Posted on 07/09/2008 5:14:51 PM PDT by Pinkbell
Parents encouraging their cute little girls to perform is as old as time...calling it perverted is new....That’s the difference.
You're not clear.
Exactly what are you saying?
No, the difference it that childhood performances in the past preserved the "child," and did not attempt to turn them into sultry little adults. My childern performed an may school and other plays and musical, but they were children, and it was their very childlikeness that was their charm.
You reall think these are "childlike?"
She was only 4 years old. Is that what a 4-year old should look like?
Those who would steal a child's childhood to make a buck are worse than murderers. God, I would have done anything to have saved that child, and let her live a normal life, which perhaps means, to have let her live.
Hank
You must be incredibly dense.
Exactly what are you saying?
Lou Smit's theory of an intruder is BS.
No, your grammar is bad.
hypothesized about a break-in turned out not to be true.
And that comment is just plain dumb.
Lou Smit’s theory of an intruder is BS
No, it isn’t and you obviously dont know $hit about this case. I have followed it from the very beginning and early on it was clear to me that this was a case of sexual homicide that the parents had nothing to do with. I would be MORE than happy to address any issue with regard to the case you think is important though I suspect it will be a waste of my time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.