Trying to Put Lipstick on a Pig (Planned Parenthood)

Townhall ^ | 6/29/08 | Ken Connor

[EternalVigilance]

“mentrualpoetry.com”??

Puhleeeze...

[narses]

The fact that the left hates him as much as you do puts you in their camp. And you speak of shame as you slander John McCain.

Here are just a few of the votes he has cast that NARAL HATES:

Voted against a resolution in support of Roe v. Wade and a woman’s constitutional right to safe and legal abortion services.4

􀀧 Repeatedly voted for (and cosponsored) the Federal Abortion Ban, a law that criminalizes some abortion services, with no exception to protect a woman’s health, and carries up to a two‐year prison sentence for doctors.5

􀀧 Supported the Unborn Victims of Violence Act, a law that grants separate legal status to an embryo or fetus,6 which anti‐choice Sen. Orrin Hatch (R‐UT) boasted “undermines abortion rights.”7

􀀧 Voted to codify a controversial regulation that allows states to make an embryo or fetus – but not a pregnant woman – eligible for health‐care coverage.8

[narses]

Sadly those who hate McCain more than they value Truth or Life have no ability to apologize. They will slur him until they draw their last breath. Very sad.

[EternalVigilance]

Pathetic.

[EternalVigilance]

Looks to me like you’re the one pouring out untruth and bile against conservatives.

Also looks to me like you’re therefore a real good fit in the McCain camp.

[EternalVigilance]

slur him

How is pointing out his egregious record a "slur"?

[narses]

So who should good folks vote for EV? In your opinion, of course.

[EternalVigilance]

Someone who doesn’t trash the Constitution.

[mc6809e]

I'm curious, do you support the entire eugenics movement or just the part that kills 3500 INNOCENT AMERICANS EVERY DAY?

Save your emotional outrage for those moved only by their hearts and not their heads. It won't work on me.

[Bullfrogg]

I thought this was a crash course on how to put lip stick on a pig! The title is misleading.

Bullfrogg

[narses]

So who would that be?

[mc6809e]

More: It [charity] encourages the healthier and more normal sections of the world to shoulder the burden of unthinking and indiscriminate fecundity of others; which brings with it, as I think the reader must agree, a dead weight of human waste. Instead of decreasing and aiming to eliminate the stocks that are most detrimental to the future of the race and the world, it tends to render them to a menacing degree dominant [emphasis added].11

She concluded,

The most serious charge that can be brought against modern “benevolence” is that it encourages the perpetuation of defectives, delinquents and dependents. These are the most dangerous elements in the world community, the most devastating curse on human progress and expression.12

The Review printed an excerpt of an address Sanger gave in 1926. In it she said:

It now remains for the U.S. government to set a sensible example to the world by offering a bonus or yearly pension to all obviously unfit parents who allow themselves to be sterilized by harmless and scientific means. In this way the moron and the diseased would have no posterity to inherit their unhappy condition. The number of the feeble-minded would decrease and a heavy burden would be lifted from the shoulders of the fit.

Do you also agree with these quotes?

Sure do.

And so should anyone that wishes to live in the first world and not the third world.

[narses]

So your head answers how? When can and should you kill innocent life?

[narses]

So America today is the ‘third world’?

[narses]

So who would that be?

So who would that be?

(Second request.)

[mc6809e]

So your head answers how? When can and should you kill innocent life?

A fetus that is allowed to become a person is going to require food, water, shelter, etc.

If that fetus can't be expected to become a person that will proportionally increase the production of the above, then maybe abortion is the right choice.

Easy energy and advances in the sciences have allowed humanity to produce a surplus in food, shelter, etc, year after year to be consumed by greater and greater numbers of people.

Do you think it can go on forever? And do you think as things get tougher, that those hungry masses are going to respect YOUR needs for energy and food, etc?

Why do Mexicans risk dying in the desert to come to the United States? Because Mexico has already moved past the point of overpopulation. There is very little surplus left. Any surplus is taken and consumed, mostly through the Democratic process.

It all comes down to productivity versus fecundity. If productivity doesn't increase proportionally with population, then what is produced must be divided into smaller and smaller pieces. Or go someplace else where they can get a bigger share of the pie.

[mc6809e]

So America today is the ‘third world’?

Parts of America surely are.

More and more people with lower and lower (and sometime no) productivity.

[narses]

LOL, the old Malthusian fallacy. More people means more possibilities.

Out of curiosity, two questions - what faith do you practice and who are you voting for in the Presidential race and why?

[narses]

Where are “Parts of America...” the thrid world? And how has abortion played out in that area?

[narses]

So who would that be?

So who would that be?

So who would that be?

(Third request.)

{{{CRICKETS}}}