Skip to comments.NOW let's compare "apples to apples" [Obama birth certificate controvery, part 2]
Posted on 06/23/2008 3:45:52 PM PDT by freespirited
Thirty years between the births, true. But not thirty years between the documents. Both are certified (or purport to be certified) copies. And both were produced subsequent to November, 2001.
In that respect, the code in the lower LH-corner -- OHSM 1.1 (Rev. 11/01) LASER -- tells you that both were printed using the same computer format that was approved effective November, 2001.
Accordingly, there can't be more than seven years difference in the age of the documents.
Could you be any dumber? Or could you have made a stupider statement? Highly doubtful. You don't care that he might not meet one of the requirements to be President of the USA? What in the He** is the matter with you? You want to keep a Marxist out of the White House then you use the law to stop him. If he is not a US born citizen then he can't run, simple as that and to say it doesn't matter to you tells me you are either a troll or extremely stupid, period.
This seems like a reach to me, the Clintons would have smoked this out if it were true.
Hawaii wasn’t even a state in 1930.
It was in 1961.
I’m sure everything “official” changed after that
I haven’t followed this as closely as many- but with all the talk about the comparisons between the two types of paper I’m wondering if the background might be similar-but different from 1930 to 1961?
Obviously it’s not the SAME- but perhaps the state changed the background over the years?
I’ve gotta forward this on to some non-freepers. Thank you.
Does his being illegitimate somehow affect his citizenship?
Like Larry Sinclair, this is a strawman. A set-up. A diversion.
And if you make a valid point ("he has no experience"), you will be lumped in with the rest ("there are people attacking me because they believe that I was involved with a male prostitute, that I wasn't born in this country, that I don't have enough experience, or that I'm black...") and your valid point will be lost.
...and, it’s still a non issue
And wasn’t Hawaii a State in 1961?
Wouldn’t that mean that Nobamasiah would have been a natural born citizen even if his parents weren’t?
I worry about the 31 year difference between these two documents. I didn’t see that addressed nor acknowledged.
Me too- see # 27 and answer # 31
Surprising that it doesn’t have the “footprint.” My birth certificate had my footprint. Anyone else’s.
Are these abstracts created from the genuine birth certificate for legal purposes?
Hey, the birth certificate is as genuine as his Presidential Seal.
mine has a foot print too, but it does not match my current right....