Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Disconfirmations Disconfirmed: Saddam Had Nuke Program
American Thinker ^ | July 06, 2008 | Randall Hoven

Posted on 07/06/2008 3:59:22 PM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-137 last
To: smithone
Sorry, I missunderstood you. I don’t like hit and run posters though.

No problem...and me neither.

101 posted on 07/06/2008 8:06:22 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Bump


102 posted on 07/06/2008 8:07:06 PM PDT by swmobuffalo ("We didn't seek the approval of Code Pink and MoveOn.org before deciding what to do")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

See Post #95.


103 posted on 07/06/2008 8:07:23 PM PDT by Chgogal (Voting "Present" 130 times might be a sign of a smart politician. It is not a sign of a good leader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

You say IAEA seal and inspection as if it means something. Who inspected the thousands of tons of yellowcake left under Saddam’s control when the inspectors were expelled from the country for five years?


104 posted on 07/06/2008 8:12:41 PM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

The whole point is this particular yellowcake, and the previous 2 tons or so of low-enriched uranium, are not any sort of in-your-face discovery. They’re remnants of the pre-1991 program, that were well known, and were not a particular issue for the UN or the United States. Any other aspects of the Iraqi post-1991 program are a separate issue.


105 posted on 07/06/2008 8:17:19 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
He doesn’t have to back up the claim.

Yes he does and so do you. You and he can't post this information with absolutely no proof. Put up or shut up.

106 posted on 07/06/2008 8:17:22 PM PDT by smithone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Nice how they try to slide this in on a holiday weekend. I’m not saying that Bush is a great president, but the facts, and history will prove that he will be better than 7 of the last 8 presidents. I will take a George W. Bush in most elections, and God, I wish we had one now.


107 posted on 07/06/2008 8:22:24 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard; Strategerist; neverdem

I have issues with the assertion that all the yellow cake
was tagged in 1991 and then subsequently “monitored” by
the IAEA. The amounts are in dispute. I’ve read articles
that say 330 tons were tagged and sealed, yet 550 tons
are reported to have been shipped to Canada (Islams new
staging area for invasion of and nuclear threat to the United
States).

I’m just sayin’...


108 posted on 07/06/2008 8:31:16 PM PDT by Jo Nuvark (Those who bless Israel will be blessed, those who curse Israel will be cursed. Gen 12:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

I think it had a great deal to do with justification for the war.

I am uncertain whether we knew of the existence of the isotope. Its possession, however, is sufficient cause to depose Hussein (Sadam, not Barak).

A UN agency, two years ago fond that Iraq did indeed possess these weapons. It was news at the time, but not from any major source.

George Bush and the world’s leading intelligence agencies present more credibility to me than those who have not even answered the probable explanation that Iraq divested itself of WMD in the months of posturings before we attacked.

George Bush has come under continuous attack from the left-wing groups just as Ronald Reagan did. Left wingers cannot stand decisiveness, masculinity, or nationalism.

most radiccal liberals lie as readily as Islamists.


109 posted on 07/06/2008 8:32:10 PM PDT by TFMcGuire (Either you are an American, or you are a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

Brit might make mention of it on the Grape Vine


110 posted on 07/06/2008 8:36:39 PM PDT by Friendofgeorge (Someone said something about Christian snipers??? still trying to get my mind around it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jo Nuvark
I’ve read articles that say 330 tons were tagged and sealed...

I tried "330 tons of yellowcake in 1991 iaea" on Google and Yahoo, and with variations just using some of those words, no luck. Maybe you can backtrack to find it?

111 posted on 07/06/2008 8:45:33 PM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: do the dhue; All
Thanks! That youtube video you posted was great. I just now got around to viewing it. It's like that list of pre-war quotes from democrats that I posted earlier, except you actually see them saying it. For anyone who didn't catch it, here it is again:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1q9Q0OtJ4g

112 posted on 07/06/2008 8:59:11 PM PDT by ETL (Plenty of REAL smoking-gun evidence on the demonRats at my FR home page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I backtracked for a couple of hours, then I read
all of my saved text docs since 9/11, bud nada.
I think it may have to do with Iran’s fissionable
material. All I know for sure is that I read it
today on the internet.

Thanks for searching for me.


113 posted on 07/06/2008 9:09:57 PM PDT by Jo Nuvark (Those who bless Israel will be blessed, those who curse Israel will be cursed. Gen 12:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

*A-hem*
RandallFlagg: WMDs = Cheese ^

*cough*
114 posted on 07/06/2008 9:28:00 PM PDT by RandallFlagg (Satisfaction was my sin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
CTV.ca

Yellowcake in Montreal

06/07/2008 11:11:52 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A load of nuclear material has arrived in Montreal, two weeks after the secret shipment left Iraq.

A load of nuclear material has arrived in Montreal, two weeks after the secret shipment left Iraq.

The uranium's next destination is Ontario, where it will be processed into fuel for nuclear power plants.

550 metric tonnes of uranium was trucked out of Baghdad, put aboard 37 cargo flights to a remote island in the Indian ocean, then loaded onto a Montreal-bound freighter.

The operation was kept secret out of fears someone might attack the shipments.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. wanted secrecy in uranium deal: Cameco

CTV.ca News Staff

Updated: Sun. Jul. 6 2008 5:08 PM ET

A Canadian company that acquired a reported 550 tonnes of yellowcake uranium from Iraq says that the U.S. military wanted the deal to be kept quiet.

"We were following the request of the U.S. government,'' Saskatoon-based Cameco Corp. spokesperson Lyle Krahn told The Canadian Press of the clandestine route the material took to get out of Baghdad and to Canada.

The yellowcake has been described as the last remnant of former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein's nuclear program.

The material arrived in Montreal by ship Saturday and is scheduled to be transported by truck to the company's facilities in Ontario.

"We will be completing the transaction in the third quarter of this year, the shipment is in Canada at this point and we will be completing it by the fall,'' Krahn said.

"We are sending it to Port Hope and Blind River,'' he added, referring to the Ontario nuclear facilities.

Yellowcake is milled uranium ore. Doug Brugge of Tufts University told CTV Newsnet that in its current state it could not be used in a weapon.

It can be processed "into higher levels of refinement for making nuclear fuel -- either for weapons or power plants," Brugge said.

The material is considered harmful to the environment, however.

"Yellowcake is comprised mostly of uranium and uranium is a toxic chemical -- I would put it in a similar category to lead and mercury," Brugge said. "They are environmental contaminates of considerable concern.

"It's not something you would want to breathe in or ingest."

However, if properly sealed and transported it is not considered much of a risk.

Nuclear watchdogs questioned why the U.S. wanted the shipment kept secret.

"If it's yellowcake, then why would it be top secret? It's not weapons usable material per se,'' Gordon Edwards who heads Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility, told The Canadian Press.

"But why is there this secrecy surrounding it,'' Edwards said. "That's the real question here.''

Brugge said the purchase was a good one for Cameco.

"Mining of uranium has caused so much devastation around the world that probably reprocessing some of this yellowcake . . . is a good thing rather then opening up new mines," he said.

Canada is the world's leading uranium producer.

With files from The Canadian Press
© 2008 All Rights Reserved.
_________________

115 posted on 07/06/2008 9:33:01 PM PDT by NorthernRight (Liberalism is a mental disorder - Socialism is a mental illness!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: NorthernRight
"Liberalism is a mental disorder - Socialism is a mental illness!"

And Communism is a total mental breakdown! (great tagline, btw)

Bill Ayers TODAY (April 6, 2008), from his own red communist star-headed website, begging to debate communism vs capitalism with Sean Hannity and STILL calling for revolution!

"Imperialism. I’m against it, and if Sean Hannity and others were honest, this is the ground they would fight me on. Capitalism played its role historically and is exhausted as a force for progress: built on exploitation, theft, conquest, war, and racism, capitalism and imperialism must be defeated and a world revolution—a revolution against war and racism and materialism, a revolution based on human solidarity and love, cooperation and the common good —must win.

We begin by releasing our most hopeful dreams and our most radical imaginations: a better world is both possible and necessary.

Source: http://billayers.wordpress.com/2008/04/page/2/

'Guilty as hell, free as a bird—America is a great country,' he [Ayers] said."
August 2001, Chicago Magazine (article: No Regrets)

http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/August-2001/No-Regrets/

"It was at the Chicago home of [Bill] Ayers and [Bernardine] Dohrn that Obama, then an up-and-coming 'community organizer,' had his political coming out party in 1995. Not content with this rite of passage in Lefty World — where unrepentant terrorists are regarded as progressive luminaries, still working 'only to educate' — both Obamas tended to the relationship with the Ayers."
Article: The Company He Keeps:
Meet Obama’s circle: The same old America-hating Left
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YThjYTU1ZDBjNmQ2YzcwNzU1MmYwN2JiMWY0ZGI0NDA=&w=MA==

116 posted on 07/06/2008 9:51:21 PM PDT by ETL (Plenty of REAL smoking-gun evidence on the demonRats at my FR home page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy; All

It’s already been on FOX - and it was FOX who actually interviewed a former intel person (Timmerman I think) who revealed the info about the nuke facility right before we went to war in Iraq - or shortly after.


117 posted on 07/06/2008 10:35:52 PM PDT by CyberAnt (Michael Yon: "The U.S. military is the most respected institution in Iraq.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: syriacus

“Bush interrupted Saddam’s comeback on the world stage.”

bttt


118 posted on 07/06/2008 10:54:04 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
This story was on Yahoo when I signed into my email an hour ago, and now it's gone.

Shouldn't this be the top story in every paper, on every TV show?

I know, I know, but seriously--what kind of coverage is this story getting?

119 posted on 07/06/2008 11:07:12 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (American secret agent in enemy territory (Cambridge, MA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
Shouldn't this be the top story in every paper, on every TV show?

I know, I know, but seriously--what kind of coverage is this story getting?

I heard it on the radio, WABC-AM in NYC, twice. LA & NY Times & WaPo posted the AP version. Check the links in comment# 1.

120 posted on 07/06/2008 11:37:20 PM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Thanks for the info. I don't watch the tube or listen to radio on weekends.

I can't wait to read the Krugman and NYT spin on this...

121 posted on 07/06/2008 11:49:10 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (American secret agent in enemy territory (Cambridge, MA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: TFMcGuire

FR bookmark , right here , .. ..

((( “I’m glad you said it , TFMcGuire!” )))

and may I say , .. The BugZapperThread was a really dumbF*CKIN’ idea , as it backfired { “no worries Mate! , .. got my flame-proof-undies” } , .. .. there were FReepers that hounded trolls & disruptors , and They’re no longer here ,.. and some here say “Good , glad they’re gone” , but you know we’re not quite as strong in our ranks , YOU KNOW IT ! .. .. .. and look at what our wonderful USofA is faced with now!


122 posted on 07/07/2008 1:10:27 AM PDT by Dad yer funny (FoxNews is morphing , and not for the better ,... internal struggle? Its hard to watch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

I’ll bet you $5K , that there won’t be any Krugman/NYTimes/Leftie spin , .. ( at least for a month or so , until they get a Concrete’Wishy’Washy TalkingPoint )

{{ they’d prefer to let this Blossom “die on the vine” , so to speak }}


123 posted on 07/07/2008 1:16:54 AM PDT by Dad yer funny (FoxNews is morphing , and not for the better ,... internal struggle? Its hard to watch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Dad yer funny
I wouldn't take that bet. Tomorrow they'll still be talking about Bush's "flipflop" on North Korea. (Don't get me wrong, I don't agree with what Bush did, but he did so after getting something from NK. That's not a flipflop, but setting a ridiculously low bar for NK to reach.)

The MSM are so in the tank for Obama that it's hilarious to argue, as I have, with lefties at work about it. I just read an article comparing McCain's "flipflops" to Obama's, and it's truly embarassing--McCain disagreed with the SCOTUS verdict on Gitmo, but that's not a flipflop about Gitmo. Yet they claim it is, whereas Obama's completely reversing his policies is seen as "just moving to the middle, like ALL candidates do."

So of course this story will be an "In other news..." story until it goes away...which will take a matter of hours.

124 posted on 07/07/2008 1:29:31 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (American secret agent in enemy territory (Cambridge, MA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: txflake

ping


125 posted on 07/07/2008 5:01:44 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (A vote for any Democrat from BO on down the ticket is a vote for $10 a gallon gas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smithone

I have to back up Strategerst’s claims now? I don’t think so.

Re-read my post and maybe you’ll understand the second time around.


126 posted on 07/07/2008 5:17:00 AM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

My whole point is that Saddam had thousands of tons of yellowcake, including enough low-enriched uranium to make two nuclear bombs in his possession after he was allegedly “disarmed”. UN inspectors and their seals are meaningless when the dictator can (and did) throw them out of the country at will for years on end (and that’s saying nothing of that fact that the inspectors were acting on orders from a body being bribed by said dictator).

We don’t need “gotchas”. The reality of the situation was compelling enough. Especially in light of the 9/11 attacks and Saddam’s demonstrable connections to the group that attacked us.

And the truth is, WMD were one of many, many reasons for the invasion. None of those reasons have ever been disproved.


127 posted on 07/07/2008 6:58:11 AM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard; neverdem
"...He’s admitting to a damaging fact: thousands of tons of enriched uranium were left in Saddam Hussein’s possession with nothing but a bungling, corrupt and incompetent inspection team standing in the way of his using them."

Be careful with this. Iraq did not have any significant quantities of enriched uranium at a level suitable for weapon grade use (atomic bomb). What he had was a lot of yellowcake ore which is a mid step which can be through a acidification process be converted to UF6 (which typically is then stored in a gas form in special containers).
The gas is then introduced into parallel cascaded gas centrifuges where sufficient quantities of U235 atoms can be extracted and stored.
Depending how efficient this later process can be obtained, defines how much fission grade uranium can be extracted. Typically we read on the order of 87% or greater constitutes a mass that would be considered adequate for use in making a bomb. Typically 6 to say 12% (whatever...) would be sufficient for using in fuel rods for nuclear reactors for generating electricity.
What is clear beyond fact is that he had every intention to restore his nuclear weapons program once in the future the sanctions where lifted.
By all indications with what we have been reading over the past few years, is where his people where patiently obtaining various pieces of equipment from abroad to in the future assemble a reliable manufacturing process capable of producing atomic bombs.
And they played cat and mouse with the weapon inspector teams over the years to shuffle documents and equipment from one place to another.
Had sanctions been lifted and all inspectors been removed, they would have eventually made an atomic bomb.
Same scenario was found in their bio/chemical weapons programs. Precursors where stored illegally for eventual use for making say VX nerve gas. There was no need to manufacture the final product. And these are points the L/MSM have knowingly keeped out of their articles over the years. In short. They lied.
128 posted on 07/07/2008 8:28:31 AM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Duncan Hunter was our best choice...Now we are left with a bunch of idiots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

btt


129 posted on 07/07/2008 7:42:16 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Note: The following text is a quote:

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=50430

Defense Personnel Transport Uranium Ore Out of Iraq

By Jim Garamone
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, July 7, 2008 – Defense personnel have completed the transfer of 550 metric tons of Iraqi uranium ore to Canada, Defense officials said here today.

The Iraqi government asked the United States to help transfer the yellowcake — as the ore is known — from Tuwaitha Nuclear Research Center near Baghdad to its buyer in Canada, Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said today.

The military dubbed the movement Operation McCall, and it ended July 5. DoD’s portion of the operation involved the transfer of the ore.

Yellowcake is a uranium ore that can be processed to become nuclear fuel. State and Energy Department personnel also participated in the transfer.

Officials transferred the uranium by convoy from Tuwaitha nuclear research facility to a secure location in Baghdad’s International Zone, Whitman said. The ore was in 110 shipping containers. The shipping containers were placed aboard Air Force C-17 Globemaster III airlifters and taken to an intermediate location. It took 37 sorties to transfer the yellowcake.

At the intermediate location — which Whitman could not name — the ore was loaded aboard the SS Gopher State, a Military Sealift Command ship, which took it to Montreal.

“This was material that was discovered when we initially went in to Tuwaitha,” Whitman said. “It was under the control of the United Nations International Atomic Energy Agency since that time.”

Whitman stressed that yellowcake is not of direct use in a nuclear weapon. “It is a commodity that is traded routinely in the global nuclear energy sector,” he said. “It can be used as a feed material for nuclear weapons if a country has access to the necessary fuel technology.”

The cost of the transfer was $70 million, and the government of Iraq will reimburse the United States for a portion of the cost, Whitman said.


130 posted on 07/08/2008 3:12:52 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

Answer post #95. If you do not then you lost the debate. Period.


131 posted on 07/08/2008 6:26:37 AM PDT by Chgogal (Voting "Present" 130 times might be a sign of a smart politician. It is not a sign of a good leader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

According to the AP article, yellowcake goes for $120/lb. According to this article, there were 1,200,000lbs. The value of the yellow cake then is $144million. Saddam could have sold the yellowcake for $144million, but he did not. Apparently, he had no use for the yellowcake, no intentions for its future use, and he had no use for 144 million dollars. This strains my credulity.


132 posted on 07/10/2008 8:21:30 PM PDT by ChessExpert (This enemy is more dangerous than any threat we faced in the 20th century, LTG Sanchez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert; Strategerist; cookcounty; raptor29; lepton; TigersEye; DaveLoneRanger; ETL; ...

I can’t believe that Saddam Hussein would sit on 144 million dollars worth of yellowcake uranium for more than a decade if he had no use for the stuff. Why didn’t he sell it? it is far more likely that he had nuclear weapons ambitions, as both major parties, and I believe the MSM, stated in the 1990s.


133 posted on 07/10/2008 8:39:05 PM PDT by ChessExpert (This enemy is more dangerous than any threat we faced in the 20th century, LTG Sanchez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert

It is hard to imagine that the world (UN) could have objected if he had said he wanted to sell it and “feed the children.” Obviously there are countries that would buy it and use it with no IAEA objections.


134 posted on 07/10/2008 9:24:07 PM PDT by TigersEye (Berlin '36 Olympics for murdering regimes Beijing '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; Jet Jaguar; piasa
A Sampler ON THE INTERNET...


DEFENSElink.mil (AMERICAN FORCES PRESS SERVICE): Washington - "COALITION FORCES IN IRAQ NET AL-QAIDA SUSPECTS; IRAQIS FIND WEAPONS" (July 7, 2008)

DEFENSElink.mil (AMERICAN FORCES PRESS SERVICE): Washington - "COALITION FORCES KILL TWO MILITANTS, DETAIN 35 SUSPECTS, CAPTURE WEAPONS" (July 6, 2008)


DEFENSElink.mil (AMERICAN FORCES PRESS SERVICE): Washington - "DEFENSE PERSONNEL TRANSPORT URANIUM ORE OUT OF IRAQ" by Jim Garamone (July 7, 2008)

AMERICAN THINKER.com - blog: "DISCONFIRMATIONS DISCONFIRMED: SADDAM HAD NUKE PROGRAM" by Randall Hoven (July 6, 2008)

Link


Article.CNN.com: Iraqi Government - "500 TONS OF URANIUM SHIPPED FROM IRAQ, PENTAGON SAYS" (SNIPPET: "The U.S. military spent $70 million ensuring the safe transportation of 550 metric tons of the uranium from Iraq to Canada, said Pentagon spokesman Brian Whitman. The shipment, which until recently was kept secret...") (July 7, 2008)

USA TODAY.com (AP): UNITED NATIONS - "U.S. TRANSFERRED URANIUM FROM IRAQ WITHOUT U.N. AUTHORIZATION" (SNIPPET: "According to the letter, the United States informed the IAEA on June 30 that approximately 1.8 tons of uranium, enriched to a level of 2.6%, another 6.6 pounds of low-enriched uranium, and approximately 1,000 highly radioactive sources had been transferred on June 23.") (Posted July 7, 2004, 7:34 pm)

135 posted on 03/11/2012 3:04:59 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

www.un.org/depts/unmovic/new/pages/compendium.asp

#

http://cnsnews.com/blog/terence-p-jeffrey/all-israeli-cities-saddams-taped-order-targeting-wmds

“All the Israeli Cities:’ Saddam’s Taped Order for Targeting WMDs”

By Terence P. Jeffrey
March 14, 2012

SNIPPET: “It was January 1991.”

SNIPPET: “The week before the deadline, Saddam met with his air force commander, Muzahim Sa’b Hasan al Masiri, and his son-in-law, Husayn Kamil — the minister responsible for Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction.

Saddam tape-recorded the conversation. More than a dozen years later, the Iraq Survey Group, headed by Charles Duelfer, a special assistant to the director of the Central Intelligence Agency, discovered the recording and translated it.”

SNIPPET: “”I was talking to Abd, and I told him there is no need to make a big fuss about these suits because we are going to use them in this special occasion,” said Saddam.

His lieutenants expressed obsequious concerns about their leader’s new clothing. “Then my design is right?” asked Saddam.

“Absolutely right, sir!” said his son-in-law, Husayn.

Saddam then segued from suits to WMDs. “I want to make sure — close the door (sound of door slamming) — the germ and chemical warheads, as well as the chemical and germ bombs are available to the ‘concerned people,’ so that in case we ordered an attack, they can do it without missing any of their targets,” he said.

Son-in-law Husayn began a long explanation of how chemical weapons were being deployed. Saddam interrupted: “This is not important to me.”

The son-in-law said: “So, sir, regarding the germs and—

Saddam: “And the chemicals.”

Son-in-law: “No, we have some of the chemicals available—”

Saddam: “So, we qualify that the missiles, by tomorrow, will be ready on the 15th” — the day Bush’s ultimatum expired.

Son-in-law: “Sir, we don’t have the germs.”

Saddam: “Then, where are they?”

Son-in-law: “It’s with us.”

Saddam: “What is it doing with you? I need these germs to be fixed on the missiles, and tell them to hit, because starting on the 15th, everyone should be ready for the action to happen at any time, and I consider Riyadh a target.”

A moment later, a waiter entered the room. Saddam briefly suspended the conversation. Then the door slammed again.

“Sir,” said the son-in-law, “we have three types of germ weapons, but we have to decide which ones we should use. Some types stay capable for many years —”

Saddam: “We want the long term, the many years kind.”

The son-in-law then said the options for delivering the germs included “a missile, a fighter bomb or a fighter plane.”

Saddam: “With them all, all the methods.”

A moment later, the son-in-law said: “The bombs or warheads are all available, but the moment for using them at zero hour is something we should indicate, sir. We will say that this will be launched —”

Saddam: “At the moment of use (zero hour), you should launch them all against their targets.”

The son-in-law expressed his concern that transporting the germs to deploy them might contaminate Iraqis. Saddam then issued what sounded like an order to launch a WMD attack in the event he was killed.

“I want as soon as possible, if we are not transferring the weapons, to issue a clear order to the ‘concerned people’ that the weapons be in their hands ASAP,” said Saddam.

“I will give them an order stating that at ‘one moment,’ if I’m not there and you don’t hear my voice, you will hear somebody else’s voice, so you can receive the order from him, and then you can go attack your targets,” said Saddam.

“I want the weapons to be distributed to the targets,” said Saddam. “I want Riyadh and Jeddah, which are the biggest Saudi cities with all the decision makers, and the Saudi rulers live there. This is for the germ and chemical weapons.”

The son-in-law then said, “In terms of chemical weapons, we have an excellent grip on them.”

Saddam responded: “Only in the case we are obliged and there is a great necessity to put them into action. Also, all the Israeli cities, all of them. Of course you should concentrate on Tel Aviv, since it is their center.”

“Sir,” said the son-in-law, “the best way to transport this weapon and achieve the most harmful effects would come by using planes, like a crop plane; to scatter it. This is, sir, a thousand times more harmful. This is according to the analysis of the technicians —”

Saddam: “We should consider alternatives, Husayn. Meaning that if the planes don’t arrive, then the missile will, and if the missile is intercepted, the plane will arrive.”

Someone suggested targeting refineries, power plants and water resources. Saddam said these should be targeted by routine air force operations. But his son-in-law objected.

“Sir, these vital locations must be added to the mission and become priority targets to the biological and chemical weapons, because this will end all sorts of life,” said Husayn. “People are drinking water from these desalination plants and getting their fuel from refineries, thus ending the mission.”

Saddam affirmed his son-in-law’s thought and noted that the air force commander had already taken them down. “The refineries and desalination plants, sir,” the general said dutifully.

“May God help us do it,” said Saddam.”


136 posted on 03/15/2012 3:26:07 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: All

ON THE INTERNET:

www.cia.gov/library/reports/general-reports-1/iraq_wmd_2004/index.html


137 posted on 03/15/2012 3:33:03 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-137 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson