Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NJ reps lead charge against offshore drilling
NorthJersey.com ^ | 06.18.08 | herb jackson

Posted on 06/22/2008 7:23:52 PM PDT by Coleus

The high price of gasoline pushed the possibility of drilling in the Atlantic Ocean for oil onto the front burner this week, and politicians from New Jersey and other coastal states are pushing back. Republican presidential candidate John McCain, who had previously supported an existing ban on drilling in the Atlantic and most of the Pacific, said yesterday he would support giving states the option to allow offshore exploration. President Bush followed up today, blaming Congress for high energy costs by standing in the way of expanded production. In reality, the ban is contained both in an executive order by the president and an act of Congress, and Bush said he would not lift the executive order unless Congress acted.

Governor Corzine today called it deception to talk about offshore drilling as a solution to high prices at the pump because of the years it would take to issue leases, begin exploring, and then bring oil to the market.  “This helps the stock price of Exxon and other oil companies a heck of a lot more than it’s going to have anything to do with supply and demand conditions in the oil market,” Corzine said in a conference call arranged by Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama’s campaign. Also on the call were North Carolina Gov. Mike Easley and former Florida Gov. Bob Graham.

Corzine also said more drilling would “support a pattern of dependency on oil” and could destroy the state’s tourism economy if there were an oil spill offshore.  Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J., worked to defeat four attempts over the past year to lift the ban on offshore drilling. He said Wednesday that oil companies already own 30 million acres of offshore exploration leases that they are not using. “When John McCain and George Bush talk about opening up our coastlines to drilling, they make it sound like gasoline is going to run straight out of the ground and right into your car,” Menendez said.

McCain spokesman Peter Feldman said each state would be able to veto any plan for drilling off its shores and that “nothing has changed” in regard to McCain’s position.  “There’s an energy crunch right now, and New Jerseyans are hurting at the pump,” Feldman said. “This is an initiative that seeks to ease some of the pressure points, to limit the effect it’s having on everyday New Jerseyans.”  But two Republican candidates who will be on the ballot with McCain in November put out statements opposing Atlantic exploration.

“In the U.S. Senate, as I did in Congress, I will support a ban on oil and gas leases off our coast because of the risks they pose to our environment and our economy,” said Republican Senate candidate Dick Zimmer. “I am strongly against any drilling or exploration off the New Jersey coast or in any area that poses a risk to our beaches.”  A similar statement was issued by Rep. Frank LoBiondo, a Millville Republican whose district covers part of the Jersey Shore.  Only one New Jersey Republican in the House — Rep. Scott Garrett of Wantage — has voted to lift the offshore drilling ban. 

More....
Bush looks offshore for remedy to high oil prices


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: 110th; drilling; energy; environment; offshoredrilling; oil

1 posted on 06/22/2008 7:23:53 PM PDT by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Hey, why don’t you come and fill up my tank!


2 posted on 06/22/2008 7:24:30 PM PDT by Southerngl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Come November, throw out all who oppose drilling, irregardless of party.


3 posted on 06/22/2008 7:27:20 PM PDT by webschooner (Bumper Sticker: "None of the Above, 2008")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

I guess his driver hasn’t taken him to fill up the limo in a while....


4 posted on 06/22/2008 7:27:35 PM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Obama for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Why not let the states that oppose offshore drilling pay an extra premium for gasoline? That would encourage voter who are sick and tired of their elected officals from making dumb stands against offshore drilling.


5 posted on 06/22/2008 7:31:45 PM PDT by encm(ss) (USN Ret.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Since when do these states have control of federal waters? They belong to all of us. I think a special Parasite Tax should be levied on all coastal states that block the use of our oil. Have all Florida, California, Virginia and New Jersey drivers pay an extra dollar a gallon for using Texas, Louisiana, and Oklahoma oil, and thus depleting the resources of those states.
It is utter nonsense to have practically all our oil and refinery capacity situated in one spot...and that happens to be Hurricane Alley. Are we crazy?


6 posted on 06/22/2008 7:32:34 PM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webschooner

I think that is going to be the theme of the 2008 election.


7 posted on 06/22/2008 7:33:05 PM PDT by DarthVader (Liberal Democrats are the party of EVIL whose time of judgement has come.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce
“When John McCain and George Bush talk about opening up our coastlines to drilling, they make it sound like gasoline is going to run straight out of the ground and right into your car,” Menendez said. I have never heard the President or MCCain even remotely make such a statement.. plus the American people are smarter than that.. at least the non kool aid drinkers.
8 posted on 06/22/2008 7:33:45 PM PDT by JoanneSD (illegals represented without taxation.. Americans taxed without representation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

yet the nj govt. doesn't do anything about toxic-waste sites all over the state.
 
Feds criticize NJ state, fed environment officials over toxic sites

9 posted on 06/22/2008 7:37:58 PM PDT by Coleus (Abortion and Physician-assisted Murder (aka-Euthanasia), Don't Democrats just kill ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
Corzine also said more drilling ... could destroy the state’s tourism economy if there were an oil spill offshore.

Yeah. The medical waste I have to dodge in the surf every August might be hidden by an oil slick.

10 posted on 06/22/2008 7:38:49 PM PDT by FredZarguna (I'm taking Grandma's advice and I'm holding my nose, John, stop sticking your finger down my throat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
...could destroy the state’s tourism economy if there were an oil spill offshore

How many people go to New Jersey for the beaches?

11 posted on 06/22/2008 7:41:08 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Maybe we could subcontract with the Chinese to have them do the offshore drilling for us. The environmentalists and other drilling opponents don’t seem to have a problem when it is China doing the drilling.


12 posted on 06/22/2008 7:45:26 PM PDT by Russ (Repeal the 17th amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Millions. Every year.


13 posted on 06/22/2008 8:18:47 PM PDT by free me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

gag them and throw them back under the rock they came out from.


14 posted on 06/22/2008 8:19:25 PM PDT by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Who wants to make a bet when winter comes around these same NJ reps will be going on TV complaining about how home heating oil is over $4 a gallon and poor people are forced to choose between heating their homes and food. Of course we will all be asked to go into out pockets to provide some sort of subsidy to these people.


15 posted on 06/22/2008 8:21:46 PM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
Governor Corzine today called it deception to talk about offshore drilling as a solution to high prices at the pump because of the years it would take to issue leases, begin exploring, and then bring oil to the market.

The roof blew off my house last week. Since I can't get someone to fix it right away, I'm not going to fix it at all...

16 posted on 06/22/2008 8:23:56 PM PDT by an amused spectator (corruptissima republica, plurimae leges)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

Corzine also said more drilling ... could destroy the state’s tourism economy if there were an oil spill offshore.

If gas keeps going up there will be no tourism but politicians can’t be expected to think ahead.

I would think that people would want to visit beaches and see the oil rigs that saved our economy and ended the wealth transfer to natiions that want us destroyed and helped save our country.


17 posted on 06/22/2008 8:25:03 PM PDT by smoketree (the insanity, the lunacy these days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Psssssst, a little secret... drilling does not automatically mean there’s anything there !


18 posted on 06/22/2008 8:38:21 PM PDT by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
Governor Corzine today called it deception to talk about offshore drilling as a solution to high prices at the pump because of the years it would take to issue leases, begin exploring, and then bring oil to the market.

Sorry, but you're wrong. Allowing off shore drilling will have an immediate impact on gas prices as speculators cool off. The argument all governors seem to be offering is really this: "The long run for me is my term of office and if it doesn't produce results while I'm in office, screw you."

Just once, politicians, do what's right for the country. It will have both immediate and long run benefits.

19 posted on 06/22/2008 8:38:40 PM PDT by econjack (Some people are as dumb as soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoketree
I would think that people would want to visit beaches and see the oil rigs that saved our economy and ended the wealth transfer to natiions that want us destroyed and helped save our country.

And, if absolutely necessary, so as not to offend Corzine's discriminating eye, the rigs could be camouflaged.

Okie01's Offshore Camouflage Kits would come in five styles:

1. Three-masted schooner.

2. Lighthouse.

3. Grain elevator.

4. Clipper ship.

5. Skyscraper.

For the adventurous, we are investigating the market for an extra cost specialty design: The Alcatraz (available one per state).

Note: No windmill kits are offered due to prior consultation with Sen. Kennedy.

20 posted on 06/22/2008 8:39:02 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: okie01

How dare you be creative. Don’t you know there is nothing the greatest nation in history can do to solve a simple problem?
We can only be creative when it comes to rat voters, e.g. illegal aliens and “yes we can”.
-S-


21 posted on 06/22/2008 8:49:40 PM PDT by smoketree (the insanity, the lunacy these days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
because of the years it would take to issue leases, begin exploring, and then bring oil to the market. “This helps the stock price of Exxon and other oil companies a heck of a lot more than it’s going to have anything to do with supply and demand conditions in the oil market,” Corzine said

Hey highway speedster...world demand for oil is way up and the USA supply is way down. Pushing aside your pontificating about Exxon stock prices we need more oil here in the USA. What can be more of an eyesore than northeast NJ anyway. Oh I know liberals want to sue OPEC and increase taxes on the Oil Companies and American drivers. That will certainly solve the high gas prices for sure ay? MORONS to the nth degree!

22 posted on 06/22/2008 9:30:28 PM PDT by tflabo (Truth or tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer
How many people go to New Jersey for the beaches?

Millions. Actually, from Sandy hook to Cape May, NJ has the best Atlantic Ocean beaches in the country.

23 posted on 06/22/2008 9:36:15 PM PDT by Go Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer
How many people go to New Jersey for the beaches?

Photobucket

24 posted on 06/22/2008 9:44:43 PM PDT by Cobra64 (www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: smoketree
If gas keeps going up there will be no tourism but politicians can’t be expected to think ahead.

Bingo!

25 posted on 06/22/2008 9:45:53 PM PDT by Cobra64 (www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64; Vince Ferrer
Funny. Here's where I go to the beach here in New Jersey:


26 posted on 06/22/2008 9:48:10 PM PDT by Clemenza (No Comment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
Corzine also said more drilling would “support a pattern of dependency on oil”..

What a genius !

If you know we are DEPENDENT on oil, why on earth would you limit our access to it ?

27 posted on 06/22/2008 10:19:56 PM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Democrats - “Drilling for oil will take too long. We need to come up with a new plan instead.” /cognitive dissonance


28 posted on 06/22/2008 10:26:44 PM PDT by TigersEye (Berlin 1936. Olympics for murdering regimes. Beijing 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape
Corzine also said more drilling would “support a pattern of dependency on oil”..

Hey, Corzine! More breathing supports a pattern of dependency on oxygen. Notice, though, the typical bureaucrat speech. He can't just say "dependency on oil" he has to come up with the nonsense of a "pattern" of dependency on oil. Is our economy dependent on energy and does a lot of that energy come from oil? What's so remarkable about this? If someone found something that could miraculously deliver us from a "pattern" of dependency on oil, then we would have established another "pattern" of dependency on that. Corzine and those like him are fools that deserve to be turned out of Congress and every other public office on their sorry butts. Haven't they spent too long developing a "pattern of dependency" on taxing and spending?
29 posted on 06/22/2008 10:26:53 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
Good points. How about this.

The US Tax Payers also said more taxes would “support a pattern of dependency on taxation”..

30 posted on 06/23/2008 2:10:52 AM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
The soaring oil prices are affecting the costs of everything from food to gas. There are also significant issues on local and global environmental impact. While there are many issues, we need to look at our next leader and determine which will have the best course of action going forward…..I recently watch the two video in Pollclash about this issue, Obama and McCain talk about this…
31 posted on 06/23/2008 5:03:24 AM PDT by skyWinNters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
Here's where I go to the beach here in New Jersey

Ahhh, good old Spring Lake! We lived there 19 years (Mrs. JimRed grew up there) then downsized to Wall.

32 posted on 06/24/2008 8:04:18 AM PDT by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson