That’s because the secret has been uncovered.
The Senator wasn’t born in the United States. No matter what the Democrats do at this point it will be inevitable: he is not eligible to be POTUS, period. They will have to float another candidate and after the way the Clintons have been treated, no Democrat leaders want them back in Power.
I suspect in the end...we will find that a young woman with a PhD who was a bit naive and unable to cope in the real world. The relationships that she had with men...were always fellow male students who were from exotic countries. When she got pregnant...she generally left the raising of the kids to her mother. Neither of the relationships she had that produced kids...were of any significance. Neither guy stayed around.
The fact that the kid was born in Hawaii...has yet to be disproved in any aspect. While the birth certificate has some suspect problems assigned to it...we are left with few alternate conclusions.
As long as he was born in Hawaii...of any parent...even if wasn’t his mother as claimed...then he still ends up with citizenship and this argument is a joke. The only way the argument becomes real...is if he was born on another island in the Pacific...not from this American mother...and she simply took him as an adoption situation. In this case...he isn’t an American citizen. But this scenario has no real basis and I doubt it can be proven.
Why does Google remove the certificates? I’m guessing that they really don’t want to invent some suggestion out of thin air to support this argument. The one scenario I’ve heard so far that might fit this discussion...is that the mother didn’t deliver a live birth....went into a slight depression and then adopted from thin air some child to fit her fragile mind’s requirements. The birth certificate would have been generated by someone to help cover bases and make this all appear legitimate later.