Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Better Dead Than Rude [Polictical Correctness]
The American Conservative ^ | July 2, 2007 Issue | John Derbyshire

Posted on 06/11/2008 7:42:03 PM PDT by OnRightOnLeftCoast

Political correctness began as a reasonable adjustment of manners, but as an ideology, it corrupts language and dulls thought.

(Excerpt) Read more at amconmag.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: ideology; pc; politicalcorrectness
Mark Steyn's Canada hate speech trial is a good example of what is being rammed down our throats.
1 posted on 06/11/2008 7:42:03 PM PDT by OnRightOnLeftCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OnRightOnLeftCoast

Just like Liberalism in general.


2 posted on 06/11/2008 7:43:20 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham ("The land of the Free...Because of the Brave")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OnRightOnLeftCoast

Political Correctionism is nothing more than a means used by Communists, Marxists, and socialists to advance their agenda and incrementally remove your freedoms from you.


3 posted on 06/11/2008 7:50:17 PM PDT by BuffaloJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OnRightOnLeftCoast
Political correctness began as a reasonable adjustment of manners

No it didn't. It began in Marxism to describe thoughts consistent with the goal of spreading communism, so that thoughts inconsistent with Communism (those that were against the goals of the party, or "politically incorrect") were considered illegitimate thought (not even to be discussed in private).

Political Correctness is nothing more than cultural Marxism.

4 posted on 06/11/2008 7:55:35 PM PDT by Technogeeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Technogeeb
Political correctness began as a reasonable adjustment of manners.

Manners are manners.

Political correctness is political correctness.

Two different things.

5 posted on 06/11/2008 7:58:03 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OnRightOnLeftCoast

PC is the scourge of our times.


6 posted on 06/11/2008 7:58:15 PM PDT by Ptarmigan (Bunnies=Sodomites)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OnRightOnLeftCoast

Very good article. I usually don’t read things that long, but this was very, very good. He ends by pointing out that PC will crumble as it comes up against human nature. Surely this is true.


7 posted on 06/11/2008 8:33:25 PM PDT by ichabod1 (If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it, and if it stops moving, subsidize it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Technogeeb

In other words, something may be correct, but not politically correct, hence, by definition, incorrect.


8 posted on 06/11/2008 8:34:58 PM PDT by ichabod1 (If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it, and if it stops moving, subsidize it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OnRightOnLeftCoast

call me ignorant but what the heck does “BCE” and “CE” stand for?


9 posted on 06/11/2008 8:46:21 PM PDT by Awestruck (All the usual suspects)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Awestruck

“Before Common Era”
and
“Common Era”

You see...we can no longer have any reference to Christ (shhhh!)
He must become person non grata in school text books -else someone somewhere be traumatized or deeply offended by the mere sight of his name.

Therefore the term “common era” had been invented to replace the old BC and AD.

The funny thing is...it still revolves around the same time period - the estimated year of “His” (shhh) birthyear - but they’re hoping the young’uns won’t get too curious and figure that one out.


10 posted on 06/11/2008 8:51:06 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: OnRightOnLeftCoast

There was never anything reasonable about political correctness. It is fascist and totalitarian in nature and has always been so. It’s only purpose is to suppress words and ideas that are deemed unacceptable by a particular group or individual. The author gives credence to a virulent propaganda technique by conceding any amount of reasonableness to it.


11 posted on 06/11/2008 9:39:10 PM PDT by TigersEye (Berlin 1936. Olympics for murdering regimes. Beijing 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife
“Before Common Era”
and
“Common Era”

I define them as "Before Christian Era" and "Christian Era" just to tick off the PC folks. :=)

12 posted on 06/11/2008 9:45:35 PM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bob

That’s a good one!

I’ll have to borrow that.

Whoever thought of this “common era” BS has way too much time on their hands.


13 posted on 06/11/2008 9:57:08 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: OnRightOnLeftCoast

Not so many years ago, people were warning of the domino effect, or the slippery slope, with regard to scrapping laws against abortion; they were dismissed as crackpots when they said the state would soon legitimize abortion for gender, abortion without parental consent, abortion of full term babies, infanticide, and euthanasia.

And with regard to scrapping laws against sexual perversion; people scoffed at predictions that the day would come when homosexuals could adopt children and marry one another.

Hate speech legislation was never going to result in priests recanting or going to jail, and certainly journalists would never have anything to worry about.

Once, a long, long time ago, income tax wasn’t supposed to take anything you could really feel being torn out of your pockets.

Does anyone think there are enough people in this country today who will kick up a serious fuss if free speech is smothered by “hate crime law” or “rights commissions?” If gun ownership is slowly strangled until one day (very soon) it becomes everywhere illegal? If mandatory civil service for high school diploma becomes more “fair” and everyone is required to serve the state, whether or not they want a diploma or already have one they didn’t serve for? If energy companies are nationalized?

There is no going back from here. Not enough people know what they’re missing. Not enough people know what America originally was. And too many people are getting government handouts.

2A is not going to save 1A. The firearms will soon have no ammunition. And thanks to public education, free speech is already very deficient in ammunition.

2A won’t save it, conservatism hasn’t the numbers, capitalism is crawling on its belly, and there are more traitors than patriots in the media, the schools and the legislatures.

It’s just a matter of time now.


14 posted on 06/12/2008 5:15:56 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Vote McCain-Feingold. For all the difference it will make.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OnRightOnLeftCoast

Have you guys visited the Religion Forum? There are discussions every single day to limit what some refer to as “hate” speech. That so-called hate speech is often just a retelling of recorded facts.

Offensive speech is the only speech that needs protection. Nobody tries to silence polite speech.


15 posted on 06/12/2008 5:19:08 AM PDT by colorcountry (To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OnRightOnLeftCoast
Then someone noticed that Reagan actually had expressed the notion Bush attributed to him. In a 1938 letter, Reagan had written, “I was raised from childhood by parents who believed bigotry and prejudice were the worst things a person could be guilty of.”
...I think we have to conclude that, yes, these are real beliefs sincerely expressed.

Interesting that a man with so much to say about language and its deployment, a contributor to NR no less, cannot recognize a rhetorical device when he reads it. Reagan did not literally mean it. Moreover, the sentence does even not say he himself "believed bigotry and prejudice were the worst things," it says his parents did.

Reagan's statement very effectively communicates the youth's perspective of his elders' moral code, and in the typical hyperbolic all-or-nothing "cant" of the adolescent.

16 posted on 06/12/2008 6:21:58 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Vote McCain-Feingold. For all the difference it will make.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob

Oh, that’s good...

That’s one of the biggest cultural abominations that we have today. Symbolically, of course. It just represents how far our nation has slid to cater to the left.


17 posted on 06/12/2008 6:24:59 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson