 2:34:54 PM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: pissant
6
posted on
05/27/2008 2:42:41 PM PDT
by
2nd amendment mama
( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
To: pissant
Combination of beauty, brains, and conservative principles.
Hope she has a backup employement plan, because the GOP will throw her under the bus, too.
7
posted on
05/27/2008 2:42:55 PM PDT
by
Old Sarge
(CTHULHU '08 - I won't settle for a lesser evil any longer!)
To: 2nd amendment mama
I’m in the 1st District. She’s got my support and vote!
8
posted on
05/27/2008 2:57:44 PM PDT
by
feedback doctor
(Dump Henry Brown. I'm behind Katherine Jenerette all the way.)
To: feedback doctor
So am I. Who are you supporting in the primary to oust Gramnesty? I really like Buddy Witherspoon.
9
posted on
05/27/2008 3:08:42 PM PDT
by
2nd amendment mama
( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
To: 2nd amendment mama
Were her parents John and Rita Jenrette?
10
posted on
05/27/2008 3:38:17 PM PDT
by
Luke21
To: 2nd amendment mama
With those lines I assume she’s probably not the favorite of the State Party. Hope she does well.
To: 2nd amendment mama
I am a fan of KJ for obvious reasons. But i must chide her on one thing. Since she is Army she may not know this.
"We spent like drunken sailors"
Sailors spend their OWN money!!!
12
posted on
05/27/2008 4:29:07 PM PDT
by
mad_as_he$$
(Will this thread be jacked by a Mormon?)
To: Luke21
Nope. Not sure if they’re related.
13
posted on
05/27/2008 4:37:54 PM PDT
by
2nd amendment mama
( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
To: A Strict Constructionist
As far as I’m aware, the state party is supporting Henry....ugh.
14
posted on
05/27/2008 4:38:58 PM PDT
by
2nd amendment mama
( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
To: 2nd amendment mama
I wonder if she’s pro-life (my litmus test).
15
posted on
05/27/2008 4:39:42 PM PDT
by
Sun
(Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
To: 2nd amendment mama
We had the playing field, and we fumbled, she said. We spent like drunken sailors. We left the party platform behind.
....
Jenerette said education is a big issue with her, and she would push to abolish the federal No Child Left Behind Act. Its created a nightmare bureaucracy for our schools.
I like this woman a lot! More people in Congress could reverse some of the damage that Bush and the other RINOs, "compassionate conservatives" and the like have done to this nation.
To: 2nd amendment mama
Jenerette said she favors a federal hiring freeze and the Fair Tax, a plan to eliminate the income tax by significantly raising the sales tax.
This is a big misconception. The sales tax can't be raised significantly since there isn't a national sales tax! However most people fail to understand embedded in the price of every purchase are corporate income taxes that are a cost to businesses and passed onto the consumer in the form of higher prices. These value added taxes(VATS) amount to approximately 22%. It is tantamount to a sales tax. The Fair Tax will abolish all federal income taxes thereby removing the VATS. The Fair Tax will be transparent because the 23% rate will appear as a separate item on every receipt. Consequently prices will initially see only a slight price rise but will eventually decrease as businesses pass on at least some of the cost savings due to competition.
17
posted on
05/27/2008 5:08:19 PM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
To: feedback doctor
I’m in the 1st District, too. Saw Katherine on Saturday. People are listening to her when she talks about “squandering” the chance the Repubs had, and spending like drunken sailors.
18
posted on
05/27/2008 5:10:20 PM PDT
by
Lynne
To: 2nd amendment mama
“Who are you supporting in the primary to oust Gramnesty? I really like Buddy Witherspoon.”
I’m supporting Buddy also.
19
posted on
05/27/2008 5:15:57 PM PDT
by
Lynne
To: Luke21
Were her parents John and Rita Jenrette? No, her husband is Van Jenerette, who has his own problems. Link
To: 2nd amendment mama
I think I want Rita Jenrette about 20 years ago.
21
posted on
05/27/2008 6:03:55 PM PDT
by
the invisib1e hand
(The road to hell is paved with euphemisms.)
To: pissant
Those eyes are literature itself.
22
posted on
05/27/2008 6:04:51 PM PDT
by
the invisib1e hand
(The road to hell is paved with euphemisms.)
To: 2nd amendment mama
Figures, he fits the pattern.
To: pissant
To: Man50D; All
Thanks for the feedback. The news story got it wrong about the sales tax reduction - these were the reporter's words not mine. Here is my short 'abstract' view on this issue:
Katherine Jenerette on Income Tax:
From its founding, our country operated without a personal income tax for 137 years.
My bottom line on income tax may sound simplistic, but I believe that a tax on a persons income violates the basic principals of our original Constitution and the Declaration of Independence with regard to the equality of all men.
The basic principal of a free man is that he cannot be owned by another man or no man can own another mans labor. To say that the government can violate this principal is a contradiction of our uniquely American beliefs of freedom.
Once the government can sweep aside the boundary between its hand and your wallet; which is your labor, they have violated the principal of a free man.
Secondly is the principal of a limited government is violated by creating institutions that both increase the size of the federal government; which in turn, allows those institutions to control and limit the opportunities of a free people.
While I support the fair tax, I believe it is an idea with its heart in the right place; especially with the overriding objective of the repeal of the 16th Amendment but I believe it is a work in progress.
My legislative agenda is that there should be no income tax and the 16th Amendment should be repealed.
First, I would move to repeal the 16th Amendment. Concurrently; upon ratification of the appeal, institute a National Sales Tax of 23% which will be reduced each congress by 3%. By law, this tax will be reduced 3% every two years, which will force the government to shrink 3% every two years. Within 18 years, there will be no national Sales Tax and the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT will have to have shrunk by 23%.
I do not agree with the concepts of pre-bates. It is another federal government control mechanism that allows the federal government to maintain leverage over an individual which would be a close cousin to the system we have right now. This would build another level of dependency on the federal government, which would extend far beyond those persons dependent on the federal government right now. However, some legislative plan will have to be enacted for those persons below a certain income level that will be most impacted by the initial 23% tax and indexed until the moratorium is reached.
No matter how the legislation is worded or worked out the message to the Federal Government is this: Get away from our income. The only exception that I can conceive of myself, would be during a war declared by Congress in accordance with the Constitution of the United States, Article 1, Section 8.
thanks
Katherine

Katherine Jenerette for US Congress
25
posted on
05/27/2008 6:39:06 PM PDT
by
kjenerette
(www.jenerette.com - U.S. Army Paratrooper - Operation Desert Storm)
To: Sun
Thanks for the response. This is a short version of my position on life.
I am pro-life. Over the years as this debate continues, both my husband and I; in our personal and our academic lives, have written on our common position on this subject. Right now, we do not have equal protection under the law as guaranteed to us by our Constitution.
The following are my principals:
We have to respect and protect all human life To each individual their life is sacred. As a people, to begin to pass judgment or sentence on human life by age, quality, position or potential has the effect of placing a price or a measure on what can only be deemed a gift from our creator.
However, there is a paradox of life and rights: Our rights as a people for individual-self-government are based upon the uniqueness of human life with rights granted by 'nature's God,' which in turn are protected by our Constitution.
One must follow the other, or else the entire argument of human rights becomes based on man's opinion. Either life with rights is given at the same time that life begins or we have no rights beyond which other men or governments are willing to allow us.
If we as a people do not respect the sacred notion of human LIFE how can we expect to have respect for RIGHTS that are dependent upon the concept of human LIFE itself? Any society that diminishes the value of one life from another risks its very existence.
26
posted on
05/27/2008 7:05:16 PM PDT
by
kjenerette
(www.jenerette.com - U.S. Army Paratrooper - Operation Desert Storm)
To: kjenerette
Hey hey, how did I miss your post.
27
posted on
05/27/2008 8:01:50 PM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: 2nd amendment mama
Man I hope not. John and Rita were bad news way back when.
28
posted on
05/27/2008 11:15:23 PM PDT
by
Luke21
To: Non-Sequitur
Thanks for that extra info. Really yukky.
29
posted on
05/27/2008 11:16:55 PM PDT
by
Luke21
To: Luke21
I just hope her mom wasn’t named Dee. ;)
30
posted on
05/27/2008 11:30:24 PM PDT
by
Rastus
To: Luke21
Thanks for that extra info. Really yukky. I'm not passing judgement, just pointing out that there are issues she'll need to overcome.
To: Non-Sequitur
Okay....here's one of many problems I have with the allegations in the article.
She said she was bothered when she found that Jenerette did not acknowledge her sister as one of his children on Web sites about him and his current wife.
She said he has seven children, including four with Katherine Jenerette.
Jenerette-Begg said she had parted ways with her stepfather years ago.
She says that he didn't acknowledge her as his daughter, yet she refers to him as a "stepfather", and to Katherine as his "current wife", which tells me two things. 1. she is not his daughter and 2. he is not married to her mother any longer. What obligation does he have to list her as "his daughter" when she refers to him a stepfather?
Another problem I have is that she alleges that the abuse went on past the age of 20....that seems excessive. Also, she says the allegations aren't "about politics" but then asserts that her "stepfather and current wife" want to spread lies. I'm curious what lies in particular; and what does his "current wife" have to do with anything?
It seems highly suspect. I get really angry when women trump up charges like these because it then casts a doubt on those who genuinely suffer similar fates.
Unfortunately, as suspect as these claims seem to me, I'm sure it will be something Ms. Jenerette will have to combat. Unless you are a Democrat you don't get a pass on any scandal, regardless of the veracity of the allegations.
32
posted on
05/28/2008 1:03:49 PM PDT
by
IMissPresidentReagan
("If we were dog food, they'd take us off the shelf." Rep. Tom Davis on the "Republican Brand")
To: IMissPresidentReagan
He was arrested and you can see the warrant on the internet. We will have to see what happens when he gets his day in court. You can see from the warrant that they have tape of him admitting to the charges. Both should be considered innocent until proven otherwise. Too many here are quick to attack the stepdaughter just because they like the politics of the wife of the accused.
You can sell her to the rest of the country but it will be SC that will be watching the trial and many here think the world of him but they just might have been misled.
Unfortunate for all but until the trial we just won’t know but it is baggage that she carries into the race, there’s no denying that.
33
posted on
05/28/2008 3:45:54 PM PDT
by
snippy_about_it
(The FReeper Foxhole. America's history, America's soul.)
To: snippy_about_it
You're right; we'll wait and see. Just remember all the “evidence” Nifong had too, according to his warrants. Those boys were also arrested. Merely being arrested means little or nothing about one's guilt or innocence. I've seen plenty of misleading and overstated statements in arrest warrants. It's not uncommon, and is less about politics than it is zealousness for headlines.
I'm leery, having read the article and her blog. I'm not attacking the stepdaughter, although I do think she perhaps has “issues” as the youth say today, but I am skeptical, it's possible that it's the defense attorney in me. My skepticism has nothing to do with politics.
Unfortunately, too many think that to be skeptical is a personal attack. It's not. I don't know the girl, but her story doesn't jive with me. It's not a personal attack to point that out. Too often, I've seen empathy for “victims” overrule any objectivity that one would use to judge the facts. The more terrible and horrendeous the claims the harder it is to look at things objectively. However, just as you say some are quick to attack the stepdaughter because of “politics” of the third party candidate, others are just as quick to assume the guilt of Mr. Jenerette because of sheer horror of the claims she makes.
It's a shame regardless, that any baggage would follow the candidate, as she is merely a third party, who took no part in the events, and actually, I happen to like her politics. I wish the candidate the best and the rest will be what it will be.
34
posted on
05/28/2008 5:46:33 PM PDT
by
IMissPresidentReagan
("If we were dog food, they'd take us off the shelf." Rep. Tom Davis on the "Republican Brand")
To: IMissPresidentReagan
To: kjenerette
Thanks for your eloquent response.
I think the 5th amendment spells it out:
Amendment V
“..nor be
deprived of LIFE (emphasis mine), liberty, ..”
36
posted on
05/28/2008 6:33:53 PM PDT
by
Sun
(Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
To: wagglebee; floriduh voter; 8mmMauser; Dante3; BykrBayb; kjenerette
FYI: Please check out post #26.
37
posted on
05/28/2008 6:36:36 PM PDT
by
Sun
(Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
To: Sun
38
posted on
05/28/2008 6:48:28 PM PDT
by
floriduh voter
( LAUREN RICHARDSON NEEDS YOU. Pls visit www.lifeforlauren.org)
To: floriduh voter
39
posted on
05/28/2008 6:59:51 PM PDT
by
Sun
(Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
To: Sun
You can tell I read your post from my pings.
40
posted on
05/28/2008 7:00:39 PM PDT
by
floriduh voter
( LAUREN RICHARDSON NEEDS YOU. Pls visit www.lifeforlauren.org)
To: floriduh voter
You certainly do, FRiend, and I read yours. :)
41
posted on
05/28/2008 7:01:59 PM PDT
by
Sun
(Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
To: kjenerette; Sun
Thanks for the ping, Sun.
I’ve read a bit about Katherine Jenerette over the past few months. I’m not sure if I read anything about her pro-life views, but I can tell you I’m not surprised by anything she said here. She’s transparently conservative. Pick any issue, and she will come out on the conservative side. And I don’t mean just her statements. She says what she means, and means what she says. She demonstrates conservative values in her actions as well as her words.
I’m generally not comfortable betting on anyone’s strength of character. People (especially politicians) tend to let you down. But I’m convinced Katherine Jenerette is the real deal. She’s an example of the best America has to offer.
42
posted on
05/28/2008 7:43:51 PM PDT
by
BykrBayb
(In memory of my Friend T'wit, who taught me much. Þ)
To: 2nd amendment mama
Bump for later. She sounds cool from what I've read and if Conservatives are going to get on a come back, we need to start bottom up, ie from Congress first. I especially like her ‘Monday Morning Quarterback’ comment.
To: 2nd amendment mama; Sun; kjenerette
44
posted on
05/29/2008 4:52:46 AM PDT
by
8mmMauser
(Jezu ufam tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
To: IMissPresidentReagan; Non-Sequitur; Luke21; snippy_about_it
45
posted on
05/29/2008 1:55:15 PM PDT
by
CutePuppy
(If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
To: IMissPresidentReagan
My concern was that FReeper Jorge (RIP), Van’s brother, came on the thread in support of the stepdaughter. You have to read through the old threads.
We’ll see.
46
posted on
05/29/2008 2:15:42 PM PDT
by
snippy_about_it
(The FReeper Foxhole. America's history, America's soul.)
To: kjenerette
“I do not agree with the concepts of pre-bates. It is another federal government control mechanism that allows the federal government to maintain leverage over an individual which would be a close cousin to the system we have right now. This would build another level of dependency on the federal government, which would extend far beyond those persons dependent on the federal government right now. However, some legislative plan will have to be enacted for those persons below a certain income level that will be most impacted by the initial 23% tax and indexed until the moratorium is reached.”
So she does not support a universal “pre-bate” but would be ok with one which is means tested and isn’t called a “pre-bate”. She is entitled to her opinion, but I find it much more palatable to remove the burden of taxation up to the poverty level for ALL taxpayers, not just poor ones.
Also, it isn’t another federal government control mechanism since the FairTax was not developed by the federal government. If it has that effect, then it was certainly not calculated. My own view is that there will be counteracting pressures to increase the rebate and to decrease it. All taxpayers would want to see a larger rebate check, but many taxpayers would pressure congress to keep the rate as low as possible, also. Those forces would oppose.
The FairTax isn’t perfect; it’s just vastly superior to the current system and to any of the alternatives.
BTW, Henry Brown is an HR 25 co-sponsor and Buddy Witherspoon has stated that if elected he would become the strongest FairTax supporter in the US senate.
47
posted on
05/29/2008 4:45:33 PM PDT
by
phil_will1
(My posts are in no way limited or restricted by previously expressed SQL opinions)
To: BykrBayb
“Shes transparently conservative. Pick any issue, and she will come out on the conservative side. And I dont mean just her statements. She says what she means, and means what she says. She demonstrates conservative values in her actions as well as her words.”
Coming from you that’s quite a compliment for Katherine Jeanerette, because I know you’re a strong pro-life, conservative, and do your research!
48
posted on
05/29/2008 5:06:10 PM PDT
by
Sun
(Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
To: Sun
Yes, and I don’t hand out the compliments easily. I have to be very sure of someone before I’ll endorse them. Katherine Jenerette has proven herself to be a strong conservative with good character.
49
posted on
05/29/2008 5:09:54 PM PDT
by
BykrBayb
(In memory of my Friend T'wit, who taught me much. Þ)
To: 8mmMauser; All
Thanks for pinging Post 44.
We need to support as many pro-life politicians that we hear about.
50
posted on
05/29/2008 5:22:11 PM PDT
by
Sun
(Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson