Skip to comments.Texas 'Self Defense' Shooting - Was It Worth Two Lives?
Posted on 07/03/2008 5:15:19 AM PDT by marktwain
Not even a week after the Supreme Court decided that gun bans are unconstitutional, a man accused of shooting to death two burglars who were robbing his neighbor's home has been set free despite the viciousness of his act.
If you'll remember the story, Joe Horn, a 61-year-old Pasadena, Tex., resident spotted two burglars breaking into his neighbor's home in Nov. 2007. He dialed 911, but despite being warned to stay in his home, he declared that he has a right to use deadly force to defend his neighbor's property and that he was going to confront the robbers.
He does just that and then shoots them in their backs, killing them. A huge controversy ensued over whether he should stand trial in the deaths of do RiascosDiego Ortiz, 30, and Hernan Torres, 38, both Columbian immigrants.
Yesterday, a grand jury cleared him of all wrongdoing. Score another one for the gun nuts.
On Tuesday, family and activists called the killing "premeditated murder." ...
I'm not defending the two men who robbed the neighbor's home of about $2,000 in jewelry and cash. But was this worth their lives? These men were not armed, and they posed no threat to Horn, although he claims that they came into his yard.
But if you hear the 911 tapes, Horn was warned to stay in his home and let the police handle the issue. He ignored the dispatcher's orders and if you listen to the tapes you'll see that he had every intention of killing those men.
Even though Horn has expressed regret over the incident, there are supporters who swear Horn should have sawed the men's heads off and impaled them on a lamppost at the edge of his driveway. These are the people who I lose sleep over.
These are the people who love guns far more than they love anything else and are waiting for their chance to kill someone, and far too often they are looking for a nonwhite in order to get their chance. For example, the 1992 killing of Yoshihiro Hattori, a 16-year-old Japanese exchange student in Baton Rouge, La., who simply rang the wrong doorbell when looking for a Halloween party. The homeowner, Rodney Peairs, opened fire on Hattori, mortally wounding him. Peairs was later acquitted under a Louisiana law, similar to one in Texas that allows people to shoot burglars if they feel threatened.
Here's my question: If people like Horn and Peairs -- who are white -- can shoot people they feel threatened by, why is it that John White, a Long Island, N.Y., man -- who is black -- gets a jail term for defending his home when he thought a mob was coming to harm his son, which also resulted in a death.
None of the losses of life are right. The deaths are senseless, and could have been avoided if cooler heads had prevailed. But in Horn's case, he had no intention of calming down. He took the law into his own hands and now, with a Supreme Court gun decision having just passed, every firearm freak in the country will feel emboldened.
Well, here's what I have to say to them: a person who would shoot someone because they feel a gun empowers them is a sociopath with a murderous mentality. It has nothing to do with self defense, it is the mark of a weak person who would feel castrated without having a gun somewhere in their vicinity.
Point blank: If you actually love your gun, you're a punk. It takes a man to preserve life. It takes a weakling to snuff it out.
Horn, by his own admission, is an eternal victim of his weak moment.
The criminals are responsible for their own deaths.
in a word YES it was, and just maybe criminals will think twice about their chosen profession.
Pertinent advice: DON'T DO THE CRIME!
Let's throw in a racism charge and ignore the fact that the NY law is very different from the TX law.
That being said, I wouldn't shoot someone running away.
That's the question the two criminals should have been asking themselves. They alone bear the responsibility for the loss of their lives. I'm sure Mr. Horn's remorse is real, and I think any compassionate human being would feel similarly to him. But the reality is that two criminals are gone and will never again engage in criminal activity, and the world is better off for it.
The author is OK with the 20,000 Americans murdered every year, but 2 criminal deaths is more then he can stand.
Yes....you can't 'do the time', or in this case accept the consequences for your actions, don't do the crime.
Now defending your property is RACIST??? LIEberals will only get a clue after they've been victimized, but even then I have my doubts.
“These are the people who love guns far more than they love anything else and are waiting for their chance to kill someone, and far too often they are looking for a nonwhite in order to get their chance.”
Sounds like the definition of young black male.
Whites dont have to go looking for a non white to shoot, usually the non white shows up on his own and puts himself in that position. And you dont have to go back to 1992 to find an example of a black male shooting a white person.
But I do not see these as linked. If the Constitution allows me to own a gun, that says nothing about me being able to shoot people. Two different things. This Liberal writer is trying to equate gun ownership with killing people. That's BS.
Here's the author's answer, plain and simple: Had John White been white, he would have been given the same punishment. It's the idiotic legislation/legislators in the area, not skin color that is the determining factor in his case.
Had the thieves stumbled in when the homeowner was home, killed the homeowner, and took the 2000 in jewelry we wouldn’t hear a peep from these liberals.
Comparing this to the tragic death of Hattori is sick.
This dim twit needs to do some introspection on the black community and comment on what happened to Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom.
I have one of these in each ground floor window here.
If my 100# American Bulldog doesn't get 'em, Mr. Ruger will!
If you read this person's opinion on Joe Horn, you'll see that it has every intention of selling us all out to socialist mass-murderers like Uncle Joe Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot.
That's something you would have had to ask the two burglers, isn't it?
Thank heavens some people in this country are anti-crime!
Answer to that question is “YES”. In Texas the law is called the Castle Doctrine.
“Comparing this to the tragic death of Hattori is sick.”
I think there was more to Hattori’s death than innocently ringing the wrong doorbell, mostly personal stupidity.
Burglary is not an economic plan. Get a job or start a business.
The unknown and hidden costs of NOT having a castle doctrine are the lives of tens of thousands of crime victims.
Leftists LOVE hidden costs of their ideology. It lets them get away with feeling good about themselves, even superior, for having an “enlightened” viewpoint.
“Was it worth their lives?” Yup... freedom’s worth fighting for.
I should have been more clear though. I left off the assumption that the only murder was the homeowner and not the thieves. It happens all the time and we don’t get crap like this written. You know, stories where an elderly person gets beaten to death by a couple of home invaders looking for crack money.
I really wish our society had BALLS like the Israelis do.
But... we’re soft. If the Israelis weren’t as matter of fact gutsy as they are, brooking no BS, they wouldn’t exist today.
I’ll be hoping that Madison Gray breaks into somebody’s house real soon.
Yup. When predators murder innocents its no big deal to the Liberals and the press. When blacks murder whites BECAUSE they are white, it is no big deal to our Liberal masters.
Let someone actually shoot back though...
Next Question ...
Recently there was a former marine that killed one of two scumbags in a fast food robbery. The other perp was wounded. He shot them when they were shoving him and others into the bathroom I believe. They were armed. The mother or grandmother was upset he wasn’t being charged with murder and demanded justice for her dead thug. Had they murdered the folks in the bathroom, she would have been complaining that he was a good boy and just made a bad decision. The parents in this country in certain sectors are breeding gangsters and thugs.
Are “black voices” supposed to be a lobby in defense of criminality? If the Democrats get elected this fall, will this site call for subsidies?
The weren't Columbian immigrants; they were ILLEGAL ALIENS from Columbia, and one of them had been previously deported and had come back into our country illegally again. They both had criminal records because apparently they weren't willing to do any of those jobs that Americans won't do -- opting instead to support themselves via crime.
Unless I had just seen them run away after robbing someone I knew, carrying a bagful of loot.
I think it has more to do with the cultures of New York, where self-defense is not regarded as an unalienable right, vs Texas and Louisiana, where the castle doctrine is held pretty much sacred, than with the colors of the assailants and the shooters.
The author is asking the wrong question:
It should be “How bad do you want what you intend to steal, is it worth your life?”
I’m voting YES. These are/were two low-life, criminals who had CHOSEN this predatory path. We don’t need more predators. The libs would maybe prefer having a meeting?
The article makes a case that “Blackvoices.com” should be renamed “Criminalvoices.com”.
Given that American blacks are suffering most from black on black crimes of violence, the author of the article under discussion is a disgusting apologist for black criminals.
BullS#*+!! That is exactly what this idiot of a writer is doing.
I’m with the saw-their-heads-off-and-put-them-on-pikes crowd. Don’t go to sleep tonight, Madison Gray.
Oooooh, I like it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.