Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Isn’t Seeking Permanent Bases in Iraq, Ambassador Says
American Forces Press Service ^ | Donna Miles

Posted on 06/05/2008 4:35:09 PM PDT by SandRat

WASHINGTON, June 5, 2008 – The United States is not seeking permanent military bases in Iraq as it negotiates legal and military agreements with the Iraqi government, U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Ryan C. Crocker said here today.

Speaking at the State Department, Crocker called published reports that the United States is trying to set up permanent bases “flatly untrue.”

“There clearly is going to be a need” for a U.S. and coalition military presence in Iraq beyond the end of the year, Crocker said. But the status of forces agreement, when adopted, “is not going to be forever, particularly as it related to the status and authority of coalition forces in Iraq,” he said.

“So I’m very comfortable saying to you – to the Iraqis, to anyone who asks – that no, indeed, we are not seeking permanent bases, either explicitly or implicitly, by just intending to stay there indefinitely,” he said.

Both the U.S. and Iraqi governments want a strategic framework agreement as quickly as possible, possibly by July, Crocker said. But he emphasized that his focus “is more on getting it done right than getting it done quick.”

The agreement will be developed through a straightforward process, and will be scrutinized not only by the Iraqi parliament, but also Iraqi public opinion, Crocker said.

“This will be a transparent process,” he said. “It will have a full debate. It will all be out there in the open.”

Once agreed to, the agreement will have far-reaching impact, the ambassador said.

“Not only will this agreement deal with the status of U.S. and coalition forces in Iraq past 2008, we also intend for it to set the broad parameters of the overall bilateral relationship in every field,” Crocker said. This will include political, diplomatic and cultural aspects -- “the whole totality of the relationship,” he said.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bases; dod; frwn; iraq; middleeast; militarybase

1 posted on 06/05/2008 4:35:09 PM PDT by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 91B; HiJinx; Spiff; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; clintonh8r; TEXOKIE; windchime; freekitty; ...
FR WAR NEWS!
If you would like to be added to / removed from FRWN,
please FReepmail Sandrat.

WARNING: FRWN can be an EXTREMELY HIGH-VOLUME PING LIST!!

2 posted on 06/05/2008 4:35:28 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Why not?


3 posted on 06/05/2008 4:37:43 PM PDT by Maceman (If you're not getting a tax cut, you're getting a pay cut.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

Because then the Left Loons could say; “See! We’re Occupiers.”


4 posted on 06/05/2008 4:41:31 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Maceman; SandRat; Allegra
More on this:

Can the U.S. and Iraq Have a Long-Term Relationship? ( proposed long-term security arrangement )

5 posted on 06/05/2008 4:47:45 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Not permanent bases, only for about 100 years.

Let’s face it, Iraq will be an American protectorate for a long time. This agreement needs to be finalized before the US election in case the Dems end up in charge of our foreign policy.

With our bases in Iraq, we can exercise military and political influence throughout the region. This will help protect the homeland from Islamo-Fascist terrorism, plus will back up our effort to democratize the Arab world.


6 posted on 06/05/2008 4:59:28 PM PDT by FFranco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

The United States is not seeking permanent military bases in Iraq

Yep....We weren't seeking them in Germany, Italy or Korea either , yet they are still there.

7 posted on 06/05/2008 7:45:49 PM PDT by Sarajevo (You're just jealous because the voices only talk to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson