Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FBI Chief Unhappy With Supreme Court Ruling
kwtx.com ^ | July 1, 2008 | NA

Posted on 07/01/2008 10:54:32 AM PDT by neverdem

The director of the FBI is not happy with the Supreme Court's recent handgun ruling.

Robert Mueller says he tends to believe that "weapons harm people, and more often than not they harm the people carrying them."

Mueller said the high court's decision, which threw out a handgun ban in Washington, D.C., "does throw a lot of things up in the air."

Mueller said communities will now have to decide their own licensing programs.

Mueller was speaking at a convention of the International Association of Campus Law Enforcement Administrators in Hartford, Connecticut.

He says with his grandchildren going to college, he hopes "those campuses will be weapons-free."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: banglist; crymeariver; donutwatch; education; fbi; fbifailures; govwatch; gungrabber; heller; jbts; mueller; parker; policestate; robertmueller; ruling; scotus; secondamendment; shallnotbeinfringed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-334 next last
To: neverdem
Robert Mueller says he tends to believe that "weapons harm people, and more often than not they harm the people carrying them."

As evidenced by the high rate of military and police forces shooting themselves?

Ok... There was the Lubbock "Circular Firing Squad" the SWAT team there pulled, but I'm ok with only allowing law enforcement tightly regulated access to firearms.

Everyone else in the civilian population is MUCH more capable of carrying arms for their own defense and requires no such regulations.

21 posted on 07/01/2008 11:01:21 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Robert Mueller says he tends to believe that "[fill in the blank] harm people, and more often than not they harm the people [fill in the blank] them."

cars , riding
knives , holding
razors, using

22 posted on 07/01/2008 11:01:32 AM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Another Bush appoint matching the quality of Norman Mineta or Harriet Myers. Sigh....


23 posted on 07/01/2008 11:01:36 AM PDT by MainFrame65 (The US Senate: World's greatest PREVARICATIVE body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"weapons harm people, and more often than not they harm the people carrying them."

He's right.

My M-1 bit my thumb once, and it doesn't do my right shoulder any favors.

24 posted on 07/01/2008 11:02:07 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Mueller said communities will now have to decide their own licensing programs

Has anyone else noticed how the talk seems to center around the licensure of a fundamental right as if it were mere priveledge?

Keep your forms, Mr. Mueller, save the taxpayer a grundle on printing and paperwork. This is my right. Maybe we should start talking about what "shall not be infringed" means.

25 posted on 07/01/2008 11:03:14 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
He says with his grandchildren going to college, he hopes "those campuses will be weapons-free."

In an ideal world there would never be weapons on a campus. As we saw from Va. Tech, when a loon wants to bring a gun on campus they don't check to see if the rules allow them.

26 posted on 07/01/2008 11:03:24 AM PDT by MovementConservative (John Roberts and Sam Alito.... Thank you GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Robert Mueller says he tends to believe that "weapons harm people...

Weapons do NOTHING, people harm people.

27 posted on 07/01/2008 11:03:40 AM PDT by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Exactly right. Moller, hand in your resignation.

You are sworn to defend the Constitution of the United States. Now hit the road.

The amendments that don’t refer to procedural matters, address individual rights. How can anyone come away from the Second Amendment thinking it is the only Amendment that has an escppe clause.

The government answers to us. It is not the other way around. We are the ones who grant government the right to be armed in our nation. It IS NOT the other way around.


28 posted on 07/01/2008 11:03:40 AM PDT by DoughtyOne ( I say no to the Hillary Clinton wing of the Republican party. Not now or ever, John McCain...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The chief is in denial of clear data available to him.

The crime rate will fall, now that potential victims can defend themselves.

The chief is just another control freak, afraid of a citizenry able to defend itself.


29 posted on 07/01/2008 11:03:53 AM PDT by G Larry (Fight B.O. with RIGHT GUARD! Vote McCain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Robert Mueller says he tends to believe that "weapons harm people, and more often than not they harm the people carrying them."

Another Bush appointee strikes again. Yet another idiot who believes guns crawl out of cabinets, load themselves and go off and shoot people.

30 posted on 07/01/2008 11:04:04 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Who would McQueeg rather have mad at him: You or the liberals?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas

I hadn’t had any weapons for many years. Bill Clinton and Janet Reno made me reconsider, and to join the NRA.


31 posted on 07/01/2008 11:04:26 AM PDT by RDasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: G-Bear
Does that include FBI agents?

Well, at least one DEA guy with a Glock 40...

32 posted on 07/01/2008 11:04:44 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

So does Mueller carry? Is he willing to quit? Would he be happy if all his agents stopped carrying? Jus’ aksin’...


33 posted on 07/01/2008 11:04:44 AM PDT by Hegemony Cricket (Friends with umbrellas are outstanding in the rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
When Democrats are in power, they appoint liberals. Why do "our guys" keep appointing liberals?

Never mind; I know the answer.

34 posted on 07/01/2008 11:05:49 AM PDT by B Knotts (Calvin Coolidge Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Seems Robert Mueller has enough to worry about at the F.B.I. then get involved in decisions of the Supremes.
Has the F.B.I. allowed any more innocents to go to jail for long periods of time to protect their murdering informants?
Has the F.B.I. killed anyone lately? Like they did in Waco or Ruby Ridge?
Has the F.B.I. covered any embarassing incidents lately? Like The jet shoot down over N.Y? The waco fiasco? The Ruby Rigde fiasco? The Murrah building attack? The conviction of only Tim McVeigh instead of him and the others involved?
Mr. Mueller, me thinks your F.B.I. has its own internal problems for you to spend time dealing with, not MY GUN RIGHTS.
FOOL.


35 posted on 07/01/2008 11:06:00 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (An enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Our country is full of these traitorous bastards.


ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE

36 posted on 07/01/2008 11:06:05 AM PDT by G.Mason (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

He needs to be asked to resign right now.


37 posted on 07/01/2008 11:06:07 AM PDT by alarm rider (Peace! through superior fire power....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I’ll sure be glad once we get a republican administration back in the White House.


38 posted on 07/01/2008 11:06:16 AM PDT by McGruff (This is not the [insert name here] I knew.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

scissors, running with


39 posted on 07/01/2008 11:06:36 AM PDT by Hegemony Cricket (Friends with umbrellas are outstanding in the rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518
Muller needs to look at the facts instead of complaining about a right that was given to us at our Nation's foundation.

No rights were given to us at our Nation's creation. They were given to us at OUR creation.

The Constitution enumerates them, but it most certainly doesn't grant them. It lays down governments ability to restrict them.

40 posted on 07/01/2008 11:07:06 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-334 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson