Skip to comments.
Man Arrested For Unlawful Photography[TN][Took Photo of A Cop]
WJHL ^
| 11 July 2008
| Darius Radzius
Posted on 07/16/2008 3:18:48 PM PDT by BGHater
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-117 next last
To: donna
Well then I guess McCloud and Lane should have smiled.
81
posted on
07/16/2008 5:23:52 PM PDT
by
Virginia Ridgerunner
("We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!"--Duncan Hunter)
To: Greysard
If a cop is known to such a hitman by name then it's trivial to find him in the phone book, I don't know of a single cop who has a listed number.
Guess why?
And besides, if anyone with half a brain wants to take photos of cops, it's much easier done by sitting in a car parked a good distance from the front door of the police department. Use a decent camera (not an iPhone) and you can photograph anyone from afar, the pictures will be good, and nobody will ever see you.
Agreed.
I suspect that Mr. Conover is guilty of little more than having an iPhone while black.
82
posted on
07/16/2008 5:27:27 PM PDT
by
null and void
(Barack Obama - International Man of Mystery...)
To: sandyeggo
Somebody needs to read the General Statutes for the State of Tennessee to see if that is truly a fact.A fact which I doubt is true in any of the 50 states in the Union.
if that were the case a lot of news media types would be in jail for taking photo’s of the police.
83
posted on
07/16/2008 5:27:31 PM PDT
by
puppypusher
(The world is going to the dogs.)
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
I don’t suppose cops smile when they think it may be a driveby shooting.
84
posted on
07/16/2008 5:28:29 PM PDT
by
donna
( I am confident that we can create a Kingdom right here on Earth. - Barack Hussein Obama)
To: RDTF
Some cops, like this little fascist, deserve nothing but hatred and contempt from free men.
85
posted on
07/16/2008 5:30:00 PM PDT
by
allmendream
(If "the New Yorker" makes a joke and liberals don't get it, is it still funny?)
To: winner3000
I'm with you, man! Back in January, I had a Frederick County deputy pull me over after I passed by him while he was making a u-turn. Not having his radar out, he claimed that I had "blown by him" and that he had estimated my speed by looking down at his own odometer. He was a real jerk and tried to goad me into a confrontation. He utlimately gave me a speeding ticket even though he could not tell me exactly how fast I was going.
Incensed, I refused to pay the ticket, hired a good traffic lawyer, went to court, and got it thrown out. While testifying against me, the deputy told two outright lies, but the judge (who had her own liberal issues but could not find me guilty because of the law, even though she said she disagreed with it!) told him it wasn't enough.
Ever since then, I have had ZERO respect for county deputies, town cops, and even state troopers.
86
posted on
07/16/2008 5:30:45 PM PDT
by
Virginia Ridgerunner
("We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!"--Duncan Hunter)
To: kms61; elkfersupper; CedarDave; Squantos
Living out here in the “World Famous Drug Corridor” I am used to being stopped for 22 in a 20 zone, 71 in a 70 zone and tag holder blocking part of Texas (the dealer has changed tag holder design).
I am working in Artesia NM right now and it is the home of the TSA and BP training center. I overhead some trainees talking at a restaurant and learned the reason I get stopped so often is tinted windows. I have to park my car and drive for long periods in the sun.
87
posted on
07/16/2008 6:49:42 PM PDT
by
razorback-bert
(Demorats tax returns consists of "welfare in" and " child support out.")
To: padre35
This must be a young police officer...I hope...Young is no excuse, and it is every police officer. They are being trained that cameras are a threat to "homeland security".
To: RDTF; BGHater
Oh great - another one of your cop hating posts to muddy up FreeRepublic.If the cops deserve it, what better place than Free Republic?
It's in the name, donchaknow.
To: RDTF
there is nothing conservative about cop hating and police state paranoia.Of course there is.
You must have been absent that day.
To: kms61
I no longer consider the police to be on my side...Join the club.
To: roadcat
That happened to me once.In this town, you would have wound up dead. Not necessarily right there, but certainly eventually.
To: Tailgunner Joe
Why not just wear a mask? If the officer wants to hide his identity, he should wear a mask. He probably shouldnt wear his name tag or badge number either.Where have you been?
They already do that; just not while working "traffic".....yet.
To: null and void
True, but sometime their jobs make them piss off people who would happily order a hit on them. Under those circumstances I can see why they'd be less than thrilled to provide positive ID for a hitman...Then maybe they should be careful and engage in police work instead of "Click It Or Ticket".
To: RDTF
so then I guess you think it makes sense to put their lives and indentities in jeapardy by allowing the possiblity of their faces plastered all over the internet? Law enforcement officers get their photographs taken all the time in public, on a daily basis. Just open any newspaper or news website involving crimes or crime scenes/LEO interviews etc.
95
posted on
07/16/2008 8:07:51 PM PDT
by
dragnet2
To: BGHater
But can we still video tape police brutality cases? They’ve certainly come in handy.
96
posted on
07/16/2008 8:27:52 PM PDT
by
TNdandelion
(It's Buh-rack Uh-bama for uh hope and uh change.)
To: TNdandelion
But can we still video tape police brutality cases? Theyve certainly come in handy.Perhaps you've struck upon the reason that they don't like being photographed....
97
posted on
07/16/2008 8:30:44 PM PDT
by
meyer
(...by any means necessary.)
To: puppypusher
Somebody needs to read the General Statutes for the State of Tennessee to see if that is truly a fact.A fact which I doubt is true in any of the 50 states in the Union.No need for that - the first amendment of the constitution of the United States should suffice.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
I think it's pretty clear - freedom of the press. And the government doesn't get to choose who or what constitutes the press. Otherwise, the amendment's meaning is lost.
98
posted on
07/16/2008 8:33:54 PM PDT
by
meyer
(...by any means necessary.)
To: panthermom
Classic.
I was once arrested for rendering aid to victims at an accident.
Everything was sort of fine until the cops showed up.
Everything would still have been fine except the cops showed up before the EMTs.
I won't do that again.
To: Greysard
if anyone with half a brain wants to take photos of cops, it's much easier done by sitting in a car parked a good distance from the front door of the police department.It's much better to get photos of cops harassing citizens rather than photos of them belly-bumping their co-workers.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-117 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson