Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rface
I would say the ability to use it for liquid fuel makes it too valuable to use in a power plant when we already have large resources of coal.

For comparision, but note this is several years old. Petroleum has risen even more compared to the others.

Source:
http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/archive/aeo07/overview.html

13 posted on 07/24/2008 7:33:29 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: thackney

Nuclear for electricity as the exclusive energy source for electricity . That fees up oil shale, coal to oil , natural gas etc for cars.

Coal for coal to oil liquefaction.

Oil Shale only for petroleum.

Natural gas for cars.

etc.


20 posted on 07/24/2008 8:00:46 AM PDT by rurgan (socialism doesn't work. Government is the problem not the solution to our problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Nuclear for electricity as the exclusive energy source for electricity . That frees up oil shale, OCS, ANWR, coal for coal to oil , natural gas etc. all for cars.

Coal for coal to oil liquefaction.

Oil Shale only for petroleum.

Natural gas for cars.

etc.


22 posted on 07/24/2008 8:01:35 AM PDT by rurgan (socialism doesn't work. Government is the problem not the solution to our problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson