Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Flashback]: Obama Camp Says It: He'll Support Filibuster Of Any Bill Containing Telecom Immunity
tpmelectioncentral ^ | October 24, 2007 | Greg Sargent

Posted on 06/22/2008 10:21:43 AM PDT by TornadoAlley3

It's official: Obama will back a filibuster of any Senate FISA legislation containing telecom immunity, his campaign has just told Election Central. The Obama campaign has just sent over the following statement from spokesman Bill Burton:

"To be clear: Barack will support a filibuster of any bill that includes retroactive immunity for telecommunications companies."

(Excerpt) Read more at tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; antiamerican; blueturban; extortion; fisa; jihadinamerica; lawsuit; nationalinsecurity; obama; screwamerica; shakedown; telecom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-57 next last

1 posted on 06/22/2008 10:21:44 AM PDT by TornadoAlley3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Further proof that B. Hussein Obama is going after the Islamoterrorist vote.


2 posted on 06/22/2008 10:23:26 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (De-Globalize yourself !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3
B. Hussein Obama once again sides with the terrorists... even some House Democrats actually took the pro-USA side of this debate.

Is he friends with these terrorists too?

3 posted on 06/22/2008 10:25:33 AM PDT by pnh102 (Save America - Ban Ethanol Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Isn’t he a little bit late? Didn’t the President sign legislation protecting the telecoms from prosecution .. so that means the Senate already had to approve it. Am I missing something?


4 posted on 06/22/2008 10:25:46 AM PDT by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Obama seeking the terrorists vote?


5 posted on 06/22/2008 10:27:50 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken522

My mistake - the House approved it, but the Senate hasn’t yet. Sorry.


6 posted on 06/22/2008 10:28:03 AM PDT by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3
Obama had them fainting again at this morning's appearance in Sweet Apple, Ohio, where he addressed a crowd of Hillary voters in an attempt to gain their support.

Must-see video

7 posted on 06/22/2008 10:28:36 AM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken522

This was from October 07.


8 posted on 06/22/2008 10:28:45 AM PDT by TexasBeth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3
What all is Oabama against? Anyone want to start a list?

Obama is against:

* Drilling for oil

* Lower Gas Prices

* Lower food prices

* Lower taxes

* Maintaining jobs

9 posted on 06/22/2008 10:29:11 AM PDT by TennTuxedo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken522
Isn’t he a little bit late? Didn’t the President sign legislation protecting the telecoms from prosecution .. so that means the Senate already had to approve it. Am I missing something?

This means that Mr. Obama might support an ex-post facto law retroactively criminalizing acts by the telecoms. Of course, this type of law is expressly forbidden by the U.S. Constitution, but according to the left, it's a "living document" that means whatever they say it means.

10 posted on 06/22/2008 10:29:17 AM PDT by rabscuttle385
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rawhide
It's a Dem trifecta.

It's anti-business, pro-terrorist and pro-trial lawyer, all in one!

11 posted on 06/22/2008 10:30:30 AM PDT by ZOOKER ( Exploring the fine line between cynicism and outright depression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Hes such an ass.


12 posted on 06/22/2008 10:30:56 AM PDT by beckysueb (Drill here! Drill now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

MoveOn yanks the strings and Obama dances..$$$$$$$


13 posted on 06/22/2008 10:31:07 AM PDT by vietvet67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3
Jihad Hussein speaks!


14 posted on 06/22/2008 10:31:44 AM PDT by FormerACLUmember (When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken522

that was 2007, the following is 6/20/08...

Obama Supports FISA Legislation, Angering Left
By Paul Kane
Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) today announced his support for a sweeping intelligence surveillance law that has been heavily denounced by the liberal activists who have fueled the financial engines of his presidential campaign.

In his most substantive break with the Democratic Party’s base since becoming the presumptive nominee, Obama declared he will support the bill when it comes to a Senate vote, likely next week, despite misgivings about legal provisions for telecommunications corporations that cooperated with the Bush administration’s warrantless surveillance program of suspected terrorists.


15 posted on 06/22/2008 10:32:09 AM PDT by TornadoAlley3 ('GOP' : Get Our Petroleum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Guess he doesn’t need donations from any American Company now.


16 posted on 06/22/2008 10:32:45 AM PDT by rocksblues (Folks we are in trouble, "Mark Levin" 03/26/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnh102
Is he friends with these terrorists too?

Bill Ayers for starters.

17 posted on 06/22/2008 10:34:04 AM PDT by GOPyouth (Obama thinks Osama is innocent. That should be enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Islamofacist and Trial Lawyers.

What a pairing!


18 posted on 06/22/2008 10:35:05 AM PDT by MindBender26 (Leftists stop arguing when they see your patriotism, your logic, your CAR-15 and your block of C4.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
Further proof that B. Hussein Obama is going after the Islamoterrorist vote.

Along with the campaign taking the stance this week that Osama Bin Laden in innocent.

19 posted on 06/22/2008 10:35:33 AM PDT by GOPyouth (Obama thinks Osama is innocent. That should be enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TennTuxedo
He's also against life - supports partial-birth abortion - and is opposed to America and all that is good and holy!


20 posted on 06/22/2008 10:36:39 AM PDT by ConorMacNessa (HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines, RVN 1969. St. Peregrine, patron saint of cancer patients, pray for us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TennTuxedo

Add America....


21 posted on 06/22/2008 10:37:09 AM PDT by Born In America (Will vote only for the NON-CLIMATE CHANGE CANDIDATE, irrespective of party affiliation....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3
He's just running to the middle before the November election. His base will vote for him regardless. I think it was Richard Nixon who said: ‘to win the primary you have to run as far to the right (or left) as you can, then to win the general election you have to run as close to the middle as you can’. Obama is just trying to win over the vast middle voters.
22 posted on 06/22/2008 10:39:55 AM PDT by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Dated 2007. Why is this posted now????


23 posted on 06/22/2008 10:40:44 AM PDT by threeoeight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Thanks. I see the date of OP’s article is back in 2007. Kind of misleading everyone here to believe this is a recent statement by Barak, especially with this legistration coming up for a vote shortly in the Senate. I do not appreciate being misled.


24 posted on 06/22/2008 10:40:48 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

He sounds pretty sure that he will be elected.


25 posted on 06/22/2008 10:42:06 AM PDT by nobama08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Next ObamaSama will introduce “Conspiracy To Murder” charges against firms that make M-16s used by our troops...


26 posted on 06/22/2008 10:43:54 AM PDT by Doctor Raoul (Fire the CIA and hire the Free Clinic, someone who knows how to stop leaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TennTuxedo

I’d say that it pretty clearly demonstrates that a Harvard education is no longer worth the price of tuition.


27 posted on 06/22/2008 10:44:44 AM PDT by SumProVita ("Cogito ergo sum pro vita." .....updated Descartes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: threeoeight
Dated 2007. Why is this posted now????

Do you believe ObamaSama has changed his mind?

28 posted on 06/22/2008 10:45:00 AM PDT by Doctor Raoul (Fire the CIA and hire the Free Clinic, someone who knows how to stop leaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: threeoeight
Dated 2007. Why is this posted now????

Because after last week's developments, it's relevant now? I don't know.

29 posted on 06/22/2008 10:46:43 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (De-Globalize yourself !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: rawhide
Misleading would be if I posted the date as today's. It says 2007. If you see 2007 and believe it is a recent statement, that's your problem.
30 posted on 06/22/2008 10:49:29 AM PDT by TornadoAlley3 ('GOP' : Get Our Petroleum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

You should have indicated the year in your posting. It was and is misleading. That is your problem.


31 posted on 06/22/2008 10:51:08 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

How he do dat? He never go der to dat Senate nohow.


32 posted on 06/22/2008 10:51:38 AM PDT by mathurine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
Obama has flip flopped and MSM has not mentioned it. No, not a surprise about the media. But the Messiah and his followers constantly call McCain a flip flopper on tax cuts, drilling etc...
33 posted on 06/22/2008 10:51:48 AM PDT by TornadoAlley3 ('GOP' : Get Our Petroleum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3; holdonnow; Fred Nerks; HonestConservative; SE Mom; rodguy911; All

Obama’s Unsung Hero/Politico

Snip:

Berman left presidential politics for three cycles. But then, in 2004, in his second tour in Gephardt’s orbit, he made a crucial friend: Gephardt campaign manager Plouffe, who would take the same role on Obama’s campaign.

Last year, Berman moved to Chicago to help Obama; his wife and four children remain in Washington, D.C.

Many campaign operatives make a career of politics, but delegate counters tend to be an exception. They’re typically lawyers by training, for one. And their skills are in demand only every four years. Berman, despite the Obama campaign’s anti-lobbyist stance, has spent most non-campaign time at the Washington law and lobbying firm Winston and Strawn, where he specialized in telecommunications. His main lobbying client, according to federal filings, was the in-flight telecommunications firm Aircell.

Delegate selection “has been sort of his hobby while he was a real lawyer the rest of the time,” said Elmendorf. “This is the year it’s become incredibly useful.”

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=RNWE,RNWE:2005-01,RNWE:en&q=The+Obama+Campaign%27s+%27Unsung+Hero%27

Ummm... this would be a real good time for Obama to explain the Orascom deal re: Iraq (anybody out there trolling for Obama better read this before it’s too late).

http://ajacksonian.blogspot.com/2008/06/obama-and-iraq.html

Sure, they could say another reason for Obama not to want them wiretapped (that kinda makes him fodder for the terror supporter label, cause gee, no way he would set up the freedom fighters to get monitored), or they can admit Obama sure was making a lot of deals with Auchi, Rezko and Alsammarae re: Iraq... no wonder he pushed back his timeline of getting out and the recent legislation didn’t include one (hence, he’s not as against the war as he made it seem). Oh bother.

As a special double blind troll special, here’s some points on lobbyists in general and views from the other side (fair/balanced):

http://www.examiner.com/p-171260~RNC__Obama_s_Lobbyist_Denial.html

Op Research, just because (re: thread topic):

Ouch from Greenwald
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/06/19/obama/

http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Obama_I_ll_Fight_To_Strip_Telecom_Immunity_From_FISA

Rut Roh
http://www.talkleft.com/story/2008/3/7/23318/97359


34 posted on 06/22/2008 10:52:46 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Iron and clay don't mix. - Daniel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rawhide

Obama Camp Says It: He’ll Support Filibuster Of Any Bill Containing Telecom Immunity
tpmelectioncentral ^ | October 24, 2007 | Greg Sargent


35 posted on 06/22/2008 10:53:05 AM PDT by TornadoAlley3 ('GOP' : Get Our Petroleum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

I saw that later, but your post was and is still misleading, with the indication that this was a recent statement by Obama.


36 posted on 06/22/2008 10:56:37 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3
So Barack "flip flopped" on this, huh? LOL! Way to go Obama!

"Flip flopping" is only bad when gas goes from two bucks to five bucks. McCain should be ashamed of himself!

sarc/off

37 posted on 06/22/2008 10:58:44 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (De-Globalize yourself !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: rawhide
with the indication that this was a recent statement by Obama.

No where did I indicate that, you assumed.

38 posted on 06/22/2008 10:59:57 AM PDT by TornadoAlley3 ('GOP' : Get Our Petroleum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: AliVeritas

Thanks Ali.


39 posted on 06/22/2008 11:00:28 AM PDT by TornadoAlley3 ('GOP' : Get Our Petroleum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Now, let’s do nuances. Richard M. Daley is a very efficient mayor and good administrator as was his father, Richard J, but nobody in what is known as greater “Chicagoland”, who calls themselves a “reformer”, would want the endorsement of any Dick Daley. The term “Daley-Reformer” is an oxymoron (to distinguish it from ordinary morons).

And amazingly enough for a Chicago machine pol, there are millions of people out there who believe that Barack Obama will bring them “Change We Can Believe In”. In fact there is nothing in Obama’s record as a law maker that isn’t pure “sweet home Chicago”. Check this from the Boston Globe:

(Obama) worked with lobbyists as an Illinois legislator and US senator, even as he distances himself from them as a presidential candidate. The Republican National Committee sent out a press release Thursday, noting that a former lobbyist, Antill E. Trotter, held a fund-raiser for Obama that night in Washington. Trotter specialized in telecommunications, transportation, and environmental issues from 2000-2004. The RNC release also contained reminders of an ABC News report that Obama introduced nine bills to make certain chemicals tax-exempt at the request of some corporate lobbyists; and a Boston Globe report about Obama’s work with an insurance lobbyist to make healthcare legislation more acceptable to insurance companies. Joan Vennochi - Boston Globe

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2008/05/11/the_change_we_can_believe_in/

From this, read it all:
http://seaton-newslinks.blogspot.com/2008/05/dick-daleys-favorite-hawaiian.html


40 posted on 06/22/2008 11:01:22 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Iron and clay don't mix. - Daniel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

If this guy becomes president our Republic is doomed. He’s wrong on all the issues.

The McCain haters had better pull their heads out of their tailpipes or this radical Marxist is going to become president and we will be lucky if we aren’t all shuttled off to the gulags and wind up with our skin being made into lampshades.


41 posted on 06/22/2008 11:02:59 AM PDT by RichardW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3
It's official: Obama will back a filibuster of any Senate FISA legislation containing telecom immunity, his campaign has just told Election Central.
42 posted on 06/22/2008 11:04:02 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

So why post a 9 month old article? There are one or two more recent articles out there.


43 posted on 06/22/2008 11:04:40 AM PDT by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

texasdem wrote on October 24, 2007 1:51 PM:
On October 18, TPM posted an article entitled, “Obama Comes Out Against Telecom Immunity Bill.” Within that article, Obama is quoted as saying, “It is time to restore oversight and accountability in the FISA program, and this proposal — with an unprecedented grant of retroactive immunity — is not the place to start.” There was nothing from the Clinton camp.

Then yesterday, October 23, TPM posted, “Obama: I Would Support Dodd’s Filibuster.” Obama’s campaign is quoted saying, “Senator Obama has serious concerns about many provisions in this bill, especially the provision on giving retroactive immunity to the telephone companies.” Furthermore, he would support a filibuster of the bill in its current form. TPM called this a “quasi-declaration of opposition to telecom immunity in general.” Now that we are all(?) clear on Obama’s position.....


44 posted on 06/22/2008 11:04:55 AM PDT by TornadoAlley3 ('GOP' : Get Our Petroleum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner
I had not noticed any recent articles quoting his past position. I always read the full article and notice the date, I do not just read the headline and then post a comment...since many here do, in the future I will be sure to add (OLD ARTICLE) in the title. Thanks.
45 posted on 06/22/2008 11:07:50 AM PDT by TornadoAlley3 ('GOP' : Get Our Petroleum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: AliVeritas

just another dirty Rat.


46 posted on 06/22/2008 11:12:11 AM PDT by TornadoAlley3 ('GOP' : Get Our Petroleum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: rawhide

Let me mislead you some more.

June 21, 2008, 12:20 PM
Obama: I’ll Fight To Strip Telecom Immunity From FISA

Snip:

Obama said there is “little doubt” that the Bush Administration, with the cooperation of major telecommunications companies, “has abused [its] authority and undermined the Constitution by intercepting the communications of innocent Americans without their knowledge or the required court orders.”

“Given the legitimate threats we face, providing effective intelligence collection tools with appropriate safeguards is too important to delay. So I support the compromise, but do so with a firm pledge that as president, I will carefully monitor the program.

“[The bill] does, however, grant retroactive immunity, and I will work in the Senate to remove this provision so that we can seek full accountability for past offenses.”

The House approved the legislation 293-129.

THE LINK:
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/06/21/politics/horserace/entry4200105.shtml

-— Now we know CBS doesn’t lie.


47 posted on 06/22/2008 11:13:17 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Iron and clay don't mix. - Daniel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Thanks.


48 posted on 06/22/2008 11:15:55 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: rawhide

No problem.


49 posted on 06/22/2008 11:20:44 AM PDT by TornadoAlley3 ('GOP' : Get Our Petroleum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Remember that Reid is to cover for Barack re: immunity.
Don’t forget.

Maybe with the fire from his supporters, he’d have to grandstand it... I hope his earpiece works and he can ‘hear himself’ this time when explaining.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8znPAEaI9KA&feature=related


50 posted on 06/22/2008 11:23:53 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Iron and clay don't mix. - Daniel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson