Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress Questions Constitutionality Of Light Bulb Ban
Say Anything Readers Blog ^ | June 20, 2008 | Anna

Posted on 06/23/2008 8:25:30 AM PDT by Turret Gunner A20

WASHINGTON – Members of Congress are beginning to have second thoughts about the ban on incandescent light bulbs effective in 2014 as a result of an energy bill signed into law earlier this year. Rep. Ted Poe, R-Texas, says his objection is very basic – the Constitution doesn’t authorize Congress to do anything remotely like banning a product that has been used safely and efficiently for more than 100 years in favor of Chinese-imported compact fluorescent light bulbs that pose considerable health and safety risks.

Extensive cleanup is required by the Environmental Protection Agency for simply breaking a bulb. When a bulb, which contains mercury, is broken, according to the EPA, the room must be evacuated for 15 minutes and aired out with windows, but not before all glass is removed, placed in a sealed glass jar and disposed of outside. Any remaining glass must be picked up with tape. In addition, central heating or air conditioning units must be turned off.

Wait… Environmental Protection Agency must be called for a broken bulb?

(Excerpt) Read more at sayanythingblog.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 110th; 17pctapproval; commerceclause; congress; energy; govwatch; lightbulbs; tedpoe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last
To: Arkansas Toothpick

Similar to using helicopters to enforce the ban on outdoor grilling.

This clearly shows the real agenda. That helicopter puts out more CO2, etc than thousands of BBQ grills.

The agenda is control.


41 posted on 06/23/2008 9:05:21 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Congress....”And slowly they turn”....

There ain’t no stopping communism.


42 posted on 06/23/2008 9:05:29 AM PDT by gathersnomoss (General George Patton had it right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon
The amount in each bulb is minute.

Who cares? As long as they overturn this stupid law...

43 posted on 06/23/2008 9:06:12 AM PDT by Future Snake Eater (Personal Methane Reclamation: Break wind for energy independence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20

“Extensive cleanup is required by the Environmental Protection Agency for simply breaking a bulb. When a bulb, which contains mercury, is broken, according to the EPA, the room must be evacuated for 15 minutes and aired out with windows, but not before all glass is removed, placed in a sealed glass jar and disposed of outside. Any remaining glass must be picked up with tape. In addition, central heating or air conditioning units must be turned off.”

So we now have to deal with the likes of the EPA guy in the movie Ghostbusters?


44 posted on 06/23/2008 9:06:24 AM PDT by Miles the Slasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20

I sure hope I don’t break my CF bulb with my plunger handle trying to encourage my waste to go down a federally mandated 1.5 GPF toilet that I have to flush 4 times to get to work.

Point being, why worry about the CFL being constitutional? You already outlawed a toilet that will flush anything bigger than a skittle.


45 posted on 06/23/2008 9:06:52 AM PDT by IamConservative (Character: What you do when no one is looking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rawhide
You can still use the incandesant bulb after 2014, they just cannot be sold after 2014

And actually, I think that there are some new bulbs that are "legal"...has something to do with lumens vs wattage consumed. Interestingly enough, the newer technology came out shortly before this asinine legislation. Purely coincidental, I'm positive. I'm also sure that lobbyists for Phillips, GE, etc were completely uninformed of the technology, or at least completely impartial.

I'll need to dig out the particulars on the bill. I do know that it does NOT mandate CFLs, it mandates a low-power-consumption bulb. CFL's are just the most common type.

46 posted on 06/23/2008 9:07:12 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20

What I would like to see is a congressman or senator take to the floor to give a speech and in the process, drop a CFL on the floor. See how quick that place empties out. Yet they want to force us to put them in our homes.


47 posted on 06/23/2008 9:07:29 AM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glenn

The EPA, Stalin would be proud.


48 posted on 06/23/2008 9:10:14 AM PDT by gathersnomoss (General George Patton had it right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
Wait until Congress passes a new law regulating thermostats in private homes.

California was and may still be attempting to require "smart thermostats" that the government can control so they can raise and lower your energy use as they see fit.

49 posted on 06/23/2008 9:11:19 AM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20
Rep. Ted Poe, R-Texas trying to observe the US Constitution?

What effrontery!

There will soon be calls for his impeachment by his brothers and sisters in the House and Senate.

50 posted on 06/23/2008 9:11:29 AM PDT by Iron Munro (Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20

The dim bulbs in Congress or....

How many congressmen does it take to screw in a lightbulb?


51 posted on 06/23/2008 9:12:04 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20
the Constitution doesn’t authorize Congress to do anything remotely like banning a product

Oh, please! As if the Constitution is anything more to those clowns than something to wipe their despicable backsides with?

"Constitution? Don't make me laugh, comrade!"

52 posted on 06/23/2008 9:15:45 AM PDT by Sicon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

It must be there somewhere, emanating from under that prenumbra...


53 posted on 06/23/2008 9:17:50 AM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20

Yeah has the Goracle taken a position on bathing in mercury.


54 posted on 06/23/2008 9:20:12 AM PDT by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20

Hey do not forget those firearm bans while yall are questioning light bulbs. Is it true that not all of our lights and appliances can use these new bulbs. Will they not have to pay us a “takings fee” if they make us buy all new stuff. And it is my understanding that the dimmers and remote controls on all of our fans will not work. Is this so?


55 posted on 06/23/2008 9:21:20 AM PDT by therut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway
How many congressmen does it take to screw in a lightbulb?

None, that's what interns are for.

-PJ

56 posted on 06/23/2008 9:22:52 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (Repeal the 17th amendment -- it's the "Fairness Doctrine" for Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel
“The EPA does not have a mandate to regulate private property owners. Sweep it up and throw it in the trash. Nuff done, nuff said.”

I don't know if are empowered legally or not. However, they certainly DO regulate what private property owners can do and what products they can purchase! Right off the top of my head I can think of Diazinon and Creosote that are no longer available to homeowners. I also think you've forgotten about wetlands, “endangered” species, etc regulation!

57 posted on 06/23/2008 9:24:12 AM PDT by ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY ( The Constitution needs No interpreting, only APPLICATION!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20

IMHO this bill is a disaster waiting to happen. Just think of all of the mercury containmation we probably will have within probably 10 years of their use. It’s very scarey and I’m beginning to wonder how much China paid our lovely Democratic leaders to get this wrote into law?


58 posted on 06/23/2008 9:27:16 AM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logical me
Some places this miracle bulb just is not efficient and not configured in size to work.

Exactly. The cfl bulbs will work wonders keeping my pump shed warm enough to stop the pump from freezing! NOT!

59 posted on 06/23/2008 9:28:35 AM PDT by houeto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20

Obviously this atrocity must have been signed into law by a tree-hugging Dim. Did I oversleep and miss the election?


60 posted on 06/23/2008 9:28:53 AM PDT by Notary Sojac (My grandkids will ask-Was there really a time when I could get on a plane without removing my shoes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson