Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Morality -- Trotskyite vs. Christian [It's Pat]
Townhall ^ | June 24, 2008 | Pat Buchanan

Posted on 06/24/2008 3:08:57 PM PDT by Alouette

Did Hitler's crimes justify the Allies' terror-bombing of Germany?

Indeed they did, answers Christopher Hitchens in his Newsweek response to my new book, "Churchill, Hitler and the Unnecessary War": "The stark evidence of the Final Solution has ever since been enough to dispel most doubts about, say, the wisdom or morality of carpet-bombing German cities."

Atheist, Trotskyite and newborn neocon, Hitchens embraces the morality of lex talionis: an eye for an eye. If Germans murdered women and children, the British were morally justified in killing German women and children.

According to British historians, however, Churchill ordered the initial bombing of German cities on his first day in office, the very first day of the Battle of France, on May 10, 1940.

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antichristian; atheistsupremacist; bigot; buchanan; churchill; dresden; duelingbigots; franzliebkind; lunatic; mullahpat; patbuchanan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: Alouette
Keep digging any deeper, Pat, and you'll need sunlight piped down to ya........


21 posted on 06/24/2008 3:39:01 PM PDT by Viking2002 (Barak and Michelle: The Sheik and The Freak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. or WOT [War on Terror]

----------------------------

In case anyone is interested in Churchill as a terrorist bomber revisionism.

As an aside, the first German bombing of England was a bit earlier, January 19, 1915, from a Zepplin. But no matter, Churchill was the WWII villan.

This clown was once lauded as the moral voice of the Republican Party. Fair to say those who looked at the GOP as a bunch of loons had something to base their mistaken opinion on.

A snap of the heels to the Pat fans.

PS-A shame GWB isn't a modern day Churchill, but it's fair to say the US sucks to this day by Pat standards. We kill civilians just like Churchill and FDR did. Kind Adolph, he did nothing other than retaliate.

Pardon me while I vomit.

22 posted on 06/24/2008 3:40:36 PM PDT by SJackson (If we win Iowa, then we can move to the world as it should be, Michelle O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

As far as bombing cities, Pat didn’t start the debate. Dresden, Tokyo, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki ring a bell? We shouldn’t second guess the people of that era, but that doesn’t mean we should forget what was done. Even now, military strategists debate the necessity of the Dresden bombing and whether such acts are ever justified. That’s a healthy debate IMHO.

Pat also makes some good points about the Soviets. We formed an alliance with Stalin, an evil dictator on par with Hitler. In the process, we sacrificed the freedom of hundreds of millions of people in Eastern Europe. What we did may have been necessary to defeat Hitler, but it resulted in something less than a great victory for western civilization.

Pat is engaged in an intellectual exercise of discussing what ifs. What’s so wrong about that? Could we have stopped Hitler earlier without resorting to a world war? Probably. Hindsight is 20/20.


23 posted on 06/24/2008 3:41:06 PM PDT by CitizenUSA (Republican Who Will NOT Vote McCain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
Neo-Nazi, historical moron, self-promoting buffoon. Is he gonna run for anything again? He's already published his campaign book, "Mein Kampaign." It is pathetic that Townhall, MSNBC, or any other media outlet still gives him ink or time to spout his nonsense.

As long as Buchanan is still spouting in public, "liberals" can say "See. See. That's what conservatices are really like. Pathetic.

Congressman Billybob

Latest article, "Barack (Rorschach) Obama"

24 posted on 06/24/2008 3:42:13 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob ( www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

“How come Pat does not mention the Nazi bombing of Rotterdam and Warsaw?”

That was Churchill’s fault, somehow.

Pat is used by the MSM to paint the false picture of Conservatives as Nazis.

We should not permit that. This little Nazi does not speak for us.


25 posted on 06/24/2008 3:44:42 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Mossad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA
Pat is lying about history, to support his thesis. Murder of the Jews (and other "undesirables") by the hundreds of thousands, took place BEFORE his magic date of when the Final Solution was officially put in place.

This is not a logical, new analysis. It is lies based on lies.

John / Billybob

26 posted on 06/24/2008 3:48:52 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob ( www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA
Pat is engaged in an intellectual exercise of discussing what ifs. What’s so wrong about that?

Depends on whether he still cares about current politics and wants to have credibility as a commentator.

Getting a reputation for publishing things like this week after week means his opinions about other things aren't going to be given credence by most people.

Most columnists have a way of raising interesting issues without appearing obsessed by them, but right now Pat isn't showing that talent.

Pat did a lot to bring the problems of mass immigration into the political conversation, when "mainstream" or "movement" conservatives and neocons weren't interested.

But if he keeps this up he's going to be seen as the man who helped drive that debate back underground.

27 posted on 06/24/2008 3:52:10 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: elmer fudd

elmer fudd: “When the existence of your country and your people are on the line you don’t play by Marquis of Queensbury rules.”

War is not simply about destroying the enemy. War is about achieving your nation’s objectives at least cost. If playing by Marquis of Queensbury rules achieves those objectives, you play by the rules.


28 posted on 06/24/2008 3:52:41 PM PDT by CitizenUSA (Republican Who Will NOT Vote McCain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Owl558
Personally, I've got Pat in the raving nutter category. Too bad he ended up like this.
29 posted on 06/24/2008 3:53:09 PM PDT by colorado tanker (Number nine, number nine, number nine . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Alouette; Clemenza; rmlew
I made this graphic way back in 1996. He hasn't changed a bit, always trying to justify Hitler. Pitty, he's right on so many other issues and then he screws it all up by insisting Hitler was a saint.


30 posted on 06/24/2008 3:54:09 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

Another Freep thread that ignores the fact that Communist Genocide gave rise to Hitler.

http://www.lib.ndsu.nodak.edu/grhc/order/tapes/meet_again.html


31 posted on 06/24/2008 3:54:18 PM PDT by spanalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
Pat, IMHO, continues to marginalize himself. It is bad historiography to ignore the context of the times in which momentous, terrible decisions must often be made. The Allies were convinced, I think rightly, that Hitler and Co. constituted an existential threat that demanded immediate and extremely violent attention. Stalin could wait for another day, so long as he remained useful in the struggle against Fascism.

Hitchens, the Trotskyite, may leave something to be desired in his political leanings; but he has clearly recognized the grave danger created by ignoring the madness of Islamofascism in our time. Pat has missed the mark, again.
32 posted on 06/24/2008 3:56:17 PM PDT by PerConPat (A politician is an animal which can sit on a fence and yet keep both ears to the ground.-- Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA
"Pat is engaged in an intellectual exercise of discussing what ifs. What’s so wrong about that?

Listen to Rush Limbaugh... :) ...You'll see the danger of the whole "what if" thing, and making big decisions on "wacky" "what ifs"

33 posted on 06/24/2008 4:01:13 PM PDT by PEACE ENFORCER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Congressman Billybob: “Murder of the Jews (and other “undesirables”) by the hundreds of thousands, took place BEFORE his magic date of when the Final Solution was officially put in place.”

Agreed. It’s not so much that I support his entire analysis. It’s more that I think he makes a few good points. Could the war have been averted? Could Britain have saved its empire? Was the Yalta Conference a terrible mistake, an unfortunate necessity, or a grand strategy? Were the attacks on civilians justified? All good questions I think.


34 posted on 06/24/2008 4:02:23 PM PDT by CitizenUSA (Republican Who Will NOT Vote McCain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

SJackson: “We kill civilians just like Churchill and FDR did.”

Actually, WWII helped shape the Laws of Armed Conflict. The three LOAC principles are military necessity, distinction, and proportionality.

http://usmilitary.about.com/cs/wars/a/loac.htm

We do not intentionally target civilians. That would be a war crime. I’m no military lawyer, but I wonder if FDR and Churchill would be considered war criminals by today’s LOAC. For example, the British nighttime bombings were incredibly inaccurate and almost certainly not able to achieve their military objectives (destruction of factories, some of minimal value to the war effort). Did this violate military necessity and proportionality? Perhaps.


35 posted on 06/24/2008 4:11:48 PM PDT by CitizenUSA (Republican Who Will NOT Vote McCain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

For later read.

I hope Pat gets a good health screen soon.


36 posted on 06/24/2008 4:13:14 PM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

Terror bombing didn’t work. German industrial output continued to increase until the Ruhr was over ran.

It did however mess up the logistics.


37 posted on 06/24/2008 4:15:06 PM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA
The problem with yelling Stalin, is that Hitler and Stalin were operational allies from August 1939 until May 1941.
The Western powers looked at a falling USSR and Nazi Germany dominating Western and Eastern Europe and chose to support Stalin to bleed Hitler.

Had we dealt with the Nazis in 1936, this would be academic.
Personally, I blame the isolationists for World War 2 and its aftermath. That includes their current bootlickers like Patty.
38 posted on 06/24/2008 4:15:59 PM PDT by rmlew (Down with the ersatz immanentization of the eschaton known as Globalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: redgolum
And despite the bombing the Germans were able put together the Ardennes offensive completely undetected.
39 posted on 06/24/2008 4:22:54 PM PDT by colorado tanker (Number nine, number nine, number nine . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Cacique

I am so sick of Pat Buchanon and his thinly-veiled Nazi support.

Pat has gone beyond annoying or worth arguing about, and needs a good solid ass-kicking.

I despise him, and I despise the Enemedia for propping up this asshole as a “conservative” voice. He’s not a conservative. He’s a Nazi.


40 posted on 06/24/2008 4:31:13 PM PDT by TheThirdRuffian (McCain is the best candidate of the Democrat party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson