Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

9th Circuit's chief judge posted sexually explicit matter on his website
LA Times ^ | 6/11/2008 | Scott Glover

Posted on 06/11/2008 12:10:12 PM PDT by Uncledave

One of the highest-ranking federal judges in the United States, who is currently presiding over an obscenity trial in Los Angeles, has maintained a publicly accessible website featuring sexually explicit photos and videos.

Alex Kozinski, chief judge of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, acknowledged in an interview with The Times that he had posted the materials, which included a photo of naked women on all fours painted to look like cows and a video of a half-dressed man cavorting with a sexually aroused farm animal. Some of the material was inappropriate, he conceded, although he defended other sexually explicit content as "funny."

{snip}

Kozinski said he would delete some material from his site, including the photo depicting women as cows, which he said was "degrading . . . and just gross." He also said he planned to get rid of a graphic step-by-step pictorial in which a woman is seen shaving her pubic hair.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 9thcircui; 9thcircuit; judge; judiciary; kozinski; moo; mooooo; moooooooo; mostoverruledcircuit; perverts; pervoverlord
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-56 next last

1 posted on 06/11/2008 12:10:13 PM PDT by Uncledave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

What an idiot.


2 posted on 06/11/2008 12:12:12 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! You just can’t make this stuff up!


3 posted on 06/11/2008 12:12:34 PM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

well, it /is/ the ninth...


4 posted on 06/11/2008 12:12:34 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (I've left Cynical City... bound for Jaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

Just another Kalifornia Pervert!

5 posted on 06/11/2008 12:12:46 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

I guess some of us old guys ain’t hip and keep ourselves to ourselves. No Facebook or My Space, just clinging to my Holy Bible and my firearms.


6 posted on 06/11/2008 12:14:20 PM PDT by 12Gauge687 (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

7 posted on 06/11/2008 12:14:46 PM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave
Kozinski said he must have accidentally uploaded those images to his server while intending to upload AU: (them to his laptop) something else. "I would not keep those files intentionally," he said. The judge pointed out that he never used appeals court computers to maintain the site.

The sexually explicit material on Kozinski's site earlier this week was extensive, including images of masturbation, public sex and contortionist sex. There was a slide show striptease featuring a transsexual, and a folder that contained a series of photos of women's crotches as seen through snug fitting clothing or underwear. There were also themes of defecation and urination, though they are not presented in a sexual context.

8 posted on 06/11/2008 12:15:15 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave
Careful when you ask aloud who appointed him . . .
Which will then leave you surprised that it isn't in the first paragraph of the story.
9 posted on 06/11/2008 12:16:38 PM PDT by freedomlover (Make sure you're in love - before you move in the heavy stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

Back in the day, Lyndon Johnson’s Presidential Commission on Pornography published their report including all the explicit photos. Worst stuff I ever saw.


10 posted on 06/11/2008 12:17:27 PM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Nepolean fries the idea powder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

This court should be abolished — it is nothing but a bunch of leftist liberal hacks, who exist to further the liberal radical agenda, and whose illegal and perverted decisions get overturned more than any court in the land.

Just fire them all.


11 posted on 06/11/2008 12:17:53 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave
Can the mods post this in breaking news? This guy is one of the most liberal judges on the 9th circuit.

"The sexually explicit material on Kozinski's site earlier this week was extensive, including images of masturbation, public sex and contortionist sex. There was a slide show striptease featuring a transsexual, and a folder that contained a series of photos of women's crotches as seen through snug fitting clothing or underwear. There were also themes of defecation and urination, though they are not presented in a sexual context."

12 posted on 06/11/2008 12:18:58 PM PDT by rumrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

In any other profession he would be forced to resign.


13 posted on 06/11/2008 12:19:31 PM PDT by FMBass ("Now that I'm sober I watch a lot of news"- Garofalo from Coulter's "Treason")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

***CLICK THE LINK, AND READ THE ARTICLE***
You WILL be shocked!
“ He was appointed to the federal bench by then-President Ronald Reagan in 1985. He has a national reputation for a brilliant legal mind and has developed a reputation as a champion of the First Amendment right to freedom of speech and expression. Several year ago, for example, after learning that appeals court administrators had placed filters on computers that denied access to pornography and other materials, Kozinski led a successful effort to have the filters removed.”


14 posted on 06/11/2008 12:20:23 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rumrunner

Kozinski is not one of the most liberal judges on the 9th Circuit. Not even close. He’s a libertarian in some areas, but he’s often lumped in with the conservatives by the left.


15 posted on 06/11/2008 12:20:29 PM PDT by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave
Kozinski, who was named chief judge of the 9th Circuit last year, is considered a judicial conservative on most issues. He was appointed to the federal bench by then-President Ronald Reagan in 1985.

:(

16 posted on 06/11/2008 12:21:15 PM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

It’s the most Liberal Appeals Court. Why should we be surprised?


17 posted on 06/11/2008 12:22:30 PM PDT by Retired Chemist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NinoFan

Not only is he a strong conservative/libertarian, he was often mentioned as a candidate for the Supreme Court during Bush(41) administration.

He is a brilliant writer, and regularly lampoons left-wing decisions that he feels have no Constitutional basis.

Sorry to see that he has some very nasty skeletons in his closet.


18 posted on 06/11/2008 12:24:46 PM PDT by Vineyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: FMBass

The problem with the system is that the President takes suggestions for appointments from the District Senators.
So, GOP Presidents have appointed wingnuts to the bench.
This practice is fundamentally crazy.


19 posted on 06/11/2008 12:25:54 PM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 12Gauge687

That’s just because you’re bitter<sarc


20 posted on 06/11/2008 12:26:54 PM PDT by BruceysMom ( My heart is in Baggs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

21 posted on 06/11/2008 12:27:06 PM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

lol


22 posted on 06/11/2008 12:29:05 PM PDT by KoRn (CTHULHU '08 - I won't settle for a lesser evil any longer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

A pervert.


23 posted on 06/11/2008 12:29:33 PM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

This is very unfortunate. Kozinski is an ardent defender of the second amendment. Some have wondered whether one of his recent dissents in the 9th circuit would have influence in the text of the upcoming Supreme Court opinion.

He should have kept his yap shut, instead of trying to justify why he saved his favorites.


24 posted on 06/11/2008 12:30:42 PM PDT by Beelzebubba (Guns don't kill people, criminals and the governments that create them do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vineyard

Skeletons, you say?

From the little I’ve read (didn’t click the link), this man shouldn’t be judging ANYTHING OR ANYONE.


25 posted on 06/11/2008 12:32:42 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (I didn't leave the republicans, they left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rumrunner
This guy is one of the most liberal judges on the 9th circuit.

The guy is a libertarian who was appointed by Reagan.

Of all the justices on the Ninth Circuit it could have been....

26 posted on 06/11/2008 12:37:52 PM PDT by Baron OBeef Dip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NinoFan
By the descriptions I am pretty sure I have seen those images before. One is of a hapless italian slob who thought it best to do a #2 out in a pasture by the road. As he tires to drop his pants a donkey gets "agitated" and the video is of this poor slob trying to fend off the amorous donkey. Pretty funny. The other reference to shaving is pretty tame and mostly inferred by the viewer - they are humorous not salacious. The difference is important.

But this sure a bunch of folk all twitterpated. Oh Nos!

27 posted on 06/11/2008 12:38:34 PM PDT by corkoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: holdonnow

Gotta love those 9th Circuit men in black:)


28 posted on 06/11/2008 12:39:32 PM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave
Kozinski, Alex
Born 1950 in Bucharest, Romania

Federal Judicial Service:
Judge, U. S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Nominated by Ronald Reagan on June 5, 1985, to a new seat created by 98 Stat. 333; Confirmed by the Senate on November 7, 1985, and received commission on November 7, 1985. Served as chief judge, 2007-present.

Chief judge, U.S. Court of Federal Claims, 1982-1985

Education:
University of California, Los Angeles, A.B., 1972

University of California, Los Angeles, School of Law, J.D., 1975

Professional Career:
Law clerk, Hon. Anthony Kennedy, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, 1975-1976
Law clerk, Chief Justice Warren Burger, Supreme Court of the United States, 1976-1977
Private practice, Los Angeles, California, 1977-1979
Private practice, Washington, DC, 1979-1981
Deputy legal counsel, Office of the President-Elect, Washington, DC, 1980-1981
Assistant counsel, Office of Counsel to the President, Washington, DC, 1981
Special counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, Washington, DC, 1981-1982

Race or Ethnicity: White

Gender: Male

29 posted on 06/11/2008 12:50:57 PM PDT by SmithL (Look at Hillary's marriage, and tell me she won't settle for second place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
Kozinski is an ardent defender of the second amendment.

And because of this I am skeptical of this story until there is more information.

Isn't this the guy who said something along the lines that the 2nd was the last line of defense that a free people only have one chance at?

30 posted on 06/11/2008 12:51:39 PM PDT by beltfed308 (Heller: The defining moment of our Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: TLI; xsmommy

The judge to the right there raked me over the coals once in oral arguments -- but ultimately ruled in our favor.

< /boring warstories >

31 posted on 06/11/2008 12:54:56 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; ...
One of the highest-ranking federal judges in the United States, who is currently presiding over an obscenity trial in Los Angeles, has maintained a publicly accessible website featuring sexually explicit photos and videos.

Libertarian ping! To be added or removed freepmail me or post a message here.
32 posted on 06/11/2008 12:56:22 PM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

she was haht for ya, probly, from the looks of her... ; )


33 posted on 06/11/2008 1:04:46 PM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

Sounds like the kind of judge Sen. Jim Webb could vote for.


34 posted on 06/11/2008 1:11:01 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (1984 was supposed to be a warning not an instruction manual!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman
alex kozinski abusing his discretion much as always ...
35 posted on 06/11/2008 1:13:12 PM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

Doesn’t matter what or who he is politically. HE’S A PERVERT and needs to be HUNG out to dry! OFF THE BENCH! I’m tired of these useless POS’s who set on their high seats and judge everyone else. Grrrrr


36 posted on 06/11/2008 1:13:54 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy

That’s a shame, I always liked that guy.


37 posted on 06/11/2008 1:27:36 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (El Conservo Tribe, tribal name "Avoids Fort Marcy Park". We are so screwed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U
The sexually explicit material on Kozinski's site earlier this week was extensive, including images of masturbation, public sex and contortionist sex. There was a slide show striptease featuring a transsexual, and a folder that contained a series of photos of women's crotches as seen through snug fitting clothing or underwear. There were also themes of defecation and urination, though they are not presented in a sexual context.

This is not a good guy to be a chief judge of the court of appeals. He should resign or be impeached. There are good and decent judges out there that would deserve this honor...

38 posted on 06/11/2008 1:32:07 PM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave
I don't care what this guy does in his off time, but on government computers and the open internet, this is indefensible.

Impeach and ostracize.

39 posted on 06/11/2008 1:38:13 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
Impeach and ostracize.

You misspelled "osterize".

40 posted on 06/11/2008 1:41:40 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Retired Chemist
It’s the most Liberal Appeals Court. Why should we be surprised?

As a whole, it is. But not every judge on it is a liberal. Kozinski, a Reagan appointee, is generally considered the leader of the conservative bloc on the 9th Circuit.

41 posted on 06/11/2008 1:48:39 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
Otra-

Oster-

Either would work, but I'm not big on initiation of force. The former only assumes that he starves to death of his own accord. I'm ok with that...

Curious though, I found at least one article claiming he's a "conservative" judge. Of course, on the 9th Circus this term is relative and meaningless outside of California's boundaries.

42 posted on 06/11/2008 1:52:48 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
Curious though, I found at least one article claiming he's a "conservative" judge. Of course, on the 9th Circus this term is relative and meaningless outside of California's boundaries.

On any court in this country, Kozinski --himself a refugee from communism-- would be considered a conservatve, albeit of the libertarian/Goldwater school rather than the religious/ social conservative school.

43 posted on 06/11/2008 2:05:36 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

I don’t know the guy from Adam. I do know that the article points out the guys cluelessness on technology. His sense of humor isn’t what I’d call “wholesome” either.


44 posted on 06/11/2008 2:07:11 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

I am not defending what he posted on his website (though, judging from the press descriptions, it seems more crude and tasteless than really obscene or pornographic). I am only responding to people who think he’s not actually a conservative judge; he is.


45 posted on 06/11/2008 2:10:34 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

I’m guessing the judge to the right is female, but hey, ya never know.


46 posted on 06/11/2008 2:15:46 PM PDT by isom35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Martin, have you seen this thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2029394/posts


47 posted on 06/11/2008 2:20:33 PM PDT by isom35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
The judge pointed out that he never used appeals court computers to maintain the site.

Claims not to have used Government computers

48 posted on 06/11/2008 2:45:41 PM PDT by grjr21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
I don't care what this guy does in his off time, but on government computers and the open internet, this is indefensible.

Impeach and ostracize.


From the article, the server where the files were kept was not a government computer. It was this judge's own web page, presumably hosted by a private ISP (the article doesn't explicitly state). In other words, this judge was doing this on his off time, and on privately-owned equipment. Furthermore, he did not have links on his website directly to these files, meaning that he obviously didn't intend to have the world see them. He was just too ignorant about how the WWW works to prevent them from seeing it (which is ignorant in itself, given the nature of politics). He simply placed the files in a directory which was set with public permissions.

Does the very possession of these types of files make him unfit for a judgeship? Perhaps. If this standard were applied to all public servants, I would say "Certainly!" However, if this standard is only going to be applied to non-left wing nutjobs, then I say to hell with it, let him stay a judge.

Some lines from the article, that you apparently missed:

"One of the highest-ranking federal judges in the United States, who is currently presiding over an obscenity trial in Los Angeles, has maintained his own publicly accessible website featuring sexually explicit photos and videos."
[This statement is actually very misleading. Later in the article, you find out that these files were not actually on the web page. They were merely in a directory which was accessible (but not easily visible) to the public]

"The judge pointed out that he never used appeals court computers to maintain the site."

Before the site was taken down, visitors to http://alex.kozinski.com were greeted with the message: "Ain't nothin' here. Y'all best be movin' on, compadre."

Only those who knew to type in the name of a subdirectory could see the content on the site, which also included some of Kozinski's essays and legal writings as well as music files and personal photos.

49 posted on 06/11/2008 3:06:39 PM PDT by fr_freak (So foul a sky clears not without a storm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave
Jezz the ninth circus is at it again....

this is the chief justice...

I would have hoped for higher standards.... or keeping you private proclivities out of public view... what is done behind chamber doors is his business. but when it reaches the public and damages the sanctity of the Judaical bench.... he needs to go...

50 posted on 06/11/2008 3:37:27 PM PDT by Americanwolf (no matter which way you cut it...barrack obama and hitlery are socialists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson