Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exorcism Threatens [Louisiana Governor] Jindal's [VP] Candidacy
Townhall.com ^ | June 13, 2008 | Kathryn Jean Lopez

Posted on 06/17/2008 7:06:13 AM PDT by Ebenezer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: rrstar96

This only makes me like Jindal more. Leftwebbers can go stuff it.


21 posted on 06/17/2008 9:07:16 AM PDT by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twigs

yes, I agree but I feel the immediate urgency. Things are getting worse at a faster pace. Louisiana will understand - it’s for the good of the country! It’s pitiful we don’t have an over abundance of good men in office who won’t comprise their values for the PC/evil crowd. PC wasn’t prevalent in the Reagan era. Now it’s rampant.


22 posted on 06/17/2008 9:22:05 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
this is not the year for him

I say, NOW, more than ever. Read your tag line and be encouraged.
23 posted on 06/17/2008 9:26:16 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: rrstar96
KJL's love affair with Flip continues. Gag.

As for Bobby Jindal, I can't think of any better place for an exorcism than an American college campus. Many of them truly are the haunts of real, live demons.

Sticking to the Bit? Yale’s Abortion Artist
24 posted on 06/17/2008 9:31:45 AM PDT by Antoninus (Every second spent bashing McCain is time that could be spent helping Conservatives downticket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant; presently no screen name; Bobalu; twigs; Salvation; karnage

Baton Rouge, we have a problem....

As some of you know, the Louisiana Legislature has voted itself a 100% salary increase (down from 200% as originally considered). Although Jindal is against the bill in question, he has stated that he will not veto it, even when the state’s voters are strongly opposed to the increase. Bad move, Governor!


25 posted on 06/17/2008 9:55:12 AM PDT by Ebenezer (Strength and Honor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rrstar96

Frankly, I think most voters would be happy to elect someone to Washington who knows how to conduct a good exorcism!


26 posted on 06/17/2008 10:00:23 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rrstar96

I got news for people: Baptisms are exorcisms.


27 posted on 06/17/2008 10:01:30 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rrstar96

What’s your take on it? He didn’t veto it because he has to work w/these guys and needs their cooperation?


28 posted on 06/17/2008 10:04:40 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Oh yes! Moreso, since they only have 20% or so approval rating. Hey, they will thank him in the morning!


29 posted on 06/17/2008 10:07:43 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: rrstar96

bttt


30 posted on 06/17/2008 10:09:44 AM PDT by Matchett-PI (Driving a Phase Two Operation Chaos Hybrid that burns both gas AND rubber.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

It might be that Jindal wants to be in good terms with the legislators, but does it have to take practically a bribe to accomplish that? There’s nothing principled (and a lot counterproductive) about that.

My take on it is that, by his not vetoing the bill, the Governor may be allowing the legislators who supported the raise to bury themselves come re-election while he himself will not be adversely affected, or at least that is the gamble he is making. But then, the buck stops at the Governor’s desk, and Jindal’s refusal to veto may cost him politically after all, especially if he contemplates national office someday. What about cutting on government waste as an honored tenet of the conservatism he claims to embrace?


31 posted on 06/17/2008 11:03:30 AM PDT by Ebenezer (Strength and Honor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: rrstar96

I agree. No compromise. He may think it will cost him now; but in the end, it always costs more.


32 posted on 06/17/2008 11:36:06 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson