Posted on 06/25/2008 10:09:19 AM PDT by Havok
The U.S. Supreme Court will soon rule on whether Washington, D.C.'s decades-old handgun ban is constitutional.
It's been nearly 70 years since the high court has heard a firearms case that tests the scope of the Second Amendment. The outcome of this one, D.C. v. Heller, will have extraordinary implications —- not just for the District, but for the ability of cities to respond effectively to gun violence.
If more evidence is needed that the stakes could not be higher, a steady drumbeat of headlines is supplying it. In the first few days of March alone, just before the justices heard oral argument in the case, three kids were killed and five more wounded in Chicago. And in West Palm Beach, Fla., a gunman killed an off-duty firefighter and wounded five others before turning his gun on himself.
Elected officials and law enforcement in those areas have a lot riding on the court's decision. The case stems from a lower-court ruling that D.C.'s ban violated the Constitution. Breaking with decades of Supreme Court precedent and hundreds of lower-court decisions, a federal appeals court held for the first time that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to bear arms not related to service in a "well-regulated militia."
If the justices agree with the lower court's ruling, cities and states throughout the country may face challenge after challenge to the constitutionality of firearm regulations enacted to protect the public and prosecute criminals. And city attorneys may find themselves spending as much time fighting lawsuits as they do fighting crime.
Those resource-draining challenges would come at an inconvenient time. Gun violence is a national crisis, but one that disproportionately affects those of us who live in urban areas. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, more than 340,000 homicides were committed in large American cities between 1976 and 2005. About 64 percent of those homicides involved firearms.
Very often, it's our first responders who pay the harshest price. In the decades between 1976 and 2006, more than 2,251 law enforcement officers were killed in the line of duty —- more them 90 percent of them by firearms.
The problems are obvious —- and they do have solutions, some of which are already being implemented around the nation. A decision from on high that limited our authority to craft local solutions would be yet another tragedy. Different gun laws make sense in different areas. Community leaders are plainly in the best position to determine the policies needed to curb the crime, fear and disorder that gun violence creates in each city —- not a special interest lobby and gun industry more concerned about dollars than lives.
It's the nation's mayors who get the call from police when a shooting occurs. It's the local leaders who comfort the families of gunshot victims, who walk with police and residents on the neighborhood beat, who meet with block watch groups and who grapple with the demanding budget ramifications of violent crime. For those very reasons, policies affecting guns and community safety historically have been —- and should be —- made at the local level.
And when communities have the authority to enact regulations that respond to local needs, they're often aggressive and successful. New York City has experienced a dramatic decline in crimes involving firearms after tailoring creative local regulation to curb gun violence. The city of Oakland, Calif., prohibits firearms dealers from selling ultra-compact (and easily concealable) handguns. Washington, D.C.'s handgun restrictions have led to one of the lowest suicide rates in the nation. And Chicago, like the District, bans the possession of handguns.
For the sake and the safety of all Americans, let's hope the Supreme Court will allow local leaders and law enforcement the tools they need to do their jobs.
> Shirley Franklin is mayor of Atlanta. Contributing to this column were: Tom Barrett, mayor of Milwaukee; Manuel A. Diaz, mayor of Miami; Gavin Newsom, mayor of San Francisco; Greg Nickels, mayor of Seattle; and Douglas H. Palmer, mayor of Trenton, N.J.
She neglects to mention that it also has one of the highest homicide rates in the nation.
add her name to “the list” - henry bowman
BS
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shirley_Franklin
(paraphrasing from the article)
Shirley Clarke Franklin (born May 10, 1945) is an American politician, a member of the Democratic Party, since January 7, 2002, the mayor of Atlanta, Georgia, a nonpartisan office (sure it is) and a knee-jerk, liberal jack-off.
How exactly does turning law abiding folks into disarmed victims protect anyone?
People like this need to be returned to 1st Grade. They obviously missed something along the way through the publik edgeukshun cystim.
Shirley Franklin is mayor of Atlanta. Contributing to this column were: Tom Barrett, mayor of Milwaukee; Manuel A. Diaz, mayor of Miami; Gavin Newsom, mayor of San Francisco; Greg Nickels, mayor of Seattle; and Douglas H. Palmer, mayor of Trenton, N.J.
All Commie Shills.
Paging Harold Krassny. Please pick up the Blue courtesy phone.
Uh, that's kinda the point in allowing those types to protect themselves as the police obviously can't.
The gun ban types continually ignore the fact that criminals carry w/ or w/o a ban. These bans mostly effect only those who would do the right thing in the first place. How does that protect society or reduce crime? The only thing this SC ruling may do is level the playing field and in the process reduce crime. The gun ban types are running out of objections b/c as each barrier is removed for the law abiding their predictions of doom, rivers of blood etc come to nothing.
Inasmuch as this woman is incapable of balancing the books in Atlanta, we can be sure that she applied the same rigorous standards of reason to THIS essay.
And I suspect you’ll soon be getting flames from genuine jackoffs protesting the characterization and comparison to this idiot.
With the recent spate of 5-4 decisions coming down from this Supreme Court, I’m not optimistic about tomorrow’s ruling. I’m almost afraid to turn on the radio tomorrow.
A certain subset of the residents of big cities will “pay a heavy price”, but just think of the huge savings to the taxpayers, when the perps are dead instead of watching cable TV, working out, and eating 3 square meals a day in prison, and then soaking up some more taxpayer dollars in the form of parole officers and vocational training programs, until the perps get caught and convicted and imprisoned again . . .
CAMP GUNFREE!
A common sense and historically proven way to keep those dangerous and destructive GUNS out of YOUR life. MEMBERSHIPS AVAILABLE NOW!
Details below.
Concerned about the easy availability of guns in our society?
Are you as alarmed as the United Nations and some within our own government about the "gun nuts" and other freedom wackos allowed to run loose?
Wish the government would just repeal the Second Amendment and confiscate all the guns because you believe sensible people shouldn't suffer because of some idiotic notion about some antiquated “right?”
While we can't take the guns away from the people, we CAN take the people (or at least SOME of them) away from their guns.
Nazi Germany Weapons Law (1938) §1: "Jews are prohibited from acquiring, possessing, and carrying firearms and ammunition, as well as truncheons or stabbing weapons. Those now possessing weapons and ammunition are at once to turn them over to the local police authority."
At CAMP GUNFREE, we have created an atmosphere of near-total tranquility where you and your family will experience the benefits of a GUN FREE environment.
The unique main gate at Camp GunFree.
The sign over the beautiful wrought iron gate declares: “NO FIREARMS ALLOWED!” Most arriving camp guests never see this view from their comfortable rail cars.
Each of our camps is a gated community designed to keep guns away from camp guests. Firmly enforced security measures ensure that these dangerous and destructive devices are kept outside. Each camp boasts 24 hour, 7 day a week sentries and state-of-the-art enclosure systems, guard dogs, trenches and surveillance equipment to absolutely GUARANTEE that no firearms enter the facility. Rigidly controlled access ensures that no guns will ever be smuggled in.
No cost has been spared to ensure that Camp GunFree remains gun free.
All camp members are given distinctive uniforms to distinguish them from any gun-toting barbarians who might attempt to evade our security measures. Each camp member is also assigned a distinctive ID number to ensure that only the right people are allowed within the camp.
Camp Director, Oberstfurher Koch, and his crack staff are here to see to your COMPLETE safety from dangerous firearms.
Spacious and comfortable sleeping accommodations are a hallmark of Camp GunFree. Room and board are provided to each member in exchange for rewarding tasks designed to provide a sense of accomplishment and to demonstrate that large numbers of people CAN exist – even if for a short time -- in a gun violence free community.
Camp members engaged in one of our many fun-filled organized play activities.
Current headlines prompt us to remind you that there has NEVER been a shooting by a student in any of the camp schools and we can GUARANTEE that there never will be!!
For more information, call 1-800-GUNFREE OR visit our new website at http://www.privategunsareabadthingandwe'llseethatyouare”safe”.batf.gov
(This idea from a pamphlet originally created by The Minnesota Center for Individual Liberty, PO Box 32170, Minneapolis, MN 55432-0170)
She also neglects to mention that very solid research has proven that there is ZERO correlation between availability of guns and suicide rates. ZERO. Alternative methods are substituted at a rate of 100%.
I know it’s a cliche, but it’s so true, namely, that if you outlaw guns, then only the outlaws will have guns. And it’s so true that the criminal element ignores all of the gun control laws on the books anyway. Horrific criminals such as the Columbine and Virginia Tech shooters were each in violation of numerous gun laws when they committed their crimes. The criminals don’t care what laws they violate.
Criminals will pay a heavy price if handgun ban is overturned.
This is what they are afraid of.
That, and people getting too used to the idea of taking care of themselves instead of relying on “the village”.
Yeah. A lot Democrat constituents might lose their primary revenue source. True disaster.
I hear that. The way these cases are turning out it looks like the US is about to burn.
Good think I got all my security squared away.
There is only one way to interpret her views. She supports the right of criminals to not be challenged while committing a crime.
The Constitution wasn’t written to protect the cities, or their treasuries.
Notice how they have to use 29 years of numbers to pump them up. Why do they use 1976? This is when a lot of gun laws started to show up in the USA. All this shows is that gun laws increase crimes and murder because the victims could not defend themselves.
So this is a self-fulfilling prophecy. Gun laws increased murder rates, which are used as a reason for more stringent gun laws.
Politicians gain NOTHING from a problem solved.
This false connection was a cover story in TIME magazine about 25 years ago. It was the last time I picked up a copy of TIME.
Mr. Volk does some awesome work. Always to the point too...
I agree. I’m adding more of his work to my collection NOW. Dial-up users will hate me for this....eventually. :-)
Yep, I am not optimistic either. I consider it a bad omen that the Supreme’s ruling has been put off for another day. It's my guess that the split is 4 to 4 with the gadfly Kennedy's vote still up in the air and there's probably some sort of compromise being concocted. It's hard to believe that he is a Reagan appointment. But anyway, I am afraid we are at the Mercy of Justice Kennedy...
The right of a criminal shall not be infringed while committing a crime.
However, I do tend to agree with this part of the article,
"And city attorneys may find themselves spending as much time fighting lawsuits as they do fighting crime."
I might even pay for some of the legal fees myself.
Semper Fi
An Old Man
Hmm...yeah, I remember this sort of story from the time when certain states were considering “shall-issue” CCW permits. “Blood in the streets,” “wild west,” “OK Corral,” “road rage carnage,” etc, etc - good grief, I could write their own copy for them in my sleep. And it never happened.
Not quite. The sign states that "work makes you free".
Only in the biased liberal journalist's little mind are headlines written by the same now "evidence".
This asshat mayor of Atlanta, where they can’t even protect judges and clerks in their freaking courthouse nor prosecute the dude that killed them, wants me to listen to her same-o same-o B.S. about handguns? Hey Shirley, get your head out of your dumba$$ and get a clue on what’s really needed in Atlanta. Maybe if you hired smarter cops AND maybe if you prosecuted criminals the crime rate might fall. What a complete dolt she is.
Kennedy was the replacement that Reagan put up after Bork wasn’t confirmed.
Gun-grabbing is a cult and Liberalism is a mental desease.
I believe everyone in the world knows that — including me — but thanks anyway.
It was a bit of sardonic humor.
Translation: "Urban" teenagers are shooting each other, a lot. We liberals don't really care about them so we need to change the subject....I know, let's take guns away from 50 year old cowboys! They're probably all Republicans, anyway. That's the ticket!
Considering D.C. is overwhelmingly black and that whites outpace blacks 2-1 in the suicide department, this is a misleading "factoid" at best.
Shirley's reaching. She should really address why D.C. and Atlanta have such high crime and murder rates.
Good photo. And from what I can see, definitely Not Guilty.
Got the picture of the #4 Enfield?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.