Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pickens sounds alarm over energy policy
The Washington Times ^ | July 22, 2008 | Patrice Hill

Posted on 07/22/2008 2:26:05 AM PDT by T Ruth

Oil prices could hit $300 a barrel if the United States does not take drastic action to reduce its heavy dependence on foreign oil, but neither of the top presidential candidates is addressing the crisis, Texas oilman T. Boone Pickens said Monday.

To prevent economic bankruptcy as a result of sending $700 billion a year overseas to unstable oil producers in the Middle East and Africa, the nation needs to mobilize behind a plan to shift toward domestic energy sources such as natural gas, wind and solar power, he told reporters and editors of The Washington Times.

* * *

Mr. Pickens, who at 80 has amassed a fortune worth $4 billion producing and speculating in oil, said he has stopped giving to political campaigns and renounced his previous Republican affiliation in his drive to focus the nation's attention on the need for immediate, drastic action on energy.

* * *Mr. Pickens is pushing a plan to displace about 38 percent of oil imports by switching to a fleet of buses and trucks that run on natural gas. But to accomplish that, the nation would have to stop using natural gas to produce electricity.

He proposes to replace the 22 percent of electricity fueled by gas with a new network of wind and solar power emanating from Great Plains and Western states where wind and sun are abundant.

* * *

Mr. Pickens said the cost of carrying out a plan like his would be about $1 trillion - as much as the United States will soon spend importing oil each year without taking any action to prevent it. All of the technologies in the plan are proven and can be adopted quickly, he said.

* * *

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: energy; naturalgas; oil; tboonepickens

1 posted on 07/22/2008 2:26:06 AM PDT by T Ruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: T Ruth


One pair of arms is like another
I don't know why or who's to blame,
I'll go with you or with your brother
It's all the same, it's all the same.
2 posted on 07/22/2008 2:36:25 AM PDT by ari-freedom (McCain must pick a conservative VP if he wants conservative support)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T Ruth; All
I have gone onto Pickens’s website and read his policy and it is NOT the way to go. He is 80 now and I think his mental faculties are in serious decline.
His reliance on Wind is absurd. This Wind Power is not reliable and has a tremendous amount of maintenance involved as the Europeans are starting to discover. The locations for the wind energy are not where the demand is so the power has to be transmitted over long distances with all the cost involved.
But the main issue is that Wind cannot be used as a transportation fuel. We don't have as much of an energy problem as we have an oil problem. The overwhelming use of oil is for transportation and this is where wind does us little or no good. The only good that could come of it is that it is theoretically possible that wind power could free up some of the natural gas that is going to generate electricity and natural gas can (and should) be used as a transportation fuel.
Pickens plan is not the way to go. This is why many are referring to him as “Slim” Pickens. Boone should go away and enjoy his money and his grandchildren. He has had a great run but time has passed him by.
3 posted on 07/22/2008 2:40:29 AM PDT by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthguy

Pickens would be more believable if he could describe how to store the electricity generated by his wind/solar gizmos for use when the sun don’t shine and the wind don’t blow.

Seems to me he’s trying to jump the chasm in two bounds.


4 posted on 07/22/2008 2:52:32 AM PDT by plangent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: T Ruth
“He proposes to replace the 22 percent of electricity fueled by gas with a new network of wind and solar power emanating from Great Plains and Western states where wind and sun are abundant.”

The backbone of his plan refers to something he calls “wind corridors”, where this miracle is to take place. They exist in the same realm as global warming. They're a construct of the environmentalist movement. There's a reason this country moved beyond wind power in the 19th century. It's inefficient and unreliable. The Age of Sail ended long ago. It makes no sense to gamble trillions of dollars on the Pickens Plan when a proven solution lies beneath our feet right now. Drill for it.

5 posted on 07/22/2008 2:55:17 AM PDT by PowderMonkey (Will Work for Ammo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthguy
Mr. Pickens, would it make you feel better if we were to buy into your hair-brain scam ... or tell you the truth?

,

6 posted on 07/22/2008 3:18:12 AM PDT by CapnJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PowderMonkey
“He proposes to replace the 22 percent of electricity fueled by gas with a new network of wind and solar power emanating from Great Plains and Western states where wind and sun are abundant.”

one would need a huge back up reserve to put wind power on line ... likely over 90%

and he proposes to fill that reserve with gas fueled generators built with huge 'wind tax credits' (read: the earned income of others)

AND this self-serving windbag just happens to be huge in natural gas

.

7 posted on 07/22/2008 3:18:39 AM PDT by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Elle Bee
Picken plan is a scam... oh and:


8 posted on 07/22/2008 3:24:21 AM PDT by xcamel (Being on the wrong track means the unintended consequences express train doesnt kill you going by)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: T Ruth

Shut up T Boone


9 posted on 07/22/2008 3:24:50 AM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T Ruth

Windpower as a viable energy source is about as realistic as Oklahoma State football being a consistent winner. Pickens is pissing his money away on both.


10 posted on 07/22/2008 3:32:03 AM PDT by Abbeville Conservative (Just a bitter South Carolinian clinging to my religion and guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elle Bee

ah, yes windmill power
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_071608/content/01125109.guest.html


11 posted on 07/22/2008 3:46:20 AM PDT by philo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Abbeville Conservative
"Pickens is pissing his money away on both."

I don't think T-BONE is talking about HIS $$
METHINKS he is talking about our $$

12 posted on 07/22/2008 3:49:54 AM PDT by Voter#537 (I will sit out the '08 presidential election----I can't vote for A RINO or A BOZO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: T Ruth
"the nation needs to mobilize behind a plan to shift toward domestic energy sources such as natural gas, wind and solar power, he told reporters and editors of The Washington Times."

And all those combined cannot provide our energy needs, not even close.

Could it be because he owns so much interest in those areas? McCain IS calling for more drilling and building more nuclear facilities, which is the only logical choice that can meet our energy needs.

13 posted on 07/22/2008 3:57:46 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthguy

Truthguy, you are so correct in what you say. I differ with you only in that I say follow the money. T.Boone figures to gain another fortune in government subsidies from this nonsense.


14 posted on 07/22/2008 4:01:18 AM PDT by Lion Den Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Voter#537

Good point!!!


15 posted on 07/22/2008 4:04:58 AM PDT by Abbeville Conservative (Just a bitter South Carolinian clinging to my religion and guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: truthguy
"The overwhelming use of oil is for transportation"

No it isn't. But regardless 99% of our economy is driven by oil and oil products. You can't make bumpers for cars out of windmill poop, but we can make plastic ones from petroleum products.

And I don't agree with natural gas for auto fuel either. our supplies are rapidly depleting and forcing us to buy more and more from other countries, mainly Canada. Even if and when we tap into new supplies from offshore and alaska, it still won't replace what we've already used up from other local sources.

There is nothing wrong with bio fuels like ethanol and bio diesel for taking the load off oil demands for fuel. The rumors that it harms our food supply are completely bogus.

16 posted on 07/22/2008 4:06:35 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Elle Bee

Yeah, he’s trying to save his natural gas position. By shifting usage away from power generation to vehicles he’s establishing a future market for his holdings.


17 posted on 07/22/2008 4:09:23 AM PDT by Justa (The media lied while Americans died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Justa

What we need to do is tap into those huge methane ice fields off our eastern coast. There is enough there to fill the gas lines for many hundreds of years.


18 posted on 07/22/2008 4:14:33 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: T Ruth

If Pickens really believes this, doesn’t he already have the seed money to make it so?


19 posted on 07/22/2008 4:17:51 AM PDT by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T Ruth

I have been trying to find numbers on these things and what I have found is that basically no one knows what the hell they are talking about when it comes to windmills. BUT if a 1 Megawatt turbine ran at 30% capacity for 24 hours it would produce the energy equivalent of about 240 gallons of gasoline. Not bad. If this energy was used to generate Hydrogen we could put that in the existing natural gas pipelines for transmission.

I don’t know but I could maybe come around on this wind energy thing, but it would have to be done WITHOUT GUMMINT SUBSIDY. Oh, and the article from 2003 I found was very helpful on the cost and the author pointed out that the money to dismantle the things needs to be factored in and held in escrow while they are in operation. (Very good point).


20 posted on 07/22/2008 4:21:03 AM PDT by wastoute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justa

In a situation like this the first thing to do is “follow the money.” Would not be the least bit surprised that he is heavily invested in natural gas and wind technology.


21 posted on 07/22/2008 4:21:39 AM PDT by RU88 (The false messiah can not change water into wine any more than he can get unity from diversity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: T Ruth

Pickens has large land holdings in west Texas and has bought hundreds of turbines himself, hoping to sell energy to the cities. He’s just trying to create a new energy business for himself; he’s a businessman who’s dealing from both sides of the deck. It would be like a guy before the beginning of the oil boom trying to extoll the virtues of crude oil because he already went out and bought over 600 derricks.

Good for him trying to make a buck, but playing off the fears to strongarm his investments to the forefront is questionable.


22 posted on 07/22/2008 4:45:48 AM PDT by Diggler (We will be beaten with our own virtue. Proud American Infidel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RU88

BINGO, he has considerable holdings in Natural Gas and he has been focusing most of his investing on Windpower over the last couple of years. He’s being opportunistic for sure, but is it a bad thing? Our nation needs capitalists like him to keep injecting money into the economy.


23 posted on 07/22/2008 4:58:59 AM PDT by SirFishalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary; truthguy
"The overwhelming use of oil is for transportation"

No it isn't.

Yes it is. At 68% it is nearly triple the amount that goes to industry to make products.

Breakdown of Petroleum Product Supplied
http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/pet_cons_psup_dc_nus_mbblpd_a.htm

24 posted on 07/22/2008 5:02:38 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: T Ruth

How many trillions of dollars in debt is necessary to declare bankruptcy?

I think we’ve been there for quite a while and nobody’s asking questions. Are we stupid or blind?


25 posted on 07/22/2008 5:23:13 AM PDT by wolfcreek (I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T Ruth

This will help set Pickins’ plan in motion. (guess who gets to pay for it?)

http://www.sustainablebusiness.com/index.cfm/go/news.display/id/16429


26 posted on 07/22/2008 5:28:49 AM PDT by wolfcreek (I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T Ruth

I wouldn’t lose much sleep over T. Boone Pickens’ push for wind energy.

He has gotten out of the oil ‘bidness’ and invested heavily in wind energy. For him, it’s just “bidness” as usual - lining his own pocket.


27 posted on 07/22/2008 5:58:26 AM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T Ruth

Reminds me of a Sunday morning infomercial, I can just imagine people waving @20 bills in the audiance pretending they can’t wait to buy in.


28 posted on 07/22/2008 6:04:48 AM PDT by TonyM (E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment
He has gotten out of the oil ‘bidness’ and invested heavily in wind energy

T. Boone Pickens' company Mesa Energy has begun building the world's largest wind farm. But he (and Mesa) has hardly gotten out of the oil industry.

http://www.mesaenergy.us/index.aspx

29 posted on 07/22/2008 6:09:48 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: T Ruth
Pickens is correct that by purchasing 700 billion dollars of oil from foreigners, many of whom don't like us and most who are our enemies, we are paying for the WOT on BOTH ends!

BUT, all Pickens is doing is trying to get the government(American taxpayers) to pay for the transmission lines for his windmills...

DRILL HERE! DRILL NOW!

30 posted on 07/22/2008 6:25:10 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
"But, all Pickens is doing is trying to get the government(American taxpayers) to pay for the transmission lines for his windmills"

In Texas, the transmission lines will be paid for by the rate payer.

31 posted on 07/22/2008 7:49:13 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
I still like my co-generation nuclear power plants idea better. Then TX, CA and all the other deseert coastal states will not only have all the electricity they need to air condition their entire state but all the water they need to irrigate their crops and FEED THE WORLD! Try and do that with Picken’s wind mills. LOL
32 posted on 07/22/2008 7:57:18 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
You might be interested in a parallel project in Texas that is known as the Panhandle Loop and being proposed/promoted by the Hunt family/Sharyland Utilities.

If the Panhandle Loop eventually came to be, Picken's wind project would be rolled into it.

33 posted on 07/22/2008 8:07:12 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

Thanks but I have my hands full trying to get CA on cogneneration nuclear power and offshore drilling.


34 posted on 07/22/2008 8:17:53 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

I understand. Texas is unique in regards to electricity because we have a stand-alone grid and what happens here doesn’t have much bearing on other states. You have to deal with FERC.


35 posted on 07/22/2008 8:24:36 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: T Ruth

What a self-serving creep. He is blasting calls to drill offshore saying it “can’t save us”, even though he made his fortune from oil. Now that he is making his new fortune from wind and solar, that is the only answer. And he is pimping Al Gore for “Energy Czar” under Obama! This from a guy who funded the SwiftVets. What a jerk.


36 posted on 07/22/2008 8:52:06 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abbeville Conservative
But he also wants others ( just like algore) to invest in something he already has in motion so he can make more money.
If he and algore didn't have money invested in this hair-brain ideas I may be moved to believe them. (maybe not)
Just follow the money.

If con is the opposite of pro, doesn't that mean that congress is the opposite of progress.

37 posted on 07/22/2008 9:53:23 AM PDT by onlylewis (dems want a two class system)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: T Ruth

Yeah, that’s just what I want! A bunch of damn windmills in my backyard and all over the countryside! What a moron!


38 posted on 07/22/2008 11:27:07 AM PDT by RPTMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RPTMS

This is the same guy that think Al Gore should be energy czar.


39 posted on 07/22/2008 11:27:56 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: All
There is something you can do.

Get Your New Gas Pump Stickers Here! 

and here

Free Gas Pump Stickers! 

And display them where you see fit.
 
Here's a sample:
 
 

 

40 posted on 07/22/2008 12:59:03 PM PDT by coffee260 (coffee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson