Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Backs Wiretap Bill to Shield Phone Companies
New York Times ^ | 9 July 2008 | By ERIC LICHTBLAU

Posted on 07/09/2008 1:05:04 PM PDT by shrinkermd

WASHINGTON — More than two and a half years after the disclosure of President’s Bush’s domestic eavesdropping program set off a furious national debate, the Senate gave final approval on Wednesday afternoon to broadening the government’s spy powers and providing legal immunity for the phone companies that took part in the wiretapping program.

The plan, approved by a vote of 69 to 28, marked one of Mr. Bush’s most hard-won legislative victories in a Democratic-led Congress where he has had little success of late. And it represented a stinging defeat for opponents on the left who had urged Democratic leaders to stand firm against the White House after a months-long impasse.

“I urge my colleagues to stand up for the rule of law and defeat this bill,” Senator Russell D. Feingold, Democrat of Wisconsin, said in closing arguments.

But Senator Christopher S. Bond, the Missouri Republican who is vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said there was nothing to fear in the bill “unless you have Al Qaeda on your speed dial.”

Supporters of the plan, which revised the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, said that the final vote reflected both political reality and legal practicality. Wiretapping orders approved by a secret court under the previous version of the surveillance law were set to begin expiring in August unless Congress acted, and many Democrats were wary of going into their political convention in Denver next month with the issue hanging over them—handing the Republicans a potent political weapon.

So instead, Congress approved what amounted to the biggest restructuring

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 110th; 1984; 5thamendment; congress; counterterrorism; fisa; fourthamendment; governmentspying; notbreaking; oldnews; policestate; privacy; senate; surveillance; telecom; ussenate; wiretap; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

1 posted on 07/09/2008 1:05:05 PM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
"there was nothing to fear in the bill “unless you have Al Qaeda on your speed dial.”"

Unfortunately, when speaking of leftists this is not a stretch at all.....
2 posted on 07/09/2008 1:07:15 PM PDT by Enchante (OBAMA: "That's not the Wesley Clark I knew!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

I bet Obama did not even bother to vote.


3 posted on 07/09/2008 1:07:55 PM PDT by Always Right (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

I don’t trust the government. While I certainly have nothing to hide, it’s a slippery slope. We can only hope that the precident doesn’t allow some future president to justify more overt spying techniques.


4 posted on 07/09/2008 1:09:03 PM PDT by djsherin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

>>>>>>the phone companies that took part in the wiretapping program.

Pointless to correct this again, but it wasn’t a “wiretapping” program, it was a trap-and-trace and pen-register program.

There’s a huge world of technical and legal difference among those terms.


5 posted on 07/09/2008 1:10:12 PM PDT by angkor (Conservatism is not now and never has been a religious movement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

He was there. How he voted I am not sure. Said he would vote for it. But you know an empty suit is just that!


6 posted on 07/09/2008 1:10:12 PM PDT by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
I bet Obama did not even bother to vote.

He voted yes. Hillary voted no.

7 posted on 07/09/2008 1:10:33 PM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
"The plan, approved by a vote of 69 to 28, marked one of Mr. Bush’s most hard-won legislative victories in a Democratic-led Congress where he has had little success of late."

LOL! Bush just got the war funded... AGAIN!

8 posted on 07/09/2008 1:10:41 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
"I bet Obama did not even bother to vote."

Actually, I read on FR that he voted in favor of this. I could be wrong.

9 posted on 07/09/2008 1:10:46 PM PDT by cdbull23 (What's going on in my brain? Check it out: cainsbrain.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Well I was wrong. Obama did end up voting. He voted yes like he indicated in his recent flip-flop announcement. McCain however did not bother to vote, probably hurting his chance to capitolize on this issue.


10 posted on 07/09/2008 1:11:32 PM PDT by Always Right (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
The issue put Senator Barack Obama of Illinois, the presumptive Democratic nominee, in a particularly precarious spot. After long opposing the idea of immunity for the phone companies in the wiretapping operation, he voted for the plan on Wednesday.
11 posted on 07/09/2008 1:11:39 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

The DUmmies and KOSnuts heads’ must be exploding this afternoon!


12 posted on 07/09/2008 1:13:50 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
The article says he voted for it.

"The issue put Senator Barack Obama of Illinois, the presumptive Democratic nominee, in a particularly precarious spot. After long opposing the idea of immunity for the phone companies in the wiretapping operation, he voted for the plan on Wednesday. His reversal last month angered many of his most ardent supporters, who organized an unsuccessful drive to get him to reverse his position once again. And it came to symbolize what civil liberties advocates saw as “capitulation” by Democratic leaders to political pressure from the White House in an election year."

Can't wait to hear his nuanced explanation.

13 posted on 07/09/2008 1:14:18 PM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; ...
...broadening the government’s spy powers and providing legal immunity for the phone companies...

Libertarian ping! To be added or removed freepmail me or post a message here.

14 posted on 07/09/2008 1:16:40 PM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

What’s hillarious about this is that

THE

point of contention was the ability for tort lawyers to enrich themselves suing the telecom companies for helping the feds protect us from terrorist attacks shortly after 9/11.

unfrickinbelievable.


15 posted on 07/09/2008 1:17:10 PM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

If it weren’t so close to elections, I wouldn’t be so afraid of who or how the bill is used in the future.


16 posted on 07/09/2008 1:19:32 PM PDT by prisoner6sson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: avacado
where he has had little success of late."

Other than the Columbian free trade deal, I can't think of a single defeat Bush has suffered in congress in the two years the Rats have controlled it.

17 posted on 07/09/2008 1:19:37 PM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Obama: This is not the FISA I know... so I vote for it.


18 posted on 07/09/2008 1:20:05 PM PDT by paudio (Like it or not, 'conservatism' is a word with many meanings. Yours may be different from mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djsherin

well, giving up liberty for security is a proud American tradition. /s


19 posted on 07/09/2008 1:20:29 PM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
in a Democratic-led Congress where he has had little success of late.

Obviously, they haven't been paying attention. The Republicans/Bush have been kicking their butts all over the place.

20 posted on 07/09/2008 1:20:30 PM PDT by NRA2BFree (LIBERALS SHOULD BE EUTHANIZED FOR THE "COMMON GOOD.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson