Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Natural Gas Rush in Northeast Opposed!!
Damascus (PA) Citizens ^

Posted on 06/07/2008 3:59:05 AM PDT by finnsheep

The Marcellus Shale play is the latest huge thing in natural gas, considered by some to be a "super giant" gas field. Read more here http://www.petroleumnews.com/pntruncate/246893563.shtml

The edge of the Marcellus Shale in Northeast PA and NY is about 100 miles from NYC, which means the gas needs only a very short trip by pipeline to the major metropolitan centers.

Natural gas is the cleanest of the fossil fuels and also is a source for hydrogen for hydrogen powered vehicles.

So here are a bunch of "concerned citizens" planning to oppose it with all their might.

"The Damascus group has plans to pursue all avenues to stop the drilling, which include the use of moratoriums and other legal actions in the courts. It announced at the meeting that the group had enlisted the services of Richard Lippes, a renowned environmental attorney who was instrumental in winning a $129 million lawsuit for residents of the Love Canal section of Niagara Falls, NY, against Occidental Petroleum." You can tell them what you think of their efforts at DCS@mailhosts.net


TOPICS: Business/Economy; US: New Jersey; US: New York; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: damascus; energy; fossilfuel; fossilfuels; gas; gasdrilling; marcellus; marcellusshale; naturalgas; nimby; nyc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: finnsheep
You can get NG filling stations for your car at home.

The Chevy Volt IMHO should be made NG fueled only to get it of the refinery grid.

The Northeast could buy tons of them and like vehicles of this planform which can be scaled at some point. Great range, and very low emissions.

We and the Northeast Liberals can then tell the Saudi's were they could pound their sand.

Unfortunately the Sierra Club will probably nix this too, as the House and Senate continue to play musical chairs on the deck of the Titanic as the Sierra Club band continues to play their favorite tune.....

21 posted on 06/07/2008 5:01:16 AM PDT by taildragger (The Answer is Fred Thompson, I do not care what the question is.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Being as we live 1/4 mile from a gas compressor station, we would be happy if we could even get natural gas. We even have a pipe line that runs thru the back of our property. We have to use propane which is MUCH more expensive than natural gas.
22 posted on 06/07/2008 5:01:25 AM PDT by Dustbunny (Freedom prospers when religion is vibrant and the rule of law under God is acknowledged. The Gipper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dustbunny

They are typical ignorant Liberals who are jealous for one. They see the families with a drilling rig on their land, reaping a healthy retirement for land use and royalties.

Their claims are completely bogus and any half baked technical witness will make them out to be the complete morons they truly are. No court will close down drilling based on their ridiculous claims. They can’t because the drilling is done on private land and the drilling contractor is licensed and the project is overseen by the State and environmental authorities.


23 posted on 06/07/2008 5:06:00 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (Juan McCain....The lesser of Three Liberals.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: finnsheep

These projects are opposed by a smattering of moonbats who show up at local government meetings and exercise an influence far beyond their numbers.

If conservatives showed up at these meetings these leftists would be beat them everytime, and they’d crawl back in their holes and disappear. But for some unknown reason, conservatives do not show at meetings. I don’t know why.

We were warned by the Founders that if we wanted to keep this government we needed to be informed and involved. The lack of participation in local government is one of the primary reasons we are losing our country. If small government advocates attended meetings, we could take back our country in a decade and drive the left wingers over the cliff. They are, after all, cowards and find strength only in our silence.


24 posted on 06/07/2008 5:09:00 AM PDT by sergeantdave (Governments hate armed citizens more than armed criminals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

But nobody asks them whom they’re conserving it for. The only alternative to supply demand is for other countries NOT to conserve, then we have to import, which is expensive, and then use expensive treatments to make it blend enough to burn right because not all natural gas is the same: LB (imported gas) tends to be lighter and not as heat producing as natural gas found under the US.


25 posted on 06/07/2008 5:15:16 AM PDT by cake_crumb (Obama = Bumbling Tyrant who loves America's enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb

They’re not ‘conserving’ it for anything. Their guiding principle is that we should use less energy. And, they are quite content to force the rest of us to use less by restricting supplies and increasing costs to where we are forced to use less.


26 posted on 06/07/2008 5:25:29 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (A true patriot will do anything to keep a Democrat out of the White House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: finnsheep

I am to the point where I want to see all these types of lawsuits punished with life in prison.

Who died and left all the greenies in charge?

Why is 2% of the population running the other 98%???

Most of these freaks are trust fund babies who have never worked a day in their lives.

their idea of a hard life is having to get up before noon everyday and not being able to get a new BMW every 6 months. Or not having the paparazzi awaiting them when they go to dinner. Enough already!!

The inmates are in charge of the asylum, and it is time we took it all back. They have run amuck and are not thinking, they are just “feeling”.

When they all have to sign the front of a paycheck for a business, instead of the back of a trust fund check, then they can sit at the table and make monumental decisions.

Until they put in 60-80 hours a week trying to keep a business going, with employees who are expecting a paycheck every week, and government agencies who paper a business to death with forms and regulations and fees, they can just STFU.

I don’t even want a bounty on them anymore. I want open season.


27 posted on 06/07/2008 5:28:15 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat

“All that would help a pro drilling Pres candidate. If we had one.”

If those numbers are in play by then ... we’ll have one.


28 posted on 06/07/2008 5:30:13 AM PDT by Let's Roll (As usual, following a shooting spree, libs want to take guns away from those who DIDN'T do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: perez24

“Plummeting real estate values” is the key word in all of this.”

Perhaps- but they have it backwards. Wherever mineral rights exist, the values will go up.


29 posted on 06/07/2008 5:30:16 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

The opponents are wealthy Democrat “Greens”. They have got theirs and can afford $6 gas. They are stiff-necked elitists, pecksniffs and bluestockings. They play footsie with Marxists, and don’t even comprehend that “come the revolutioon” the “cosmopolitains” are always the first to be eliminated.

gr


30 posted on 06/07/2008 5:31:45 AM PDT by Melchior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave

If conservatives showed up at these meetings these leftists would be beat them everytime, and they’d crawl back in their holes and disappear. But for some unknown reason, conservatives do not show at meetings. I don’t know why.”

Alot of these “meetings” are held at hours of the day when conservatives are working. The trust fund moonbats are never working, so they schedule meetings during business hours, and they don’t heavily publicize them, as they don’t want any opposition and the other viewpoint.


31 posted on 06/07/2008 5:34:18 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat

Bob Barr.


32 posted on 06/07/2008 5:37:59 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (This election is like running in the Special Olympics. Even if McCain wins, were still retarded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb

Awesome. Rip em a new one!


33 posted on 06/07/2008 5:39:08 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (This election is like running in the Special Olympics. Even if McCain wins, were still retarded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
"They’re not ‘conserving’ it for anything. Their guiding principle is that we should use less energy."

Exactly, but they keep SAYING they want to "CONserve", rather then "PREserve" (not use ever) it. This is known as lying, and we keep letting them get away with it.

Lunatics just like that are why we don't have any new nuclear poer plants and why the US went from one of the top producers of oil to WAY down in the ranks during the Clinton administration. And don't even get me started on logging. They have been proven over and over again to have no clue what they are talking about, and yet because they are given enough of a voice to convince the public there is a majority which does not, in fact exist (climate change "consensus", anyone), the public shuts it's collective eyes and lets these blind, narrow lunatics lead our energy policy.

34 posted on 06/07/2008 5:57:15 AM PDT by cake_crumb (Obama = Bumbling Tyrant who loves America's enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave
"But for some unknown reason, conservatives do not show at meetings. I don’t know why."

Because conservatives are busy having a life. For the eco-nutcases, protesting IS their life.

35 posted on 06/07/2008 6:02:45 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: finnsheep

If they don’t want us to drill in this area, we should shut down all gas, oil, and gasoline transportation serving these morons, since all of these are ‘dangerous.’


36 posted on 06/07/2008 6:03:31 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave
"If conservatives showed up at these meetings these leftists would be beat them everytime, and they’d crawl back in their holes and disappear. But for some unknown reason, conservatives do not show at meetings. I don’t know why."

We have to know about them first. Thus the importance of telling people this is coming.

37 posted on 06/07/2008 6:08:47 AM PDT by cake_crumb (Obama = Bumbling Tyrant who loves America's enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th
I have a piece of land an oil company is paying me to extract natural gas from. I get a pretty sweet check from it, too. There are people I know who have farms on some of the land, built houses some of the land, (I own only a small parcel of the producing field), so they are literally saying Yes, In My Back Yard, the opposite of NIMBY. Of course, they get a check, but the people who don't live on the producing gas field could still benefit economically by cheaper, cleaner electricity.

I don't know about contaminated drinking water or carcinogens in the farmland, but there were no roads or only gravel roads in this area before the gas well, now they are paved. The site dates back to the 1970's and there has never been an explosion. The real estate prices have actually gone up since people want to live on land with valuable mineral rights, and I have never been able to hear any noise, but I have never gotten close to the well.

Have the protesters ever visited a gas well and/or looked at before/after scenarios, I wonder.

38 posted on 06/07/2008 6:12:38 AM PDT by sportutegrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All

In our area, this is all the talk.

http://www.shreveporttimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080606/NEWS01/806060334&s=d&page=1#pluckcomments
Haynesville Shale meeting draws hundreds


39 posted on 06/07/2008 6:16:04 AM PDT by abb (Organized Journalism: Marxist-style collectivism applied to information sharing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

They’re saying the hydraulic extraction process makes a mess and makes the drinking water stink. They also say it releases hundreds of chemicals into the water table. There is no mention of concentrations on the home page of the site.

Of course, the chemicals were already there, and natural gas has no scent (mercaptan is added to give the distinct aroma) so some of what they say is pure bs. Well, most of it.

Probably all of it. :)


40 posted on 06/07/2008 6:18:48 AM PDT by sig226 (Real power is not the ability to destroy an enemy. It is the willingness to do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson