Be nice: Britain has been told to take firm action
and combat negative public attitudes towards Muslims
Posted on 07/25/2008 6:07:10 AM PDT by yankeedame
By Mail Foreign Service
Last updated at 8:34 AM on 25th July 2008
Britain was told yesterday by a United Nations committee to take firm action to combat 'negative public attitudes' towards Muslims.
The nine-member human rights committee also criticised some of the UK's antiterror measures.
The body, which is composed of legal experts, said it was concerned ' negative public attitudes towards Muslim members of society' continued to develop in Britain.
Be nice: Britain has been told to take firm action
and combat negative public attitudes towards Muslims
The Government 'should take energetic measures to eliminate this phenomenon and ensure that authors of such acts of discrimination on the basis of religion are adequately deterred and sanctioned'. ....
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
What does the UN have to say about human rights in muslime countries?
Creepy.
Saudi Arabia was told yesterday by a United Nations committee to take firm action to combat ‘negative public attitudes’ towards Christians.
OK you Brits.
You are to THINK the way the United Nations WANTS you to think.
You have been warned.
Muslim arrogance is starting to piss me off.
Can you imagine, all of these people, if they said “you must be nicer to the Jews?”
Be positive, Britain. Deport them all as quickly as possible back to the shariah based society they apparently love.
But the message is the same.
My negative attitude about Muslims gets worse everytime I read something like this.
I guess I should feel sorry for them because they are all going to Hell.
Coming soon to a location near you.
“You must not upset the people who want to kill you, you silly Brits.”
In other words, Britain need to surrender their country to the Muslims.
They are putting booties on dogs for crying out loud! How much nicer can they be?
And where is the condemnation over the two women in Afghanistan that were shot in the head the other week Mr. UN Official?
But Christians are fair game anywhere. I think it is past time for another crusade to rid the world of the evil Moslem cult.
S2433 + Obama—UN dominance
Three Reasons your Senators Should Oppose the Global Poverty Act:
It carries a price tag of $845 billion of American taxpayers’ money. The U.S. already spends $16.3 billion on foreign aid per year. The Obama bill calls for an additional $845 billion to be spent over 13 years. This amounts to a tax of over $2,000 per American taxpayer.
History tells us that exporting large amounts of money to third-world countries has little effect on eradicating world hunger and poverty. Foreign aid dollars very often end up lining the pockets of those developing nations’ corrupt dictators. One recent example of this was the infamous Oil-for-Food scandal, where the UN’s humanitarian aid program ended up with Saddam Hussein pocketing billions.
It is part of a much larger UN scheme. The Global Poverty Act is simply a first step in adopting the provisions outlined in the UN’s Millennium Development Goals , which includes additional assaults on American’s wallets in the form of “currency transfer taxes,” “fees for commercial use of the oceans,” and “taxes on the carbon content of fuels,” just to name a few.
Our Constitution is in jeopardy with with the UN in charge, thanks to Obama.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.