Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Six Dollar Gas?
KTRH ^ | June 26, 2008 | John Labus

Posted on 06/26/2008 5:14:27 AM PDT by thackney

By some estimates, oil prices could hit 200-dollars a barrel. If you do the math, that translates to $6.64 a gallon for gas! Meanwhile, Congress can't agree on a course of action. Democrats are looking at new regulations on speculators, while others -- like Woodlands Republican Kevin Brady -- want to increase drilling:

"...And while Congress is eager to place the blame elsewhere, whether it's OPEC or Big Oil or Big Autos, the fact of the matter is we ought to take a square look in the mirror. We need more American-made energy, and this Congress has resisted it."

Oil economist Karr Ingham disagrees with other analysts who see prices continuing to spiral out of control. He says rather than penalize the speculators, the free market should be left alone: "That's the economic system under which we operate. And ultimately, it's market forces that solve our problems for us."

Ingham says it's because of the current market that we're using more ethanol, and expanding research into other areas: "We would not be embarking on any of this if crude oil were still 20-dollars a barrel. So, it's rising prices for crude oil - relative to other sources of energy - that are going to spark the development of alternative energy."

Ingham says the current economic environment is actually more favorable to a drop in oil prices, which would bring prices down.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energy; gasoline; oil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-68 next last

1 posted on 06/26/2008 5:14:28 AM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney

By Labor Day.


2 posted on 06/26/2008 5:17:45 AM PDT by nina0113 (If fences don't work, why does the White House have one?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Democrats are privately hoping for $10 gas.


3 posted on 06/26/2008 5:18:51 AM PDT by Always Right (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

“Democrats are privately hoping for $10 gas.” -Always Right

Your moniker seems fitting. The more expensive gas gets, the more people will want to carpool, get rid of their SUVs, lower overall usage here. That’s been an important Dem agenda item for some time now.


4 posted on 06/26/2008 5:23:18 AM PDT by samson1097
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nina0113

I was thinking Thanksgiving or Christmas, maybe I’m too optimistic


5 posted on 06/26/2008 5:24:37 AM PDT by underground
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Democrats are privately hoping for $10 gas.

Yes, that is right. They do not want to fix anyhting because the blame will go on the Republicans.

Just like when the Republicans had power, the rats obstructed everything the Republicans tried to do. Then the rats stood back and told the American people that the Republicans are inept. The people believed the rats and voted them into the House and Senate.

No different this time. As long as the rats can lay blame at the Republicans feet, they are not going to fix this. I am sick of the party politics. The rats should be removed and never let back into power again.

6 posted on 06/26/2008 5:25:01 AM PDT by do the dhue (They've got us surrounded again. The poor bastards. General Creighton Abrams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thackney

If some wildcatter were to find a huge heretofore unknown pool of oil/gas, the dems would do their best to stop the production.


7 posted on 06/26/2008 5:29:01 AM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
it's because of the current market that we're using more ethanol, and expanding research into other areas: "We would not be embarking on any of this if crude oil were still 20-dollars a barrel. So, it's rising prices for crude oil - relative to other sources of energy - that are going to spark the development of alternative energy."

Innovation is a by-product of our wants and needs.

8 posted on 06/26/2008 5:29:02 AM PDT by Realism (Some believe that the facts-of-life are open to debate.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
"Democrats are privately hoping for $10 gas."


Democrats, those RINO Republicans, and those legislating from the bench are soon to be seeing a mass uprising of the American people.


Obviously they haven't heard of the French Revolution, because the cake is getting to expensive to buy.


ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE

9 posted on 06/26/2008 5:31:00 AM PDT by G.Mason (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason

Democrats, those RINO Republicans, and those legislating from the bench are soon to be seeing a mass uprising of the American people.


How will they be getting to the uprising staging area? Not driving. Bicycles maybe.


10 posted on 06/26/2008 5:33:10 AM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: thackney

11 posted on 06/26/2008 5:37:40 AM PDT by bmwcyle (If God wanted us to be Socialist, Karl Marx would have been born in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: do the dhue
The rats should be removed and never let back into power again.

The opposition party had the House 12 years, Senate 6 years, and White House 7 years, and they didn't do such a stellar job.

They became ethics challenged and turned into the party of pork. They squandered their majority status to fill their own coffers. They made an overt turn leftward.

The trouble is, however, that after more seat losses in November, it may be another 40 year drought before the GOP regains majority status. Alas, the GOP does seem more comfortable being the minority.
12 posted on 06/26/2008 5:38:18 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: durasell
Uprising staging area?



13 posted on 06/26/2008 5:38:21 AM PDT by G.Mason (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason

I’m assuming the mass uprising will have a staging area and that the proper permits have been filed with the proper authorities. An adequate number of port-o-potties would also be nice.


14 posted on 06/26/2008 5:39:57 AM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: thackney

The Rats blaming the Republicans is getting old with the American people and the American people know we will have to drill our way out of it. The American people also aren’t buying this 68 million acre crap because if that amount was true the oil companies would be working OT to get the oil out of the ground at $135 a barrel.


15 posted on 06/26/2008 5:40:15 AM PDT by tobyhill (The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
It's coming.....oil futures traders are praying for a hurricane at this moment to just hint in the direction of the Gulf.

Our stupid greedy government has set up the US economy to tank.....watch. It's coming.

Still not one new gasoline refinery built since 1976...only 149 operable at this time with another 196 smaller ones siting idle that can handle other products other than gas and diesel.

No modernization of the smaller sites, no public disclosure as to really owns those sites, neither. Add to that no transparency in the futures markets......yup.....it's coming quickly.

16 posted on 06/26/2008 5:42:12 AM PDT by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Ree #12: TomGuy, you are dead on your assessments. It’s a sellout of the American people and the GOP simply laughs on the way to the bank.


17 posted on 06/26/2008 5:44:50 AM PDT by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Congress simply wants to find a scapegoat for their own stupidity. Hauling in the oil execs last month and trying to blame speculators this month is nothing more than window dressing in an attempt to deflect the blame from where it really belongs...on themselves. They are so afraid of the tree huggers they're willing to sell out the rest of us at any cost. But this time, I think they've barked up the wrong tree.

Next time you're out-and-about, look around. Compare the number of people commuting to work in a car with those who are riding a bike to work. Public sentiment is increasing for drilling in ANWR, the OCS, and all federal lands. Recent polls suggest that 57% favor these policies, and it's rising every month. At $6/gallon, there's going to be a run on tar and feathers in every city across the US.

Alas, the GOP doesn't have the brains to pin this on those who triggered these problems in the first place. I can't even begin to relate how disappointed I am in the GOP's ability to get any message out to the public. The sit there with their collective thumbs up their a$$ and let opportunity after opportunity pass them by. McCain says he favors drilling the OCS, but then yanks back that correct step with a misstep by saying: "But I'll leave it up to the States to determine whether they will permit drilling offshore." The coastal states governors (except Alaska) have reacted saying: "It will take too long and won't make any difference." The translation: "I'll be out of office when the benefits accrue to my people, so why should I care when I can't get the credit?"

IDIOTS! All you have to do is simply announce that you support all drilling everywhere and you'll completely alter speculator expectations and that would be enough to cause the current spot price of oil to drop. But, you refuse to act and yet you wonder why you have a 12% approval rating. Politicians no longer serve the public, they serve only their own self-absorbed interests.

18 posted on 06/26/2008 5:45:15 AM PDT by econjack (Some people are as dumb as soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason
Democrats, those RINO Republicans, and those legislating from the bench are soon to be seeing a mass uprising of the American people.

Obviously they haven't heard of the French Revolution, because the cake is getting to expensive to buy.


So far, things have not become that melodramatic.

So far, only a few trucker groups have mounted protests.

In earlier gas crises, the public declared no-fill-up days.

So far, the consumers seem to only be moaning.

By November, however, they will be yelling and screaming, because food prices will be even higher and the first winter heating bills will be out. And that will have drastic impact when they enter the voting booths.
19 posted on 06/26/2008 5:48:06 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: durasell
Ah ... your thinking of lawful assembly of a few thousand people petitioning their government.

A novel idea.

20 posted on 06/26/2008 5:48:17 AM PDT by G.Mason (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Sure I understand the Republicans made mistakes, but like I said the rats provided nothing but obstruction and finger pointing during this time.

I am not going to lay all the blame at the Republicans feet. The majority the Republicans had was still not enough of a majority to get things done without the help of the demorats. The rats offered no help and do not deserve to be where they are today. It was not because of the merits of the demorats that they were voted into office.

And you can be assured the rats see no benefit to their party to help lower gas prices right now.

21 posted on 06/26/2008 5:48:28 AM PDT by do the dhue (They've got us surrounded again. The poor bastards. General Creighton Abrams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Early next summer when the lease is up on my truck, I'm buying a Vespa.
22 posted on 06/26/2008 5:50:23 AM PDT by BigCinBigD (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Hello folks... mandating the use of so many gallons of corn-based ethanol is neither free market nor innovative.


23 posted on 06/26/2008 5:55:39 AM PDT by nicola_tesla ("Life is Tough... It's Worse When You're Stupid".... John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

The math is not that simple because a lot of oil companies have long term contracts that still have years until they expire. They also have their own production. Thus, their weighted average cost per barrel is far below the often quoted spot price.


24 posted on 06/26/2008 5:58:04 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
" ... By November, however, they will be yelling and screaming, because food prices will be even higher and the first winter heating bills will be out. And that will have drastic impact when they enter the voting booths.


By November jobs may be disappearing at an alarming rate, the cost of goods and services may well have become astronomical, many food products may be in short supply, and inflation will be out of sight.

Melodramatic? I don't know, but we shall see.


I do know that we are about to see our Republic go the way of Europe.

25 posted on 06/26/2008 6:00:01 AM PDT by G.Mason (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle
Photobucket
26 posted on 06/26/2008 6:00:20 AM PDT by Kozak (Anti Shahada: There is no god named Allah, and Muhammed is a false prophet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason

Actually I’m thinking of people buying vehicles they can no longer afford, houses they can no longer afford, credit cards they can no longer afford.


27 posted on 06/26/2008 6:02:37 AM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Have fun blaming it all on the Dems., but some day you might need to get back in touch with reality if you hope to ever really address the prolem.

1. GHWB signed into effect restrictions or moratoriums on offshore drilling.

2. Hey, this is not year one of W’s administration. He continued those restrictions on offshore drilling. Heard any big initiatives to open up more offshore drilling from W until very, very recently?

3. All W has done is try to open ANWR for drilling. That’s something, but hardly a president who’s been trying to avoid this crisis since day one of his administration.

4. W and Jeb got together scarcely two years ago to insure that NO OFFSHORE DRILLING WOULD BE ALLOWED OFF FLORIDA!

5. Sorry, this crisis is the fault of both parties. The Dems. are more at fault, but the Republicans are far from blameless for this mess. I think Republicans, and some Freepers, felt very clever putting forth the “let’s use all THEIR oil up first, and then we’ll still have ours for the future.” Still look like a good strategy?

7. We can now blame the Dems. for refusing to help open new areas for exploration and drilling NOW. But as far as getting us into this mess, the Republicans are only slightly less to blame.


28 posted on 06/26/2008 6:05:06 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
first winter heating bills will be out ....that's when the excrement will hit the oscillator. Buddy of mine just filled his oil tank (he thinks prices will go higher). Cost him $2000.

I can't imagine needing to take out a loan just to heat your house, but that time is fast coming.

Personally, I think that these prices are self-correcting and will eventually come down. Not sure if it'll be fast enough to help this winter, though.

29 posted on 06/26/2008 6:08:38 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Will88
I think Republicans, and some Freepers, felt very clever putting forth the “let’s use all THEIR oil up first, and then we’ll still have ours for the future.” Still look like a good strategy?

Kinda like the Soviet Union trying to starve us by eating up all our wheat? Or waiting for the heavy yoke of capitalism to break the free enterprise spirit.

30 posted on 06/26/2008 6:09:52 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedys: Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat; but they know what's best for us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: thackney

This is relevant:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ucac/20080625/cm_ucac/youcantfuelallofthepeopleallofthetime


31 posted on 06/26/2008 6:09:56 AM PDT by RoadTest ( Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up. But he spake of the temple of his body.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
the oil companies would be working OT to get the oil out of the ground at $135 a barrel.

Where are they going to put it? Most people I know are buying as little as possible and looking for ways to use less.

Think about it, its $135/bbl now. Say the critters open up the land and say the oil companies work double time to get oil down to say $50/bbl, which to me would be self-destructive. At $50/bbl it may not be worthwhile to do much of anything, except import.

32 posted on 06/26/2008 6:11:08 AM PDT by Realism (Some believe that the facts-of-life are open to debate.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BigCinBigD

A Vespa is a great idea. I had one in college and have been thinking the same thing recently. I just got back from Italy where I was paying roughly $8.50 per gallon for diesel for my rented van. Every one was either driving diesel vehicles or some type of motorcycle or scooter. Human powered bikes were also popular. I think I was looking at our future.


33 posted on 06/26/2008 6:23:00 AM PDT by BubbaBobTX (Obama is all about hope and change: he hopes you don't find out what he wants to change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Realism

“Think about it, its $135/bbl now. Say the critters open up the land and say the oil companies work double time to get oil down to say $50/bbl, which to me would be self-destructive. At $50/bbl it may not be worthwhile to do much of anything, except import.”

And that’s the whole problem, and the reason the so called free market will never solve the problem of US dependency on foreign oil. What’s the incentive when the price will go down with significantly greater production, which we must have to become less dependent on imports?

If the American people and their government desire lower prices and greater independence from imported oil, then we must open up all areas for exploration and drilling, and our government must REQUIRE in the new leases that companies bring new finds on line for production until we reach some goal of producing ____ barrels per day, or a % of our requirements.

Sorry pretend free marketers, that’s the only thing that will both decrease prices in the long run and also decrease our dependence on imports.

We are precisely where we were in the late ‘70s and early ‘80s, except it’s worse this time. We should have set a goal to bring ____ capacity for domestic production then, but Reagan (sorry, again) decided the magic of the free market would solve it all.

It didn’t. And it won’t now, either.

We have to treat this as a matter of national security, and explore and drill and put new well in production until we can produce some target amount of our needs.

It can’t all be left up to the oil companies and the fantasy free market that isn’t all that free for energy production.


34 posted on 06/26/2008 6:23:36 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: do the dhue
And you can be assured the rats see no benefit to their party to help lower gas prices right now.

Yeh. Sort of like the impending oil crisis in the late 1990s that Bill Clinton had to deal with in the waning months of his presidency.

A blast from the past:

The American economy, driven by the confidence and buying habits of the public, is now and will continue to reflect the will of an alarmed and wary consumer. Americans are patient to a fault, but when crude oil prices took another jump from $30 to $32 per barrel, they saw retail gasoline dealers immediately post prices of $1.599 or more for regular unleaded. As March began, John Q. Public rebelled.
from

Clinton's Oil Crisis

EXCLUSIVE TO THE SPOTLIGHT
By Charles P. Page

More...
Blame can readily be pinned on a failed foreign and domestic policy in which the Clinton administration and Congress have looked at election-year politics, while ignoring the effect of rapid-rising crude oil prices for the past 12 months.

For example, in southwest Florida, surrounded by water, ports and hoping to keep oil rigs at bay in the Gulf, a gallon of unleaded regular was $ .899 in February 1999. Now, at $1.599, the price increase is $ .70 per gallon or an astronomical 78 percent in the past 12 months.
Read the whole article at the link. It will cause a chuckle in light of the current state of affairs.


35 posted on 06/26/2008 6:25:04 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Realism
The only thing that will bring oil back down to $50-$60 a barrel would be to announce a massive expansion in off-shore drilling. That “68 million acres” isn't worthwhile for the oil companies or like I said they would be trying to get it at $135 a barrel. If the oil companies did drill in the acres then the most they'll be pumping out is maybe a few thousand barrels a day whereas increased off-shore could produce a couple million barrels a day in as few as 3 years. The Democrats aren't giving them a choice, they're saying, “we know there's billions of barrels 50 miles off-shore but here take this unaccessible, unpredictable, regulated filled scrap land that may produce some oil”.
36 posted on 06/26/2008 6:31:59 AM PDT by tobyhill (The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: RSmithOpt
another 196 smaller ones siting idle

I believe you are mistaken if you believe the old plants taken out of service in the 1980's mostly exist, let alone be operable. Most were scavenged of useful equipment, many chopped up and sold either overseas, for other processes or for scrap.

No modernization of the smaller sites

Not economic. It is far better return on the dollar invested to upgrade and expand the bigger refineries with modern processes.

Keep in mind billions of dollars are being spent expanding and upgrading those existing plants. Some of the expansions are bigger than the average refinery. Also, expansions and upgrades have been going on for decades, just not at the current pace. The result is in the 1990's and past 8 years, the total cumulative output capacity in the creation of fuels has risen approximately equal to one new refinery per year including the refineries that were shut down.

37 posted on 06/26/2008 6:33:33 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
My understanding is Clinton vetoed a bill that would have allowed us to drill back in 1995.

Last-minute feeble acts by the overburdened energy secretary to increase crude production, will take too long, perhaps a year.

I liked the above statement. Now, you hear the demorats say it will take ten or more years before drilling will take effect. I don't concur with that. I am also one who believes in refineries. We need more refineries along with more barrels of oil on the market.

Both parties have a responsibility to help fix this party.

38 posted on 06/26/2008 6:37:05 AM PDT by do the dhue (They've got us surrounded again. The poor bastards. General Creighton Abrams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: do the dhue
Both parties have a responsibility to help fix this party.

I meant to say fix this problem. My bad.

39 posted on 06/26/2008 6:38:10 AM PDT by do the dhue (They've got us surrounded again. The poor bastards. General Creighton Abrams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: do the dhue
Now, you hear the demorats say it will take ten or more years before drilling will take effect. I don't concur with that. I am also one who believes in refineries. We need more refineries along with more barrels of oil on the market.

The biggest obstacle to any problem is politicians.

American ingenuity can solve nearly any problem -- if it is allowed. Politicians like restrictions, however, so they can feel in control, and that stifles American ingenuity.
40 posted on 06/26/2008 6:41:02 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: theBuckwheat
At the same time, the long term contracts they have been making for the past year are locking in some pretty high prices.

But I don't think you realize how much is actually paid. The average isn't the spot market price, but take a look at what is actually paid.

Refiner Acquisition Cost of Crude Oil
http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/pet_pri_rac2_dcu_nus_m.htm

In April, the average price for a domestic barrel of Crude Oil bought by refineries was $107.50. The average spot market price for West Texas Intermediate (the futures price quoted when people talk about the price of "oil") was $112.58 for the same month.

Petroleum Spot Prices
http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/pet_pri_spt_s1_m.htm


Of course, oil comes in all kinds of quality grades and the actual price reflects that. It has different values and either produces lower grades of products or takes additional refining to produce the same amount of products as something like WTI.

Domestic Crude Oil First Purchase Prices by API Gravity
http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/pet_pri_dfp3_k_m.htm

Landed Costs of Imported Crude by API Gravity
http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/pet_pri_land3_k_m.htm

41 posted on 06/26/2008 6:59:35 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Realism

I agree with this. While we don’t like it, hey! C’mon you spoiled Americans! Make a little sacrifice here! You have your sons fighting in Iraq, maybe you could make some sacrifices yourselves!

Take one less trip this summer! Carpool! Cut out purchasing a few things, like cheap Chinese-made consumer goods!

Yes, oil priceed at $140/barrel does suck. Well? Too D*** Bad. If you are conservative and really believe in market forces, that is EXACTLY what has to happen in order to make other development of sources of energy economically feasible. The cost of capital for plant to start production has to be paid, and NO, IT’S NOT GOING TO BE PAID BY SOMEONE ELSE OR THE GOVERNMENT!!!! WE are going to have to pay for it. Plain and simple.

So, sure, we all want nuclear power for electric generation, and we want oil from oil shale and/or coal liquification. Sounds good to me. But we’ve got to pay for it.

The price of gas at $4.00/gallon and oil at $100/barrel makes this possible. So I’m not mad at price of oil. It’s what we do with this OPPORTUNITY that matters. We need to use this as a means to develop our own resources and get off the addiction to foreign oil. And say to hell with the global warming hoax and let the tree huggers go live in the woods w/o modern conveniences.

That’s what I’m more focused on.


42 posted on 06/26/2008 7:01:40 AM PDT by henkster (Politics is the art of telling a bigger and more believable lie more often than your opponent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
The biggest obstacle to any problem is politicians.

HEAR HEAR!!

I received the below (in it's entirety) in an email:

ANWR = Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

Now… A comparison:

And some perspective:

NOTE WHERE THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AREA IS… (it’s in the “ANWR Coastal Plain”):

THIS IS WHAT THE DEMOCRATS, LIBERALS AND “GREENS” SHOW YOU WHEN THEY TALK ABOUT ANWR

…and they are right… these ARE photographs of ANWR



ISN’T ANWR BEAUTIFUL? WHY SHOULD WE DRILL HERE (AND DESTROY) THIS BEAUTIFUL PLACE?

WELL… THAT’S NOT EXACTLY THE TRUTH

Do you remember the map?

The map showed that the proposed drilling area is in the ANWR Coastal Plain

Do those photographs look like a coastal plain to you?

WHAT’S GOING ON HERE?

THE ANSWER IS SIMPLE…

THAT IS NOT WHERE THEY ARE WANTING TO DRILL!

THIS IS WHAT THE PROPOSED EXPLORATION AREA ACTUALLY LOOKS LIKE IN THE WINTER:

AND THIS IS WHAT IT ACTUALLY LOOKS LIKE IN THE SUMMER:

HERE ARE A COUPLE SCREEN SHOTS FROM GOOGLE EARTH:

AS YOU CAN SEE, THE AREA WHERE THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT DRILLING IS A BARREN WASTELAND.

OH… AND THEY SAY THAT THEY ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THE EFFECT ON THE LOCAL WILDLIFE…

HERE IS A PHOTO (SHOT DURING THE SUMMER) OF THE “DEPLETED WILDLIFE” SITUATION CREATED BY DRILLING AROUND PRUDHOE BAY*…

DON’T YOU THINK THAT THE CARIBOU REALLY HATE THAT DRILLING?

HERE’S THAT SAME SPOT DURING THE WINTER.

HEY, THIS BEAR SEEMS TO REALLY HATE THE PIPELINE NEAR PRUDHOE BAY*…

*The Prudhoe bay area accounts for 17% of U.S. domestic oil production

NOW, WHY DO YOU THINK THAT THE DEMOCRATS ARE LYING ABOUT ANWR?

REMEMBER WHEN AL GORE SAID THAT THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD WORK TO ARTIFICIALLY RAISE GAS PRICES TO $5.00 A GALLON?

WELL…

AL GORE AND HIS FELLOW DEMOCRATS HAVE ALMOST REACHED THEIR GOAL!

NOW THAT YOU KNOW THAT THE DEMOCRATS HAVE BEEN LYING, WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT?

43 posted on 06/26/2008 7:29:43 AM PDT by do the dhue (They've got us surrounded again. The poor bastards. General Creighton Abrams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Of course you would know about that ...that's your occupation. My point was more that sites are available to place 'new' refineries if they are needed. I would suspect it is more economic to enlarge and modernize the existing large refineries as not to have to worry about transport of raw materials and products from the smaller sites.

I take it any refinery now cracks the oil to get all the possible product mixes (highest margins and product demand) it can out of each barrel depending upon the quality of the crude??

44 posted on 06/26/2008 7:32:08 AM PDT by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: umgud
If some wildcatter were to find a huge heretofore unknown pool of oil/gas, the dems would do their best to stop the production.

We already have huge KNOWN pools that we're not allowed to produce. I don't know why anyone would even bother looking for more, it's not like they'd be allowed to do anything with it.

45 posted on 06/26/2008 7:33:15 AM PDT by nina0113 (If fences don't work, why does the White House have one?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: henkster
It’s what we do with this OPPORTUNITY that matters. We need to use this as a means to develop our own resources and get off the addiction to foreign oil.

Absolutely! It's nice to hear from someone who actually sees it as I do and can put a positive spin on it to boot. Its a bit progressive for many here but I believe we need to roll up our sleeves and mow thru this time so we don't have to do it again in 10-15 years. People who think oil is cheap don't realize how much of this countries resources have been expended securing our addiction.

We really need to find ways to do much, much more while using much less.

46 posted on 06/26/2008 7:33:25 AM PDT by Realism (Some believe that the facts-of-life are open to debate.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: umgud

They might do that or try to. It would depend if it is on Federal turf or not.


47 posted on 06/26/2008 7:37:35 AM PDT by RightWhale (I will veto each and every beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Realism

It is a good idea to look for different methods to produce energy. But until we have put these methods into production, it is a good idea to make available those methods that are known. We need short, mid, and long term goals to solve this problem. We need true leaders who really care about our nation (not self serving interest) to carry the flag up the hill.

We don’t need obstructionist. We need producers in our Congress and in the White House. We the people can put producers in and we can remove obstructionist. I say it is time to git r done during the next election cycle. This has to be the worst Congress in my lifetime. It is time to do something about that.


48 posted on 06/26/2008 7:48:26 AM PDT by do the dhue (They've got us surrounded again. The poor bastards. General Creighton Abrams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle

Brilliant image. That needs to be printed out and spread far and wide!


49 posted on 06/26/2008 7:51:16 AM PDT by Antoninus (Every second spent bashing McCain is time that could be spent helping Conservatives downticket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: do the dhue
It is a good idea to look for different methods to produce energy. But until we have put these methods into production, it is a good idea to make available those methods that are known.

I clearly see your point, but as the last 30 years have proven, you can't have it both ways. Private investment always follows the trend, if the trend is more oil thats where the money goes. If the trend is less oil the money will seek other opportunities.

50 posted on 06/26/2008 8:04:34 AM PDT by Realism (Some believe that the facts-of-life are open to debate.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson