Skip to comments.
Vote by Numbers - Astrophysicist and the Electoral College
NYT ^
| June 6th, 2008
| NEIL DEGRASSE TYSON
Posted on 06/06/2008 9:30:09 AM PDT by The_Republican
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
To: KevinJohnson
Actually, I have a good gut, but it’s a bit too big.
21
posted on
06/06/2008 1:52:42 PM PDT
by
kjo
To: KevinJohnson
Congrats on your Sacramento mayor’s race. :)
To: penelopesire
The dems rather consult astrologists than astrophysicists...LOL
Dems think astrologists and astrophysicists are the same thing.
23
posted on
06/06/2008 2:22:17 PM PDT
by
Cheburashka
(Liberalism: a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.)
To: Cheburashka
24
posted on
06/06/2008 2:27:11 PM PDT
by
penelopesire
("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
To: The_Republican
when Professor Gott and Dr. Colley applied the median method in 2004, they correctly predicted the winner in 49 states, missing only Hawaii.If I were them, I'd be seriously concerned by this. A senile chihuahua could have predicted that Kerry would easily win Hawaii. It's very odd that their model messed up there.
25
posted on
06/06/2008 2:33:37 PM PDT
by
Redcloak
(The 2nd Amendment: It's not about sporting goods.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson