Posted on 07/05/2008 9:12:09 AM PDT by yankeedame
By Sarah Harris
Last updated at 12:40 AM on 05th July 2008

Nursery: Charities have said children should be
taught sex education from age four
Children as young as four are set to be given compulsory sex education in primary school.
They will be taught the names of body parts and basic ideas about different relationships.
Government advisers claim that 'gradual education' from such a young age would help to stop children from rushing into sex when they are older.
They argue that the sex education that children receive in science classes does not go far enough.
But the recommendations caused a storm of protest yesterday, with family campaigners claiming that the views of parents and teachers are being ignored....
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Yes, there is plenty of evidence that's what happens /sarc
Well, we all know what that means.
The fact that the government is even talking with these perverts is unnerving, of course, but no policy has been issued making this a rule for anyone.
From the article: But the fpa - formerly the Family Planning Association - the sexual health advice service Brook and the Sex Education Forum are recommending the introduction of compulsory lessons. They are taking part in a Government review of Sex and Relationship Education (SRE) in primary and secondary schools. The charities sit on a panel, which is currently examining 'the right age to begin teaching what the key messages are and content that young people should receive at each key stage'.
Yes, now they will be having sex by age five.
How times change. I was about 13 before I knew what sex was, but that was in 1957. I was over 18 before having it.
I was not any different then others in my age group.
Hmmmmmmmmmm... I wonder why my BS Detector has gone off.
Could it be that “sex education” for 4 year olds sounds suspiciously like an excuse for perverted kindy teachers Child Molestering the toddlers in their care?
This is Britain, so it could also be Muslim kindy teachers getting little kids ready so they can be married off underage to perverted followers of Muhammad...
Whatever it is, the BS Detector has gone off: there is something not right with this. Whatever it is, it is filthy and ought to be stopped.
Evidently homosexual indoctrination starting at age 6 isn’t effective enough so they are starting earlier.
“Government advisers claim that ‘gradual education’ from such a young age would help to stop children from rushing into sex when they are older.”
Will this be the idea where the government advisers will finally be right about something?
Seriously doubt it. Their track record is too strong.
“Evidently homosexual indoctrination starting at age 6 isnt effective enough so they are starting earlier.”
BINGO!!!
Theoretically possible, if they did it the right way (as it were), emphasizing disease, death, unwanted pregnancy, "He's going to put what where?!? Disgusting!" "Gays do what? GROSS!" and so on. The children could be conditioned to find sex repugnant.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping lists.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
The very same thought occurred to me.
Where, in the name of all that's decent, is the indignation and outrage over this nonsense?
Sometimes I think the left (in every country) have read books like Animal Farm, 1984 and (in this case) A Brave New World and are using them as blueprints rather then warnings!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.