Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

United Healthcare: Sterilization or No Insurance
Seeking Alpha ^ | 2 June 2008 | Michael Steinberg

Posted on 06/02/2008 5:11:42 PM PDT by shrinkermd

“Free Market” sterilization - shocking, but that is what United Healthcare’s (UNH) subsidiary Golden Rule told a 39-year-old women in perfect health. The New York Times “After Caesareans, Some See Higher Insurance Cost” reports that private health insurers either do not issue medically underwritten policies or charge substantially higher premiums to women who have undergone Caesarean deliveries. Given that most individual policies are medically underwritten and 31.1% of deliveries are Caesarean, a large percentage of women of childbearing age are not eligible for health insurance.

The excuse is that it is statistically more likely that a second Caesarean will follow the first, costing an average of $2700 more than vaginal birth. In some states, Golden Rule will treat a Caesarean as a pre-existing condition, and exclude it for three years. Where it cannot be excluded or the exclusion period allowed is shorter, Golden Rule dictates sterilization or no insurance. Where are the pro-lifers when you really need them?

Taking a step back, we are beginning to see how far medical underwriting has gone. Healthy people are no longer guaranteed access to insurance.In addition, health insurance companies can take control of your body. As more people leave the shelter of employer provided insurance, the public will be awakened to the realities of medical underwriting. The noose is getting tighter every day.

(Excerpt) Read more at seekingalpha.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: cesareansections; healthcare; healthinsurance; lifehate; populationcontrol; unitedhealthcare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 06/02/2008 5:11:42 PM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd; wagglebee

Ping to you.

Insurance companies do not you to have kids. They want you to pay into the system until you need it, and then die quietly and quickly.

When euthanasia becomes widespread in the US it will be because of insurance. Be it private or socialized.


2 posted on 06/02/2008 5:14:31 PM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Blatant discrimination against babies. Keep this nonsence up and the US will be as sterile and doomed as Europe.


3 posted on 06/02/2008 5:15:34 PM PDT by FormerACLUmember (When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nnn0jeh

crappy insurance ping


4 posted on 06/02/2008 5:17:18 PM PDT by kalee (The offenses we give, we write in the dust; Those we take, we write in marble. JHuett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
This is what Marx meant when he said that Capitalism is doomed; that it would pass through socialism into communism.

Of course, it was necessary to de-moralize a people first. Because with a moral foundation, of course, no such thing would happen to Capitalism.

But absent the moral foundation, it is frighteningly efficient at bringing about the minifestations of communism and the cult of death and totalitarianism.

5 posted on 06/02/2008 5:17:45 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (Obama's a front man. Who's behind him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redgolum

Health Insurance is nothing more than legalized scamming. You pay premiums, and they tell YOU how much of your money they get to keep. If you don’t believe it, take a look at the size of your house, and the size of their buildings.

If folks had to pay out of pocket without the insurance middleman, the market would drive the price for services down for everyone.


6 posted on 06/02/2008 5:19:13 PM PDT by GWMcClintock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

They have already come for the smokers,drinkers, drug users, now women at high risk pregnancies, obese is next.

The only high risk class they won’t bother is the butt banging men class.


7 posted on 06/02/2008 5:19:21 PM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Depopulation policy, generally unarticulated, may be the driving force behind such policies as well as the culturally ‘sudden’ gay and lesbian advocacy movements of the last 40 years. In Scotland, there is a report today of hospitals giving OR priority time for abortions at the expense of the availability of ORs for maternity services.


8 posted on 06/02/2008 5:21:43 PM PDT by givemELL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kalee
crappy insurance ping

When I was looking for coverage, I did a common sense thing. I asked my doctors, pharmacists, and friends what plan raised their blood pressure the highest and caused the worst language.

Hands down, 100% it was USHC.

Doctor: Derisive snort, shakes head.

Pharmacist: "Oh THOSE $(%&*, they suck".

Neighbor: "My late husband had them! I am still paying off bills they refused to pay".

Maybe the premiums are cheap, like Allstate used to be..sell cheap insurance, and simply never pay claims till the summons arrives.

9 posted on 06/02/2008 5:26:31 PM PDT by Gorzaloon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: shrinkermd
New Golden Rule: Do unto others, then split.

Seriously, most insurances have decision making policies that are only a little less worse than this. It's part of the driving force behind universal health care, a/k/a socialized medicine. We've got to use market forces to drive the shoddy operators out of business, so that the other providers stay somewhat honest (and in business).

11 posted on 06/02/2008 5:31:25 PM PDT by hunter112 (The 'straight talk express' gets the straight finger express from me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

I thought Goden RUle was supposed to support Christian Values (hence the name). Sheesh! Here in Illinois, the Catholic hospital got OUT ofthe med insurance business because the state is making them cover things they cannot cover.


12 posted on 06/02/2008 5:32:25 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Yet another company/industry that has no clue what its actions are doing. I’ll tell them: making people angry and making government invent more laws and regulations that they complain about.

Police yourselves and you won’t need police.


13 posted on 06/02/2008 5:33:33 PM PDT by abercrombie_guy_38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redgolum

“When euthanasia becomes widespread in the US it will be because of insurance.”

That’s what greed does.


14 posted on 06/02/2008 5:48:32 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: redgolum

Insurance is only necessary because so many people have it and it is difficult to make medical arrangements without it. It causes increased cost not less cost even though people are deceived into thinking it saves them money it tends to benefit only those who need the most expensive procedures and even then you end up paying a premium price for those procedures.

What amazes me is that standard procedures which are commonplace still cost so much. Typically services the more common they are the less expensive they become but the medical system seems to not respond well to the free market. I think we should import more doctors to help drive the costs down and sponsor scholarships for more doctors here at home. Also I think when the government funds the R&D for new drugs then they should have as a criteria that those drugs be made available within two years of release to companies that make generic versions. It is ridiculous that tax payers dollars are given away to produce something that is then turned around and sold to them at a premium and they have no recourse but to buy them or die.


15 posted on 06/02/2008 5:52:14 PM PDT by Maelstorm (Insurance is not a cure for anything but the deflection of responsibility of the parties involved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gorzaloon; shrinkermd

There is a way to deal with United Healthcare when they refuse to pay, it worked for me anyway.

Being a cancer survivor, I have to go for periodic screenings. After they refused to pay for the first one, I called and asked, “When are you going to pay this?” Their response, “We don’t cover well-patient care.”

So I called the next day, and the next day, and the day after that asking the same question. Then I started calling every chance I got, sometimes a dozen times a day. After one month of this I called and asked for a supervisor. I asked her to look at her computer screen and the log of all my calls and told her to do the math and figure out how much the 1-800 calls were costing them along with taking up the time of her customer service people. Then I told her I was going to keep calling until I had cost United Healthcare 1000 times what the bill was that I had already paid the doctor. Guess what? I received a check within 3 days covering the entire cost of my screening. Persistence pays off!


16 posted on 06/02/2008 6:37:26 PM PDT by anonsquared
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Health care is not a right, and neither is health insurance. That said, my main problem with this form of voluntary sterilization is that, combined with Medicaid, it would lead to terrible effects on differential fertility. People who add value to society will have themselves sterilized, while the parasites continue to reproduce (even more than this is already happening). Not good.

IMO, mandatory health practitioner licensing needs to be eliminated, which will lead to the availability of lower-quality (but more widely affordable) health care options, which are currently eliminated from the market by regulations. The ugly truth is that regulations are responsible for pricing health-care out of the reach of many Americans - the minimum qualifications and standards are so high that affordable health-care delivery for many individuals is impossible. Look especially at legal fees and insurance costs doctors are forced to cover because contract law regulations are so perverse. Strict fidelity to contractual agreements would render health-care more affordable IMMEDIATELY.

The process could be taken further by next expanding the functions that nurses and other medical support staff, as well as pharmacists, can legally perform. This is especially true of federal regulations - having an American health-care oasis state would do a heck of a lot of good for downward harmonization.

People want to have the best of all worlds, and it is simply not possible. Something has to give, be it average affordability (too many regulations), average quality (laissez-faires policies), or average speed of service delivery (socialist policies). I'd err on the side of liberty, against compulsory collectivism.

17 posted on 06/02/2008 6:40:38 PM PDT by M203M4 (True Universal Suffrage: Pets of dead illegal-immigrant felons voting Democrat (twice))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

I had my share of dealings with Golden Rule.

As far as they are concerned, contractual obligations work in one direction only.

It would have been cheaper for me to pay a high class escort to screw me.


18 posted on 06/02/2008 6:46:40 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Would this fall under the Pro-Life or Moral Absolutes ping?


19 posted on 06/02/2008 8:02:14 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (If Islam conquers the world, the Earth will be at peace because the human race will be killed off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anonsquared
Bravo to you. I had to do something similar when on the eve of a band-aid surgery, my insurer told my OB they weren't going to cover it. Pain, or so it seemed, wasn't a good enough criteria to authorize the surgery to find out what was causing it. They had my records for six weeks.

I kicked hell--I demanded to talk to a supervisor and asked her where her office was, because I wanted her to examine me herself and tell me to MY face that surgery wasn't necessary. I said my doctor said my uterus was immobilized. It was on the records my doctor sent. I guess the underlings don't read patient records. The supervisor authorized it on the spot.

What was causing the pain was scar tissue from the c-section. They had to go in there and laser it. I feel sorry for these new crop of moms if the same thing happens to them and especially if they have United Health Care.

20 posted on 06/02/2008 8:56:33 PM PDT by pray4liberty (Watch and pray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson