Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Suit seeks ban on oil companies disturbing wildlife
Reuters ^ | 070808 | Yereth Rosen

Posted on 07/08/2008 9:43:23 PM PDT by Fred

ANCHORAGE, Alaska (Reuters) - Two environmental groups on Tuesday filed a lawsuit seeking to overturn new federal regulations that grants permission to oil companies working in the Chukchi Sea to disturb the polar bears and walrus that live there.

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Anchorage, challenges regulations issued last month by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service that allow "incidental takes" of the animals, meaning permission to disturb or accidentally harass them as long as such actions do not result in physical injury or death.

Tuesday's lawsuit, filed by the Center for Biological Diversity and Pacific Environment, is the latest volley in legal challenges over protections for polar bears and other animals from expanded oil development in the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas off Alaska.

"It may seem like we're filing a lot of lawsuits," said Brendan Cummings, oceans program director for the center.

"But the fundamental thing is they're all really focusing on the same fundamental issue, which is protecting polar bear habitat in the Chukchi and Beaufort seas."

A spokesman for the Fish and Wildlife Service declined to comment on Tuesday's lawsuit but defended the incidental-take regulations, which are meant to be in effect for five years.

"We believe that the incidental-take regulations are a valuable conservation tool," said Bruce Woods, spokesman for the service's Alaska headquarters.

Polar bears were listed in May as threatened under the Endangered Species Act, and a petition is pending that would give similar protections to the Pacific walrus.

The remote and ice-choked Chukchi, which lies between northwestern Alaska and northeastern Siberia, is emerging as a hot oil prospect.

After many years of scant industry activity, Royal Dutch

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: energy; environment; envirowackos; gasprices; globalwarming; greenparty; greens; oil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: Montana Kid

If they were drilling, they already had the mineral rights or would not have been permitted to drill.


41 posted on 07/09/2008 4:40:34 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps; Fred

Shell nixes 2008 drilling {Shell out of time to prepare for Beaufort season}
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2037723/posts

With no sign of a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit on a lawsuit over Shell’s U.S. Beaufort Sea exploration plans, the company has decided to call it quits on its planned Beaufort Sea drilling program during the 2008 open water season. The company had hoped to do some top-hole drilling at its Sivulliq prospect on the west side of Camden Bay, as well as conducting some geotechnical boring in the seafloor.


42 posted on 07/09/2008 4:42:41 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thackney

I think he’s drilling for BS. And hit a heck of a zone.


43 posted on 07/09/2008 4:43:46 AM PDT by Dusty Road
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: businessprofessor

“The power to file third party lawsuits has made environmentalists the fifth branch of government.”

This is the key to ridding ourselves of the eco-fascist movement. Remove that and the eco-nazis go out of business. We can thank that stupid RINO Nixon for our problems.

Incidentally, the economic impact of listing endangered species must also be considered, but the Marxist traitor judges never bring that into the mix.

We are infested with seditionists in this country.


44 posted on 07/09/2008 5:43:51 AM PDT by sergeantdave (We are entering the Age of the Idiot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dusty Road
Montana Kid
Since Jul 8, 2008
45 posted on 07/09/2008 5:51:33 AM PDT by Pistolshot (When you let what you are define who you are, you create divisiveness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: thackney
They wanted the oil companies to leave the whales alone so the locals could kill them easier.

I have to say, that was an inventive bit of thought on the part of the type of folks who usually try to stop whaling ships.
46 posted on 07/09/2008 6:10:59 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: llandres
On the other hand, it might greatly elevate our natural gas supply.

Can you explain your comment? How will we get more natural gas if drilling is banned in places with large reserves of both oil and natural gas.

47 posted on 07/09/2008 6:15:23 AM PDT by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: thackney

It may have been the intent of the 9th Circuit to delay a decision and, thus, prevent Shell from drilling.


48 posted on 07/09/2008 6:16:48 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Montana Kid

Now I understand Montana Kid (7/08/08) bringing the Obama/Dem side of the story....uhh no thanks.


49 posted on 07/09/2008 7:21:26 AM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Fred; Timeout; Entrepreneur; Defendingliberty; WL-law; Genesis defender; proud_yank; FrPR; ...
 




Beam me to Planet Gore !

50 posted on 07/09/2008 9:00:46 AM PDT by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred

Look at this crap organization at http://www.pacificenvironment.org/article.php?id=1800


51 posted on 07/09/2008 9:16:05 AM PDT by saminfl (,/i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llandres


Looks like the polar bear is quite capable of taking care of itself....
52 posted on 07/09/2008 4:43:14 PM PDT by Fred (The Democrat Party is the Nadir of Nilhilism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Montana Kid

Yes, you’ve got it all figured out. Oil companies like drilling at a cost of millions of dollars but not producing any oil or gas to pay for it.

I look forward to more of your insights into the industry.


53 posted on 07/09/2008 4:52:47 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: businessprofessor

On the other hand, it might greatly elevate our natural gas supply.”
Can you explain your comment? How will we get more natural gas if drilling is banned in places with large reserves of both oil and natural gas.”

I was being quite sarcastic - natural gas, as in hot air and related things :-)))))))))))))))))))


54 posted on 07/09/2008 9:13:57 PM PDT by llandres (I'd rather be alive and bankrupt than dead and solvent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Plus maybe you have a situation where the Sierra Club sues even though it has no members where the suit is filed”

no matter, the ACLU will ride in to save the day for them!!! “details” such as what you said don’t matter to them. :-)))))


55 posted on 07/09/2008 9:17:28 PM PDT by llandres (I'd rather be alive and bankrupt than dead and solvent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson