Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did explosion cause jet hole?
The Sun ^ | 7/25/08 | STAFF REPORTER

Posted on 07/25/2008 12:59:54 PM PDT by null and void

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: Ol' Dan Tucker

Good point.


21 posted on 07/25/2008 1:26:34 PM PDT by null and void (Barack Obama - International Man of Mystery...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RadioCirca1970
I can't stand it when they rule out terrorism before they even know what happened. It makes it look like they are trying to cover something up. I trust them a little less every time they issue a denial immediately after an incident.
22 posted on 07/25/2008 1:28:09 PM PDT by peeps36 ( Al Gore Is A Big Fat Lying Hypocrite. He Pollutes The Air By Opening His Big Mouth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: null and void

any passengers with connections to Whitewater or Vince Foster? (I’m keeeeeeding......)


23 posted on 07/25/2008 1:30:53 PM PDT by isom35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

any passengers with connections to Whitewater or Vince Foster? (I’m keeeeeeding......)


24 posted on 07/25/2008 1:30:54 PM PDT by isom35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void
INVESTIGATORS should be able to quickly pinpoint the basic reason behind the Qantas plane’s emergency landing in the Philippines, aviation experts said today.
They might want to consider starting from a fairly reasonable presumption -- the basic reason behind the emergency landing may have had a little something to do with the gaping hole in the side of the airplane. Sheesh!!
25 posted on 07/25/2008 1:31:20 PM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

“the plane reportedly plunged 20,000ft.”

They say this like the incident cause the plane to lost its ability to stay aloft, and was in danger of crashing. Undoubtedly, the pilot followed standard procedure to calmly and deliberately fly the plane to a much lower altitude where the air is thicker, and oxygen masks are not needed.

No “plunging” involved.


26 posted on 07/25/2008 1:33:04 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Guns don't kill people, criminals and the governments that create them do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milford421; Calpernia; Velveeta; DAVEY CROCKETT

Ping.


27 posted on 07/25/2008 1:34:09 PM PDT by nw_arizona_granny ( http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1990507/posts?page=451 SURVIVAL, RECIPES, GARDENS, & INFO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

I remember seeing retired passenger aircraft in the AMARC at Davis-Monthan AFB in Tucson that were being retrofitted in the cargo area. They were experimenting on using reinforced containers in the luggage area to allow for bombs to blow out the side of the aircraft, but not allow the blast to destroy or blow into the aircraft. Basically enough to allow the plane to land. This was in the early 90s.


28 posted on 07/25/2008 1:35:23 PM PDT by IYAS9YAS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RadioCirca1970

Make sure you have your “Terrorists are responsible for everything in the world.” tinfoil hat screwed on tight.
8^,


29 posted on 07/25/2008 1:35:51 PM PDT by dbacks (Should we really elect a man that would not be allowed to be an airport baggage screener?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Southack
The metal starts missing at the rivet line...not something one sees from an explosion.

I'm not familiar with aircraft design, but there appears to be an inner wall (green) and the outer hull wall (clean tear). The green inner wall looks to be very jagged. Could it have been blown by explosion and placed pressure on the outer wall in such a manner as to cause it to rip at the joint?

30 posted on 07/25/2008 1:40:01 PM PDT by IYAS9YAS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: null and void
"the incident was not related to terrorism."

That's the standard line, even when they are clueless as to the cause.

31 posted on 07/25/2008 1:41:10 PM PDT by isrul (Help make every day, "Disrespect a muzzie day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peeps36
I can't stand it when they rule out terrorism before they even know what happened. It makes it look like they are trying to cover something up. I trust them a little less every time they issue a denial immediately after an incident.

Me too. That's precisely why I quoted that little tidbit from the article.

32 posted on 07/25/2008 1:42:37 PM PDT by null and void (Barack Obama - International Man of Mystery...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RadioCirca1970

TWA 800?


33 posted on 07/25/2008 1:45:43 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: null and void

“Folks, this is your Captain....”


34 posted on 07/25/2008 1:45:46 PM PDT by wolfcreek (I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Dan Tucker
That's why Itchy and Scratchy can ride down there and not be dead when you get to your destination.

But they may still be doped out of their little gourds. I had to move a 120 lb dog that was too stoned to walk on her own after a trip. I later told the vet about it, and he said Oops! Maybe too much for her.

/johnny

35 posted on 07/25/2008 1:46:38 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Bless us all, each, and every one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Bob

It must have been an explosion in the central fuel tank. /sarc


36 posted on 07/25/2008 1:46:52 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba

“Plunging” sounds more dramatic and sells more papers...


37 posted on 07/25/2008 1:47:09 PM PDT by null and void (Barack Obama - International Man of Mystery...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: null and void

The main lines of separation are along structural members, the hole itself is somewhat small and seems to be located between fuselage structural members.

There seems to be no shrapnel marks at or near the hole which would be visible with the amount of missing material.

You would see it near the wing root and on the forward leading edge of the wing itself.

I’m voting fatigue on this one.


38 posted on 07/25/2008 1:48:44 PM PDT by The Magical Mischief Tour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
"Michael Rivero...white courtesy phone."
39 posted on 07/25/2008 2:05:56 PM PDT by a6intruder (downtown with big bombs, 24/7, rain or shine, day or night)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Holes don’t appear in jets without an explosion, so I would venture that an explosion is a good guess. And it was coming from London, Heathrow, wasn’t it?


40 posted on 07/25/2008 2:09:46 PM PDT by Boagenes (I'm your huckleberry, that's just my game.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson