Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawsuit stirs fear of 'strangelets' destroying the Earth
Market Watch ^ | June 12, 2008 | John Letzing

Posted on 07/01/2008 9:35:45 AM PDT by glymers

If all goes according to plan, a massive underground facility in Switzerland will begin smashing particles together later this summer in an effort to provide a clearer understanding of the physical universe than has ever before been possible. Known as the Large Hadron Collider, or LHC, the project is composed of a 17-mile circular tunnel beneath Geneva, containing thousands of magnets meant to send beams of subatomic particles hurtling toward each other. The resulting collisions are expected to release matter similar to that present at the "Big Bang" that created the universe.

(Excerpt) Read more at marketwatch.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: callingartbell; cernsgiantmagnet; chickenlittle; hadroncollider; stringtheory; weredoomed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
They want to find the God Particle. The Big Bang. They have no clue what will happen. Smashing atoms together with this much energy may just cause a bigger bang than they or we are ready for.
1 posted on 07/01/2008 9:35:45 AM PDT by glymers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: glymers

Sounds like a global warmingdoom and gloom scenario that gives way to much credit to humans to me.


2 posted on 07/01/2008 9:38:34 AM PDT by rwilson99 (Barrack Obama... more in common with Archie Bunker than Tiger Woods)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glymers

We’ve already seen worse than this thing could create.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultra-high-energy_cosmic_ray


3 posted on 07/01/2008 9:42:31 AM PDT by ko_kyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwilson99

Will watch this thread to learn more. I may be wrong, but I seem to recall that there are numerous other collidors smashing atoms (probably the same atoms). But the size of this one is to allow us to “see” the smallest particles or something. (Although I imagine in 20 years we will need a bigger one, because after all our study we will have discovered that there must be something even smaller!)


4 posted on 07/01/2008 9:44:07 AM PDT by 21twelve (Don't wish for peace. Pray for Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rwilson99

I had no clue about this super magnet. Found the article interesting and a bit scarey, since they don’t know what will happen when they turn this thing on in August.


5 posted on 07/01/2008 9:45:21 AM PDT by glymers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: glymers

Uberhype. The scientists are mainly concerned that their hugh and expensive magnets do not self-destruct.


6 posted on 07/01/2008 9:46:55 AM PDT by RightWhale (I will veto each and every beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glymers

Yay! The world’s going to end! Now I can tell National City where they can stick their mortgage payments!


7 posted on 07/01/2008 9:47:41 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (This tagline is completely naked - STOP STARING!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glymers

Black holes?

Sit down Bill Clinton, it ain’t what you’re thinking.


8 posted on 07/01/2008 9:47:58 AM PDT by mkjessup (Jimmy Carter is the Skidmark in the panties of American history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glymers

“Smashing atoms together with this much energy may just cause a bigger bang than they or we are ready for.”

Not to worry — all they’ll hear is a snap, crackle and pop.


9 posted on 07/01/2008 9:50:38 AM PDT by 353FMG (What marxism and fascism could not destroy, liberalism did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve
Although I imagine in 20 years we will need a bigger one, because after all our study we will have discovered that there must be something even smaller!)

That's what everybody thought until they tried it and the hadrons kept getting bigger

10 posted on 07/01/2008 9:50:51 AM PDT by Soliton (Investigate, study, learn, then express an opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: glymers

To paraphrase Neil Peart, “All the brightest boys, Play with the biggest toys, More than they bargained for...”


11 posted on 07/01/2008 10:06:30 AM PDT by printhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: printhead

And Buddy Rich said,”I can’t sit down long enough to absorb any kind of learning. “


12 posted on 07/01/2008 10:24:13 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ko_kyi
Thanks,,,,fascinating....found this:

The Oh-My-God Particle

************************EXCERPT***********************

See Link for Math calculations...etc...

***************************************

The Oh-My-God Particle

by John Walker
January 4, 1994

Fly's Eye

The University of Utah operates a cosmic ray detector called the Fly's Eye II, situated at the Dugway Proving Ground about an hour's drive from Salt Lake City. The Fly's Eye consists of an array of telescopes which stare into the night sky and record the blue flashes which result when very high energy cosmic rays slam into the atmosphere. From the height and intensity of the flash, one can calculate the nature of the particle and its energy.

On the night of October 15, 1991, the Fly's Eye detected a proton with an energy of 3.2±0.9×1020 electron volts.[1,2] By comparison, the recently-canceled Superconducting Super Collider (SSC) would have accelerated protons to an energy of 20 TeV, or 2×1013 electron volts—ten million times less. The energy of the Oh My God particle seen by the Fly's Eye is equivalent to 51 joules—enough to light a 40 watt light bulb for more than a second—equivalent, in the words of Utah physicist Pierre Sokolsky, to “a brick falling on your toe.” The particle's energy is equivalent to an American baseball travelling fifty-five miles an hour.

All evidence points to these extremely high energy particles being protons—the nuclei of hydrogen atoms. Recalling that the rest mass of the proton is 938.28 MeV—roughly 1 GeV, 1×109 eV, all of the rest of the particle's energy results from the kinetic energy resulting from its motion, which we can calculate according to basic formulæ of special relativity. So let's crunch a few numbers.

Microbial Mass

First of all, noting that mass and energy are equivalent, we can calculate the rest mass equivalent of a 3×1020 eV particle to be about 5×10−13 grams. That doesn't sound like much until you recall that this is about 3×1011 daltons (chemists measure molecular mass in daltons, where 1 dalton is the mass of a hydrogen atom), just about the same as a single cell of the intestinal bacterium E. coli (5×1011 daltons). Thus this single subatomic particle had a mass-energy equivalent to a bacterium.

How Fast?

*************snip**************Formula at the link....*************************

After traveling one light year, the particle would be only 0.15 femtoseconds—46 nanometres—behind a photon that left at the same time.

13 posted on 07/01/2008 10:45:32 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All; NormsRevenge; Marine_Uncle; RadioAstronomer
As a math/computing guy...I find the disclaimer exceedingly interesting....

******************EXCERPT********************

Disclaimer

These calculations involve some elementary but easy to mess up algebra and some very demanding numerical calculations for which regular IEEE double precision is insufficient. If you'd like to double-check these results, be sure to use a multiple precision calculator with at least 30 significant digits of accuracy. I generally use Mathematica for symbolic work and Mark Hopkins' package C-BC for number crunching. It's entirely possible I've made one or more mistakes of order-of-magnitude or greater significance. But even so, (and please correct me!), this is, particle physics wise, a genuine Oh Wow event.

14 posted on 07/01/2008 10:54:17 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: glymers; Fred Nerks

See post #13 ....I don’t think the energy of any particles to be generated approaches what has been observed in the WILD!


15 posted on 07/01/2008 10:57:52 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glymers

‘The resulting collisions are expected to release matter similar to that present at the “Big Bang” that created the universe.’
Bad assumption. They don’t know if there was an event like the “big bang” or what matter was like at the supposed event.


16 posted on 07/01/2008 11:01:25 AM PDT by BooksForTheRight.com (Fight liberal lies with knowledge. Read conservative books and articles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glymers; SunkenCiv; martin_fierro; MHGinTN; UCANSEE2; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; Dog Gone; 6SJ7
Earlier thread with slight mention of the lawsuit:

Tech giants use controversial project as test bed ( Hadron Collider threatens the earth says Suit)

17 posted on 07/01/2008 11:05:06 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: glymers

Well, can you tell me if this sort of collision (at this energy level of the LHC but with greater magnetic confinements) is occurring in nature, perhaps inside stars, which would seem to indicate something, if such stars do not implode due to the collisions. And then there’s the question of ‘at what confinement can the collisions be kept from “growing”’ a black hole?’


18 posted on 07/01/2008 11:09:46 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glymers
Lawsuit stirs fear of 'strangelets' destroying the Earth

They're already here.

19 posted on 07/01/2008 11:17:13 AM PDT by martin_fierro (Strange Attractors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
Yup, the starngelets are destroying, yup ...


20 posted on 07/01/2008 11:25:46 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson