Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas grand jury may be hearing evidence against polygamous sect (FLDS)
Salt Lake City Tribune ^ | June 2, 2008 | Brooke Adams

Posted on 06/02/2008 3:48:58 PM PDT by hocndoc

ELDORADO, Texas -- Hours after signing an order releasing FLDS children from state custody, 51st District Judge Barbara Walther arrived at the Schleicher County Courthouse in Eldorado to swear in a grand jury that may be considering indictments related to the polygamous sect.

By the end of the day, 18 indictments had been issued, although no details were immediately available. The number was more than the usual; it is more typical for five to 15 indictments to be returned, a court clerk said.

Walther arrived at at the Eldorado courthouse at 12:30 p.m., accompanied by two bailiffs and her court clerk. She left an hour later.

Allison Palmer, the deputy district attorney for Tom Green County who has been leading the office's investigation into the sect and appearing at related hearings, also was at the courthouse.

Schleicher County Sheriff David Doran was unavailable earlier in the day because he was meeting with the DA's office, a spokeswoman said.

In a story published Saturday by The Los Angeles Times, Doran indicated criminal charges were pending, while downplaying reports that FLDS members had requested voter registration forms and could influence county elections.

"Once we begin impaneling some grand juries and the criminal case comes to light, we'll see the tide turn once again," he said.

It could be days before the focus of any of Monday's indictments are known; the county's policy is not to release information about indictments until they are served.

News of the grand jury's meeting circulated among members of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, creating concern about returning to their homes on the YFZ Ranch.

A raid of the ranch that began April 3 led to the removal of some 450 children, who were eventually placed in shelters throughout Texas. Walther signed an order on Monday morning that allowed them to be returned to their parents immediately.

Last week, Arizona and Texas authorities collected DNA samples from Warren S. Jeffs, the sect's leader. He is jailed in Kingman, Ariz., awaiting trial on charges related to marriages he conducted between underage girls and older men.

The search warrant said the evidence was needed as part of a new investigation of four spiritual marriages between Jeffs and girls who range in age from 12 to 15.

In Texas, the Attorney General's Office is awaiting results from 599 DNA samples collected six weeks ago, mostly from FLDS adults and children living at the YFZ Ranch, located just outside Eldorado.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: childmarriage; civilrights; cpswatch; flds; intolerance; jeffs; polygamy; violation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-231 next last
18 indictments, today.
1 posted on 06/02/2008 3:48:58 PM PDT by hocndoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hocndoc

nothing to see here - move along


2 posted on 06/02/2008 3:50:37 PM PDT by Revelation 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc

Deserved, I’m sure. However, when will we see the indictments against some of the judges, CS personnel, and the sherrif that should stem from this case?


3 posted on 06/02/2008 3:51:59 PM PDT by Ingtar (Haley Barbour 2012, Because he has experience in Disaster Recovery. - ejonesie22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc

Wow. For two months, I have said 10 indictments, and out of that 3 prosecutable cases, and ending with one conviction containing multiple charges.

So, I got the number of indictments wrong, so far.

And, the children are being returned slowly, as I guessed they would be.

Everything seems to be preceding normally. Due Process, in action.

I don’t know how this will affect the future of the FLDS in general. I hope it is for the best.


4 posted on 06/02/2008 3:57:33 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (I reserve the right to misinterpret the comments of any and all pesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc

I got nothing against charging people with crimes, if their is evidence that they comitted them.

On the other hand...snatching kids and ADULTS, in violation of federal and TX law, is also a crime.

Do you think a single CPS worker will be charged with kidnapping, in the case of the 27-yo they kidnapped?

It is a federal death-penalty crime.


5 posted on 06/02/2008 3:58:52 PM PDT by patton (cuiquam in sua arte credendum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc

The other foot is about to drop, even as the FLDS tries to sign up all of its voting-age members to vote in the next election so that they can take over El Dorado, just like Hildale and Colorado City.


6 posted on 06/02/2008 3:58:52 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner ("We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!"--Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patton
It is a federal death-penalty crime.

You're not spouting the crazy non-sense that Texas officials should be executed by the federal government too are you?

7 posted on 06/02/2008 4:00:34 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner ("We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!"--Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Revelation 911

18 indictments? Gee.


8 posted on 06/02/2008 4:02:17 PM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Protected species legislation enacted May 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc

Well, maybe. Or Maybe the DA is doing a bit of CYA.


9 posted on 06/02/2008 4:03:29 PM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc; colorcountry; Pan_Yans Wife; MHGinTN; Colofornian; Elsie; FastCoyote; Osage Orange; ...

Ping


10 posted on 06/02/2008 4:04:24 PM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Protected species legislation enacted May 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc; Ingtar; patton

Good thing I read the thread...since my first reaction was:

When will we hear about indictments against the officer requesting the initial warrant, the judge, and the kidnapping CPS folks?


11 posted on 06/02/2008 4:04:50 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2; patton; All

And the DNA reports began coming in, too.

http://www.gosanangelo.com/news/2008/jun/02/flds-children-heading-home-today/

While orders might have been vacated, no crimes were committed by the judge or the Texas Rangers and local Sheriff who carried out the orders.

There’s going to be a mess figuring out who lives where and that definition of “household” is still not settled.

In the meantime, that last article from the San Angelo paper notes that the lawyer for one of the girls - the 16 year old daughter of Warren Jeffs - asked the judge to stay the return of one of her clients, who the lawyer has identified as a victim of sexual abuse. She may go back tomorrow, but the lawyer is asking for stricter conditions.


12 posted on 06/02/2008 4:05:50 PM PDT by hocndoc (http://www.LifeEthics.org (I have a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

>> The other foot is about to drop

Is this one jack-booted? Like the first one was?


13 posted on 06/02/2008 4:06:01 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (La Raza hates white folks. And John McCain loves La Raza!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner; patton
You're not spouting the crazy non-sense that Texas officials should be executed by the federal government too are you?

Nah...sounds like the perfectly reasonable law-and-order response, asking for all to be punished by the same standards.

14 posted on 06/02/2008 4:06:04 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc
While orders might have been vacated, no crimes were committed by the judge or the Texas Rangers and local Sheriff who carried out the orders.

Like h*ll, IMO.

15 posted on 06/02/2008 4:06:45 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc
who the lawyer has identified as a victim of sexual abuse

Yes, the government lawyer... Who is acting against her client's wishes... And who released her client's name to the world as a sexual-abuse victim.

16 posted on 06/02/2008 4:08:30 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

Nope - I am perfectly willing to charge them INDIVIDUALLY, allow them to mount an INDIVIDUAL defense, find them INDIVIDUALLY guilty, and then hang them, INDIVIDUALLY.

Which is more than they offered the crazies in Eldorado.


17 posted on 06/02/2008 4:08:33 PM PDT by patton (cuiquam in sua arte credendum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

No one released anyone’s name. Remember, most of the women go by their own names. It’s not a given that the children take on the father’s name, since there’s no real marriage under state law.


18 posted on 06/02/2008 4:10:48 PM PDT by hocndoc (http://www.LifeEthics.org (I have a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc

“and that definition of “household” is still not settled.

Nonsense - see item VI of the order. The last sentence defines “Household.”


19 posted on 06/02/2008 4:11:28 PM PDT by patton (cuiquam in sua arte credendum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Gondring; Virginia Ridgerunner; patton

Don’t forget that when Willie Jessop told all the women to stay sweet and cooperate, they willing got on those buses.


20 posted on 06/02/2008 4:12:35 PM PDT by hocndoc (http://www.LifeEthics.org (I have a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc

Also not tru - the girl in question is clearly identified in the order (they neglected to blank out her name).


21 posted on 06/02/2008 4:14:41 PM PDT by patton (cuiquam in sua arte credendum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc

I don’t think the 27-yo had a choice.

KIDNAPPING.


22 posted on 06/02/2008 4:15:51 PM PDT by patton (cuiquam in sua arte credendum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc

Does anyone else find it ironic that they are in Tom Green County? (Anyone remember that famous polygamist?)


23 posted on 06/02/2008 4:15:51 PM PDT by Southerngl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc
>>>>>>"While orders might have been vacated, no crimes were committed by the judge or the Texas Rangers and local Sheriff who carried out the orders."

Not necessarily true.

The Rangers and Sheriff were found by a court of law twice to have unlawfully remove children from their parents.

"SAN ANGELO, Texas - In a ruling that could torpedo the case against the West Texas polygamist sect, a state appeals court Thursday said authorities had no right to seize more than 440 children in a raid on the splinter group's compound last month."

That is what's called civil rights violations and these officers can be held individually responsible for both criminal and civil penalties.
24 posted on 06/02/2008 4:17:47 PM PDT by ktime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc

So the sect says FROM THIS POINT, it will restrict marrying underage girls. So they are admitting they are raping children???

As I have said before, ALL THE ADULTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR NOT STOPPING CHILD RAPE.


25 posted on 06/02/2008 4:22:33 PM PDT by Southerngl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Southerngl
Refresh our memory with a summary on this villain.
26 posted on 06/02/2008 4:31:22 PM PDT by labette ( Doctor of Thinkology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: labette

Oh this is the nimrod that went on Jerry Springer bragging about his five wives. Then Utah decided to prosecute him for “marrying” his 13 year old stepdaughter. He had 33 children with his five ‘wives’ and got welfare and food stamps for all.

Loser,sicko, and deserves his jail sentence.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/08/28/national/main520012.shtml


27 posted on 06/02/2008 4:34:18 PM PDT by Southerngl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc
No one released anyone’s name. Remember, most of the women go by their own names. It’s not a given that the children take on the father’s name, since there’s no real marriage under state law.

So your claim is that they just gave her a name that matched her father's, and they made it up?

28 posted on 06/02/2008 4:36:59 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc

Indictments? I hope they lead to convictions. That said there was no excuse for trampling the rights of the whole FLDS cult.


29 posted on 06/02/2008 4:37:52 PM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revelation 911
By the end of the day, 18 indictments had been issued, although no details were immediately available.

I wonder how many of these once in court are dependent on evidence found from the first warrant or the other warrants that came out of it. Thanks to the failure to get a good warrant most of this could git tossed.

Possibly they are hoping to run the cases after the election and then quietly drop them

30 posted on 06/02/2008 4:40:34 PM PDT by mouser (run the rats out its the only hope we have)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Southerngl
ALL THE ADULTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR NOT STOPPING CHILD RAPE.

So is it your opinion then, that the brides and the parents who give them permission to marry, should be arrested as accessories and co-conspirators as well?

Cause all I see are people calling for the MEN to be charged, even though the women, 14+ know that it's illegal for the people they're marrying to be married to more than one person and what the age to marry is. If they're old enough to be married they're old enough to deal the consequenses of it as well.

31 posted on 06/02/2008 4:43:49 PM PDT by HeartlandOfAmerica (Don't blame me - I voted for Fred and am STILL a FredHead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc; patton
I don’t think the 27-yo had a choice.

KIDNAPPING.

Patton's right.

The woman showed birth certificate and drivers license...and they still took her away. Don't tell me that guys in body armor, toting automatic weapons and riding in a tank Armored Personnel Carrier, don't give weight to this being coerced compliance.

And so we have supposedly competent professionals...allegedly experts...handling this case. and they can't tell the difference between a 27-year-old and a 16-year-old (at best)?!? Seems to me there's no way we can blame a child molester for failing to identify his underage victims, if these professionals can't tell the difference!

It's obvious that they just didn't care about rights...that their arrogance led them to believe that they would get away with it. And, in fact, they are getting away with a lot more than they should.

Can you imagine if a nursing 27-year-old mother were snatched off the street in Manhattan and carried away to where she was held against her will...wouldn't it provoke outrage and get covered to death by the media? Well, then, where are the muckraking reports on all of the abuses against these people?

Will you care when it happens to you, hocndoc?

32 posted on 06/02/2008 4:49:24 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: HeartlandOfAmerica

So is it your opinion then, that the brides and the parents who give them permission to marry, should be arrested as accessories and co-conspirators as well?
***************************

Not the brides that are underage, but yes, all others who sat by while this happened.


33 posted on 06/02/2008 4:51:14 PM PDT by Southerngl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Southerngl
Not the brides that are underage,

Why? They know that they're breaking the law. Why should they not face the consequences of breaking the law like everyone else?

34 posted on 06/02/2008 4:54:28 PM PDT by HeartlandOfAmerica (Don't blame me - I voted for Fred and am STILL a FredHead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

Oh good, I got one right.

Off topic, but do have any idea why the korean workmen at my house today kept laughing, every time I yelled at my dog, Kaygoki?


35 posted on 06/02/2008 5:01:26 PM PDT by patton (cuiquam in sua arte credendum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

Now I agree. They acted like it was a standoff.

I agree that child rape is WRONG and all involved should be punished, but to kidnap adults is also wrong. And very frightening.


36 posted on 06/02/2008 5:10:37 PM PDT by Southerngl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: HeartlandOfAmerica

OH that’s just retarded and I won’t even comment on the stupidity.


37 posted on 06/02/2008 5:13:16 PM PDT by Southerngl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Southerngl
Oh? Which part is retarded?

Do you seriously contend that at 14+ years old, a girl doesn't know that it's only legal for 1 man to marry one woman and anything else is illegal?

Or that criminals shouldn't be prosecuted? Why shouldn't they? Because they're underage or because they're female?

38 posted on 06/02/2008 5:18:40 PM PDT by HeartlandOfAmerica (Don't blame me - I voted for Fred and am STILL a FredHead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: HeartlandOfAmerica

Do you seriously contend that at 14+ years old, a girl doesn’t know that it’s only legal for 1 man to marry one woman and anything else is illegal? ‘

***************************
I seriously contend a 14 year old girl who is a CHILD should not be held legally responsible as of yet. Period. My kids know things are WRONG and even illegal, but I don’t think they should go to prison.


39 posted on 06/02/2008 5:25:51 PM PDT by Southerngl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Southerngl
Did I say prison. Please point out where, since I must have mispoken.

Thousands of crimes happen in this country every single day without prison being the result. But why should these children who are about to do some VERY adult things, get off scot-free? It just shows them that breaking the law has no consequences and encourages the next breaking of the law.

40 posted on 06/02/2008 5:30:47 PM PDT by HeartlandOfAmerica (Don't blame me - I voted for Fred and am STILL a FredHead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

Check out the requirements for a Texas Driver License or Identification Certificate. They’ll have to prove residency to register to vote. It might not be that easy for some of them:

http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/administration/driver_licensing_control/identificationrequirements.htm

Note: revised 5/20/08


41 posted on 06/02/2008 5:31:10 PM PDT by Alice in Wonderland (4-Hshootingsports.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc

I doubt many if any are for the FLDS in regards to criminal acts. For one thing it hasn’t been that long and just recently there was an article quoting one of the DAs that they were still going through the some 400 boxes of material gathered during the raid.

I doubt they’ve had time to finish that process, organize it into some sort of case structure, decide which things they want to persue first, etc. etc. etc.....

Now all that speculation on my part isn’t worth a cup of coffee but just my thoughts at this stage. I’ve been wrong a bunch in this case and I suspect I’ll be wrong a bunch more times before it’s over with.


42 posted on 06/02/2008 5:39:22 PM PDT by deport ( -- Cue Spooky Music --)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HeartlandOfAmerica

Ri-Dic-U-Lous.

Thanks for the debate.


43 posted on 06/02/2008 5:43:54 PM PDT by Southerngl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc

There’s going to be a mess figuring out who lives where and that definition of “household” is still not settled.


It may not be settled but the judge issue her definition of it in her ‘vacating order’ in the last few sentences of item no. VI.


44 posted on 06/02/2008 5:58:18 PM PDT by deport ( -- Cue Spooky Music --)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Southerngl

uh huh


45 posted on 06/02/2008 5:58:29 PM PDT by HeartlandOfAmerica (Don't blame me - I voted for Fred and am STILL a FredHead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

Good for her..


46 posted on 06/02/2008 6:40:47 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: patton

You were yelling

BAD CAT


47 posted on 06/02/2008 6:45:33 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

LOL, not quite. I gotta admit, the old Korean construction supervisor acted like it was the funniest thing he had heard in weeks.


48 posted on 06/02/2008 6:52:11 PM PDT by patton (cuiquam in sua arte credendum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Gondring; patton; hocndoc
And so we have supposedly competent professionals...allegedly experts...handling this case...It's obvious that they just didn't care about rights...that their arrogance led them to believe that they would get away with it. And, in fact, they are getting away with a lot more than they should.

Hear, hear. Government is corrupt and incompetent by its very nature! This incident also brings to mind the famous C.S. Lewis quote:

"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience."

49 posted on 06/02/2008 6:55:46 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (La Raza hates white folks. And John McCain loves La Raza!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

I was looking for that qoute - which essay is it from?


50 posted on 06/02/2008 7:00:02 PM PDT by patton (cuiquam in sua arte credendum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-231 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson