Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking: Iraqi PM denies backing Obama's withdrawal plan
Chinaview.cn ^ | July 20, 2008 | Sun Yunlong

Posted on 07/20/2008 7:16:02 AM PDT by Kleebo151

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: Kleebo151

The press got it bass-ackwards wrong last week too:

Iraq News

Rubaie denies halt of Iraq-US security pact

Tuesday, July 15, 2008 06:25 GMT

Alsumaria Iraqi Satellite Network

Iraq’s National Security Advisor Mowaffaq Al Rubaie denied reports saying that Washington and Baghdad have ended efforts to reach an agreement on the status of US Forces in Iraq before President George W Bush leaves office.
In an interview with the CNN, Al Rubaie announced that the article published by the Washington Post is untrue saying that Iraq and the US are working hard to reach an agreement by the end of July.

Earlier, the Post cited senior US officials as saying that Iraq and US will opt for an interim deal instead. It added that the “bridge” security document would be limited in both time and scope and would allow basic US military operations to continue once the UN mandate ended, which would likely covers till 2009 only.

It is to be noted that in the past week Iraqi leaders have evoked what they call a memorandum of understanding while Prime Minister Nuri Al Maliki has also raised for the first time the prospect of a timetable withdrawal of US troops from Iraq. Iraqi Vice President Tarek Al Hashemi approved this demand as well. The document is expected to include as well a “time horizon”, with specific goals for a US troop withdrawal from Baghdad and other cities and installations.
One ought to mention that while violence in Iraq has dropped to its lowest in 4 years and Iraqi security forces are commanding military operations, internal pressures are increasing on Iraq to set dates for a withdrawal of US Forces

The Newspaper noted that Al Maliki’s political opponents would likely cash in on the issue of an undefined US troop presence in provincial elections later this year.
The most debated unresolved issue was the legal immunity of US troops in Iraq which US officials have said it is non-negotiable, the Post added.

© 2007 Alsumaria Iraqi Satellite Network


21 posted on 07/20/2008 8:15:30 AM PDT by angkor (Conservatism is not now and never has been a religious movement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
Humans seldom ask such questions or give credit for averting disasters that never happened.

Good point.

22 posted on 07/20/2008 8:17:21 AM PDT by syriacus (Democrats got THEIR "change" in Election 2006. Are WE better off now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kleebo151

Some Iraqis are quite annoyed about this whole fiasco.


23 posted on 07/20/2008 8:18:26 AM PDT by Allegra (Ain't it grand? I'm back in the sand...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kleebo151

BTTT! I wondered about this previous statement coming out. The lamestream media at work????


24 posted on 07/20/2008 8:24:33 AM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reg45
That is not true, the media will propagate any lie told about Republicans as if it were the absolute truth.

I think you missed my point. What I'm saying is that anything Dems (and their allies in the media) say is accepted at face value whereas everything Republicans say is subject to intense scrutiny and critical review. Its simply a double standard that is applied. That said, your point about the media's propagation of lies is also true.

25 posted on 07/20/2008 8:27:20 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Kleebo151

Why would we not want to have a presence in such a strategic position?? Sitting right next to Iran and Syria, come on. Course the Establishment Media went with a story making him look Presidential, he’s their candidate.

Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters


26 posted on 07/20/2008 8:30:43 AM PDT by bray (Drill Congress!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devolve

BTTT!


27 posted on 07/20/2008 8:37:28 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bray; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Jeff Head; Grampa Dave; devolve; MeekOneGOP; gonzo
Why would we not want to have a presence in such a strategic position?? Sitting right next to Iran and Syria, come on.

Think of Hussein as the Islamists' fellow traveller, mole, agent-in-place.

When the stuff hits the fan, he will stand with the Muslims.


28 posted on 07/20/2008 8:38:50 AM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Kleebo151
Years ago, Drudge would have been the first to pick up the denial. Now he plays dumb.

The old Drudge we knew and loved would also have these pics leading, too.



29 posted on 07/20/2008 8:39:26 AM PDT by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa

Excellent fix.


30 posted on 07/20/2008 8:43:57 AM PDT by Laverne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi



31 posted on 07/20/2008 8:45:18 AM PDT by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi

Too late, page A1 top of the fold LA times, as I knew it would be. The correction will be no where to be found.


32 posted on 07/20/2008 8:46:47 AM PDT by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: DAC21
I find the Daily News headline (big lib tabloid) very telling--Obama campaigns with troops...

Is that what this is a campaign stop or a fact-finding mission? Who is paying for this trip anyway?
33 posted on 07/20/2008 8:56:29 AM PDT by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Kleebo151

Why didn’t they try to confirm the story? LOL, well hell, why let the facts get in the way of a great story?

See, the story is page one o the right above the fold, the correction is page 22 buried among the grocery ads.

Problem is the keep forgetting about the web.


34 posted on 07/20/2008 8:58:41 AM PDT by lexusppd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kleebo151
Drudge Is Head Cheerleader for Obama Media Whores.
I suggest we all slam his TIPS line and demand he pull this LIE off his Headlines( in Red) . Matt Drudge is a disgrace and just another Obama media groupie !
35 posted on 07/20/2008 9:00:46 AM PDT by ncalburt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kleebo151

As of 10.30 EST the retraction was on the DRUDGE site. It is still there and highlighted in red.


36 posted on 07/20/2008 9:02:59 AM PDT by lexusppd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kleebo151
Why didn't US media outlets attempt to confirm the veracity of the German magazine's claims?

Maybe because:

White House Accidentally E-Mails to Reporters Story That Maliki Supports Obama Iraq Withdrawal Plan

37 posted on 07/20/2008 9:06:58 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

Obviously, we are both right!


38 posted on 07/20/2008 9:14:16 AM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: lexusppd
As of 10.30 EST the retraction was on the DRUDGE site. It is still there and highlighted in red.

But why is the lie in big bold letter, still the top news, while the retraction is on tiny letters?

39 posted on 07/20/2008 9:17:59 AM PDT by Kleebo151
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

obamawama is proving what the voters already know, he’s arrogant empty suit who has no clue on how to deal with ANYONE WHO DOES NOT AGREE WITH HIS WORDS OF WISDOM.


40 posted on 07/20/2008 9:25:13 AM PDT by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson