Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain Slams Obama for Opposing Gun Ownership
CNSNews ^ | June 26, 2008 | Penny Starr

Posted on 06/26/2008 10:58:41 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo

(CNSNews.com) - Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) said the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling that the Second Amendment provides individuals the right to bear arms was a "landmark victory" and that his Democratic rival is on the wrong side of the debate.

"Unlike Senator Obama, who refused to join me in signing a bipartisan amicus brief, I was pleased to express my support and call for the ruling issued today," McCain said in a statement issued by his campaign following Thursday's 5-4 ruling.

"Today's ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller makes clear that other municipalities like Chicago that have banned handguns have infringed on the constitutional rights of Americans.

"Unlike the elitist view that believes Americans cling to guns out of bitterness, today's ruling recognizes that gun ownership is a fundamental right -- sacred, just as the right to free speech and assembly," he added.

McCain was referring to Obama's controversial remark before the Pennsylvania primary in April, when he told a San Francisco fundraiser: "You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing's replaced them...And it's not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations," Obama said.

McCain, who has been campaigning in the western United States touting his energy plans, said the ruling is not the end of the battle for personal liberty.

"This ruling does not mark the end of our struggle against those who seek to limit the rights of law-abiding citizens," McCain said. "We must always remain vigilant in defense of our freedoms. But today, the Supreme Court ended forever the specious argument that the Second Amendment did not confer an individual right to keep and bear arms."

Some Second Amendment supporters fault McCain for advocating restrictions on gun show sales.

Libertarian Party presidential candidate Bob Barr on Thursday noted that McCain has co-sponsored legislation that could require the registration of attendees at gun shows and even ban such shows.

McCain, on his campaign Web site, says he supports legislation that would require an instant criminal background check for all sales at gun shows.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; banglist; gunvote; heller; issues; mccain; obama; smalltown

1 posted on 06/26/2008 10:58:42 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Gun ownership kinda infringes on the “Obama or die” theme.


2 posted on 06/26/2008 10:59:28 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE

Gun ownership kinda infringes on the “Obama or die” theme.


You beat me to it. Smith and Wessen is very good insurance to have.


3 posted on 06/26/2008 11:01:59 AM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

“Unlike the elitist view that believes Americans cling to guns out of bitterness, today’s ruling recognizes that gun ownership is a fundamental right — sacred, just as the right to free speech and assembly,” he added.

FINALLY! I am not thrilled by John McCain, but at least he finally seems to be taking it to Obama. Expose the socialist, elitist jerk for who he is!


4 posted on 06/26/2008 11:03:28 AM PDT by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unkus

Excuse me: Smith and Wesson.


5 posted on 06/26/2008 11:03:54 AM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Yes SCOTUS got this one right The scarey part is that the victory was 5-4... four yahoos thought the right to bear arms didn’t apply to “the people”. Think about how this would be different if BHO were in charge with a dem congress confirming social activist judges. It would only take one more activist liberal justice to vaporize our entire constitution. The next pres will nominate justices for 2-3 vacating SC seats who will likely hear cases involving the 1st amendment (Fairness Doctrine), death penalty, the right to homeschool, religious freedom — the list is endless and scarey. Nuff said.


6 posted on 06/26/2008 11:14:00 AM PDT by Snow Eagle (Portsmouth FReep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snow Eagle

McCain needs to ride this one hard, this and energy will see him thru!!!! and yeah, Juan is a boofu but I will still vote for him...so y’all can save the quaint Juanito comments...


7 posted on 06/26/2008 11:17:43 AM PDT by Fred (The Democrat Party is the Nadir of Nilhilism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Nice, but McCain only supports FUDD guns...


8 posted on 06/26/2008 11:20:19 AM PDT by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE
I'd be curious as to the opinion of FR's 2nd amendment absolutists who feel anyone should be able to own any military weapon as long as they can afford one.

Ths decision specifically denies that right.

9 posted on 06/26/2008 11:25:50 AM PDT by stravinskyrules (Why is it that whenever I hear a piece of music I don't like, it's always by Villa-Lobos?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: unkus
Excuse me: Smith and Wesson

Yes, the original point & click interface.

10 posted on 06/26/2008 11:28:52 AM PDT by paulcissa (The first requirement of Liberalism is to stand on your head and tell the world they're upside down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Another reason to not support comrade Obama


11 posted on 06/26/2008 11:31:12 AM PDT by F15Eagle (1 John 5:4-5, 4:15, John 11:25, 14:6, 1 Tim 2:5, John 3:17-18, John 20:31, 1 John 5:13, John 6:69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

I’m glad McCain’s going after Obama on this. He’s got the majority of the country behind him on this issue. I’m not a McCain fan, but he’s playing it smart on this and energy. Hopefully the slim 5-4 victory will cause a few fence-sitters to wake up.


12 posted on 06/26/2008 11:37:21 AM PDT by chickpundit (I will abide under the shadow of the Almighty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unkus

Smith and Wesson? I still haven’t forgotten how they buckled under the Clintonista regime. I’ve got my Beretta and H&K sidearms to comfort me :)


13 posted on 06/26/2008 11:38:45 AM PDT by Man from Oz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
"Unlike the elitist view that believes Americans cling to guns out of bitterness, ...

As I said earlier,

LOLOLOL!!!

14 posted on 06/26/2008 11:40:05 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man from Oz

Yes Smith and Wesson. What’s your problem?


15 posted on 06/26/2008 11:42:21 AM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
McCain said in a statement issued by his campaign following Thursday's 5-4 ruling.

Five-to-four? So we came that close to losing on this one, which would have made a nice pairing with the decision giving foreign terrorists Constitutional rights last week.

16 posted on 06/26/2008 11:43:48 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Well that’s a change. He’s goin’ after a Democrat instead of insulting and backstabbing conservatives....


17 posted on 06/26/2008 11:44:03 AM PDT by Little Ray (I'm a Conservative. But I can vote for John McCain. If I have to. I guess.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man from Oz
I still haven’t forgotten how they (S&W) buckled under the Clintonista regime.

New ownership now (since 2001); time to move on.

18 posted on 06/26/2008 11:46:03 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: stravinskyrules

It is only a small step in the right direction - but its big change from the normal course of things.


19 posted on 06/26/2008 11:46:08 AM PDT by Little Ray (I'm a Conservative. But I can vote for John McCain. If I have to. I guess.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Fred
McCain needs to ride this one hard, this and energy will see him thru!!!! and yeah, Juan is a boofu but I will still vote for him...so y’all can save the quaint Juanito comments...

I agree - that he is a boofu for one - but these issues are winners for McCain. The thought of B Hussein Obama appointing judges-for-life is truly frightening.

20 posted on 06/26/2008 11:46:43 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Man from Oz
"Smith and Wesson? I still haven’t forgotten how they buckled under the Clintonista regime. I’ve got my Beretta and H&K sidearms to comfort me :)"

S&W has since changed ownership and has disavowed any agreement that they had with the clintonista. They are good to go now.

Glad ,too, as they make some of the finest firearms made.

21 posted on 06/26/2008 11:49:54 AM PDT by Eagles6 ( Typical White Guy: Christian, Constitutionalist, Heterosexual, Redneck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Man from Oz

I’d guess that you will NOT vote McCain. Am I right?


22 posted on 06/26/2008 11:51:51 AM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: unkus

What? Be careful what you assume. Who else is there to vote for in order to keep Obama out? Of course I am voting McCain but like many others on this forum I view him as the lesser of two evils.


23 posted on 06/26/2008 11:57:01 AM PDT by Man from Oz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6

I stand corrected. No offense to the FReeper S&W enthusiasts intended


24 posted on 06/26/2008 12:00:12 PM PDT by Man from Oz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Man from Oz

I thought you might be a one issue voter when you responded to me with “Smith and Wesson?” I found that to be somewhat arrogant. Thanks for your response. I, too, will vote McCain for your same reasons. We stand together fighting the bastards, FRiend.


25 posted on 06/26/2008 12:02:37 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Man from Oz

;)
=#


26 posted on 06/26/2008 12:07:23 PM PDT by Eagles6 ( Typical White Guy: Christian, Constitutionalist, Heterosexual, Redneck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: unkus

Unkus

I did not intend to come off that way and I apologize for that. I am so darn disgusted with the shape this country is in (and where it is headed) and why we can’t field ANY legitimate, sane leaders who will stand up for the people instead of the special interests. I know that sounds naive but where is the leadership that is not tainted by the beltway?

What part of CO do you live? I was born and raised near Trinidad.

Best to you and all MFO


27 posted on 06/26/2008 12:16:51 PM PDT by Man from Oz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: stravinskyrules

Myself, and most people I know draw the line at weapons not possessed by the infantryman.

1. Assault Rifles (with automatic fire capability): Yes.
2. Belt fed machineguns: Yes.
.....
....
...
..
.
99. Nuclear Weapons: No.


28 posted on 06/26/2008 12:19:28 PM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: stravinskyrules
Ths decision specifically denies that right.

I don't see that at all. It specifically says a class of weapons cannot be banned.

29 posted on 06/26/2008 12:26:00 PM PDT by beltfed308 (Heller: The defining moment of our Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson